MRI Predicts Residual Disease and Outcomes in Watch-and-Wait Patients with Rectal Cancer.

Background MRI plays a crucial role in restaging locally advanced rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT); however, prospective studies have not evaluated its ability to accurately select patients for nonoperative management. Purpose To evaluate the ability of restaging MRI to predict oncologic outcomes and identify imaging features associated with residual disease (RD) after TNT. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma (OPRA) trial, which randomized participants from April 2014 to March 2020 with stages II or III rectal adenocarcinoma to undergo either induction or consolidation TNT. Participants enrolled in the OPRA trial who underwent restaging MRI were eligible for inclusion in the present study. Radiologists classified participants as having clinical complete response (cCR), near-complete clinical response (nCR), or incomplete clinical response (iCR) based on restaging MRI at a mean of 8 weeks ± 4 (SD) after treatment. Oncologic outcomes according to MRI response category were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify imaging characteristics associated with RD. Results A total of 277 participants (median age, 58 years [IQR, 17 years]; 179 male) who were randomized in the OPRA trial had restaging MRI forms completed. The median follow-up duration was 4.1 years. Participants with cCR had higher rates of organ preservation compared with those with nCR (65.3% vs 41.6%, log-rank P < .001). Five-year disease-free survival for participants with cCR, nCR, and iCR was 81.8%, 67.6%, and 49.6%, respectively (log-rank P < .001). The MRI response category also predicted overall survival (log-rank P < .001), distant recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = .005), and local regrowth (log-rank P = .02). Among the 266 participants with at least 2 years of follow-up, 129 (48.5%) had RD. At multivariable analysis, the presence of restricted diffusion (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI: 1.22, 5.24) and abnormal nodal morphologic features (odds ratio, 5.04; 95% CI: 1.43, 23.9) remained independently associated with RD. Conclusion The MRI response category was predictive of organ preservation and survival. Restricted diffusion and abnormal nodal morphologic features on restaging MRI scans were associated with increased likelihood of residual tumor. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008656 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Milot in this issue.

Treatment reduces or stabilizes brain imaging abnormalities in patients with MPS I and II.

BACKGROUND: The mucopolysaccharidoses (MPSs) are a family of lysosomal storage disorders caused by impaired glycosaminoglycan degradation. Characteristic brain imaging abnormalities are seen in MPS patients. This study aims to determine the effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and/or intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) on these abnormalities. METHODS: A retrospective chart and brain imaging study review was conducted of MPS types I and II patients with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at, and following, initiation of treatment. White matter abnormalities, dilated perivascular spaces, corpus callosal abnormalities, and ventriculomegaly were scored by three independent neuroradiologists blinded to cognitive status, date of treatment initiation, and type(s) of treatment. RESULTS: Five patients were identified: three patients with MPS I and two with MPS II. Duration of follow-up ranged from 13 to 51 months. One patient had severe MPS I (genotype W402X/35del12) and received ERT followed by HSCT. The remaining patients had ERT only. The other two MPS I patients were cognitively normal siblings (genotype P533R/P533R) with an intermediate phenotype. One MPS II patient had moderate cognitive impairment without regression (genotype 979insAGCA); the other (genotype R8X) had normal cognition. There was very little inter-observer variation in MRI scoring. The greatest abnormalities for each patient were found at initial MRI. All patients, including the ERT-only patients, demonstrated improved or unchanged MRI scores following treatment. Severity of white matter abnormalities or dilated perivascular spaces did not correlate with cognitive impairment; as such, extensive pre-treatment MRI abnormalities were noted in the older, cognitively normal MPS I sibling. In comparison, his younger sibling had only mild MRI abnormalities at the same age, after receiving 4 years of ERT. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents one of the first to document the CNS effects of ERT in MPS patients utilizing serial brain MR imaging studies, and raises several important observations. Brain MRI abnormalities typically become more pronounced with age; initiation of ERT or HSCT reversed or stabilized this trend in the MPS patients studied. In addition, earlier initiation of treatment resulted in decreased severity of imaging abnormalities. Possible mechanisms for these observations include improved cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, reduced central nervous system glycosaminoglycan storage via efflux through the blood-brain barrier (BBB), repair of damaged BBB, reduction in CNS inflammation, or ERT permeability through the BBB.