Evaluating plant lineage losses and gains in temperate forest understories: a phylogenetic perspective on climate change and nitrogen deposition.

Global change has accelerated local species extinctions and colonizations, often resulting in losses and gains of evolutionary lineages with unique features. Do these losses and gains occur randomly across the phylogeny? We quantified: temporal changes in plant phylogenetic diversity (PD); and the phylogenetic relatedness (PR) of lost and gained species in 2672 semi-permanent vegetation plots in European temperate forest understories resurveyed over an average period of 40 yr. Controlling for differences in species richness, PD increased slightly over time and across plots. Moreover, lost species within plots exhibited a higher degree of PR than gained species. This implies that gained species originated from a more diverse set of evolutionary lineages than lost species. Certain lineages also lost and gained more species than expected by chance, with Ericaceae, Fabaceae, and Orchidaceae experiencing losses and Amaranthaceae, Cyperaceae, and Rosaceae showing gains. Species losses and gains displayed no significant phylogenetic signal in response to changes in macroclimatic conditions and nitrogen deposition. As anthropogenic global change intensifies, temperate forest understories experience losses and gains in specific phylogenetic branches and ecological strategies, while the overall mean PD remains relatively stable.

Les changements globaux accélèrent les processus de colonisation et d'extinction locales d'espèces, aboutissant à des gains ou à des pertes de lignées évolutives uniques. Ces gains et pertes se produisent-ils de manière aléatoire dans l'arbre phylogénétique ? Nous avons mesuré: les changements de diversité phylogénétique; et la parenté phylogénétique des espèces végétales gagnées ou perdues dans 2672 placettes semi-permanentes disposées dans le sous-bois de forêts tempérées d'Europe sur une période moyenne de 40 ans. Une fois corrigée par la richesse spécifique, la diversité phylogénétique a légèrement augmenté au cours du temps dans les différentes placettes. Les espèces perdues ont une plus grande parenté phylogénétique que les espèces gagnées. Les espèces gagnées sont donc issues d'un plus grand nombre de lignées évolutives que les espèces perdues. Certaines lignées ont gagné ou perdu davantage d'espèces que ce qui est prédit par le hasard : les Ericaceae, les Fabaceae et les Orchidaceae ayant davantage perdu, tandis que les Amaranthaceae, les Cyperaceae, et les Rosaceae ont plus gagné. Il n'y a pas de signal phylogénétique des gains ou pertes d'espèces en réponse aux changements de conditions macroclimatiques ou des dépôts atmosphériques d'azote. Alors que les changements globaux d'origine anthropique s'intensifient, les sous-bois des forêts tempérées connaissent des gains et des pertes de certaines lignées évolutives et de certaines stratégies écologiques, sans que la diversité phylogénétique moyenne ne s'en trouve véritablement affectée.

El cambio global ha acelerado las extinciones y colonizaciones a escala local, lo que a menudo ha supuesto pérdidas y ganancias de linajes evolutivos con características únicas. Ahora bien, ¿estas pérdidas y ganancias ocurren aleatoriamente a lo largo de la filogenia? Cuantificamos: los cambios temporales en la diversidad filogenética de las plantas; y la relación filogenética de las especies perdidas y ganadas en 2.672 parcelas de vegetación semipermanente en sotobosques templados europeos y re-muestreadas durante un período promedio de 40 años. Al controlar por las diferencias en la riqueza de especies, la diversidad filogenética aumentó ligeramente con el tiempo y entre parcelas. Además, las especies perdidas dentro de las parcelas exhibieron un mayor grado de relación filogenética que las especies ganadas. Esto implica que las especies ganadas se originaron en un conjunto de linajes evolutivos más diversos que las especies perdidas. Ciertos linajes también perdieron y ganaron más especies de las esperadas aleatoriamente: Ericaceae, Fabaceae y Orchidaceae experimentaron pérdidas y Amaranthaceae, Cyperaceae y Rosaceae mostraron ganancias. Las pérdidas y ganancias de especies no mostraron ninguna señal filogenética significativa en respuesta a los cambios en las condiciones macro-climáticas y la deposición de nitrógeno. A medida que se intensifica el cambio global antropogénico, los sotobosques temperados experimentan pérdidas y ganancias en ramas filogenéticas y estrategias ecológicas específicas, mientras que la diversidad filogenética media general permanece relativamente estable.

Residential yard management and landscape cover affect urban bird community diversity across the continental USA.

Urbanization has a homogenizing effect on biodiversity and leads to communities with fewer native species and lower conservation value. However, few studies have explored whether or how land management by urban residents can ameliorate the deleterious effects of this homogenization on species composition. We tested the effects of local (land management) and neighborhood-scale (impervious surface and tree canopy cover) features on breeding bird diversity in six US metropolitan areas that differ in regional species pools and climate. We used a Bayesian multiregion community model to assess differences in species richness, functional guild richness, community turnover, population vulnerability, and public interest in each bird community in six land management types: two natural area park types (separate and adjacent to residential areas), two yard types with conservation features (wildlife-certified and water conservation) and two lawn-dominated yard types (high- and low-fertilizer application), and surrounding neighborhood-scale features. Species richness was higher in yards compared with parks; however, parks supported communities with high conservation scores while yards supported species of high public interest. Bird communities in all land management types were composed of primarily native species. Within yard types, species richness was strongly and positively associated with neighborhood-scale tree canopy cover and negatively associated with impervious surface. At a continental scale, community turnover between cities was lowest in yards and highest in parks. Within cities, however, turnover was lowest in high-fertilizer yards and highest in wildlife-certified yards and parks. Our results demonstrate that, across regions, preserving natural areas, minimizing impervious surfaces and increasing tree canopy are essential strategies to conserve regionally important species. However, yards, especially those managed for wildlife support diverse, heterogeneous bird communities with high public interest and potential to support species of conservation concern. Management approaches that include the preservation of protected parks, encourage wildlife-friendly yards and acknowledge how public interest in local birds can advance successful conservation in American residential landscapes.

Horticultural availability and homeowner preferences drive plant diversity and composition in urban yards.

Understanding the factors that influence biodiversity in urban areas is important for informing management efforts aimed at enhancing the ecosystem services in urban settings and curbing the spread of invasive introduced species. We determined the ecological and socioeconomic factors that influence patterns of plant richness, phylogenetic diversity, and composition in 133 private household yards in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Metropolitan area, Minnesota, USA. We compared the composition of spontaneously occurring plant species and those planted by homeowners with composition in natural areas (at the Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve) and in the horticulture pool of species available from commercial growers. Yard area and fertilizer frequency influenced species richness of the spontaneous species but expressed homeowner values did not. In contrast, the criteria that homeowners articulated as important in their management decisions, including aesthetics, wildlife, neatness and food provision, significantly predicted cultivated species richness. Strikingly, the composition of plant species that people cultivated in their yards resembled the taxonomic and phylogenetic composition of species available commercially. In contrast, the taxonomic and phylogenetic composition of spontaneous species showed high similarity to natural areas. The large fraction of introduced species that homeowners planted was a likely consequence of what was available for them to purchase. The study links the composition and diversity of yard flora to their natural and anthropogenic sources and sheds light on the human factors and values that influence the plant diversity in residential areas of a major urban system. Enhanced understanding of the influences of the sources of plants, both native and introduced, that enter urban systems and the human factors and values that influence their diversity is critical to identifying the levers to manage urban biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Shoot flammability of vascular plants is phylogenetically conserved and related to habitat fire-proneness and growth form.

Terrestrial plants and fire have interacted for at least 420 million years1. Whether recurrent fire drives plants to evolve higher flammability and what the evolutionary pattern of plant flammability is remain unclear2-7. Here, we show that phylogeny, the susceptibility of a habitat to have recurrent fires (that is, fire-proneness) and growth form are important predictors of the shoot flammability of 194 indigenous and introduced vascular plant species (Tracheophyta) from New Zealand. The phylogenetic signal of the flammability components and the variation in flammability among phylogenetic groups (families and higher taxonomic level clades) demonstrate that shoot flammability is phylogenetically conserved. Some closely related species, such as in Dracophyllum (Ericaceae), vary in flammability, indicating that flammability exhibits evolutionary flexibility. Species in fire-prone ecosystems tend to be more flammable than species from non-fire-prone ecosystems, suggesting that fire may have an important role in the evolution of plant flammability. Growth form also influenced flammability-forbs were less flammable than grasses, trees and shrubs; by contrast, grasses had higher biomass consumption by fire than other groups. The results show that shoot flammability of plants is largely correlated with phylogenetic relatedness, and high flammability may result in parallel evolution driven by environmental factors, such as fire regime.