RESUMO
Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) are ubiquitous in the aquatic environment and have caused widespread concerns globally due to their potential hazards to humans. Especially, NPs have smaller sizes and higher penetrability, and therefore can penetrate the human barrier more easily and may pose potentially higher risks than MPs. Currently, most reviews have overlooked the differences between MPs and NPs and conflated them in the discussions. This review compared the differences in physicochemical properties and environmental behaviors of MPs and NPs. Commonly used techniques for removing MPs and NPs currently employed by wastewater treatment plants and drinking water treatment plants were summarized, and their weaknesses were analyzed. We further comprehensively reviewed the latest technological advances (e.g., emerging coagulants, new filters, novel membrane materials, photocatalysis, Fenton, ozone, and persulfate oxidation) for the separation and degradation of MPs and NPs. Microplastics are more easily removed than NPs through separation processes, while NPs are more easily degraded than MPs through advanced oxidation processes. The operational parameters, efficiency, and potential governing mechanisms of various technologies as well as their advantages and disadvantages were also analyzed in detail. Appropriate technology should be selected based on environmental conditions and plastic size and type. Finally, current challenges and prospects in the detection, toxicity assessment, and removal of MPs and NPs were proposed. This review intends to clarify the differences between MPs and NPs and provide guidance for removing MPs and NPs from urban water systems.
Assuntos
Microplásticos , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Purificação da Água , Plásticos , Águas Residuárias/químicaRESUMO
The N, S co-doped biochar (N, S-BC) with multistage pore structure was successfully synthesized from nanocellulose and thiourea by one-step pyrolysis, which could effectively activate peroxymonosulfate (PMS) to degrade sulfamethoxazole (SMX) in water. Moreover, the removal efficiency of SMX by this oxidation system was 2.3-3.1 times than that of other systems activated by common metal oxides (such as Fe3O4ãFe2O3, and MnO2). More importantly, the mechanism of the N, S-BC/PMS process was deduced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) quenching experiment and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) test, which exhibited that surface-bound free radicals and singlet oxygen (1O2) played an essential role in the SMX degradation. Surprisingly, the sulfate radical (SO4â¢-) and hydroxyl radical (â¢OH) produced in this system existed in a bound state on the surface of the carbon catalyst to react with SMX, rather than dispersed in the aqueous solution. This particular form of free radicals could resist the influence of background substances and pH changes in water, and maintain excellent SMX degradation efficiency under different water matrices and pH. This study provides a new insight into the application of carbon catalyst in actual water pollution control.