Smoking Is Associated with Increased Risk of Binge Drinking in a Young Adult Hispanic Population at the US-Mexico Border.

BACKGROUND: This study examines factors related to general health and health behavior, including smoking, that may be associated with binge drinking, drinking "at risk," and potential for alcohol use disorder among young adults of Mexican ancestry. METHODS: A total of 2191 young adult emergency department (ED) patients (18-30 years) of Mexican ancestry in a public hospital proximate to the US-Mexico border completed health surveys while they were waiting to be treated, including questions on general health, drinking, smoking, and drug use. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of the study participants reported binge drinking, 38% were "at-risk" alcohol users (above National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism guidelines), and 22% were Rapid Alcohol Problem Screen (RAPS) positive (indicating potential for alcohol use disorder). Smoking was reported by 31%, marijuana use by 16%, and other drug use by 9%. Multiple variable models revealed that smoking was the strongest factor associated with binge drinking. Those who smoked were 3.1 (P < .0001) times more likely to binge drink. Other factors independently associated with binge drinking were age 22-25 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, P = .003), male gender (OR = 1.5, P = .0001), and ED visit for injury (OR = 1.4, P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association of smoking and binge drinking. Study findings suggest that brief interventions designed to reduce preventable health risks for young Hispanics should include discussion of both binge drinking and smoking behaviors.

Assessing Individual Competency Differences Between Third- and Fourth-Year Medical Students Using the National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in the Emergency Department.

Medical students rotating through emergency departments as part of their clinical education are typically evaluated using an on-shift evaluation tool. The National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in the Emergency Department (NCAT-EM) is the current standard of evaluation for medical students in the emergency department, regardless of level of training. This study aims to evaluate whether the NCAT-EM can detect differences in skill levels between third-year medical students (MS3s) and fourth-year medical students (MS4s) rotating at a level 1 trauma center and teaching institution. These authors hypothesized that MS4s should outperform MS3s across all assessment domains given their additional training. A total of 930 performance evaluations were gathered for MS3 and MS4 rotating between May 2022 and June 2023. There were 321 evaluations of MS3s and 609 evaluations of MS4s. Across the six assessment domains, MS4s had statistically significant higher performances in two domains - namely emergency recognition and management (fully entrustable: 37.4% vs. 23.8% (p = 0.03)) and communication (fully entrustable: 46.2% vs. 33.6% (p = 0.03)). These findings indicate that the use of the NCAT-EM at this institution reliably differentiated between MS3s and MS4s in these two assessment domains. There were trends suggesting MS4s outperform MS3s in the other four domains, which did not rise to the level of statistical significance, but are consistent with prior validation studies of the NCAT.

Assessment of Professionalism During the Emergency Medicine Clerkship Using the National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in Emergency Medicine.

OBJECTIVES: In 2016, a national consensus conference created the National Clinical Assessment Tool for Medical Students in Emergency Medicine (NCAT-EM), a standardized end-of-shift assessment tool. We report the first large-scale analysis of professionalism concerns collected from May 2017 through December 2018 by a multisite consortium using the NCAT-EM. Our primary objective was to characterize the nature and frequency of professionalism concerns. Our secondary objective was to identify characteristics associated with giving or receiving a professionalism flag. METHODS: The consortium database includes assessments for all students on EM clerkships at participating sites. This report presents descriptive statistics about the frequency of different flags, the distribution of flags among different student categories, assessor and student characteristics, and distribution of global assessment scores on assessments citing concerns. We used Fisher's exact test to look for associations between the frequency of professionalism flags and the sex of the students and assessors and across student categories. We used logistic regression to look for relationships between professionalism concerns and global assessment scores as well as intent to apply in EM. RESULTS: We screened 6,768 assessments of 784 students by 719 assessors from 13 sites. After excluding assessments without flags and assessments with apparent data entry errors, we analyzed 57 (0.8%) assessments containing 79 flags. The most frequent flags were punctuality (25/79, 31.6%) and initiative (20/79, 25.3%). Few students received flags (42/784, 5.4%). Few assessors flagged concerns (41/719, 5.7%). We detected no correlation between the frequency of flags and whether a student was applying in EM or between the sex of students and assessors. Global scores of lower one-third appeared more often in assessments with a flag (30/57, 52.6% vs. 233/6,711, 3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Only 5.4% of students received flags. Punctuality and initiative accounted for a majority of citations. Professionalism flags correlated strongly with lower global assessment scores.