EOF and target PFAS analysis in surface waters affected by sewage treatment effluents in Berlin, Germany.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are emerging organic pollutants and can occur in surface and groundwater. To identify the degree of pollution in surface water with PFAS, often targeted HPLC-ESI-MS/MS has been employed in which commonly 30-40 compounds are analyzed. However, other PFAS and organofluorines remain undetected. We sampled surface water of the river Spree and the Teltow Canal in Berlin, Germany, which are affected by the effluent discharge of wastewater treatment plants. Here, we employed high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS-GFMAS) for measuring extractable organofluorines (EOF) and compared in a mass balance approach the total fluorine to the identified and quantified PFAS from the targeted analysis. The analysis highlights that the EOF are in the range expected for an urban river system (Winchell et al. in Sci Total Environ 774, 2021). However, downstream of an effluent discharge, the EOF increased by one order of magnitude, e.g., 40.3 to 574 ng F L-1, along the Teltow Canal. From our target analytes, mostly short-chained perfluorinated carboxylic acids and sulfonates occur in the water, which however makes up less than 10% of the EOF. The increase in EOF in the Teltow Canal correlates well with the increase of perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA), indicating that PFHxA is characteristic for the discharged EOF but not responsible for the increase. Hence, it points to PFHxA precursor discharge. The study highlights that EOF screening using HR-CS-GFMAS is necessary to identify the full scale of pollution with regard to PFAS and other organofluorines such as pharmaceutical compounds from the effluent of WWTPs.

Fluorine-Specific Detection Using ICP-MS Helps to Identify PFAS Degradation Products in Nontargeted Analysis.

Although several per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been banned and classified as substances of very high concern by the European Chemicals Agency, similar chemicals remain widely used compounds to date. Even though more than 4700 PFASs may occur in the environment, only 40-50 compounds are routinely determined in targeted analysis by ESI-MS using isotopically labeled standards. Nontargeted analysis using high resolution (HR) molecular mass spectrometry suffers from a lack of data mining algorithms for identification and often low ionization efficiency of the compounds. An additional problem for quantification is the potential lack of suitable species specific standards. Here, we demonstrate the usefulness of a hard ionization source (ICP-MS/MS) as a fluorine-specific detector in combination with ESI-MS for the identification of fluorine containing compounds. Simultaneous hyphenation of HPLC-ICP-MS/MS with HR-ESI-MS is applied to evaluate biodegradation products of organofluorine compounds by sewage sludge. The data are analyzed in a nontarget approach using MZmine. Due to the fluorine-specific detection by ICP-MS/MS, more than 5000 peaks (features) of the ESI-MS were reduced to 15 features. Of these, one was identified as a PFAS degradation compound of fluorotelomer alcohol (8:2 FTOH) without using targeted analysis. The feasibility of the detection of organofluorine metabolites using a fluorine-specific detection was demonstrated using a model compound and can thus be applied to new experiments and unknown organofluorine containing samples in the future.

Determination of total extractable organofluorine (EOF) in food contact materials and target and non-target analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using LC-MS/MS and LC-HRMS simultaneously coupled to ICP-MS.

Food contact materials (FCMs) from three countries were analysed for all extractable organofluorines (EOFs) from the materials and subsequently by target and non-target analysis for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The EOF varied by two orders of magnitude for FCM from UK and Saudi Arabia ranging between 2.14 and 483 ng cm-2 (0.2-48 ng g-1) showing that one quarter of all samples were above the Danish regulation for PFAS in FCM. Target PFAS showed high variability in composition and accounted for less than 1% of the EOF. Non-target PFAS screening using HPLC-ICP-MS and coupled simultaneously to HRMS showed the occurrence of organofluorines which were identified by neither LC-MS/MS nor LC-HRMS. This illustrates that the current target PFAS approaches fail to identify EOFs from FCM, which would be a problem with the new EU proposal to ban all PFAS.