Feasibility of low-dose digital subtraction angiography protocols for the endovascular treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Among neurointerventional procedures, the embolization of complex shunt lesions usually requires more radiation dose. We aimed to evaluate the procedural outcome and safety in using low-dose DSA protocols for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (AVF) embolization treatment. METHODS: Between January 2014 and July 2018, 55 patients with dural AVFs who underwent endovascular treatment were included in the study. The low-dose group (n = 27) included from January 2016 used various low-dose DSA protocols made by modifying the thickness of the copper filter or the detector entrance dose. We compared radiation dose metrics, such as air-kerma, kerma-air product (KAP), and fluoroscopy time, as well as clinical and imaging outcomes with the conventional-dose group (n = 28) included before January 2016. RESULTS: The total KAP was 40.1% lower in the low-dose group (87.9 vs. 146.7 Gy cm2, p = 0.002). The average number of DSA runs (25.1 vs. 25.5, p = 0.86) and fluoroscopy times (77.4 vs. 69.7 min, p = 0.48) were similar between the groups. An immediate favorable occlusion rate (total or near total occlusion) was achieved in 41 (74.5%) patients. Ten patients (18.2%) underwent additional procedures due to residual (n = 6) and/or recurrent (n = 5) lesions. At a median of 10 months follow-up, 45 patients (86.5%) had achieved favorable occlusion. Treatment outcomes showed no significant between-group differences. There was one case (1.8%) of procedure-related complications in the low-dose group. All but one patient showed favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin score ≤ 2). CONCLUSION: The low-dose protocols were feasible by showing significant radiation dose reduction and acceptable procedural outcome.

Low-Dose Fluoroscopy Protocol for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography.

PURPOSE: We applied a low-dose fluoroscopic protocol in routine diagnostic cerebral angiography and evaluated the feasibility of the protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 60 patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography for various neurovascular diseases from September to November 2019. Routine protocols were used for patients in the first phase and low-dose protocols in the second phase. We compared radiation dose, fluoroscopy time, and complications between groups. RESULTS: Age, diseases, and operators were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean fluoroscopy dose significantly decreased by 52% in the low-dose group (3.09 vs. 6.38 Gy·cm2 ); however, the total dose was not significantly different between the two groups (34.07 vs. 33.70 Gy·cm2 ). The total fluoroscopic time was slightly longer in the low-dose group, but the difference was not statistically significant (12.2. vs. 12.5 minutes). In all patients, angiography was successfully performed without complications. CONCLUSION: The low-dose fluoroscopy protocol is feasible to apply for diagnostic cerebral angiography in that this protocol could significantly reduce the fluoroscopic dose.