Real-World Adequacy of Glycaemic Control in Treatment-Naïve Greek Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment with Metformin Monotherapy at the Maximum Tolerated Dose: The Reload Study.

BACKGROUND: Metformin, in the absence of contraindications or intolerance, is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This observational, retrospective study assessed the real-world adequacy of glycaemic control in Greek patients with T2DM initiating metformin monotherapy at maximum tolerated dose. METHODS: Included patients received metformin monotherapy for ≥24 months; relevant patient data were collected immediately prior to metformin initiation (baseline) and at other prespecified time points. The primary objective was to report, after 9 months of metformin treatment, the percentage of patients with baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/mol) achieving HbA1c<6.5%. Secondary objectives included the assessment of time spent with poor glycaemic control and time to treatment intensification. A sensitivity analysis assessed the percentage of patients with baseline HbA1c≥7% (≥53 mmol/mol) achieving HbA1c<7% (<53 mmol/mol). RESULTS: Of the enrolled patients (N=316), 247 had baseline HbA1c ≥6.5%; following 9 months on metformin, 90 (36.4%) patients achieved HbA1c<6.5% (mean HbA1c change-1.3% [-14 mmol/mol]). Median time of exposure to HbA1c ≥6.5% was 23.4 months and time to treatment intensification was 28.0 months. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% was 50% (mean HbA1cpy for up to 24 months. Addressing clinical inertia could improve disease outcomes and, possibly, economic burden.

Influence of Supervised Disease Understanding and Diabetes Self-Management on Adherence to Oral Glucose-Lowering Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic patient education has been reported to improve adherence to treatment, leading to better clinical outcomes. This cluster randomized real-world study investigated the effect of a systematic education program and telephone support on self-reported adherence to oral glucose-lowering treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Centers were randomized (1:1) to provide either standard-of-care (control group) or standard-of-care along with the education program and telephone support (empowerment group). Adherence to treatment and satisfaction with treatment were assessed using the four-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). The study population included 457 patients (258/199 male/female) with T2DM and non-optimal glycemic control, on oral antidiabetic treatment (age 62.7 [11.4]; disease duration 8.5 [6.5] years). RESULTS: MMAS-4 high adherence rates for the control and empowerment groups were increased by 3.8% and 16.8% at 4 months (Breslow-Day test p = 0.04) and by 8.5% and 18.8% at 8 months of follow-up, respectively (Breslow-Day test p = 0.09), compared to baseline. Intense physical activity was increased in both control and empowerment groups by 2.3% and 13.9% at 4 months (Breslow-Day test p = 0.082) and by 4.0% and 22.5% at 8 months of follow-up (Breslow-Day test p < 0.001). Baseline mean (SD) HbA1c was significantly lower in the control group compared with the empowerment group [7.7% versus 8.0%, p = 0.001] and decreased in both groups at 4 months by 0.7% and 0.9%, respectively. The change from baseline in the mean DTSQ status score at 4 months was greater in the empowerment group, and the effect was sustained at 8 months (control group: 29.1, 30.5, and 30.9; empowerment group: 25.0, 28.7, and 29.4 at baseline, 4 and 8 months, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Systematic education combined with telephone support delivered by physicians might be associated with improvement in treatment adherence and treatment satisfaction in patients with T2DM. FUNDING: MSD, Greece.

Combinations of insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents in diabetes mellitus type 2.

Insulin therapy is considered to be the most effective therapy for the reduction of high glucose levels. In patients who cannot be regulated with the combination of oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin should be administrated. The first step is the combination of insulin together with the already administrated oral hypoglycemic agents. The fear for hypoglycemia, the refusal and weakness that patients face when dealing with insulin, constitute reasons for many doctors to deal with insulin therapy in a more skeptical way. As a result, the initiation of insulin therapy is delayed for those patients who need it for hyperglycemia adjustments. This article provides useful practical instructions for initiating insulin therapy.