A retrospective evaluation of the use of video-capable double-lumen endotracheal tubes in thoracic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a video double-lumen tube reduced the need for fiberoptic bronchoscopy for (1) verification of initial tube placement and for (2) reverification of correct placement after repositioning for thoracotomy. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective study. SETTING: Thoracic surgery in a medical university hospital. PARTICIPANTS & INTERVENTIONS: After institutional review board approval, 29 patients who underwent thoracic surgical procedures using video double-lumen tubes were included in the final retrospective analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For 27 (93.2%) patients, the use of fiberoptic bronchoscopy was not needed either for initial placement or for verification of correct video double-lumen tube placement upon final positioning of the patient. However, for two patients, fiberoptic bronchoscopy was needed: for (1) one patient with severe left mainstem bronchus distortion as a result of a large left upper lobe tumor, and (2) a second patient with secretions that were difficult to clear. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the video double-lumen tube requires significantly less (6.8%) fiberoptic use for both initial placement and verification of final position, in stark contrast to standard practice in which bronchoscopy is always used to verify final positioning of the double-lumen tube. As opposed to intermittent bronchoscopy, the continuous visualization offered by an embedded camera may confer an added measure of safety.

Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis During Bronchoscopy Under General Anesthesia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Ventilatory Strategy to Prevent Atelectasis -VESPA- Trial).

BACKGROUND: Atelectasis negatively influences peripheral bronchoscopy, increasing CT scan-body divergence, obscuring targets, and creating false-positive radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) images. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a ventilatory strategy reduce the incidence of atelectasis during bronchoscopy under general anesthesia? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Randomized controlled study (1:1) in which patients undergoing bronchoscopy were randomized to receive standard ventilation (laryngeal mask airway, 100% Fio2, zero positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP]) vs a ventilatory strategy to prevent atelectasis (VESPA) with endotracheal intubation followed by a recruitment maneuver, Fio2 titration (< 100%), and PEEP of 8 to 10 cm H2O. All patients underwent chest CT imaging and a survey for atelectasis with RP-EBUS bilaterally on bronchial segments 6, 9, and 10 after artificial airway insertion (time 1) and 20 to 30 min later (time 2). Chest CT scans were reviewed by a blinded chest radiologist. RP-EBUS images were assessed by three independent, blinded readers. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with any atelectasis (either unilateral or bilateral) at time 2 according to chest CT scan findings. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were analyzed, 38 in each group. The proportion of patients with any atelectasis according to chest CT scan at time 2 was 84.2% (95% CI, 72.6%-95.8%) in the control group and 28.9% (95% CI, 15.4%-45.9%) in the VESPA group (P < .0001). The proportion of patients with bilateral atelectasis at time 2 was 71.1% (95% CI, 56.6%-85.5%) in the control group and 7.9% (95% CI, 1.7%-21.4%) in the VESPA group (P < .0001). At time 2, 3.84 ± 1.67 (mean ± SD) bronchial segments in the control group vs 1.21 ± 1.63 in the VESPA group were deemed atelectatic (P < .0001). No differences were found in the rate of complications. INTERPRETATION: VESPA significantly reduced the incidence of atelectasis, was well tolerated, and showed a sustained effect over time despite bronchoscopic nodal staging maneuvers. VESPA should be considered for bronchoscopy when atelectasis is to be avoided. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04311723; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Adverse events associated with the intraoperative injection of isosulfan blue.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the adverse events associated with the intraoperative injection of isosulfan blue in a large group of patients having a wide range of surgical procedures, and to identify risk factors for these events. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: University-affiliated institution specializing in malignancies PATIENTS: 1835 patients representing a total of 1852 surgical procedures. MEASUREMENTS: Incidence, type, severity, onset time, duration, management, and the presence of potential risk factors for adverse events. Events were considered "major" if potentially life-threatening hypotension occurred. MAIN RESULTS: Adverse events occurred in 28 procedures (1.5%) and 14 of these adverse events (0.75%) were classified as major. The types of events were: skin reactions in 21 patients, hypotension in 14 patients, edema in 1 patients, and unspecified in 1 patient. The time of onset for adverse events was 42.2 +/- 53.9 minutes (median, 17.5; range, 1 to 180 min) after isosulfan blue injection, and was significantly longer for minor reactions compared with major events (p = 0.015). The longest adverse event lasted at least 21 hours. Treatment was successful with usual antiallergy/antianaphylaxis medications. Ten patients received diphenhydramine alone, and four patients received intravenous epinephrine infusions. Factors associated with a significantly increased incidence of adverse events were isosulfan blue injection in the vulvar area (p = 0.000038), and the chronic preoperative use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor-blocking agents (p = 0.043). Trends toward an increased risk of an adverse event were noted with isosulfan blue injection in the breast area (p = 0.19), and having more than one surgical procedure with isosulfan blue (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: Although the most frequent adverse event associated with injection of isosulfan blue was a skin reaction, potentially life-threatening hypotension occurred in 0.75% of all procedures. Anesthesiologists must be aware of the variable onset time and potentially prolonged duration of the adverse events. They should recognize the need for extra vigilance in patients with potential risk factors, and have the usual antiallergy/antianaphylaxis medications available for administration if necessary.

A retrospective analysis of the effect of intraoperative opioid dose on cancer recurrence after non-small cell lung cancer resection.

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that opioid receptor agonists increase the rate of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) growth and metastasis. Following institutional review board approval, we retrieved data on 901 patients who underwent surgery for NSCLC at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Comprehensive demographics, intraoperative data, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 and 5 years were obtained. Cox proportional analyses were conducted to assess the association between intraoperative opioid exposure and RFS and OS. The median intraoperative fentanyl equivalents dosage was 10.15 µg/kg. The multivariate analysis by stage indicated that a trend toward significance for opioid consumption as a risk factor in stage I patients (P = 0.053). No effect was found on RFS for stage II or III patients. Alternatively, opioid consumption was a risk factor for OS for stage I patients (P = 0.036), whereas no effect was noted for stage II or III patients. Intraoperative opioid use is associated with decreased OS in stage I but not stage II-III NSCLC patients. Until randomized controlled studies explore this association further, opioids should continue to be a key component of balanced anesthesia.

A possible association between aprotinin and improved survival after radical surgery for mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Aprotinin has been used to decrease blood loss with complicated cardiac surgery but has not been investigated in extrapleural pneumonectomy, an operation that does not use cardiopulmonary bypass. In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial, the authors investigated whether aprotinin decreased blood loss in patients who underwent this operation. METHODS: After appropriate statistical design and institutional review board approval, eligible patients who were scheduled for extrapleural pneumonectomy were randomized to receive either aprotinin or placebo during the operation. Blood loss and survival data were obtained from electronic medical records and surgical databases. RESULTS: Of 20 patients who were enrolled, 16 patients met criteria for blood loss analysis. Four patients were excluded from the blood loss analysis: Three patients were inoperable because of tumor spread and underwent limited surgery, and 1 patient died intraoperatively because of acute, massive hemorrhage. The mean blood loss was 769 mL with aprotinin versus 1832 mL with placebo (P = .05; Wilcoxon test). All 20 patients were included in survival analyses. All 9 patients who received placebo died. In contrast, 7 of 11 patients who received aprotinin remained alive at the time of the current report. Kaplan-Meier survival curves differed significantly between the 2 groups (P = .0004). A Bayesian multivariate survival analysis of 18 patients who had complete data available on 8 prognostic variables indicated a posterior probability of .99 that aprotinin was beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin decreased blood loss. After accounting for covariate effects, there was a significant comparative benefit with aprotinin in postoperative survival. This finding was unexpected and could not be considered conclusive because of the small size of the current study. A confirmatory study may be warranted.