[A Recurrent Colon Cancer Successfully Treated by Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab with On and Off for Preventing Exacerbation of Skin Disorders].

Here, we report a case in which nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy was significantly effective for MSI-high recurrent colon cancer with acute exacerbation after 5-FU/L-OHP/CPT-11 treatment. At the end of 4 cycles of combination therapy, clinical CR was obtained on diagnostic imaging. At the end of the 2 cycles of transition from combination therapy to monotherapy, eosinophilia was observed in a quadratic function, and exacerbation of skin disorders was observed. Eosinophil counts normalized promptly after discontinuation of treatment, and skin disorders gradually improved. Two months after the discontinuation of treatment, monotherapy was restarted. After the resumption of treatment, an increase in eosinophils and worsening of skin symptoms were observed again, and stopped treatment. We report an interesting case in which immune checkpoint inhibiter were turned on and off according to eosinophil counts for preventing exacerbation of skin disorders, and for maintaining cancer remission by continuing immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Impact of bodyweight-based starting doses on the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in primarily Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: The phase III REFLECT study utilized bodyweight-based lenvatinib dosing in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, based on results of the phase II Study 202. This post hoc analysis compared efficacy and safety in patients with lower and higher bodyweights. METHODS: This comparison included patients from Study 202 (Japanese, n = 43; Korean, n = 3) and Japanese patients from REFLECT (n = 81) who received lenvatinib. In Study 202, all patients received a starting dose of lenvatinib 12 mg/day; in REFLECT, patients received starting doses based on bodyweight (patients <60 kg, 8 mg/day; ≥60 kg, 12 mg/day). Safety and efficacy were assessed in both studies according to bodyweight. RESULTS: In Study 202, treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to dose reductions in 80.8% and 55.0% of patients in the lower and higher bodyweight groups, respectively. In REFLECT, treatment-related TEAEs led to dose reductions in 52.5% and 70.7% of patients in the 8 and 12 mg groups, respectively. In Study 202, median overall survival (OS) was 16.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.8-25.1) and 21.3 months (95% CI, 10.1-not estimable) in the lower and higher bodyweight groups, respectively. In REFLECT, median OS was 15.8 months (95% CI, 10.4-27.6) and 18.2 months (95% CI, 11.3-26.9) in the 8 and 12 mg groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison between patients in Study 202 and REFLECT demonstrates efficacy was maintained with improved safety in patients with lower bodyweights who received lenvatinib 8 mg/day in REFLECT versus patients who received lenvatinib 12 mg/day in Study 202.

Proposal for new sleep disorder criteria in patients with chronic liver disease: Influence of liver-related complications.

AIM: Sleep disorder is common in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Liver-related silent complications, including muscle cramps, covert hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and sarcopenia, often reduce the quality of life of patients with CLD and have been reported to cause sleep disorders. In this study, we clarified the prevalence of liver-related complications associated with sleep disorders in patients with CLD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter cohort study of 271 patients with CLD. The Athens Insomnia Scale, muscle cramps questionnaires, and Stroop test were used to assess insomnia, muscle cramps, and covert HE, respectively. In addition, sarcopenia, dynapenia, and myopenia were diagnosed according to the guidelines of the Japan Society of Hepatology. RESULTS: In total, 136 patients (50.2%) had sleep disorders. Serum albumin and hemoglobin levels and prothrombin time activity were significantly lower in patients with sleep disorders than in those without sleep disorders. On univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted with inverse probability weighting, muscle cramps, covert HE, and dynapenia were associated with a sleep disorder. Sleep disorder was categorized as follows: cramp, covert HE, dynapenia, multiple complications, and others. In total, 106 of 136 patients (77.9%) with sleep disorder had at least one liver-related complication, whereas 75 patients had multiple liver-related complications. CONCLUSION: Sleep disorder in patients with CLD was classified into four categories (muscle cramp, covert HE, dynapenia, and others). Questionnaire for sleep disorder might be an easy primary step for surveillance of high-risk patients with silent complications associated CLD.

The Usefulness of the Athens Insomnia Scale for Evaluating Sleep Disturbance in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease Comparing with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Epworth Sleepiness Scale.

Background and Objectives: Sleep disturbance due to muscle cramps or hepatic encephalopathy in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) can lead to a reduced quality of life. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) is commonly used for evaluating sleep disturbance; however, this questionnaire is time-consuming owing to the large number of questions. As the usefulness of the Athens insomnia scale (AIS) in patients with CLD is not sufficiently known, the present study aimed to determine whether the AIS and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) could be used as simple alternative questionnaires for evaluating sleep disturbances in patients with CLD. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 patients with CLD were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with overt hepatic encephalopathy were excluded. All patients were examined using the AIS, PSQI, and ESS, and their responses to these questionnaires were statistically analyzed. Results: The number of patients diagnosed with sleep disturbance using the AIS, PSQI, and ESS were 39 (33.3%), 37 (31.6%), and 9 (7.7%), respectively. There was no correlation between PSQI and ESS scores (r = 0.011, p = 0.910); in contrast, the AIS scores showed a significant correlation with the PSQI scores (r = 0.689, p < 0.001). When the PSQI was considered as the standard for evaluating sleep disturbance, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AIS were 76.9%, 91.0%, 81.1%, and 88.8%, respectively. In the sleep medication group, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the AIS were 100%, 70%, 78.6%, and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: This is the first report to indicate that the AIS is an alternative questionnaire to the PSQI and that it can be a useful tool for detecting cirrhosis-related complications in patients with CLD.

Proposal of Stroop test cut-off values as screening for neuropsychological impairments in cirrhosis: A Japanese multicenter study.

AIM: Despite its relevant clinical impact and high prevalence, covert hepatic encephalopathy (HE) still remains underdiagnosed. As patients with liver cirrhosis tend to be older in Japan, more suitable tests for the elderly and cut-off values based on this attribute are needed. Recently, a Stroop test has been developed and validated for the screening and diagnosis of covert HE in the United States. The present study aims to establish the cut-off values of the Stroop test to screen covert HE. METHODS: This study was a prospective multicenter cross-sectional endeavor. We undertook a survey of 311 cirrhotic patients, administering the number connection test (NCT)-A and -B and the Stroop-off and -on test. RESULTS: We determined the cut-off values of Stroop test results for cirrhotic patients in a variety of age ranges. The cut-off value of the Stroop test was strongly correlated with age. There was a significant correlation between the results of NCT-B and age, and Stroop-on test results showed a correlation with serum albumin (Alb) levels. Serum Alb ≤3.2 g/dl could have the potential to be an objective biomarker of covert HE. In addition, stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed a relationship between the results of the Stroop-on test and plasma ammonia levels. CONCLUSIONS: We established the cut-off values of Stroop test results and confirmed the efficacy of the Stroop test as a simple tool for assessing cognitive alterations. The Stroop test could be suitable as a necessary minimum for the diagnosis of covert HE.

Randomised, multicentre prospective trial of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: TACTICS trial.

OBJECTIVE: This trial compared the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) plus sorafenib with TACE alone using a newly established TACE-specific endpoint and pre-treatment of sorafenib before initial TACE. DESIGN: Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were randomised to TACE plus sorafenib (n=80) or TACE alone (n=76). Patients in the combination group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2-3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable (unTACEable) progression (TTUP), defined as untreatable tumour progression, transient deterioration to Child-Pugh C or appearance of vascular invasion/extrahepatic spread. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), which is not a conventional one but defined as TTUP, or time to any cause of death plus overall survival (OS). Multiplicity was adjusted by gatekeeping hierarchical testing. RESULTS: Median PFS was significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib than in the TACE alone group (25.2 vs 13.5 months; p=0.006). OS was not analysed because only 73.6% of OS events were reached. Median TTUP (26.7 vs 20.6 months; p=0.02) was also significantly longer in the TACE plus sorafenib group. OS at 1 year and 2 years in TACE plus sorafenib group and TACE alone group were 96.2% and 82.7% and 77.2% and 64.6%, respectively. There were no unexpected toxicities. CONCLUSION: TACE plus sorafenib significantly improved PFS over TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. Adverse events were consistent with those of previous TACE combination trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01217034.

Rifaximin-altered gut microbiota components associated with liver/neuropsychological functions in patients with hepatic encephalopathy: An exploratory data analysis of phase II/III clinical trials.

AIMS: Rifaximin (RFX), a non-systemic antibiotic, improves liver/neuropsychological functions in patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). We aimed to investigate the clinical profiles associated with gut bacterial loads using exploratory data analysis and the effects of RFX on the gut microbiota of patients with HE. METHODS: We analyzed the data from 17 patients with HE who underwent fecal microbiota examination in phase II/III trials in Japan. Profiles associated with genera Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Lactobacillus loads were analyzed using classification and regression trees (CART). Changes in gut microbial consortia of seven patients with HE were then assessed 2 weeks after RFX treatment by principal component analysis. RESULTS: In the CART, the first and second divergence variables for each higher bacterial load were as follows: (i) in Streptococcus, the number connection test-A ≥39.55 s and presence of portal-systemic shunt; (ii) in Veillonella, serum potassium levels <4.75 mEq/L and total cholesterol level <129.5 mg/dL; and (iii) in Lactobacillus, white blood cell counts ≥3.4 × 103 /µL and aspartate aminotransferase level ≥44.5 U/L. There was no significant change in total bacterial load before and after RFX treatment; however, there was a decrease in Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Lactobacillus counts after RFX treatment. CONCLUSION: We report clinical profiles associated with gut bacterial loads in patients with HE, and showed that RFX altered gut microbiota components associated with liver/neuropsychological functions. Thus, RFX could improve liver/neuropsychological functions through the regulation of the gut microbial consortia in patients with HE.

Relationship of muscle cramps to quality of life and sleep disturbance in patients with chronic liver diseases: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although muscle cramps frequently occur in patients with cirrhosis, the importance of muscle cramps remains unclear. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship of muscle cramps with quality of life (QOL) and sleep disturbance. In addition, this multi-institutional collaborative study in Japan investigated factors associated with muscle cramps in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 1788 patients with chronic liver diseases including both non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis completed a questionnaire survey investigating: (i) frequency of muscle cramps, (ii) relationship of muscle cramps to poor QOL and sleep disturbance, (iii) characteristics of patients who require therapeutic intervention and (iv) characteristics of patients prone to experiencing muscle cramps. RESULTS: This study revealed that 51.8% of patients with cirrhosis have experienced muscle cramps. People who experienced muscle cramps were more likely to have reduced QOL and sleep disturbance if muscle cramps had (i) high frequency (occurring daily to a few times per week, P < .01); (ii) long duration (between a few minutes and a few hours, P < .01) and (iii) intense severity (visual analogue scale ≥4, P < .01). Age, female sex, positive results for hepatitis C virus, low serum albumin concentration, and cirrhosis were independent factors related to the severity of muscle cramps. CONCLUSION: Muscle cramps occurred with great frequency and were associated with various factors such as age, sex, hepatitis C virus and liver function. Many patients experience poor QOL (26.3%) due to muscle cramps, and therapeutic interventions are therefore needed.

Efficacy and safety of rifaximin in Japanese patients with hepatic encephalopathy: A phase II/III, multicenter, randomized, evaluator-blinded, active-controlled trial and a phase III, multicenter, open trial.

AIM: The efficacy and safety of rifaximin in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) are widely known, but they have not been confirmed in Japanese patients with HE. Thus, two prospective, randomized studies (a phase II/III study and a phase III study) were carried out. METHODS: Subjects with grade I or II HE and hyperammonemia were enrolled. The phase II/III study, which was a randomized, evaluator-blinded, active-comparator, parallel-group study, was undertaken at 37 institutions in Japan. Treatment periods were 14 days. Eligible patients were randomized to the rifaximin group (1200 mg/day) or the lactitol group (18-36 g/day). The phase III study was carried out in the same patients previously enrolled in the phase II/III study, and they were all treated with rifaximin (1200 mg/day) for 10 weeks. RESULTS: In the phase II/III study, 172 patients were enrolled. Blood ammonia (B-NH3 ) concentration was significantly improved in the rifaximin group, but the difference between the two groups was not significant. The portal systemic encephalopathy index (PSE index), including HE grade, was significantly improved in both groups. In the phase III study, 87.3% of enrolled patients completed the treatment. The improved B-NH3 concentration and PSE index were well maintained from the phase II/III study during the treatment period of the phase III study. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were seen in 13.4% of patients who received rifaximin, but there were no severe ADRs leading to death. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of rifaximin is sufficient and treatment is well tolerated in Japanese patients with HE and hyperammonemia.

Carnitine dynamics and their effects on hyperammonemia in cirrhotic Japanese patients.

AIM: Supplementation with levocarnitine preparations has been reported to improve hepatic encephalopathy, but no detailed investigations have addressed the dynamics of carnitine or its supplementation indication in cirrhosis patients. We studied carnitine dynamics in cirrhotic patients by measuring serum and liver tissue carnitine levels and tested the effects of levocarnitine supplementation on concurrent hyperammonemia. METHODS: In a pilot cohort of seven patients with liver cirrhosis and five patients without cirrhosis, the serum and liver carnitine concentrations were measured. Then the serum carnitine fractions were analyzed in 70 liver cirrhosis patients. Among them, a levocarnitine preparation (1800 mg/day) was supplemented orally for 3 months in 27 patients with refractory hyperammonemia, and the effects were evaluated. RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between serum and liver tissue carnitine concentrations (r = 0.69, P < 0.05). The serum total carnitine concentration was 68.4 ± 4.7 µmol/L, the free carnitine concentration was 53.2 ± 2.6 µmol/L, and the acylcarnitine concentration was 13.2 ± 1.1 µmol/L in 70 cirrhotic patients (reference values are 45-91, 36-74, 6-23 µmol/L, respectively). There was no correlation between blood ammonia and serum carnitine concentrations. The serum carnitine concentration rose with levocarnitine supplementation, reaching steady state after 1 month and, in parallel, refractory hyperammonemia was significantly improved. The cut-off level for a 20% decrease in blood ammonia was identified as 62.0 µmol/L total carnitine concentration by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, with an area under the curve of 0.69. CONCLUSION: Serum carnitine concentrations were within standard levels in the majority of liver cirrhosis patients. In patients with concurrent hyperammonemia, the levocarnitine supplementation reduced blood ammonia levels.

Phase 1 and pharmacological trial of OPB-31121, a signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of OPB-31121, a signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: HCC patients of Child-Pugh A or B who progressed on, or were intolerant to, sorafenib were eligible for this phase 1 trial. We used a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with a 28-day cycle at dose levels of 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg/day. Tumor responses were assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled, of whom 23 received OPB-31121 (20 males; median age, 65 years). The most common adverse drug reactions were nausea (87.0%), vomiting (82.6%), diarrhea (69.6%), fatigue/malaise (52.2%), anorexia (47.8%) and peripheral sensory neuropathy (26.1%). The recommended dose for OPB-31121 was determined to be 200 mg. Six patients had stable disease for 8 weeks or more, resulting in disease control rates of 25.0-42.9%. In the 200-mg dose cohort, three of seven patients had stable disease and a median time to progression of 61.0 days. The maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of OPB-31121 were dose proportional. CONCLUSION: OPB-31121 demonstrated insufficient antitumor activity for HCC. Furthermore, peripheral nervous system-related toxicities may negatively affect long-term administration of OPB-31121. Therefore, it was deemed difficult to continue the clinical development of OPB-31121 for treating advanced HCC and further investigation is expected in the agent with favorable profile in this category.

Correlation between changes in bodyweight and changes in ascites volume in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema in short-term diuretic therapy.

AIM: Although it is an important treatment challenge to treat ascites with diuretic therapy, no objective markers have been established to assess improvement of ascites. However, change in bodyweight has been used as a marker of change in ascites volume. Thus, we evaluated the relationship between changes in bodyweight and changes in ascites volume in liver cirrhosis patients with ascites. METHODS: We calculated ascites volume in patients using the simple 5-point method by conventional computed tomography and conducted a correlation analysis between changes in bodyweight and changes in ascites volume as a part of our double-blind phase 3 trial of tolvaptan. RESULT: Change in bodyweight (x-axis) was correlated with change in ascites volume (y-axis) in all included patients (r = 0.52). A strong correlation were observed between the changes in patients without lower limb edema (r = 0.61). These correlations between the changes were expressed by the following linear regression equations: y = -0.102 + 0.206x or y = -0.033 + 0.292x, respectively. Proportions of change in ascites volume to change in bodyweight were estimated to be nearly 30%. Therefore, bodyweight reduction was confirmed to lead to improvement in ascites. CONCLUSION: Change in bodyweight can be an objective marker to assess improvement of hepatic edema in the short-term diuretic therapy in everyday clinical practice. Decrease in ascites volume was estimated to account for nearly 30% of bodyweight reduction.

Tolvaptan for improvement of hepatic edema: A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIM: Hepatic edema is manifested by ascites, lower limb edema and intolerable symptoms. Some patients insufficiently respond to the conventional diuretic therapy. Therefore, a novel therapeutic option is required. We conducted a phase 3 study to confirm therapeutic effect of tolvaptan on hepatic edema associated with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: In our multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, liver cirrhosis patients who showed insufficient response to conventional diuretics were randomly assigned to 7-day administration of either tolvaptan at 7.5 mg/day or placebo as an add-on therapy to conventional diuretics. The primary outcome was change in bodyweight from baseline. RESULTS: Of 164 eligible patients, 84 were assigned to tolvaptan and 80 to placebo. Change in bodyweight from baseline on the final dosing day was -0.44 kg (standard deviation [SD], 1.93) in the placebo group and -1.95 kg (SD, 1.77) in the tolvaptan group (P < 0.0001). Improvement rates for lower limb edema and ascites-related clinical symptoms were higher with tolvaptan than with placebo. Even in patients with low serum albumin (<2.5 g/dL), decrease in bodyweight was greater with tolvaptan than with placebo (P = 0.0163). In addition, tolvaptan significantly increased serum sodium concentration from baseline. CONCLUSION: Add-on therapy with tolvaptan was effective for the treatment of hepatic edema and ascites-related clinical symptoms. Furthermore, tolvaptan is expected to improve low serum sodium concentration and to exert its effect regardless of serum albumin level. Add-on therapy with tolvaptan is therefore considered to be a novel therapeutic option for hepatic edema.

Clinical efficacy of combination therapy with ME3738 and pegylated interferon-alpha-2a in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1.

AIM: ME3738, a derivative of soyasapogenol B, enhances the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) effect of interferon in an in vitro replication system and an in vivo mouse model of HCV infection. ME3738 plus pegylated interferon (PEG IFN)-α-2a treatment for 12 weeks decreased HCV RNA levels in enrolled late virus responder (LVR) patients with relapsed HCV. Half of the patients reached undetectable HCV RNA level. The present clinical study of ME3738 was conducted in naïve chronic hepatitis C patients to investigate the sustained virological response (SVR) and safety of 48-week treatment with ME3738 plus PEG IFN-α-2a. METHODS: Subjects (n = 135) with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C with high viral loads were divided into three groups (ME3738 50 mg b.i.d., 200 mg b.i.d. or 800 mg b.i.d.). ME3738 was administrated p.o. and PEG IFN-α-2a (180 µg/week) s.c. for 48 weeks, and SVR was assessed at 24 weeks of treatment-free follow up. RESULTS: The viral disappearance rates at 12 and 48 weeks were 23.0% and 48.9%, respectively. SVR was seen in 5.9% of subjects. ME3738 did not worsen the adverse reactions generally seen with PEG IFN-α-2a treatment, and any adverse reactions specific to ME3738 were not observed. CONCLUSION: ME3738 plus PEG IFN-α-2a treatment to naïve chronic hepatitis C patients showed an antiviral effect and a good safety profile up to 48 weeks. However, HCV RNA was again detected in many subjects after treatment termination. Even though ME3738 is not enough to suppress HCV reproduction in this treatment. ME3738 was concurrently used with PEG IFN-α-2a treatment; however, a clear additional effect on SVR was not confirmed.

Dose-finding trial of tolvaptan in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

AIM: Liver cirrhosis represents the end stage of any chronic liver disease, and it is associated with hepatic edema such as ascites. Many patients with ascites do not respond to diuretic therapy or require administration of diuretics at high doses that can cause adverse events. This 7-day, multicenter, double-blind trial of tolvaptan was designed to determine the optimal dose of tolvaptan for producing the intended pharmacological effect in hepatic edema. METHODS: Liver cirrhosis patients with inadequate diuretic response despite having received a conventional diuretic therapy were enrolled in the trial. Participants were stratified randomly to four groups receiving tolvaptan at 7.5, 15 or 30 mg/day, or placebo as an add-on to conventional diuretics once daily for 7 days. Changes in bodyweight and abdominal circumference were analyzed. Serum sodium concentrations were measured. Safety assessment was performed. RESULTS: Tolvaptan at 7.5-30 mg/day reduced bodyweight and abdominal circumference compared with placebo. Serum sodium concentrations remained within the normal range in all tolvaptan groups. Serious adverse events were not observed, and most common adverse event was thirst. Tolvaptan at 7.5 mg/day showed the maximum change in bodyweight and abdominal circumference together with preferable tolerability. CONCLUSION: Tolvaptan at 7.5 mg/day was considered the optimal dose in liver cirrhosis patients with hepatic edema who showed inadequate response to conventional diuretics.

Rectal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, cetuximab, and radiation: A case report of pathological complete response.

RATIONALE: Treatment strategies for rectal squamous cell carcinoma (rSCC) are yet to be established, given its rarity. Although squamous cell carcinoma has been reported to be highly sensitive to cetuximab and radiation, there is no report of combination therapy of cetuximab and radiation for rSCC. In this study, we firstly reported a case of rSCC in which a complete response was achieved with the original chemoradiotherapy comprising oxaliplatin, S-1, cetuximab, and simultaneous radiation. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 46-year-old women presented to our hospital with lower abdominal pain and fatigue. DIAGNOSES: Based on tumor marker analyses, histological examination of biopsy specimens, and comprehensive imaging, the patient was diagnosed with rSCC. INTERVENTIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (50.4 Gy) was administered in 28 fractions, along with concurrent chemotherapy comprising SOX (S-1: 80 mg/m2, days 1-5 and 8-12, oxaliplatin: 85 mg/m2, day 1) and cetuximab (400 mg/m2, day 1, 250 mg/m2, after day 8). OUTCOMES: Five weeks after chemoradiation, the patient underwent laparoscopic partial intersphincteric resection, achieving a complete pathological response. LESSONS: This case firstly highlights the usefulness of SOX plus cetuximab combined with radiation in the treatment of locally advanced rSCC. However, a large-scale study is required to establish safe and effective treatment regimens.

Nutritional management contributes to improvement in minimal hepatic encephalopathy and quality of life in patients with liver cirrhosis: A preliminary, prospective, open-label study.

AIM: Problems in patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) include episodes such as falls and deficient driving skills, without any recognition of neurophysiological dysfunction. Patients with MHE are also more likely to develop overt hepatic encephalopathy. However, there is not yet any interventional strategy for MHE involving nutritional management. We conducted a preliminary study to investigate the proportion of positive MHE and the effects of nutritional management on MHE. METHODS: Patients with viral liver cirrhosis and abnormal neuropsychological tests were included. Nutritional consultations were conducted periodically by a dietitian, who recommended 30-35 kcal with 1.0-1.5 g of protein/kg of ideal bodyweight/day. The primary end-point was to evaluate the proportion of patients who recovered from MHE. The secondary end-point was to evaluate the improvement in the patients' quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: Thirty-two (30.1%) of 106 patients were diagnosed with MHE. Nineteen patients were enrolled in the study. Eleven of 19 patients became non-MHE after 4 weeks, and 13 of 19 patients (68.4%, P < 0.001) after 8 weeks. The mental summary scores were significantly improved at 8 weeks (P = 0.0413). Changes in albumin levels from week 0 to week 8 were 0.15 ± 0.16 g/dL in the improved MHE group and -0.28 ± 0.33 g/dL in the non-improved MHE group, which differ significantly (P = 0.0130). CONCLUSION: Periodical nutritional management improved MHE and QOL. Improving the patient's nutritional condition may be one approach to treating MHE.

A randomized phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using SM-11355 (Miriplatin) for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: SM-11355 is a platinum complex developed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) via administration into the hepatic artery as a sustained-release suspension in iodized oil. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial in patients with HCC to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SM-11355, using a Zinostatin stimalamer suspension in iodized oil as a reference. METHODS: Patients with unresectable HCC were randomized 2:1 to receive administration of the SM-11355 or Zinostatin stimalamer suspension into the hepatic artery. A second injection was given 4-12 weeks later. Efficacy was evaluated by CT 3 months after treatment and categorized as therapeutic effect (TE) V to I, where TE V was defined as disappearance or 100% necrosis of all treated tumors. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity (SM-11355, n = 83; Zinostatin stimalamer, n = 39). Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The TE V rates were 26.5% (22/83) and 17.9% (7/39) in the SM-11355 and Zinostatin stimalamer groups, respectively. In the SM-11355 group,the most frequent drug-related adverse events (AEs) of ≥ grade 3 were elevated AST, elevated ALT, thrombocytopenia, and hyperbilirubinemia. The AEs with the largest difference between the two groups (SM-11355 vs. Zinostatin stimalamer) were hepatic vascular injury (0 vs. 48.4%) and eosinophilia (84.3 vs. 41.0%). The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 75.9% vs. 70.3% and 58.4% vs. 48.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that SM-11355 in iodized oil has similar efficacy to Zinostatin stimalamer and that repeated dosing of SM-11355 is possible without hepatic vascular injury in cases of relapse.

[A case of anorectal malignant melanoma appearing 1 year after endoscopic mucosal resection of a rectal adenocarcinoma].

We present a case of a 61-year-old woman who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early-stage colorectal cancer. However, because the condition of the horizontal margin of the resected tumor was unknown, she further underwent local transanal excision. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy performed 1 year later showed protruding lesions both on the scar tissue and in the vicinity. Biopsy revealed malignant melanoma. She then underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and colostomy. This was an extremely rare case of adenocarcinoma complicated by malignant melanoma after resection.

Final Results of TACTICS: A Randomized, Prospective Trial Comparing Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib to Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Introduction: Several clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus molecular-targeted agents versus TACE alone revealed no clinical benefits in progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Here, we report the final OS analysis from the TACTICS trial, which previously demonstrated significant improvement in PFS with TACE plus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (NCT01217034). Methods: Patients with unresectable HCC were randomized to a TACE plus sorafenib group (N = 80) or a TACE alone group (N = 76). Patients in the combination treatment group received sorafenib 400 mg once daily for 2-3 weeks before TACE, followed by 800 mg once daily during on-demand conventional TACE sessions until time to untreatable progression. In this trial, TACE-specific PFS was used. TACE-specific PFS is defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, and PD was defined as untreatable progression, caused by the inability of a patient to further receive or benefit from TACE for reasons that include intrahepatic tumor progression (25% increase vs. baseline) according to response evaluation criteria in cancer of the liver, the detection of extrahepatic spread, vascular invasion, or transient deterioration of liver function to Child-Pugh C after TACE. Results: At the cut-off date of July 31, 2020, 131 OS events were observed. The median OS was 36.2 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 30.8 months with TACE alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.861; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.607-1.223; p = 0.40, ΔOS, 5.4 months). The updated PFS was 22.8 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 13.5 months with TACE alone (HR = 0.661; 95% CI, 0.466-0.938; p = 0.02). Post-trial treatments with active procedures/agents were received by 47 (58.8%) patients in the TACE plus sorafenib group and 58 (76.3%) in the TACE alone group (p = 0.01). In post hoc analysis, PFS and OS benefit were shown in HCC patients with tumor burden beyond up-to-7 criteria. Conclusions: In TACTICS trial, TACE plus sorafenib did not show significant OS benefit over TACE alone; however, clinical meaningful OS prolongation and significantly improved PFS was observed. Thus, the TACE plus sorafenib can be considered a choice of treatment in intermediate-stage HCC, especially in patients with high tumor burden. Trial Registration: NCT01217034.