Risk stratification following complex PCI: clinical versus anatomical risk stratification including "post PCI residual SYNTAX-score" as quantification of incomplete revascularization.

BACKGROUND: EuroSCORE and completeness of revascularization predicts long-term survival after multivessel PCI (MV-PCI). The SYNTAX-Score has also been proposed to predict clinical outcome. The prognostic impact of these scores to predict long-term survival after PCI has not yet been compared. METHODS AND RESULTS: Long-term survival was assessed in 740 patients undergoing MV-PCI. We calculated EuroSCORE, SYNTAX-Score, STS-Score, the clinical SYNTAX-Score (CSS), and the "post-PCI residual SYNTAX-Score." Mean follow-up time was 4.5 ± 2.5 years. 341 patients (46%) were treated for ACS (STEMI N = 191; NSTEMI N = 150). 113 patients (15%) underwent PCI of left main coronary artery. The EuroSCORE was significantly lower for stable patients compared to patients with ACS (stable 4.1 ± 4.5, NSTEMI 13.9 ± 13.3, STEMI 18.1 ± 18.7, p < 0.001). The differences in the SYNTAX-Score were less obvious but even significant (stable 14.9 ± 8.6, NSTEMI 17.8 ± 9.9, STEMI 18.3 ± 9.0; p < 0.001). Patients in the highest tertiles of each risk score experienced a dramatically elevated mortality rate compared to the extremely low mortality rate in the lower tertiles (p log-rank <0.001). This comparison remained significant for the EuroSCORE and STS-Score but not for the SYNTAX-Score, when analysis was restricted to stable patients. The multivariate Cox-regression-analysis confirmed the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and the STS-Score as independent predictors of long-term mortality, whereas the SYNTAX-Score (including residual form) and the CSS had no predictive value. CONCLUSION: The EuroSCORE and the STS-Score outperforms the SYNTAX-Score and the CSS in predicting long-term survival following MV-PCI. In addition, the residual SYNTAX-Score predicts long-term survival not independently.

Intracoronary administration of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells and arrhythmic events in patients with chronic heart failure.

AIMS: There are continued debates on potential proarrhythmic effects of intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cell (BMC) therapy for treatment of chronic heart failure. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), a mainstay of heart failure therapy, provide the possibility of validly assessing arrhythmias in patients with chronic heart failure. The aim of this analysis was to assess the arrhythmogenic potential of intracoronary BMC therapy, continuously documented by ICD-stored intracardiac electrograms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Matched cohort study of 112 patients receiving intracoronary administration of autologous BMC and 224 heart failure patients, matched for age, gender, and left ventricular ejection fraction fitted with an ICD. Within a follow-up period of 2 years (total patient-years at risk: 595 years), no significant difference was detected for ICD-stored episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT; 25.0 vs. 27.1%; P = 0.779), VT/ventricular fibrillation treated by antitachycardia pacing or ICD shock (15.6 vs. 15.5%; P = 0.956), or death from arrhythmic cause (4.2 vs. 1.0%; P = 0.667). Predictors of occurrence of major arrhythmic events were parameters of advanced heart failure and implantation of ICD for secondary prevention; no influence could be detected for BMC administration (odds ratio = 1.198; P = 0.440). CONCLUSION: There is no evidence that intracoronary administration of BMC aggravates life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with chronic heart failure.

Detection and functional analysis of tumor infiltrating T-lymphocytes (TIL) in liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes (TIL) play an important role in primary colorectal cancer, but their activity in liver metastases has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to examine whether tumor-selective infiltration, activation, and cytotoxic activity of TIL can be demonstrated in situ in colorectal liver metastases. METHODS: TIL were obtained from liver metastases and corresponding normal liver tissue of 16 patients with colorectal liver metastases. Characterization of TIL in situ was performed by multicolor flowcytometric analysis. Presence of tumor antigen-reactive T cells was evaluated by interferon gamma Elispot analysis. RESULTS: TIL in colorectal liver metastases responding against tumor antigens were present in most patients. Although the proportions of CD3(+) T cells were comparable in liver metastasis and normal liver tissue, metastases contained significantly enhanced proportions of CD4(+) cells (49% vs. 22%, P < .001). Among all CD4(+) T helper cells, the proportion of activated (CD4(+)CD25(+)) effector cells was significantly increased in liver metastases (15.0% vs. 7.8%, P = .003). Metastases showed significantly higher proportions of activated (CD69(+) [70.1% vs. 49.8%, P = .02] and CD25(+) [4.1% vs. .6%, P = .06]) and cytotoxically active (CD107a(+)) CD8(+) TIL (3.2% vs. 1.3%, P = .03). Importantly, the presence of activated T helper cells correlated with the frequencies of cytotoxic T lymphocytes that exerted cytotoxic activity in situ (P = .02). CONCLUSION: CD4(+) and CD8(+) TIL are selectively activated in liver metastases, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes exert tumor-selective cytotoxic activity in situ in the presence of activated T helper cells, suggesting the requirement of in-situ-activated T helper cells for efficient cytotoxic T lymphocytes effector function.

Prognostic value of reported chest pain for cardiovascular risk stratification in primary care.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of chest pain is well established in patients with coronary artery disease, but still ill defined in primary prevention. Therefore, the aim of our analysis was to assess the prognostic value of different forms of chest pain in a large cohort of primary care subjects under the conditions of contemporary modalities of care in primary prevention, including measurement of serum levels of the biomarker NT-pro-BNP. DESIGN: We carried out a post-hoc analysis of the prospective DETECT cohort study. METHODS: In a total of 5570 unselected subjects, free of coronary artery disease, within the 55,518 participants of the cross-sectional DETECT study, we assessed chest pain history by a comprehensive questionnaire and measured serum NT-pro-BNP levels. Three types of chest pain, which were any chest pain, exertional chest pain and classical angina, were defined. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs = cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization procedures) were assessed during a 5-year follow-up period. RESULTS: During follow-up, 109 subjects experienced a MACE. All types of reported chest pain were associated with an approximately three-fold increased risk for the occurrence of incident MACEs, even after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. Any form of reported chest pain had a similar predictive value for MACEs as a one-time measurement of NT-pro-BNP. However, adding a single measurement of NT-pro-BNP and the information on chest pain resulted in reclassification of approximately 40% of subjects, when compared with risk prediction based on established cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: In primary prevention, self-reported chest pain and a single measurement of NT-pro-BNP substantially improve cardiovascular risk prediction and allow for risk reclassification of approximately 40% of the subjects compared with assessing classical cardiovascular risk factors alone.

Prognostic value of NT-pro-BNP and hs-CRP for risk stratification in primary care: results from the population-based DETECT study.

BACKGROUND: There is continuous debate to the use of biomarkers in the general practitioners office and to what degree the established biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) might contribute to improved prediction of incident cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility and 5-year predictive value of a single measurement of NT-pro-BNP and hs-CRP for incident cardiovascular events, and its added value beyond the contribution of conventional risk factors in primary care. METHODS: Five year prospective longitudinal clinical epidemiological study in a nationwide sample of 4,775 primary care subjects (mean age 55.8 years, 62 % women) without coronary artery disease at baseline. Main outcome measures were incident major cardiovascular events and all-cause death. RESULTS: During the 5 years of follow-up, 188 subjects (3.9 %) died or experienced a first major cardiovascular event. The addition of NT-pro-BNP, but not of hs-CRP to a prediction model with established cardiovascular risk factors improved the prediction of major cardiovascular events (increase in C statistic by 0.009; p = 0.008), and was associated with a significant improvement in net reclassification improvement (NRI = 23.6 %; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: In a primary care setting, one single measurement of NT-pro-BNP, but not of hs-CRP significantly improves the prediction of incident cardiovascular events.

Resting heart rate as a tool for risk stratification in primary care: does it provide incremental prognostic information?

BACKGROUND: Several selected population-based studies have emphasized the significance of resting heart rate as an independent cardiovascular risk factor. However, there are no data available for using resting heart rate as a cardiovascular risk predictor in contemporary primary care. Thus, the aim of our analysis was to examine the clinical value of the measurement of resting heart rate in a large, unselected population-based cohort of primary care subjects under the conditions of contemporary primary prevention. DESIGN: Prospective, population-based cohort study. METHODS: We examined a subgroup of 5320 unselected primary care subjects free of coronary artery disease from the nationwide, longitudinal Diabetes Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation Targets and Essential Data for Commitment of Treatment (DETECT) cohort study, which was conducted from 2003 to 2008. RESULTS: During the follow-up time of 5 years, 258 events were reported. Elevated resting heart rate was not associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events (HR = 0.75, p = 0.394), cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.71, p = 0.616) or major cardiovascular events (HR = 0.77, p = 0.376). By cross-sectional analysis, elevated heart rate clustered with markers of the metabolic syndrome, like increased blood pressure (systolic: OR = 5.54, p < 0.0001; diastolic: OR = 3.82, p < 0.0001), elevated fasting plasma glucose levels (OR = 8.84, p < 0.0001), hypertriglyceridaemia (OR = 22.16, p = 0.001), and obesity (body mass index OR = 0.89, p < 0.0001). Assessment of resting heart rate in clinical practice had minimal and non-significant additional prognostic value compared to established cardiovascular risk factors as judged by C statistics (C = 0.001, p = 0.979). CONCLUSION: The measurement of resting heart rate in the daily routine of primary care does not provide incremental prognostic information for cardiovascular risk stratification.