Rectovaginal Fistula: What Is the Role of Martius Flap and Gracilis Muscle Interposition in the Therapeutic Strategy?

BACKGROUND: Although numerous treatments exist for the management of rectovaginal fistula, none has demonstrated its superiority. The role of diverting stoma remains controversial. A few series include Martius flap in the armamentarium. OBJECTIVE: Determine the role of gracilis muscle interposition and Martius flap in the surgical management of rectovaginal fistula. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of a pooled prospectively maintained database from 3 centers. PATIENTS: All consecutive eligible patients with rectovaginal fistula undergoing Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition were included from 2001 to 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success was defined by the absence of stoma and rectovaginal fistula. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included with 55 Martius flap and 24 gracilis muscle interposition performed after failures of 164 initial procedures. Total length of stay was longer for gracilis muscle interposition by 2 days ( p = 0.01) without a significant difference in severe morbidity (20% vs 12%, p = 0.53). Twenty-seven percent of the Martius flap interpositions were performed without a stoma, which did not have an impact on overall morbidity ( p = 0.763). Per patient immediate success rates were not significantly different between groups (35% vs 31%, p > 0.99). The success of gracilis muscle interposition after the failure of the Martius flap was not significantly different from an initial gracilis muscle interposition ( p > 0.99). After simple perineal procedures, the immediate success rate rose to 49.4% (49% vs 50%, p > 0.99). After a median follow-up of 23 months, no significant difference was detected in success rate between the 2 procedures (69% vs 69%, p > 0.99). Smoking was the only negative predictive factor ( p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: By its retrospective nature, this study is limited in its comparison. CONCLUSIONS: This novel comparison between Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition suggests that Martius flap presents several advantages, including shorter length of stay, similar morbidity, and similar success rate. Proximal diversion via a stoma for Martius flap does not appear mandatory. Gracilis muscle interposition could be reserved as a salvage procedure after Martius flap failure. See Video Abstract . FSTULA RECTOVAGINAL CUL ES EL ROL DEL COLGAJO DE MARTIUS Y LA INTERPOSICIN DEL MSCULO GRACILIS EN LA ESTRATEGIA TERAPUTICA: ANTECEDENTES:Si bien existen numerosos tratamientos para el manejo de la fistula rectovaginal, ninguno ha demostrado su superioridad. El papel del estoma de derivación sigue siendo controvertido. Pocas series incluyen colgajo de Martius en el armamento.OBJETIVO:Determinar el rol de la interposición del músculo gracilis y del colgajo de Martius, en el manejo quirúrgico de la fístula rectovaginal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente en 3 centros.AJUSTES/PACIENTES:Se incluyeron todos los pacientes elegibles consecutivos con fistula rectovaginal sometidos a colgajo de Martius y la interposición del músculo gracilis desde 2001 hasta 2022.RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El éxito se definió por la ausencia de estoma y fistula rectovaginal.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 62 pacientes con 55 colgajo de Martius y 24 con interposición del músculo gracilis realizados después de fracasos de 164 procedimientos iniciales. La duración total de la estancia hospitalaria fue dos días más larga para la interposición del músculo gracilis ( p = 0,01) sin una diferencia significativa en la morbilidad grave (20% frente a 12%, p = 0,53). El 27% de los colgajos de Martius se realizaron sin estoma, sin impacto en la morbilidad global ( p = 0,763). Las tasas de éxito inmediato por paciente no fueron significativamente diferentes entre los grupos (35% vs. 31%, p = 1,0). El éxito de la interposición del músculo gracilis después del fracaso del colgajo de Martius no fue significativamente diferente de una interposición del músculo gracilis inicial (p = 1,0). La tasa de éxito inmediato aumentó al 49,4% (49% frente a 50%, p = 1,0) después de procedimientos perineales simples. Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 23 meses, no se detectaron diferencias significativas en la tasa de éxito entre los dos procedimientos (69 % frente a 69 %, p = 1,0). El tabaquismo fue el único factor predictivo negativo ( p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Por su naturaleza retrospectiva, este estudio tiene limitaciones en su comparación.CONCLUSIÓN:Esta novedosa comparación entre colgajo de Martius y la interposición del músculo gracilis sugiere que el colgajo de Martius presenta varias ventajas, incluida una estancia prolongada más corta, una morbilidad similar y un éxito. La derivación proximal a través de un estoma para el colgajo de Martius no parece obligatoria. La interposición del músculo gracilis podría reservarse como procedimiento de rescate después de una falla de colgajo de Martius. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).

What is the rate of definitive stoma after subtotal colectomy for inflammatory bowel disease? A nationwide study of 1860 patients.

AIM: Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) require subtotal colectomy (STC) with ileostomy. The recent literature reports a significant number of patients who do not undergo subsequent surgery and are resigned to living with a definitive stoma. The aim of this work was to analyse the rate of definitive stoma and the cumulative incidence of secondary reconstructive surgery after STC for IBD in a large national cohort study. METHOD: A national retrospective study (2013-2021) was conducted on prospectively collected data from the French Medical Information System Database (PMSI). All patients undergoing STC in France were included. The association between definitive stoma and potential risk factors was studied using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1860 patients were included (age 45 ± 9 years; median follow-up 30 months). Of these, 77% (n = 1442) presented with ulcerative colitis. Mortality and morbidity at 90 days after STC were 5% (n = 100) and 47% (n = 868), respectively. Reconstructive surgery was identified in 1255 patients (67%) at a mean interval of 7 months from STC. Seveny-four per cent (n = 932) underwent a completion proctectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis and 26% (n = 323) an ileorectal anastomosis. Six hundred and five (33%) patients with a definitive stoma had an abdominoperineal resection (n = 114; 19%) or did not have any further surgical procedure (n = 491; 81%). Independent risk factors for definitive stoma identified in multivariate analysis were older age, Crohn's disease, colorectal neoplasia, postoperative complication after STC, laparotomy and a low-volume hospital. CONCLUSION: We found that 33% of patients undergoing STC with ileostomy for IBD had definitive stoma. Modifiable risk factors for definitive stoma were laparotomy and a low-volume hospital.

Influence of neoadjuvant treatment strategy on perioperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer.

AIM: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer facilitates tumour downstaging and complete pathological response (pCR). The goal of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant chemotherapy, TNT) is to further improve local and systemic control. While some patients forgo surgery, total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the standard of care. While TNT appears to be noninferior to nCRT with respect to short-term oncological outcomes few data exist on perioperative outcomes. Perioperative morbidity including anastomotic leaks is associated with a negative effect on oncological outcomes, probably due to a delay in proceeding to adjuvant therapy. Thus, we aimed to compare conversion rates, rates of sphincter-preserving surgery and anastomosis formation rates in patients undergoing rectal resection after either TNT or standard nCRT. METHODS: An institutional colorectal oncology database was searched from January 2018 to July 2023. Inclusion criteria comprised patients with histologically confirmed rectal cancer who had undergone neoadjuvant therapy and TME. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with a noncolorectal primary, those operated on emergently or who had local excision only. Outcomes evaluated included rates of conversion to open, sphincter-preserving surgery, anastomosis formation and anastomotic leak. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients were eligible for inclusion (60 with standard nCRT, 59 with TNT). There were no differences in rates of sphincter preservation or primary anastomosis formation between the groups. However, a significant increase in conversion to open (p = 0.03) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.03) was observed in the TNT cohort. CONCLUSION: In this series TNT appears to be associated with higher rates of conversion to open surgery and higher anastomotic leak rates. While larger studies will be required to confirm these findings, these factors should be considered alongside oncological benefits when selecting treatment strategies.

Attitudes and access of Irish general surgery trainees to robotic surgical training.

Background: Although the use of robotic-assisted surgery is now mainstream for procedures such as robotic prostatectomy and hysterectomy, its role in general surgery is less well established. Access to training in robotics for general surgery trainees in the Republic of Ireland is variable. Further, there are no data on specific attitudes of Irish trainees toward the role of robotics. We aimed to establish attitudes of Irish general surgery trainees toward the perceived utility of robotic surgery as well as access and satisfaction with training. Methods: A survey was disseminated to trainees in the Republic of Ireland enrolled in a General Surgery training scheme via email and social media. Data collected included stage of training, intended subspecialty, interest in developing robotic skills, previous exposure to robotic surgery, satisfaction with current access to robotic training, and opinion on formally incorporating training in robotics into the general surgery curriculum. Results: The response rate was 53.8%. Of these, 83% reported interest in training in robotics and 66% anticipated using the technology regularly in consultant practice. Previous exposure to robotic-assisted surgery was significantly predictive of interest in developing the skillset (P = .014). More than 71% of trainees reported that they were not satisfied with access to robotic training. Of those satisfied with access, 40% felt there was a role for incorporating robotic training into the curriculum compared to 68% of those dissatisfied. Conclusion: Irish general surgery trainees perceive robotic-assisted surgery to be highly relevant to their future practice. There is an unmet need to provide additional training in the skillset.