SANI-Severe Asthma Network in Italy: a way forward to monitor severe asthma.

Even if severe asthma (SA) accounts for 5-10% of all cases of the disease, it is currently a crucial unmet need, owing its difficult clinical management and its high social costs. For this reason several networks, focused on SA have been organized in some countries, in order to select these patients, to recognize their clinical features, to evaluate their adherence, to classify their biological/clinical phenotypes, to identify their eligibility to the new biologic therapies and to quantify the costs of the disease. Aim of the present paper is to describe the ongoing Italian Severe Asthma Network (SANI). Up today 49 centres have been selected, widespread on the national territory. Sharing the same diagnostic protocol, data regarding patients with SA will be collected and processed in a web platform. After their recruitment, SA patients will be followed in the long term in order to investigate the natural history of the disease. Besides clinical data, the cost/benefit evaluation of the new biologics will be verified as well as the search of peculiar biomarker(s) of the disease.

Asthma management among different specialists: results from a national Italian survey.

In Europe more than 50% of asthmatic treated patients have a not well-controlled asthma. The present survey aims at investigating how different specialists approach asthmatic patients. A web anonymous questionnaire was randomly administered to 604 General Practitioners (GPs), 241 Pneumologists and 131 Allergists. It concerned: epidemiology, diagnostic workup, follow-up and risk factors, treatment and future risk. A general agreement emerges about asthma diagnostic work-up. All categories are aware of the impact of comorbidities on asthma. LABA/inhaled steroids combination is considered the first choice treatment. Surprisingly, depot steroids and long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) alone are still prescribed by GPs. Concerning monitoring tools, Allergists rely on inflammation biomarkers, whereas reduction of rescue medication is more relevant for GPs. Asthma Control Test (ACT) is considered time consuming by more than 50% of all physicians and is not known by most of GPs. Adherence is considered a crucial problem in asthma management. All categories seem to have a good knowledge about asthma. The cultural background may account for mild differences in asthma control tools and treatment options. GPs have a pivotal role in discriminating patients who need specific assessment by specialists. It is thus important that GPs and specialists share common tools for recognizing and managing those patients.

May the reduction of exposure to specific sensitizers be an alternative to work cessation in occupational asthma? Results from a follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Few data are reported on the effects of a reduction of exposure to specific sensitizers in occupational asthma (OA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of subjects with OA, comparing the effect of a reduction with that of the persistence or cessation of occupational exposure to the specific sensitizer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-one subjects with OA due to different sensitizers were diagnosed via a specific inhalation challenge. After a follow-up interval of 3.5 years, subjects were reexamined by clinical assessment, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BH) and induced sputum. RESULTS: At follow-up, subjects who had reduced occupational exposure (n = 22) showed a significant improvement in BH and a nonsignificant improvement in sputum eosinophilia (from 5.3 to 1.1%, n.s.), while subjects still exposed (n = 10) showed a significant decrease in FEV(1). Subjects who ceased work (n = 9) showed a trend of improvement in BH and sputum eosinophilia. Logistic analysis showed that the major determinant of improvement in BH at follow-up was the severity of BH at diagnosis, with a minimal contribution from the duration of exposure and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids during follow-up; reduction of work exposure did not enter into any model. CONCLUSION: The reduction of occupational exposure could not be considered to be as effective as work cessation, which remained the best treatment for OA. However, it was not associated with a deterioration of FEV(1) as observed in subjects with persistent exposure.

Malondialdehyde in exhaled breath condensate as a marker of oxidative stress in different pulmonary diseases.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress plays a role in the pathogenesis of many chronic inflammatory lung diseases. Exhaled breath condensate (EBC) collection is a noninvasive method to investigate pulmonary oxidative stress biomarkers such as malondialdehyde (MDA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We measured MDA levels in EBC in a large number of patients (N = 194) with respiratory diseases: asthma (N = 64), bronchiectasis (BE, N = 19), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, N = 73), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF, N = 38). Fourteen healthy nonsmoking subjects were included as controls. RESULTS: Excluding IPF subjects, MDA levels were significantly higher in all disease groups than in control group. MDA was significantly higher in COPD than asthmatic and BE subjects. Among asthmatics, corticosteroids-treated subjects had lower MDA levels than untreated subjects. COPD subjects showed an inverse correlation between MDA concentrations and FEV(1)% (rho: -0.24, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: EBC-MDA is increased in subjects with chronic airway disorders, particularly in COPD, and it is related to FEV(1) reduction.

Sequential sensitization to different occupational compounds in a young woman.

BACKGROUND: Very few authors have reported sensitization to two or more different occupational sensitizers in a single patient. OBJECTIVE: To describe a subject with occupational asthma caused by sensitization to two different agents, exposure to which occurred in dierent time periods. METHODS: We studied a young woman with asthma-like symptoms predominantly in relationship to a sequential occupational exposure, first to methylene diisocyanate (MDI) and later to flour dust. In the first and second periods of occupational exposure, the patient was subjected to metbacholine challenge test (MCT), sputum analysis, and specific challenge test (SCT). RESULTS: At the first observation, MCT (PD20FEV1: 0.109 mg) and SCT with MDI were positive and induced sputum analysis showed a high percentage of eosinophils (32%). The patient reduced exposure to MDI but symptoms worsened with continuing occupational exposure. After one year, she started another job exposed to flour dust. After four years, asthma symptoms persisted despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators, and bronchial byperreactivity and sputum eosinophbilia were still present (PD2OFEV1: 0.067 mg; sputum eosinophils: 5.3%). The patient also developed rhinitis symptoms associated with dermatitis. A SCT with flour dust showed an immediate response (deltaFEV1: 33%). The subject left work and a year later was still symptomatic:pulmonary function was within normal limits under regular therapy and induced sputum showed absence of eosinophilia. CONCLUSIONS: This was an unusual case of double sensitization to different occupational compounds to which the patient was exposed in different time periodsj suggesting the role of a pre-existing occupational aSthma in the development and/or worsening of sensitization to other occupational agents.

What drives inhaler prescription for asthma patients? Results from a real-life retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The choice of inhaler device for asthma patients depends upon multiple attributes. We investigated factors that may drive general practitioners (GPs) and respiratory specialists in the prescription of inhaler devices for asthma patients who initiated inhalation therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed prescriptions by GPs and respiratory specialists to asthma patients commencing inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonist combination therapy available as both pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Patient characteristics were compared by device and multivariate analysis was used to model the likelihood of receiving a pMDI as opposed to a DPI in order to identify drivers for prescription. A sample of the respiratory specialists completed an ad-hoc survey of their perceived success in achieving asthma control in their patients and barriers to attaining full control. RESULTS: Prescription of a particular inhaler device was unrelated to the characteristics of the patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the main driver for the choice of inhaler device was the medication (Odds Ratio and 95% Confidence Interval, respectively for GPs and specialists: 0.19 [0.16-0.23]; 0.17 [0.08-0.37]). Specialists perceived asthma as being inadequately controlled in 41% of their patients, and considered patients' difficulties in using DPIs and pMDIs as instrumental in this, citing a need for a novel, more effective inhaler technology. CONCLUSION: Physicians choose inhaler devices according to the prescribed drugs and not to the characteristics of the individual patient. This may reflect a lack of confidence in existing inhaler devices and underlines the need for technologies, which are more reliable and easier to use by patients.

Factors reducing omalizumab response in severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Despite adding Omalizumab to conventional therapy, several severe asthmatics still show poor disease control. We investigated the factors that may affect a reduced Omalizumab response in a large population of severe asthmatics. METHODS: 340 patients were retrospectively evaluated. FEV1%, FVC%, Asthma Control Test (ACT), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), possible step-downs/step-ups of concomitant therapies, exacerbations, disease control levels, ICS doses and SABA use, observed at the end of treatment, were considered as a response to Omalizumab. RESULTS: Age was an independent risk factor for a reduced response concerning FEV1%, FVC%, ACT and for a lower asthma control. Obesity (vs normal weight) was a determinant condition for exacerbations (OR:3.114[1.509-6.424], p = 0.002), for a disease partial/no control (OR:2.665[1.064-6.680], p = 0.036), for excessive SABA use (OR:4.448[1.837-10.768], p = 0.002) and for an unchanged/increased level of concomitant asthma medications. Furthermore, obesity also reduced the response in FEV1 (ß = -6.981,p = 0.04), FVC (ß = -11.689,p = 0.014) and ACT (ß = -2.585, p = 0.027) and was associated with a higher FENO level (ß = 49.045,p = 0.040). Having at least one comorbidity was a risk factor for exacerbations (OR:1.383[1.128-1.697], p = 0.008) and for an ACT <20 (OR:2.410[1.071-3.690], p = 0.008). Specifically, chronic heart disease was associated with both a lower ACT and FVC% whereas gastroesophageal reflux with a partial/no asthma control. Nasal polyps were a predisposing factor leading both to exacerbations and to the use of higher inhaled corticosteroids doses. Moreover, smoking habits, pollen or dog/cat dander co-sensitizations may negatively influence Omalizumab response. CONCLUSION: Age, obesity, comorbidities, smoking habits, nasal polyps, allergic poly-sensitization might reduce Omalizumab effectiveness independently to other asthma-influencing factors.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and laryngeal involvement: review of the literature and a cross-sectional prospective experience.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and granulomatosis with polyangiitis show variable otorhinolaryngological involvement. Up to 14 per cent of granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients have subglottis involvement; little is known about the laryngeal involvement in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. METHOD: A literature review was conducted, together with a prospective cross-sectional analysis of 43 eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis patients. All patients underwent fibre-optic laryngoscopy with narrow-band imaging, and completed health-related questionnaires. RESULTS: The literature review showed only two cases of laryngeal involvement in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; in our cohort, no cases of subglottis stenosis were found, but local signs of laryngeal inflammation were present in 72 per cent of cases. Of the patients, 16.2 per cent had a pathological Reflux Finding Score (of 7 or higher). CONCLUSION: Laryngeal inflammation in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is frequent. It is possibly due more to local factors than to eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis itself. However, ENT evaluation is needed to rule out possible subglottis inflammation. These findings are in line with current literature and worthy of confirmation in larger cohorts.

Some factors influencing quality of spontaneous or induced sputum for inflammatory cell analysis.

AIM: To find some simple clinical factors which can predict the quality of the sputum samples obtained in a large group of asthmatic subjects. METHODS: We compared the presence of sputum productive cough in the days preceding the test, easiness in expectoration during the test, and sputum macroscopic aspect (presence of visible plugs) with the quality of slides obtained from sputum processing. We also monitored changes in the quality in patients who repeated sputum collection several times, comparing those whose first sample was adequate with those whose first sample was inadequate. We analysed 547 sputum samples obtained from 238 asthmatic patients. Sputum was processed using the whole sample method. RESULTS: Patients with productive cough in the days preceding the test and easy expectoration during the test produced a higher percentage of adequate samples than those without productive cough (86% vs 76 %, p=0.01) and with difficulty in expectoration (85% vs 63%, p=0.0001). "Good" macroscopic samples were associated with better quality of slides (91% vs 38%, p=0.0001). Patients with inadequate first sample (n=40) had a higher percentage of inadequate samples (55%) in the subsequent tests than patients (n=115) with adequate first sample (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with increased airway secretions in the days preceding the test, easy expectoration and "good" macroscopic aspect of the sputum are more likely to produce sputum sample adequate for inflammatory cell analysis. If the first sputum sample is adequate, subsequent samples are very likely to be adequate as well. If the first sputum sample is inadequate, the quality of subsequent samples cannot be predicted, since there are similar probabilities of having adequate or inadequate samples.

Predictors of symptom recurrence after low-dose inhaled corticosteroid cessation in mild persistent asthma.

In order to identify predictors of recurrence of asthma symptoms after withdrawal of therapy in mild persistent asthmatics, asymptomatic on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), we studied 87 asthmatic patients regularly treated with ICS for at least 6 months. At the enrollment visit (T1), 71 on ICS were asymptomatic over the past 3 months and discontinued asthma treatment. Symptoms and PEF were then monitored for up to 3 months or until symptoms recurred (T2). At T1 and T2, all subjects underwent methacholine challenge and sputum induction. Thirty nine out of 71 patients experienced symptom recurrence. At T1, clinical and functional data and sputum eosinophilia between patients with or without recurrence of symptoms were similar. Age > 40 yr, and disease duration > 5 yr were significantly associated with recurrence of asthma symptoms, while the presence of allergic rhinitis, low baseline FEV(1) and untreated time span > 60 months showed a trend to be associated with symptoms recurrence. At T2, symptoms, pulmonary function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and sputum eosinophilia deteriorated in patients with symptom recurrence but not in patients without symptom recurrence. In conclusion, age and asthma duration were the best predictors of symptom recurrence in mild persistent asthmatics who withdrew pharmacological therapy, as recommended in the step-down of international guidelines.

Effects of omalizumab in severe asthmatics across ages: A real life Italian experience.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed at evaluating long-term effects of Omalizumab in elderly asthmatics in a real-life setting. METHODS: 105 consecutive severe asthmatics (GINA step 4-5; mean FEV1% predicted:66 ± 15.7) treated with Omalizumab for at least 1 year (treatment mean duration 35.1 ± 21.7 months) were divided into 3 groups according to their age at Omalizumab treatment onset: 18-39, 40-64 and ≥ 65 years. RESULTS: Comorbidities, number of overweight/obese subjects and patients with late-onset asthma were more frequent among older people. A similar reduction of inhaled corticosteroids dosage and SABA on-demand therapy was observed in all groups during Omalizumab treatment; a similar FEV1 increased was also observed. Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved significantly (p < 0.001) in the three groups, increasing from 15 [IQR:12-18] to 24 [IQR:22-25] in younger subjects, from 14 [IQR:10-16] to 21 [IQR:20-23] in the 40-64-year-group and from 15 [IQR:12-16] to 20 [IQR:18-22] in elderly patients where improvement was lower (p = 0.039) compared to younger people. Asthma exacerbations decreased significantly after Omalizumab but the percentage of exacerbation-free patients was higher in younger people (76.9%) compared to middle aged patients (49.2%) and the elderly (29%) (p = 0.049). After Omalizumab treatment, the risk for exacerbations was lower in subjects aged 40-64 (OR = 0.284 [CI95% = 0.098-0.826], p = 0.021) and 18-39 (OR = 0.133 [CI95% = 0.026-0.678], p = 0.015), compared to elderly asthmatics. Also, a significantly reduced ACT improvement (ß = -1.070; p = 0.046) passing from each age class was observed. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab improves all asthma outcomes independently of age, although the magnitude of the effects observed in the elderly seems to be lower than in the other age groups.

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and toluene diisocyanate. Long-term change in sensitized asthmatic subjects.

Long-term change in nonspecific and specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness was studied in 16 subjects with asthma induced by toluene diisocyanate (TDI). A significant positive correlation between months of follow-up and provocative dose inducing a 20 percent fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) methacholine was observed in 5 of 16 subjects. In 4 of these 5 subjects, a PD20FEV1 > 1 mg of methacholine was observed 30 to 48 months after the end of TDI exposure. In most subjects, nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness did not change. Nine of 16 subjects became nonresponsive to TDI at follow-up examination, but only 3 of these showed a significant increase in PD20FEV1 methacholine. Seven subjects were still responsive to TDI. Recovery from TDI-induced asthma can occur and only after long-term work cessation. Nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine can persist even in the absence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness to TDI, suggesting permanent chronic damage to mechanisms controlling airway tone.

Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge.

Long-term treatment with inhaled beta 2-agonists may be associated with a deterioration in asthma control, potentially due to tolerance. Regular use of short-acting beta 2-agonists has been shown to induce tolerance to allergen or adenosine 5'-monophosphate challenge. The aim of the study was to detect the efficacy of a single dose and a short-term treatment with salmeterol, a long-acting beta 2-agonist, to protect against early asthmatic reaction (EAR) to allergen. Eight subjects with mild allergic asthma underwent two treatment periods in which subjects performed an allergen challenge (specific bronchial provocation test) protected by a single dose (50 micrograms) of salmeterol (Salm-1) followed by a second specific bronchial provocation test after regular treatment with salmeterol for 1 week (Salm-2), or a single dose of placebo (Plac-1) and regular treatment (1 week) with placebo (Plac-2). Each subject performed both treatments in a randomized order. Each time allergen challenge was performed 1 h after last drug inhalation and it was stopped when the same provocative dose of allergen of a previous screening allergen challenge was achieved. The maximum decrease in FEV1 and area under curve in the first hour after allergen inhalation were significantly lower in Salm-1 (max delta FEV1 %, median [range]: 4%[0 to 9]) with respect to Salm-2, Plac-1, Plac-2 (24%[13 to 38], 31%[19 to 50], 30%[6 to 44], respectively, p < 0.001); there was no difference among Salm-2, Plac-1 and Plac-2. In Salm-1, all subjects were protected against EAR, whereas in Salm-2 only 2 subjects showed a partial protection. In conclusion the protective effect of a single dose of salmeterol against allergen-induced EAR was lost after regular treatment with salmeterol for 1 week. The clinical relevance of this mechanism remains to be elucidated.

Macrophage-specific eicosanoid synthesis inhibition and lipocortin-1 induction by glucocorticoids.

It has been suggested that the induction of lipocortin-1, a phospholipase A2-inhibitory protein, may mediate the anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids. We assessed the production of prostaglandin E2, thromboxane B2, and leukotriene B4 and the expression of lipocortin-1 in different populations of blood leukocytes and in alveolar macrophages (obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage) from patients with inflammatory lung diseases (bronchial asthma, n = 21; interstitial lung disease, n = 6) undergoing glucocorticoid treatment at clinically effective doses. No inhibition of eicosanoid production was observed in either whole blood or single populations of blood leukocytes (granulocytes and monocytes) stimulated with ionophore A-23187, N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine, or zymosan. Conversely, eicosanoid production from alveolar macrophages (assessed in 9 cases) was significantly inhibited by glucocorticoids. After ionophore stimulation, eicosanoid production was as follows (in ng/ml): prostaglandin E2, 0.19 +/- 0.06 and 0.06 +/- 0.01; thromboxane B2, 2.9 +/- 0.9 and 0.5 +/- 0.1; leukotriene B4, 6.6 +/- 1.1 and 3.6 +/- 1.0, before and after treatment, respectively (P < 0.05 for all differences). Lipocortin-1 expression, determined by Western blot and enzyme immunoassay, was significantly (P < 0.05) stimulated in alveolar macrophages, but not in blood leukocytes, by glucocorticoid treatment. These results indicate that alveolar macrophages, at variance from blood leukocytes, are the most likely cell target for glucocorticoid-induced eicosanoid inhibition and lipocortin expression. We suggest that cell responsiveness to glucocorticoids is acquired during differentiation from monocyte to tissue macrophage.

Natural exposure to pollen reduces the threshold but does not change the pattern of response to the allergen in allergic subjects.

It is known that exposure to seasonal allergen in sensitized asthmatics increases non-specific bronchial responsiveness, but it is controversial if exposure to seasonal allergen influences the presence and the severity of the late asthmatic response (LAR) to allergen. Fifteen asthmatic subjects sensitized to grass pollen performed a specific bronchial provocative test (sBPT) with Phleum pratensis extract before and during the pollen season. Changes of methacholine were also assessed. Allergen PD20FEV1 significantly decreased during the pollen season with respect to outside (allergen PD20FEV1, geometric mean: 0.10 vs. 0.23 biological units; P < 0.05), but the pattern of specific airway response did not change. Particularly, a consistent LAR was observed in three subjects outside the pollen season and in two subjects during the pollen season. Seven subjects with isolated early asthmatic response (EAR) outside the season did not show LAR after allergen inhalation during the pollen season. However, four of five subjects with slight LAR outside the pollen season (deltaFEV1% between 15 and 20%) lost LAR during season. Methacholine sensitivity increased slightly but significantly from outside to during the pollen season. This increase was greater in subjects with LAR outside the pollen season. The natural exposure to pollen induces an increase in bronchial sensitivity to allergen in sensitized subjects, but it does not induce LAR in subjects without LAR outside the pollen season.

Diagnosis of flour-induced occupational asthma in a cross-sectional study.

The diagnosis of occupational asthma is usually performed in epidemiology using a combination of symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, while in a clinical setting the 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of occupational asthma is the specific bronchial challenge test in the laboratory The aim of this study was to detect new cases of flour-induced occupational asthma (OA) in a group of workers exposed to grain and/or flour dust, by means of a step-by-step approach, as used in a clinical setting. In an epidemiological study, III millers and 186 bakers were examined by means of questionnaire, pulmonary function tests and skin-prick tests (SPT) to common allergens and to wheat flour dust extracts. From the whole sample, 82 subjects who showed asthma-like symptoms in the questionnaire and/or low forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) were selected. Selected subjects underwent methacholine challenge test, and hyperreactive subjects underwent specific bronchial challenge with flour dust in the laboratory. Sixty-two of the selected subjects performed the methacholine challenge test, and 22 (33 8%) were hyperreactive (PD20 FEV1 <1 mg of methacholine). Fifteen of 22 hyperreactive subjects underwent specific bronchial challenge test (s BCT) with flour dust; a positive response was elicited in six subjects. These subjects can be diagnosed as having flour-induced occupational asthma. Atopy and skin sensitivity to flour was partially related to the response to flour bronchial challenge. Bronchial hyperreactivity can be observed in a small percentage of subjects with asthma-like symptoms and/or low FEV1, and a positive response to s BCTwas observed in a subgroup of hyperreactive subjects.Therefore, using these selection criteria, a diagnosis of flour-induced OA, as commonly performed in a clinical setting, can be performed in few previously undiagnosed subjects.This approach could be relevant for an early diagnosis ofoccupational asthma.

Duration of preventive effect of inhaled salbutamol on early airway response to allergen in asthmatic subjects.

Salbutamol is known to effectively prevent early asthmatic response (EAR) after specific bronchial provocation test (sBPT) in asthmatic subjects, but the time-course of this protection is not known. In this study the effects of 200 micrograms salbutamol inhaled 2 h before sBPT were compared with 200 micrograms salbutamol inhaled 10 min before sBPT in eight asthmatic subjects sensitized to Phleum pratensis (PP) or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP). All subjects showed an EAR (% decrease in FEV1 from baseline value: 30.4 +/- 11%) in a preliminary sBPT performed with cumulated doses of extracts of PP or DP titrated in biological units (BU). Each subject performed, on two different days, in a random, double-blind, cross-over study, two puffs of placebo 2 h before sBPT and two puffs of salbutamol 10 min before sBPT (treatment A) or two puffs of salbutamol 2 h before sBPT and two puffs of placebo 10 min before sBPT (treatment B). Baseline FEV1 were similar in both tests. In treatment B, 10 min, 1 h and 2 h after salbutamol inhalation, FEV1 increased significantly with respect to placebo inhalation in treatment A. Ten minutes after salbutamol inhalation in treatment A, FEV1 became similar to that obtained 2 h after salbutamol inhalation and 10 min after placebo in treatment B. Allergen inhalation induced an EAR in only one out of eight subjects after treatment A, and five of the eight subjects after treatment B.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fifty microg b.i.d. of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) are effective in stable asthmatics previously treated with a higher dose of FP.

Twenty-seven subjects with moderate asthma at the time of diagnosis, well controlled under regular fluticasone propionate (FP) (250 microg b.i.d.) for 6 months at least, were randomized to receive in double-blind fashion: FP 125 microg b.i.d. (Group 1) or FP 50 microg b.i.d. (Group 2) or placebo (Group 3) for 3 months or until symptom recurrence. Daily symptom score and peak expiratory flow were monitored. At the beginning and at the end of the study subjects underwent methacholine challenge and sputum induction. Recurrence of symptoms occurred shortly after randomization in all subjects receiving placebo. None from Group 1 or 2 experienced symptom recurrence during the study. No significant difference in clinical and functional data, and in sputum eosinophil percentages was observed between the beginning and the end of the study in both Groups 1 and 2. Subjects from Group 3 showed a significant increase of sputum eosinophils (P<0.05) and a significant decrease in provocative dose of methacholine (P<0.05) when asthma symptoms recurred. Therefore, very low doses of FP (50 microg b.i.d.) are effective in maintaining for 3 months a good control of the disease in asthmatics already stable under high-dose fluticasone, considering both clinical and functional outcomes and markers of airway inflammation.