Elder Mistreatment Experienced by Older Caregiving Adults: Results from a National Community-Based Sample.

BACKGROUND: With an aging population, older adults are increasingly serving as caregivers to others, which may increase their risk of adverse interpersonal experiences. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and types of elder mistreatment experienced by older caregiving adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis PARTICIPANTS: National sample of community-dwelling US adults over age 60 in 2015-2016. MAIN MEASURES: Caregiving (assisting another adult with day-to-day activities) was assessed by interviewer-administered questionnaires. Experience of elder mistreatment was assessed by participant-reported questionnaire in three domains: emotional, physical, and financial. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between caregiving status and each domain of elder mistreatment, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, gender, education, marital status, concomitant care-receiving status, overall physical and mental health, and cognitive function. Additional logistic regression models examined associations between being the primary caregiver (rather than a secondary caregiver) and each domain of mistreatment among older caregivers. KEY RESULTS: Of the 1898 participants over age 60 (including 1062 women and 836 men, 83% non-Hispanic white, and 64% married or partnered), 14% reported serving as caregivers for other adults, including 8% who considered themselves to be the primary caregiver. Among these older caregivers, 38% reported experiencing emotional, 32% financial, and 6% physical mistreatment after age 60. In multivariable models, caregiving was associated with experiencing both emotional mistreatment (AOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.15-2.25) and financial mistreatment (AOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.18-2.50). In analyses confined to caregiving older adults, those who served as primary rather than secondary caregivers for other adults had an over two-fold increased odds of emotional mistreatment (AOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.07, 4.41). CONCLUSION: In this national cohort of older community-dwelling adults, caregiving was independently associated with experiencing emotional and financial mistreatment after age 60. Findings suggest that efforts to prevent or mitigate elder mistreatment should put more emphasis on vulnerable older caregivers.

Separate functional properties of NMDARs regulate distinct aspects of spatial cognition.

N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) at excitatory synapses are central to activity-dependent synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. NMDARs act as ionotropic and metabotropic receptors by elevating postsynaptic calcium concentrations and by direct intracellular protein signaling. In the forebrain, these properties are controlled largely by the auxiliary GluN2 subunits, GluN2A and GluN2B. While calcium conductance through NMDAR channels and intracellular protein signaling make separate contributions to synaptic plasticity, it is not known if these properties individually influence learning and memory. To address this issue, we created chimeric GluN2 subunits containing the amino-terminal domain and transmembrane domains from GluN2A or GluN2B fused to the carboxy-terminal domain of GluN2B (termed ABc) or GluN2A ATD (termed BAc), respectively, and expressed these mutated GluN2 subunits in transgenic mice. Expression was confirmed at the mRNA level and protein subunit translation and translocation into dendrites were observed in forebrain neurons. In the spatial version of the Morris water maze, BAc mice displayed signs of a learning deficit. In contrast, ABc animals performed similarly to wild-types during training, but showed a more direct approach to the goal location during a long-term memory test. There was no effect of ABc or BAc expression in a nonspatial water escape task. Since background expression is predominantly GluN2A in mature animals, the results suggest that spatial learning is more sensitive to manipulations of the amino-terminal domain and transmembrane domains (calcium conductance) and long-term memory is regulated more by the carboxy-terminal domain (intracellular protein signaling).

PD-L1 and MHC Class I Expression in High-grade Ovarian Cancers, Including Platinum-resistant Recurrences Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Immune-modulating therapies targeting the programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunosuppressive system have been used successfully in many solid tumor types. There is evidence that biomarkers such as PD-L1 and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I help identify candidates for anti-programmed cell death-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition, though the evidence is limited in ovarian malignancies. PD-L1 and MHC Class I immunostaining was performed on pretreatment whole tissue sections in 30 cases of high-grade ovarian carcinoma. The PD-L1 combined positive score was calculated (a score of ≥1 is considered positive). MHC class I status was categorized as an intact or subclonal loss. In patients who received immunotherapy, drug response was assessed using RECIST criteria. PD-L1 was positive in 26 of 30 cases (87%; combined positive score: 1 to 100). Seven of 30 patients showed subclonal loss of MHC class I (23%), and this occurred in both PD-L1 negative (3/4; 75%) and PD-L1 positive (4/26; 15%) cases. Only 1 of 17 patients who received immunotherapy in the setting of a platinum-resistant recurrence responded to the addition of immunotherapy, and all 17 died of disease. In the setting of recurrent disease, patients did not respond to immunotherapy regardless of PD-L1/MHC class I status, suggesting that these immunostains may not be effective predictive biomarkers in this setting. Subclonal loss of expression of MHC class I occurs in ovarian carcinoma, including in PD-L1 positive cases, suggesting that the 2 pathways of immune evasion may not be mutually exclusive and that it may be important to interrogate MHC class I status in PD-L1 positive tumors to identify additional immune evasion mechanisms in these tumors.