One-dioptre toric IOL versus spherical IOL in eyes with low preoperative corneal astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To investigate the advantages/disadvantages of a 1.0 D toric IOL vs spherical IOL after regular phacoemulsification in eyes with preoperative astigmatism ≤ 1 D. METHODS: Retrospective comparative series involving pseudophakic eyes with preoperative topographic astigmatism ≤ 1.0 D implanted either with monofocal 1.0 D Toric IOL (T-group), or with spherical IOL (S-group). The postoperative refractive astigmatism (PRA, i.e. surgically induced + corneal) was the main outcome; also considered in the analyses were the uncorrected and best-corrected distance visual acuity (VA). The data were referred to the last postoperative follow-up visit, 2 to 4 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 60 eyes were included: 30 in the T-group and 30 in the S-group, matched for patient's age, laterality, and axial length. Before surgery, the mean corneal astigmatism was 0.62 ± 0.39 D in the T-group and 0.54 ± 0.33 D in the S-group (p = 0.4). In the S-group, PRA was 0.73 ± 0.37 D, higher than the corresponding preoperative corneal astigmatism (p = 0.040). In the T-group, PRA was 0.58 ± 0.31 D; the variation was not statistically significant. Uncorrected VA was significantly better in the T-group vs the S-group (p = 0.007), and the best-corrected VA was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present study indicated that in eyes with very low preoperative astigmatism, 1.0 D toric IOLs were able to limit the increase of the PRA instead of those observed with the spherical IOLs. This could support the better uncorrected VA recorded in the T-group.

Orbital lymphoma mimicking lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma.

PURPOSE: To describe the case of a patient affected by orbital lymphoma mimicking pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal gland. METHODS: This was a retrospective case report. RESULTS: We present the case of a patient with 15-year history of slowly progressive left proptosis and inferomedial bulbar dislocation who had the presumptive diagnosis of lacrimal gland pleomorphic adenoma based on clinical and radiological features. The patient underwent lateral orbitotomy and lacrimal gland excision. Postoperative histological features were consistent with low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CONCLUSION: The accepted clinico-radiological criteria used for the diagnosis of lacrimal gland fossa lesions might have a certain false-positive rate, even in recent years. The initial surgical approach with the appropriate choice between fine-needle aspiration biopsies, intraoperative biopsies and lacrimal gland excisions might be a challenge.