Aortic valve replacement with the perceval S bioprosthesis: single-center experience in 143 patients.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent heart valve disease in western countries, and its prevalence increases with age. Sutureless valves have recently become available that allow the surgical procedures to be shortened. The study aim was to assess clinical outcome after sutureless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) performed with the Perceval S bioprosthesis at the authors' institution. METHODS: Between June 2007 and November 2011, a total of 143 patients (78 females, 65 males; mean age 79.4 +/- 5.9 years) was prospectively enrolled and followed at the authors' center. The median preoperative logistic EuroSCORE was 12.04 +/- 10.7. Preoperatively, 58.8% of patients were in NYHA class III or IV, and the mean gradient and effective orifice area (EOA) were 38.8 +/- 17 mmHg and 0.76 +/- 0.24 cm2, respectively. Isolated SAVR was performed in 95 patients (66.4%), while associated procedures were necessary in 48 patients (33.6%). The follow up was 100% complete (mean 13.4 +/- 11.6 months; range: 0-5 years; total cumulative follow up 155 patient-years). RESULTS: The procedural success rate was 99.3%. The mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 32.0 +/- 14.9 min and 44.7 +/- 18.6 min, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 4.9% (n=7). Pacemaker implantation was required in seven patients (4.9%). Survival at five years was 85.5%. Reoperation was necessary in seven patients (4.9%); early reoperations were due to paravalvular leak (n = 3; 2.0%) and intra-prosthetic regurgitation (n=3; 2.0%). One late reoperation (at 29 months) was required, due to fibrous pannus overgrowth. One late endocarditis (0.7%) occurred at 26 months and was medically treated. No structural valve deterioration occurred during the follow up. At 12 months, 94.4% of survivors were in NYHA class I-II, and the mean pressure gradient and EOA were 9.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg and 1.60 +/- 0.3 cm2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Perceval S valve appears to be a safe option for SAVR, though further follow up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome with this bioprosthesis.

Aortic valve fenestration: respect it or fix it?

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether aortic valve fenestrations (respected or fixed) represent a factor associated with recurrent aortic insufficiency or reoperation after repair. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2019, patients who underwent aortic valve repair were included. Aortic insufficiency phenotypes were root aneurysm (repair: root remodelling + annuloplasty), ascending aorta aneurysm (repair: tubular aortic replacement + annuloplasty) and isolated regurgitation (repair: single/double annuloplasty). Fenestrations were either respected or fixed according to their features. RESULTS: A total of 618 patients (out of 798 operated on; 77.4%) had their valve repaired, with 167 cases of fenestrations (128 were respected, 39 fixed-32 with a patch, 6 with running suture and 1 with both). After conducting propensity score matching between no-fenestration (n = 167) and fenestration groups (n = 167), respectively, we noted the following: survival [90.3% (n = 7 deaths) vs 95.8% (n = 4)], cumulative incidence of reoperation [6.7% (n = 7) vs 5.2% (n = 4)], aortic insufficiency grade ≥ 3 [6.4% (n = 6) vs 4.4% (n = 4)] and grade ≥ 2 [28.9% (n = 28) vs 37.1% (n = 35)] were similar at 9 years [P = 0.94; median follow-up: 2.2, interquartile range: (0.8, 5.8)], whether fenestration was respected (P = 0.55) or fixed (P = 0.6, at 6 years). Standardization of the surgical approach (consisting of double annuloplasty in isolated regurgitation phenotype and expansible subvalvular annuloplasty with effective height assessment with remodelling repair for root aneurysm phenotype) reduced the risk of reoperation (era before standardization: hazard ratio: 5.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.9-15.7, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Fenestration, respected or fixed, is not a factor associated with reoperation or recurrence of significant aortic insufficiency after valve repair if the surgical approach is standardized.

Aortic valve repair versus mechanical valve replacement for root aneurysm: the CAVIAAR multicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite growing evidence that aortic valve repair improves long-term patient outcomes and quality of life, aortic valves are mostly replaced. We evaluate the effect of aortic valve repair versus replacement in patients with dystrophic aortic root aneurysm up to 4 years. METHODS: The multicentric CAVIAAR (Conservation Aortique Valvulaire dans les Insuffisances Aortiques et les Anévrismes de la Racine aortique) prospective cohort study enrolled 261 patients: 130 underwent standardized aortic valve repair (REPAIR) consisting of remodelling root repair with expansible aortic ring annuloplasty, and 131 received mechanical composite valve and graft replacement (REPLACE). Primary outcome was a composite criterion of mortality, reoperation, thromboembolic or major bleeding events, endocarditis or operating site infections, pacemaker implantation and heart failure, analysed with propensity score-weighted Cox model analysis. Secondary outcomes included major adverse valve-related events and components of primary outcome. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.1 years, and valve was bicuspid in 115 patients (44.7%). Up to 4 years, REPAIR did not significantly differ from REPLACE in terms of primary outcome [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.66 (0.39; 1.12)] but showed significantly less valve-related deaths (HR 0.09 [0.02; 0.34]) and major bleeding events (HR 0.37 [0.16; 0.85]) without an increased risk of valve-related reoperation (HR 2.10 [0.64; 6.96]). When accounting for the occurrence of multiple events in a single patient, the REPAIR group had half the occurrence of major adverse valve-related events (HR 0.51 [0.31; 0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary outcome did not significantly differ between the REPAIR and REPLACE groups, the trend is in favour of REPAIR by a significant reduction of valve-related deaths and major bleeding events. Long-term follow-up beyond 4 years is needed to confirm these findings.

Root repair with aortic ring annuloplasty using the standard approach.

Standardization of aortic valve repair techniques with use of a calibrated annuloplasty have led to improved long-term outcomes in dystrophic aortic insufficiency. It can also improve dissemination of techniques and rates of aortic valve repair. Dystrophic aortic insufficiency can be found in three aortic phenotypes: dilated aortic root, dilated ascending aorta and isolated aortic insufficiency. The aortic annulus is invariably dilated above 25 mm in the vast majority of cases of aortic insufficiency, regardless of whether the aorta is dilated or not. A dilated annulus is a risk factor for late failure of aortic valve repair if not addressed at the time of surgery. We perform a calibrated annuloplasty at both sub- and supra-valvular levels in order to restore the ratio of sinotubular junction and annulus. Current evidence shows aortic valve repair reduces valve-related mortality compared to prosthetic valve replacement, with an improved quality of life.

Mitroflow LXA structural deterioration following aortic valve replacement: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been previously raised regarding the potential early degeneration of the Mitroflow (Sorin Group Italia, Saluggia, Vercelli, Italy) bioprostheses. We aimed to evaluate our clinical experience with the Mitroflow LXA prosthesis for aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data from 227 consecutive patients (133 males, mean age 73.9±9.2 years) implanted with the Mitroflow LXA between February 2007 and October 2011. Follow-up data were obtained by contacting the referring cardiologists. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for all-cause mortality, valve related mortality and structural valve degeneration (SVD). Multivariable analysis was conducted to identify SVD predictors. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 54.2±37.9 months and completeness of follow-up was 95%. Overall mortality in the entire series was at 31% (N.=71) and mortality from cardiac or unknown causes at 20% (N.=46). SVD occurred in 24 patients (10%) (median delay between implantation and diagnosis: 62.6 (36.5) months). Reintervention was required in 20 cases (13 redo surgery, 7 percutaneous transcatheter valve intervention). The 8 years actuarial global survival was 54.7±4.9%, freedom from valve related mortality 67.5±4.9% and freedom from SVD 72±8%. The estimated freedom from SVD was significantly (P=0.007) longer in larger prosthesis (diameter >21 mm, 77±11%) compared to the smaller devices (≤21 mm, 59±13%.). Multivariate analysis identified smaller prostheses and age at implantation as independent predictors of SVD. CONCLUSIONS: The Mitroflow LXA showed evidence of early SVD in this cohort. A close follow-up of these patients is strongly advised.

Management of commissural lesions in native mitral valve endocarditis: long-term results of valve repair and partial homograft replacement.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Commissural lesions in the context of native mitral valve endocarditis are a technically challenging condition for conservative surgery. Herein are reported the authors' 10-year results for mitral valve repair (MVRep) or partial homograft replacement (PHR) performed in this setting. METHODS: Data were reviewed from 19 consecutive patients who underwent MVRep using either Carpentier's technique (n = 14) or PHR (n = 5) for endocarditis at the authors' institution between 1989 and 1994. RESULTS: There was one operative death (5%; 95% CI 0-15.5%). Two reoperations were performed in each subgroup for recurrence of endocarditis (n = 2) and mitral valve failure (n = 2). The 10-year survival rate and freedom from mitral valve reoperation were 95% (95% CI 84-100%) and 78% (95% CI 59-97%), respectively. At 10 years, 13 (93%) surviving and non-reoperated patients were in good functional status (NYHA class I-II), and 14 (100%) were in sinus rhythm. Although echocardiographic results were excellent in the MVRep group, all PHR patients had moderate or severe mitral valve dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Commissural reconstruction using Carpentier's techniques demonstrated excellent long-term results in patients with native mitral valve endocarditis. In contrast, the results for PHR were rather disappointing.

Long-term results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair.

OBJECTIVES: An untreated dilated aortic annulus is a major risk factor for failure of aortic valve-sparing operations or repair of either bicuspid or tricuspid valve. Aortic annuloplasty efficiently reduces the annulus and increases the coaptation height, thus protecting the repair. This study analyses long-term results of 232 consecutive patients operated on with a standardized and physiological approach to aortic valve repair according to each phenotype of the dystrophic ascending aorta. Subvalvular aortic annuloplasty was systematically added using an external aortic ring to reduce annulus diameter when ≥25 mm. METHODS: Data were collected into the multicentric international AVIATOR registry (AorticValve repair InternATiOnal Registry): 149 patients with root aneurysm underwent remodelling with an external ring; 21 patients with tubular aortic aneurysm underwent supracoronary grafts with an external open ring and 62 patients with isolated aortic insufficiency (AI) underwent double sub- and/or supravalvular external open ring annuloplasty. Preoperative AI ≥ Grade III was present in 58.6% (133), and the valve was bicuspid in 37.9% (88). RESULTS: Cusp repair was performed in 75.4% (175) patients. The 30-day operative mortality rate was 1.4% (3). The mean follow-up was 40.1 ± 37.8 months (0-145.5). The actuarial survival rate at 7 years was 89.9%. The rate of freedom from reoperation at 7 years was similar among each phenotype, being 90.5% for root aneurysms, 100% for tubular aortic aneurysms and 97.5% for isolated AI with no difference between the bicuspid and tricuspid valve. The rates of freedom from AI ≥ Grade 2 and from AI ≥ Grade 3 at 7 years were, respectively, 76.0 and 93.1% for root aneurysms, 92.9 and 100% for tubular aortic aneurysms and 57.3 and 82.2% for isolated AI. Eye balling repair achieved suboptimal valve competency when compared with systematic cusp effective height assessment, which tended to improve the rate freedom from reoperation, respectively, from 85.8 ± 5.5% to 98.9 ± 1.1% and the rate of freedom from AI ≥ Grade 3 from 89.8 ± 4.9% to 100%. For isolated AI, an additional sinotubular junction ring (double sub- and supravalvular annuloplasty) tended to reduce recurrent AI when compared with single subvalvular annuloplasty. CONCLUSIONS: External aortic ring annuloplasty provides a reproducible technique for aortic valve repair with satisfactory long-term results for each ascending aorta phenotype with bicuspid or tricuspid valve. Longer follow-up is ongoing with the AVIATOR registry.

An expansible aortic ring to preserve aortic root dynamics after aortic valve repair.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic annuloplasty and preservation of root dynamics have been described as factors for durability of aortic valve repair. The objective of this study is to document the first clinical analysis of root dynamics after a standardized valve-sparing procedure for root aneurysms associating a calibrated expansible external aortic ring annuloplasty with a physiological remodelling of the aortic root (CAVIAAR technique: Conservative Aortic Valve surgery for aortic Insufficiency and Aneurysm of the Aortic Root). METHODS: Of the 600 patients operated on with the CAVIAAR technique, 60 consecutive patients from a single team underwent double independent reading of the echocardiographic analysis performed in the operative period and yearly after discharge until a maximum of 5-year follow-up. Forty-four patients had preoperative aortic insufficiency (AI) ≥grade 2 (73.3%) and 29 patients (48%) had bicuspid valves. RESULTS: The expansible aortic ring (median size 27 (25-27) mm) significantly reduced the aortic annular base diameter (from 28 (25-29) mm to 23 (21-24) mm) (P < 0.001) without a significant median transvalvular gradient increase (P = 0.545). Cusp repair was performed in 55 patients (91.7%). Operative mortality was 1.7% (1). During the median 19-month (95% confidential interval [11-26]) follow-up, annular diameter and cusp effective height remained stable. There were no valve-related reoperations. One patient died at 6 months postoperatively from congestive heart failure. Freedom from AI ≥grade 2 was 100% at 1-year follow-up and 96.8% ± 3.2% at 3-year follow-up. Systolic root expansibility of the four echocardiographic diameters (aortic annular base, sinuses of Valsalva level, sino tubular junction and tubular aorta) was maintained, throughout the follow-up period with the aortic annular base expansibility coefficient having consistently higher values than the three other levels. CONCLUSIONS: The expansible aortic ring achieved a complete calibrated external annuloplasty and maintained dynamics of the aortic root at mid-term follow-up. Whether this could be a factor for durability of aortic valve repair is currently under evaluation through the CAVIAAR study 10-year follow-up.

Correction of anterior mitral prolapse: the parachute technique.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a new surgical technique for the correction of anterior mitral leaflet prolapse. METHODS: From October 2006 to November 2011, 44 consecutive patients (28 males, mean age 55 ± 13 years) underwent mitral valve repair because of anterior mitral leaflet prolapse. Echocardiography was performed to evaluate the distance from the tip of each papillary muscle to the annular plane. A specially designed caliper was used to manufacture a parachute-like device, by looping a 4-0 polytetrafluoroethylene suture between a Dacron strip and Teflon felt pledget, according to the preoperative echocardiographic measurements. This parachute was then used to resuspend the anterior mitral leaflet to the corresponding papillary muscle. Of the 44 patients, 35 (80%) required concomitant posterior leaflet repair. Additional procedures were required in 16 patients (36%). The preoperative logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was 4.3 ± 6.9. RESULTS: The clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were complete. The total follow-up was 1031 patient-months and averaged 23.4 ± 17.2 months per patient. The overall mortality rate was 4.5% (n = 2). Also, 2 patients (4.5%) with recurrent mitral regurgitation required mitral valve replacement, 1 on the first postoperative day and 1 after 13 months. In the latter patient, histologic analysis showed complete endothelialization of the Dacron strip. At follow-up, all non-reoperated survivors (n = 40) were in New York Heart Association class I, with no regurgitation in 40 patients (93%) and grade 2+ mitral regurgitation in 3 (7%). CONCLUSIONS: This technique offers a simple and reproducible solution for correction of anterior leaflet prolapse. Echocardiography can reliably evaluate the length of the chordae. However, the long-term results must be evaluated and compared with other surgical strategies.

Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to study the behavior of a stent deployed inside human stenotic aortic valves. BACKGROUND: Endovascular valved stent (VS) implantation is a promising new therapy for patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis (AS). The precise characteristics of stent deployment in humans have been poorly studied so far. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with severe AS were included in the study. Sixteen patients (46%) had bicuspid aortic valves. A self-expandable stent specifically designed for VS implantation was deployed intraoperatively inside the aortic valve before surgical aortic valve replacement. RESULTS: In tricuspid aortic valves, the shape of stent deployment was circular, triangular, or elliptic in 68%, 21%, or 11%, respectively. Noncircular stent deployment was frequent in bicuspid aortic valves (the elliptic deployment being the rule [79%]), and stent underdeployment was constant. The incidence of gaps between the stent external surface and the aortic valve did not differ between tricuspid and bicuspid valves (58% vs. 43%; p = 0.49). Sharp calcific excrescences protruding inside the stent lumen were present in 3 cases (9%). Ex vivo study of a homemade VS confirmed that the regularity of the coaptation line of the leaflets was critically dependent on the presence or the absence of stent misdeployment. CONCLUSIONS: Stent misdeployment was constant in bicuspid valves and occurred in one-third of cases of tricuspid valves. Premature failure of implanted VS (secondary to valve distortion or traumatic injury to the leaflets by calcific excrescences) might be an important concern in the future.

Late posterior failure after mitral valve repair in degenerative disease.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the mechanisms, the feasibility and the long-term results of re-repair in 'posterior failure' of a previous mitral valve repair performed for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation. We report our 16-year experience in redo surgery for late posterior failure of mitral valve repair in degenerative disease. METHODS: From 1991 to 2004, 13 consecutive patients (10 males; median age: 65 years) were reoperated for late posterior failure of mitral valve repair. All patients had grade > or =3+ mitral regurgitation. Repair was mainly performed using Carpentier's techniques. RESULTS: Repair failure was due to posterior leaflet prolapse, leaflet retraction or leaflet dehiscence in eight (62%), three (23%) and two (15%) patients, respectively. Repair was performed in nine patients (69%). There was no perioperative death. During follow-up (median: 105 months; range: 40-170 months) one late death occurred in the mitral valve replacement group. One (11%) patient underwent mechanical mitral valve replacement 125 months after re-repair. Congestive heart failure occurred in one patient in each group. At the latest follow-up, all but one patient in the mitral valve repair group were in NYHA functional class I or II and all were in sinus rhythm. Doppler echocardiographic studies of the re-repaired valves (n=8) showed no or trivial, grade 1+ and grade 2+ residual mitral regurgitation in 6 (75%), 1 and 1 patients, respectively. Mean transmitral gradient was 3 mmHg (2-8 mmHg) and left ventricular ejection fraction was 59% (43-77%). CONCLUSION: In case of late posterior failure of mitral valve repair for severe degenerative, re-repair is feasible in about 70% of the patients with encouraging results at 10 years.