"How to navigate this new area": Intensive care clinicians' perceptions of voluntary assisted dying in the intensive care unit: A multisite exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: There is growing momentum worldwide for assisted dying. In Australia, voluntary assisted dying may occur in any setting, including an intensive care unit (ICU). As the subject of much debate worldwide, exploring ICU clinicians' perceptions of assisted dying is essential. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore clinicians' perceptions of and preparedness for voluntary assisted dying in the ICU. METHOD: An exploratory qualitative descriptive design using individual interviews was used. Medical, nursing, and allied health clinicians from three ICUs were recruited. Interviews were conducted between Nov 2022 and Jan 2023, with a hypothetical scenario about voluntary assisted dying used to prompt discussion. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using inductive content analysis. FINDINGS: ICU registered nurses (n = 20), physicians (n = 2), and allied health clinicians (n = 4) participated with interviews lasting 18-45 min (mean: 28 min). Analysis revealed four themes: (i) purpose of ICU reflected that ICU care was not all about saving lives, yet recognising dying and changing priorities was challenging; (ii) dying in the ICU is complex due to difficulties in talking about dying, accepting death as the outcome and evaluating care efficacy; (iii) voluntary assisted dying is a lot of grey because of perceived clinical and ethicolegal challenges; and finally, (iv) respecting choice was about respecting patients' values, beliefs, and autonomy, as well as clinicians' beliefs and right to exercise autonomy through conscientious objection. CONCLUSION: Dying and death are inevitable, and views and perspectives about assisted dying will continue to evolve. Respecting patient choice is at the core of assisted dying, but respecting clinicians' perspectives and choice is equally important. With voluntary assisted dying now legal in all Australian states, ensuring ICU team and individual clinician preparedness through access to education, resources, and specialist support services is key to raising awareness and easing uncertainty about deaths through voluntary assisted dying.

Improving the handover of complex trauma patients by implementing a standardised process.

BACKGROUND: Patient handover continues to be an international health priority in the prevention of patient harm. Transitioning patients from the intensive care unit (ICU) to the ward is complex, particularly for trauma patients, due to the multifaceted aspects of their care requirements as a result of multiple injuries and different speciality teams. OBJECTIVES/AIM: To design, implement, and evaluate the efficacy of a standardised handover process and tool for the transfer of ICU trauma patients. METHODS: A multimethod before/after study design was used. This included observations before and after an implemented transfer process and semistructured interviews with ICU and ward nurses caring for trauma patients. Comparisons were made of data before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Eleven patient handovers were observed, and 21 nurses (11 from the ICU and 10 from the ward) were interviewed. Patients and family members were included during the handover following the intervention (n = 0/10 [0%] vs n = 4/11 [36%]) and the ward nurses were asked if they had any concerns (n = 5/10 [50%] vs n = 10/11 [91%]). Improvements in patient observations handed over were reported following the intervention. However, omissions remained in some key areas including patient introduction, patient identity, fluid balance, and allergies/alerts. Thematic analysis of interviews revealed that the new handover process was perceived advantageous by both ICU and ward nurses because of its structured and comprehensive approach. Identified future improvements included the need for hospital service managers to ensure integration of ICU and ward electronic health record systems. CONCLUSION: Precise, accurate, and complete handover remains a patient safety concern. Improvements were achieved using a standardised process and handover tool for the transfer of complex trauma patients. Further improvements are required to reduce the failure to hand over essential patient information.

Fostering positive emotions, psychological well-being, and productive relationships in the intensive care unit: A before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care units (ICUs) are emotionally demanding workplaces. Exposure to stress can negatively impact ICU staff members' emotional resilience, health, and capacity to provide care. Despite recognition of the benefits of promoting "healthy workplaces", there are limited interventional studies aimed at improving the well-being of ICU staff. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention for improving well-being of staff working in a tertiary ICU. METHODS: A before-and-after interventional study was conducted over a 2-year period, between 2019 and 2021. Interventions included social activities, fitness, nutrition, and emotional support. An electronic version of the PERMA-Profiler questionnaire was used to assess the well-being of a convenience sample of ICU staff before (n = 96) and after (n = 137) the intervention. Ten focus groups (each involving 12-18 nurses) were held to explore nurses' perceptions of the intervention's effectiveness. RESULTS: After the intervention, a significantly greater proportion of participants described their work week as draining (32% vs 19%, χ2 = 4.4 df + 1, P = 0.03) and at least a bit harder than normal (38% vs 22%, χ2 = 6.4 df + 1, p = 0.01) compared to baseline surveys. However, well-being scores after the intervention (mean = 6.95, standard deviation = 1.28) were not statistically different (p = 0.68) from baseline scores (mean = 7.02, standard deviation = 1.29). Analysis of focus groups data revealed three key categories: boosting morale and fostering togetherness, supporting staff, and barriers to well-being. CONCLUSIONS: After the intervention, there was a preserved level of well-being from baseline despite a statistically significant increase in staff reporting the work week as draining and at least a little bit harder than normal. These findings must be considered in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, which started after baseline data collection and continues to impact the community, including staff workload and pressures in intensive care. The study findings may inform strategies for improving ICU staff members' well-being.

Dying in intensive care: An analysis of the perspectives of families and clinicians on end-of-life care.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of research into end-of-life care (EOLC) in intensive care units (ICUs), few studies have concurrently explored the perspectives of families and clinicians. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the characteristics of high-quality EOLC in the ICU from family and clinician perspectives and by examining the care documented in medical records. METHODS: A convergent mixed-methods study incorporating electronic health record audits (n = 20), structured interview surveys with families (n = 20), clinician surveys (n = 189), and focus groups (n = 10) was undertaken at a 30-bed, level 3 ICU at a metropolitan public adult teaching hospital in Australia. Descriptive statistics were calculated from quantitative data, and inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse qualitative data. RESULTS: Overall, families were very satisfied with EOLC and the quality of communication yet, felt that earlier, clearer communication that the patient was dying was required. Families spoke of the attentiveness, or lack thereof, by ICU clinicians and the opportunity to be present for the patient's death. The majority of ICU clinicians felt EOLC could be improved. Nurses highlighted communication challenges when family meetings were delayed. Some nurses expressed a lack of clarity of how to withdraw care, resulting in hesitancy to cease potentially inappropriate care, and to provide EOLC outside ICU practice norms. In many instances, observations, invasive monitoring, and interventions were documented after EOLC commenced. A lack of documented personal cares was also noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into EOLC from the dual perspectives of families and clinicians. There is a need for institutional guidelines to support ICU clinicians' EOLC practices and education to improve clinician confidence with communication.

An integrative review of potassium replacement protocol use in critical care: Development, use and critical care nurse autonomy.

BACKGROUND: Potassium replacement protocols are used to standardise practice, reduce risk, and ensure timely potassium replacement, but there is considerable variability in their development and use, particularly as part of critical care nursing practice. AIM: To synthesise the research evidence on how potassium replacement protocols are used in adult critical care; and how critical care nurses' role and practice is influenced by a potassium replacement protocol. The research question was 'How are protocols used by intensive care clinicians to guide potassium replacement in adult critical care?' DESIGN: A structured integrative review was undertaken. A combination of keywords, synonyms, and Medical Subject Headings were used across the Ovid Medline and Embase databases. Records were independently assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All papers were assessed for quality. A narrative synthesis was used to analyse and present the findings. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in this review from 4076 records identified. Narrative synthesis revealed five categories: (i) protocol design demonstrating variation in protocol mechanisms, (ii) protocol rationale eliciting reasonings for protocol implementation, (iii) protocol use describing how protocols were nurse-driven enabling nursing autonomy (iv) protocol adherence highlighting variability in protocol compliance and (v) critical care nurse acceptability and feasibility coupling greater shared responsibility for patient care and improved clinician satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Safe, high-quality care, supported by evidence continues to be a priority. Protocolised potassium replacement can improve patient outcomes and promote nurses' autonomy, efficiency, and job satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Recognising and promoting critical care nurses' expert assessment skills and clinical decision-making is essential for optimising efficient, safe, and high-quality patient care. Although protocol deviations are accommodated in protocol development, comprehensive documentation to justify protocol deviations is key to justifying practice. Understanding protocol deviations are crucial to inform future protocol development, improvements, and evaluation to further enhance critical care nursing practice.