Examining Intercage Transmission of Chlamydia muridarum: Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization.

Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups (n = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; n = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; n = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; n = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.

Assessment of Antimicrobial Therapy in Eradicating Chlamydia muridarum in Research Mice: Immune Status and its Impact on Outcomes.

Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) is a moderately prevalent, gram-negative, intracellular bacterium that affects laboratory mice, causing subclinical to severe disease, depending on the host's immune status. The effectiveness of various antibiotic regimens aimed at eradicating Cm in both immunodeficient and immunocompetent laboratory mice was evaluated. NSG mice were cohoused with Cm-shedding BALB/cJ mice for 14 days to simulate natural exposure. Four groups of 8 infected NSG mice were treated for 7 days with either 0.08% sulfamethoxazole and 0.016% trimethoprim (TMS) in water, 0.0625% doxycycline in feed, 0.124%/0.025% TMS in feed, or 0.12% amoxicillin in feed. A control group was provided standard water and feed. The impact of treatment on gastrointestinal microbiota (GM) was performed using next-generation shotgun sequencing on the last day of treatment. TMS and Amoxicillin had negligible effects on GM, while doxycycline had the largest effect. All antibiotic treated NSG mice exhibited clinical disease, including dehydration, hunched posture, >20% weight loss, and dyspnea, leading to euthanasia 21-40 days post-treatment (32.6 ± 4.2 days; mean ± SD). Untreated controls were euthanized 14-33 days post-exposure (23.75 ± 5.9 days). All mice were fecal PCR positive for Cm at euthanasia. Histological evaluation revealed multifocal histiocytic and neutrophilic bronchointerstitial pneumonia and/or bronchiolitis featuring prominent intralesional chlamydial inclusion bodies in all mice. Subsequently, groups of 8 C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, NOD.SCID, and NSG mice infected with Cm were treated with 0.124%/0.025% TMS in feed for 7 (BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J) or 21 days (NSG and NOD.SCID). All immunocompetent and NOD.SCID mice were negative for Cm by PCR 14 days post-treatment, remained clinically normal and had no evidence of Cm infection at necropsy, all NSG mice remained Cm positive and were euthanized. While these findings highlight the difficulties in eradicating Cm from highly immunodeficient mice, eradication of Cm from immunocompetent or moderately immunocompromised mice with antibiotics is feasible.

Mechanical Washing Prevents Transmission of Bacterial, Viral, and Protozoal Murine Pathogens from Cages.

Infectious agents have varying susceptibilities to thermal inactivation and/or mechanical removal from cages by the use of heated, pressurized water. In this study, we tested whether 5 specific infectious organisms (Candidatus savagella [segmented filamentous bacterium (SFB)], Helicobacter sp., mouse norovirus (MNV), Tritrichomonas sp., and Entamoeba muris) could survive the cage wash process and still infect naïve mice. These 5 organisms were chosen due to their prevalence in rodent colonies, environmental stability, and/or potential to influence experimental outcomes. Cages that had housed mice shedding all 5 organisms were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 1) sanitization in a tunnel washer followed by autoclaving (121 °C [250 °F] for 20 min; n = 40 cages); 2) sanitization in a tunnel washer (82 °C [180 °F] for an average of 30 s; n = 40 cages); or 3) control (bedding change only; n = 40 cages). The presence of these agents in the cage was assessed by performing PCR on swabs of the empty soiled cage interior before and after the treatment. In addition, to determine if any residual nucleic acid was infectious, 2 Swiss outbred (J:ARC(S)) female mice were housed for 7 d in cages from each treatment group. The above procedures were then repeated so that every week each pair of J:ARC(S) mice ( n = 10 pairs of mice/treatment group) were housed in another cage that underwent the same treatment; this was done for a total of 4 consecutive, 1-wk-long periods. Swabs collected from soiled cages were PCR-positive for SFB, Helicobacter, MNV, Tritrichomonas, and Entamoeba in 99%, 97%, 39%, 63%, and 73% of the cages tested, respectively. Cages in the tunnel wash group that were PCR-positive for SFB, Helicobacter, Tritrichomonas, and Entamoeba before treatment remained PCR-positive in 8%, 15%, 43%, and 10% of positive cages, respectively. None of the cages from the autoclave group were PCR-positive for any of the agents after treatment. None of the mice housed in cages in either the autoclave or tunnel wash groups became infected with any of the agents. However, 80%, 60%, and 100% of the pairs of mice housed in untreated cages were PCR-positive for SFB, MNV, and Entamoeba, respectively. None of the mice housed in untreated cages were positive for Helicobacter or Tritrichomonas. Our results suggest that nucleic acids from these bacterial and protozoal organisms may remain in cages after mechanical cage washing, but these nucleic acids are not infectious, and autoclaving is not necessary to prevent transmission.

Internal Temperatures of Packaging for Overnight Cross-country Shipping of Zebrafish (Danio Rerio).

As the use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a research model continues to rise, so too will the shipping and sharing of zebrafish strains across collaborating institutions. If done incorrectly, shipping can result in significant mortality, welfare concerns, and loss of valuable resources for researchers and research institutions. Here we introduce a novel method to track temperatures of zebrafish containers during shipping and show that internal packaging temperatures are directly affected by the external temperatures. We used temperature logging Thermochron iButtons to track the temperatures of 2 packages containing adult zebrafish that were shipped overnight from Dallas, TX to Columbus, OH during winter following recommended fish shipping guidelines. We found that the external packaging of both boxes of fish were exposed to temperatures that had previously been shown to be lethal to zebrafish. However, internal temperatures and, more specifically, water temperature, stayed within 24.0 to 26.5°C during shipment, resulting in 100% survival of adult zebrafish. This novel method of tracking packaging temperatures of live fish during shipping can help to inform fish health status on arrival.

Detection of Zoonotic Bacteria and Paragonimus kellicotti in Red Swamp Crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) and the Assessment of Traditional Crayfish Boils.

ABSTRACT: Studies of red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) outside of the United States confirm the presence of a variety of zoonotic pathogens, but it is unknown whether these same pathogens occur in P. clarkii in the United States. The U.S. commercial crayfish industry generates $200 million yearly, underscoring the need to evaluate this consumer commodity. The study objectives were to evaluate specific zoonotic pathogens present on P. clarkii from Alabama and Louisiana, states in the southeastern United States, and to determine the effectiveness of traditional food preparation methods to reduce pathogens. Experiment A evaluated the presence of Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, and Vibrio spp. in crayfish and environmental samples over a 2-month collection period (May to June 2021). Crayfish sampling consisted of swabbing the cephalothorax region; 15 samples were tested for E. coli, Salmonella, and S. aureus, and an additional 15 samples for Vibrio spp. Additionally, crayfish shipping materials were sampled. In experiment B, 92 crayfish were evaluated for Paragonimus kellicotti. Experiment C compared live and boiled crayfish for the presence of Vibrio spp. In experiments A and B, all 60 (100%) crayfish samples and 13 (81.25%) of 16 environmental samples showed growth characteristic of Vibrio spp. Three (5%) of 60 samples showed E. coli growth, with no statistical difference (P = 0.5536) between farms. P. kellicotti, Salmonella, and S. aureus were not recovered from any samples. In experiment C, all 10 (100%) of the live preboiled crayfish samples showed characteristic growth, whereas 1 (10%) of 10 samples of crayfish boiled in unseasoned water showed Vibrio growth (P < 0.0001). These results confirm that Vibrio spp. and E. coli may be present on U.S. commercial crayfish and that care should be taken when handling any materials that come into contact with live crayfish because they can potentially be contaminated.