Cardiac Safety of Ozanimod, a Novel Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator: Results of a Thorough QT/QTc Study.

Ozanimod is a novel, selective, oral sphingosine-1-phosphate (1 and 5) receptor modulator in development for multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, positive-controlled, parallel-group thorough QT study characterized the effects of ozanimod on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. Eligible subjects were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: ozanimod (escalated from 0.25 to 2 mg over 14 days) or placebo (for 14 days). A single dose of moxifloxacin 400 mg or placebo was administered on days 2 and 17. The primary end point was the time-matched, placebo-corrected, baseline-adjusted mean QTcF (ΔΔQTcF). A total of 113/124 (91.1%) subjects completed the study. The upper limits of the 2-sided 90% confidence intervals for ΔΔQTcF for both ozanimod 1 and 2 mg were below the 10-millisecond regulatory threshold. No QTcF >480 milliseconds or postdose change in QTcF of >60 milliseconds was observed. There was no evidence of a positive relationship between concentrations of ozanimod and its active metabolites and ΔΔQTcF. Although ozanimod blunted the observed diurnal increase in heart rate, excursions below predose heart rates were no greater than with placebo. Results demonstrate that ozanimod does not prolong the QTc interval or cause clinically significant bradycardia, supporting ozanimod's evolving favorable cardiac safety profile.

Results From the First-in-Human Study With Ozanimod, a Novel, Selective Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulator.

The sphingosine-1-phosphate 1 receptor (S1P1R ) is expressed by lymphocytes, dendritic cells, and vascular endothelial cells and plays a role in the regulation of chronic inflammation and lymphocyte egress from peripheral lymphoid organs. Ozanimod is an oral selective modulator of S1P1R and S1P5R receptors in clinical development for the treatment of chronic immune-mediated, inflammatory diseases. This first-in-human study characterized the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ozanimod in 88 healthy volunteers using a range of single and multiple doses (7 and 28 days) and a dose-escalation regimen. Ozanimod was generally well tolerated up to a maximum single dose of 3 mg and multiple doses of 2 mg/d, with no severe adverse events (AEs) and no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common ozanimod-related AEs included headache, somnolence, dizziness, nausea, and fatigue. Ozanimod exhibited linear PK, high steady-state volume of distribution (73-101 L/kg), moderate oral clearance (204-227 L/h), and an elimination half-life of approximately 17 to 21 hours. Ozanimod produced a robust dose-dependent reduction in total peripheral lymphocytes, with a median decrease of 65% to 68% observed after 28 days of dosing at 1 and 1.5 mg/d, respectively. Ozanimod selectivity affected lymphocyte subtypes, causing marked decreases in cells expressing CCR7 and variable decreases in subsets lacking CCR7. A dose-dependent negative chronotropic effect was observed following the first dose, with the dose-escalation regimen attenuating the first-dose negative chronotropic effect. Ozanimod safety, PK, and PD properties support the once-daily regimens under clinical investigation.

The diagnostic evaluation of children with cyclic vomiting: a cost-effectiveness assessment.

Because patients with cyclic vomiting often (82%) have a family history of migraines and often (60%) respond to antimigraine therapy, we investigated whether an initial therapeutic trial could precede diagnostic testing. We used a decision analysis program to compare the cost and benefit of three initial treatment strategies. The costs of the three strategies were extensive diagnostic evaluation, $3020; empiric treatment alone, $1830, and upper GI series with small-bowel follow-through (UGI-SBFT) plus empiric treatment, $1600, respectively. When compared with the extensive evaluation strategy, initial antimigraine treatment avoided 65% of the esophagogastroduodenoscopys. On the basis of this decision analysis, a UGI-SBFT plus empiric migraine therapy was the most cost-effective initial strategy to treat cyclic vomiting syndrome. The cost of complications of a missed malrotation with volvulus was higher than that of adding a UGI-SBFT to each evaluation.