Dialysis Therapy for Volume Overload: A Feasible Option to Reduce Heart Failure Hospitalizations in Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Advanced heart failure (HF) carries a high rate of recurrent HF hospitalizations and a very high mortality rate. Mechanical devices and heart transplantation are limited to a select few. Dialysis may be a good alternative for advanced HF patients with volume overload despite maximal pharmacological therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the net clinical outcome of peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis in patients with advanced HF. METHODS: We analyzed all advanced HF patients who were referred for dialysis due to volume overload in our institution. Patients were followed for complications, HF hospitalizations, and survival. RESULTS: We assessed 35 patients; 10 (29%) underwent peritoneal dialysis and 25 (71%) underwent hemodialysis; 71% were male; median (interquartile range) age was 74 (67-78) years. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was 20 (13-32) ml/min per 1.73 m2. New York Heart Association functional capacity was III. Median follow-up time was 719 days (interquartile range 658-780). One-year mortality rate was 8/35 (23%) and overall mortality rate was 16/35 (46%). Three patients (9%) died during the first year due to line or peritoneal dialysis related sepsis, and 6 (17%) died during the entire follow-up. The median number of HF hospitalizations was significantly reduced during the year on dialysis compared to the year prior to dialysis (0.0 [0.0-1.0] vs. 2.0 [0.0-3.0], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis is reasonably safe and significantly reduced HF hospitalization in advanced HF patients. Dialysis could be a good alternative for advanced HF patients with intractable volume overload.

Degenerative mitral regurgitation predicts worse outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role mitral regurgitation (MR) etiology and severity play in outcomes for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: Multiple prior studies have investigated the influence of MR severity on outcomes for patients undergoing TAVR. Less has been published regarding the effects of MR etiology on outcomes, including its impact on heart failure hospitalization. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy patients undergoing TAVR at 2 hospitals were enrolled. Each patient had a baseline and follow-up (within 30 days of TAVR) echocardiogram that was analyzed. MR was graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe, as well as functional or degenerative. We compared patient outcomes, including death and heart failure hospitalization, among none-mild MR, moderate-severe functional MR, and moderate-severe degenerative MR groups. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy patients underwent TAVR, reducing mean aortic valve gradients from 45 ± 15 mm Hg to 9 ± 4 mm Hg. On multivariable analysis, only patients with moderate-severe degenerative MR had decreased survival free of death or CHF hospitalization compared to those with none-mild MR (P = .011). Subanalysis showed patients with moderate-severe degenerative MR were more likely to be hospitalized for heart failure at 2 years compared to those with moderate-severe functional MR (P = .02). Patients with moderate-severe degenerative MR were also less likely to have improvement in MR severity at follow up (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Special consideration should be given to patients with moderate-severe degenerative MR undergoing TAVR. As transcatheter approaches for mitral valve repair and replacement continue to evolve, moderate-severe degenerative MR patients may benefit from consideration of double valve intervention.

Bupropion for smoking cessation in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Smokers hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk for subsequent ischemic events. Nevertheless, over two-thirds of patients continue to smoke after an acute myocardial infarction. Bupropion hydrochloride has proven efficacy as a smoking cessation aid, but data regarding its safety and efficacy in ACS patients are limited. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of 8 weeks of treatment with bupropion slow-release (SR) or placebo for smokers hospitalized with ACS as an adjunct to nurse-led hospital- and telephone-based support. Primary efficacy outcome was smoking abstinence at 1 year. Primary safety outcome was clinical events at 1 year. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were enrolled; all but 2 completed follow-up. Abstinence rates at 3 months were 45% and 44% in the bupropion SR and placebo groups, respectively (P = .99); 37% vs 42% (P = .61) at 6 months; and 31% vs 33% (P = .86) at 1 year. On multivariate analysis, an invasive procedure performed during index hospitalization was an independent predictor for smoking abstinence at 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-14.19). Presence of adverse effects attributed to treatment was a negative predictor for smoking cessation (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.78). Treatment with bupropion SR was not associated with an increase in clinical events or change in blood pressure or body mass index, but dizziness was more common compared with placebo (14% vs 1.4%; P = .005). CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients with ACS who received continuous, intensive nurse counseling about smoking cessation, bupropion did not increase the rates of smoking abstinence.