Accumulation of damaged mitochondria in alveolar macrophages with reduced OXPHOS related gene expression in IPF.

BACKGROUND: Impaired mitochondria homeostasis and function are established hallmarks of aging and increasing evidence suggests a link with lung fibrosis. Mitochondria homeostasis may be also affected in alveolar macrophages (AMs) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In this study, we used bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), a tool for both clinical and research purposes, and a rich source of AMs. METHODS: BAL samples were examined from 52 patients with IPF and 19 healthy individuals. Measurements of mitochondria reactive oxygen species (mtROS), mitochondria morphology and related gene expression were performed. Additionally, autophagy and mitophagy levels were analysed. RESULTS: Mitochondria in AMs from IPF patients had prominent morphological defects and impaired transcription paralleled to a significant reduction of mitochondria homeostasis regulators PINK1, PARK2 and NRF1. mtROS, was significantly higher in IPF and associated with reduced expression of mitochondria-encoded oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes. Age and decline in lung function correlated with higher mtROS levels. Augmentation of damaged, oxidised mitochondria in IPF AMs however was not coupled to increased macroautophagy and mitophagy, central processes in the maintenance of healthy mitochondria levels. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a perturbation of mitochondria homeostasis in alveolar macrophages in IPF.

Pirfenidone improves survival in IPF: results from a real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Pirfenidone is an antifibrotic compound approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We present our real-world experience in terms of Pirfenidone's effect on mortality and adverse events profile outside the restrictions of a clinical trial. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational intention to treat study of 82 consecutive IPF patients (UHH cohort). RESULTS: We observed a high 3-years survival rate of 73% without excluding patients who discontinued treatment for different reasons. The survival was compared to the survival of an IPF cohort from a tertiary referral center (RBH cohort). After exclusion of severe cases (DLco< 30%), in unadjusted analysis, the survival in the UHH cohort was better than in the RBH cohort (HR:0.32, 95% CI: 0.19-0.53, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for age, gender and FVC, the survival remained higher in the UHH cohort (HR:0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.48, p < 0.0001). We observed a similar safety profile compared to previously published data and a lower rate of drug discontinuation due to photosensitivity reactions. CONCLUSION: Pirfenidone provides a survival benefit in a real-life IPF cohort compared to previously used medications. Counselling patients and proactively managing possible adverse effects can reduce the necessity to discontinue pirfenidone.