Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chest ; 130(6): 1726-32, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17166989

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The distal airways are likely to contribute to asthma pathobiology and symptoms but have rarely been specifically evaluated in relation to systemic oral therapy. We hypothesized that treatment with montelukast, an oral cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist, would improve both proximal and distal lung physiology in patients with mild asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, crossover design. SETTING: Academic referral center. PATIENTS: Subjects with mild asthma limited to using short-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists. INTERVENTIONS: Nineteen subjects with mild asthma underwent a baseline assessment of lung function, lung mechanics, and symptoms, followed by randomization to therapy with montelukast, 10 mg taken in the evening, or placebo in a crossover, double-blind fashion. Each treatment phase lasted 4 weeks, with a 2-week washout period. A repeat evaluation was performed during the last week of each treatment phase. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Montelukast resulted in improvement in (mean +/- SD) proximal and distal lung function parameters (change in FEV(1): montelukast, 0.16 +/- 0.06 L; placebo, -0.05 +/- 0.05 L; p = 0.008); change in specific conductance: montelukast, 7.2 +/- 2.9% predicted; placebo, -17 +/- 8% predicted; p = 0.007; change in % predicted residual volume [RV]: montelukast, 18.4 +/- 8.3% predicted; placebo, 3.0 +/- 2.9% predicted; p = 0.05). Improvement in symptoms (ie, wheeze and chest tightness) correlated with improvements in RV while receiving montelukast, but not while receiving placebo (Pearson coefficients: 0.55 and 0.66, respectively; p < 0.008 and 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The systemically acting oral agent montelukast improves proximal and distal lung physiology. Improvements in distal lung function correlate with improvements in asthma symptoms.


Assuntos
Acetatos/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Volume Expiratório Forçado/efeitos dos fármacos , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/uso terapêutico , Quinolinas/uso terapêutico , Volume Residual/efeitos dos fármacos , Mecânica Respiratória/efeitos dos fármacos , Capacidade Vital/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Ciclopropanos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estatística como Assunto , Sulfetos
2.
Chest ; 121(6): 1782-8, 2002 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12065339

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of clarithromycin therapy in patients with asthma. DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five subjects with chronic, stable asthma recruited from the general Denver, CO, community. INTERVENTIONS: Patients underwent airway evaluation for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture, followed by treatment with clarithromycin, 500 bid, or placebo for 6 weeks. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Outcome variables were lung function, sinusitis as measured by CT, and the inflammatory mediators tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-12 messenger RNA (mRNA) measured via in situ hybridization, in airway biopsies, and BAL. Mycoplasma or chlamydia were detected by PCR in 31 of 55 asthmatics. Treatment resulted in a significant improvement in the FEV(1), but only in the PCR-positive subjects (2.50 +/- 0.16 to 2.69 +/- 0.19 L, mean +/- SEM; p = 0.05). This was not appreciated in the PCR-negative subjects (2.59 +/- 0.24 to 2.54 +/- 0.18 L, p = 0.85) or the PCR-positive or PCR-negative subjects who received placebo. Sinus CTs revealed no change in sinusitis with clarithromycin treatment. In situ hybridization revealed no significant difference in baseline airway tissue or BAL-mediator expression between the PCR-positive and PCR-negative subjects. However, the PCR-positive subjects who received clarithromycin demonstrated a reduction in TNF-alpha (p = 0.006), IL-5 (p = 0.007), and IL-12 (p = 0.004) mRNA in BAL and TNF-alpha mRNA in airway tissue (p = 0.0009). The PCR-negative subjects who received clarithromycin only demonstrated a reduction in TNF-alpha (p = 0.01) and IL-12 (p = 0.002) mRNA in BAL and TNF-alpha mRNA in airway tissue (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in cytokine expression in those subjects who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These observations support the hypothesis that clarithromycin therapy improves lung function, but only in those subjects with positive PCR findings for M pneumoniae or C pneumoniae.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/microbiologia , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Mycoplasma pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Asma/imunologia , Asma/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Interleucinas/biossíntese , Masculino , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/biossíntese
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA