Association between case volume and mortality in pre-hospital anaesthesia management: a retrospective observational cohort.

BACKGROUND: Pre-hospital anaesthesia is a core competency of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS). Whether physician pre-hospital anaesthesia case volume affects outcomes is unknown in this setting. We aimed to investigate whether physician case volume was associated with differences in mortality or medical management. METHODS: We conducted a registry-based cohort study of patients undergoing drug-facilitated intubation by HEMS physician from January 1, 2013 to August 31, 2019. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, analysed using multivariate logistic regression controlling for patient-dependent variables. Case volume for each patient was determined by the number of pre-hospital anaesthetics the attending physician had managed in the previous 12 months. The explanatory variable was physician case volume grouped by low (0-12), intermediate (13-36), and high (≥37) case volume. Secondary outcomes were characteristics of medical management, including the incidence of hypoxaemia and hypotension. RESULTS: In 4818 patients, the physician case volume was 511, 2033, and 2274 patients in low-, intermediate-, and high-case-volume groups, respectively. Higher physician case volume was associated with lower 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.79 per logarithmic number of cases [95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.98]). High-volume physician providers had shorter on-scene times (median 28 [25th-75th percentile: 22-38], compared with intermediate 32 [23-42] and lowest 32 [23-43] case-volume groups; P<0.001) and a higher first-pass success rate for tracheal intubation (98%, compared with 93% and 90%, respectively; P<0.001). The incidence of hypoxaemia and hypotension was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality appears to be lower after pre-hospital anaesthesia when delivered by physician providers with higher case volumes.

Reasons behind failed prehospital intubation attempts while combining C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Frova introducer.

BACKGROUND: High first-pass success rate is achieved with the routine use of C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Frova introducer. We aim to identify potential reasons and subgroups associated with failed intubation attempts, analyse actions taken after them and study possible complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult intubated patients at a single helicopter emergency medical service unit in southern Finland between 2016 and 2018. We collected data on patient characteristics, reasons for failed attempts, complications and follow-up measures from a national helicopter emergency medical service database and from prehospital patient records. RESULTS: 1011 tracheal intubations were attempted. First attempt was successful in 994 cases (FPS 994/1011, 98.3%), 15 needed a second or third attempt and two a surgical airway (non-FPS 17/1011, 1.7%, 95% CI 1.0-2.7). The failed first attempt group had heterogenous characteristics. The most common cause for a failed first attempt was obstruction of the airway by vomit, food, mucus or blood (10/13, 76%). After the failed first attempt, there were six cases (6/14, 43%) of deviation from the protocol and the most frequent complications were five cases (5/17, 29%) of hypoxia and four cases (4/17, 24%) of hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: When a protocol combining the C-MAC videolaryngoscope and Frova introducer is used, the most common reason for a failed first attempt is an airway blocked by gastric content, blood or mucus. These findings highlight the importance of effective airway decontamination methods and questions the appropriateness of anatomically focused pre-intubation assessment tools when such protocol is used.

An analysis of prehospital critical care events and management patterns from 97 539 emergency helicopter medical service missions: A retrospective registry-based study.

BACKGROUND: It is largely unknown how often physicians in emergency helicopter medical services (HEMS) encounter various critical care events and if HEMS exposure is associated with particular practice patterns or outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed: to describe the frequency and distribution of critical care events; to investigate whether HEMS exposure is associated with differences in practice patterns and determine if HEMS exposure factors are associated with mortality. DESIGN: A retrospective registry-based study. SETTING: Physician-staffed HEMS in Finland between January 2012 and August 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four physicians who worked at least 6 months in the HEMS during the study period. Physicians with undeterminable HEMS exposure were excluded from practice pattern comparisons and mortality analysis, leaving 80 physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a physician's average annual frequencies for operational events and clinical interventions. Our secondary outcomes were the proportion of missions cancelled or denied, time onsite (OST) and proportion of unconscious patients intubated. Our tertiary outcome was adjusted 30-day mortality of patients. RESULTS: The physicians encountered 62 [33 to 98], escorted 31 [17 to 41] and transported by helicopter 2.1 [1.3 to 3.5] patients annually, given as median [interquartile range; IQR]. Rapid sequence intubation was performed 11 [6.2 to 16] times per year. Physicians were involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) 10 [5.9 to 14] and postresuscitation care 5.5 [3.1 to 8.1] times per year. Physicians with longer patient intervals had shorter times onsite. Proportionally, they cancelled more missions and intubated fewer unconscious patients. A short patient interval [odds ratio (OR); 95% confidence interval (CI)] was associated with decreased mortality (0.87; 95% CI, 0.76 to1.00), whereas no association was observed between mortality and HEMS career length. CONCLUSION: Prehospital exposure is distributed unevenly, and some physicians receive limited exposure to prehospital critical care. This seems to be associated with differences in practice patterns. Rare HEMS patient contacts may be associated with increased mortality.

Does experience in prehospital post-resuscitation critical care affect outcomes? A retrospective cohort study.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) often provide post-resuscitation care. Our aims were to investigate whether physicians' frequent exposure to prehospital post-resuscitation care is associated with differences in (1) medical management, (2) achieving treatment targets recommended by resuscitation guidelines, (3) survival. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from a national HEMS quality register. We included patients between January 1st, 2012 and September 9th, 2019 who received post-resuscitation care by a HEMS physician. We excluded patients <16 years old. For each patient we determined the number of post-resuscitation cases the physician had attended in the previous 12 months. Patients were divided in to three groups: low (0-5), intermediate (6-11) and high exposure (≥12 cases). Medical management and proportions within treatment targets were compared. Survival at 30-days and 1-year was analysed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, controlling for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: 2272 patients were analysed. Patients in the high exposure group had mechanical ventilation and vasoactive medications initiated more often (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively) and on-scene times were longer (P < 0.001). The target for blood pressure was achieved more often in this group (P = 0.026), but targets for oxygenation and ventilation were not. We did not see an association between survival and physicians' exposure to post-resuscitation care (odds ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.70-1.33 for low and 0.78, 0.56-1.08 for intermediate, compared to high exposure). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians with more, frequent exposure take a more active approach to post-resuscitation care, but this does not seem to improve survival.