An Italian study on treatment trends and outcomes of patients with stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the gemcitabine era: is it time to change?

A series of 650 patients treated between 1997 and 2007 at 10 Italian centers was analyzed to assess treatment trends and efficacy in stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Data on patient characteristics, treatment and outcomes were collected. The inclusion criteria were pathological diagnosis of stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma; age more than 18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than 3, and no past therapy. Most patients (95%) received up-front chemotherapy, which mainly consisted of gemcitabine alone (N=323), gemcitabine-based four-drug combinations (N=107), gemcitabine-platinum compound doublets (N=87), or intra-arterial gemcitabine-free triplets (N=57). The use of gemcitabine-platinum compound doublets increased over time (1997-2001: 2%; 2002-2007: 21%) whereas an inverse trend was observed for gemcitabine (71-61%). No overall survival (OS) difference was observed between patients enrolled in clinical trials and those not enrolled. The median and 1-year OS were 9.5 months and 35.5% for patients treated with gemcitabine; 8.9 months and 36.8% for those treated with gemcitabine-free intra-arterial triplets; 13.3 months and 55.8% for those treated with gemcitabine-platinating agent doublets; and 16.2 months and 62.6% for those treated with gemcitabine-based four-drug combinations. Moreover, the median and 1-year OS were 12.7 months and 51.4% in patients who underwent planned consolidation chemoradiation, and 8.4 months and 30.4% in patients who did not. The use of a strategy consisting of a gemcitabine-platinating agent containing chemotherapy followed by consolidation chemoradiation has been increasing over time and may represent a suitable choice in the therapeutic management of stage III pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Management of Frail and Not-Frail elderly cancer patients in a hospital-based geriatric oncology program.

PURPOSE: To evaluate management and outcome of patients >or=70 years admitted to our Medical Oncology ward and evaluated by Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment before treatment with standard or "elderly-friendly" chemotherapy regimens, a list of which was developed within our Geriatric Oncology Program based on published clinical trials and personal experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Charts of patients treated from January 2004 to January 2006 were reviewed for choice of treatment, tumor response, toxicities and survival. RESULTS: 117 patients (median age 75 years) were divided into Frail (F) (34.2%) and Not-Frail patients (NF: 33.3% Fit plus 32.5% Vulnerable). The two groups did not differ according to the use of "elderly-friendly"chemotherapy regimens (40% of F pts and 39% of NF pts), dose reductions >or=25% (37.5% vs. 31.2%) and grade 3-4 toxicities (52.5% vs. 58.4%). Early interruption of treatment due to toxicity or patient's refusal (42.5 vs. 15.6, p=0.001) and deaths within 30 days from last chemotherapy administration (22.5% vs. 3.9%, p=0.003) were significantly different. F patients showed clinical or radiological response in 21.2% of cases, and subjective improvement in 22.6%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, median survival of F patients (6.4 months) is shorter compared to NF group (16.9 months, p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The use of "elderly-friendly"chemotherapy regimens was limited to less than a half of cases. F patients may respond to chemotherapy but display higher rates of premature withdrawal and early deaths compared to NF patients, with a shorter survival. Clinical trials particularly aimed at frail patients are urgently needed.

Vulnerable and frail elderly: an approach to the management of the main tumour types.

In dealing with older cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, some form of geriatric evaluation is needed to distinguish those which can be treated as adults from those - the vulnerable ones - who need a modified approach and also from those who are frail or too sick to receive an active treatment. Only scarce data are available to guide treatment of vulnerable or frail patients, the neglected majority of older cancer patients. In most of these cases they receive an adapted approach which does not derive from the results of clinical trials, but from an enlightened empiricism. In this article we summarise and discuss available data for management of the main tumour types in frail and vulnerable patients, and call for further research in this field.

Health-related quality of life outcomes in disease-free survivors of mid-low rectal cancer after curative surgery.

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to investigate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in terms of symptoms and functional outcomes in disease-free survivors of rectal cancer. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 117) who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up and whose disease had not recurred were asked to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and its colorectal cancer module (QLQ-CR38). Long-term HRQOL outcomes were compared with reference data from the general population. Relevant clinical data including type of surgery, stage of disease, type of treatment, and early and late complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to investigate associations among covariates. RESULTS: HRQOL functional aspects were similar with that of an age- and sex-matched general population. Although clinically meaningful better outcomes favoring our patients were found for the global health status/HRQOL and the pain scales, constipation was worse in rectal cancer survivors than the general population. Multivariate analysis found that worse physical functioning was associated with increasing age (P < .001), female sex (P < .01), presence of stoma (P < .05), and occurrence of late major complications (P < .05). Worse body image was associated with the presence of stoma (P < .001) and chemoradiotherapy (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Overall, patients with rectal cancer recover well in the long run, with HRQOL levels comparable to that of the general population. HRQOL outcomes provide valuable data that may be used to improve information disclosure to patients.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil by bolus.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) with continuous infusion (c.i.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) before resection of high-risk rectal cancer improves overall survival (OS) and pelvic control. Since the presence of cardiomiopathy may contraindicate c.i. of 5-FU, an alternative regimen of 5-FU CT-RT was prospectively studied in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2000 to December 2006, patients with clinical stage T3 or T4, or node-positive disease were assigned according to their cardiological status to receive weekly 5-FU bolus administration during radiotherapy (RT). The preoperative treatment consisted of 5,040 cGy, delivered infractions of 180 cGy per day, five days per week, and 5-FU, given in 15 minutes at a dose of 450 mg/m2 of body surface area weekly during all radiotherapy. Surgery was performed six weeks after the completion of CT-RT. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients received preoperative CH-RT. The 2-year OS rate was 92.3% and the 3-year DFS was 87.5%. The five-year cumulative incidence of local relapse was 3.9%. Grade 3 acute toxic effects occurred in 19.6% of the patients; worsening of patient's cardiopathy was never reported. CONCLUSION: Patients with cardiopathy developed similar local control and DFS, toxicity and OS with 5-FU administered weekly by bolus as those reported by literature data.

Role of neoadjuvant treatment in cT3N0M0 rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the pathological response (pTNM), local relapse and overall survival (OS) in clinical T3N0M0 (cT3N0M0) rectal cancer after a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CHT-RT) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion (c.i.) (+/- oxaliplatin) or bolus or capecitabine (an oral fluorpyrimidine). A secondary endpoint was to identify the local relapse rate and OS in those patients also receiving an adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2006, 48 consecutive cT3N0M0 rectal cancer cases neoadjuvantly treated were retrospectively examined. Variables considered were age, gender, modality of 5-FU administration and tumour site. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years (range, 22-84 years) and the male:female ratio was 28:20. All the patients received the full course of CHT-RT. Twenty-eight patients received c.i. 5-FU neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 17 received bolus 5-FU administration and 3 patients received capecitabine-based therapy. The mean number of chemotherapy weeks was 4.9 (range, 2-6). A total of 85.4% of patients were operated on without relevant postoperative complications but another 4 are awaiting surgery. Twenty-one patients had a lower (< or = 5 cm from the anal verge) and 27 had a middle rectal lesion (from 6 to 10 cm). In those patients with the lower site of lesion, a sphincter-saving (SS) procedure was achieved in 88.9%. Downstaging was reported in 66.7%. Ninety percent of cases are still free from progression after a median follow-up of 22.1 months; 7.5% are dead. CONCLUSION: The down-staging, the good level of SS and the disease-free survival (DFS) obtained here suggests that a neoadjuvant therapy may also be useful for stage II rectal cancer at diagnosis. The use of a postoperative chemotherapy should probably be outlined better.

Rectal cancer adjuvant chemotherapy: when is more useful?

UNLABELLED: THE AIM of the study was to evaluate time-to-progression (TTP) of rectal cancer in a group of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) after combined neoadjuvant treatment. A secondary end-point was to identify the possible influence of clinical TNM (cTNM) or pathological TNM (pTNM) on TTP and overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2005, 101 consecutive rectal cancer patients who had been neoadjuvantly treated and had underne adjuvant CHT were retrospectively examined. The variables considered were age, gender and clinical and pathological effect of CHT administration. RESULTS: The mean age was 59 years (29-78 years) and the male:female ratio, 61:40. Forty-two patients had a lower (< or =5 cm from the anal verge), 54 a middle (from 6 to 10 cm) and 5 a higher (=10 cm) rectal lesion. All the patients had received the full course of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) while 26.7% patients had received a reduced number of neoadjuvant CHT cycles. All the patients had undergone surgery and had received adjuvant chemotherapy which was completed in only 77.2% of the cases. Tumour down-staging and complete remissions were reported in 75.2% and 14.8% of cases, respectively. TTP and OS at 3 years were 81.2% and 91.1%, respectively. Out of locally recurrent patients, 77.8% were N+ (p=0.0026) at the pathological evaluation. CONCLUSION: In our series, neither administration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.44) nor age > or =70 years (p=0.51), clinical stage III (p=0.67), tumour down-staging (p=0.44) and achievement of pCR (p=0.66) appeared to have a significant impact on TTP; only pN+ (patients "not responders" to a neoadjuvant CHT-RT) influenced local relapse requiring more accurate postoperative treatment and confirming the literature data about the utility of adjuvant therapy in stage III disease.

Neoadjuvant carboplatin and vinorelbine followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck or oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study in elderly patients or patients with poor performance status.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of neo-adjuvant carboplatin and vinorelbine followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients > or =70 years of age or with Karnofsky performance status (PS) 70-80, diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck (H&N) or oesophageal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The treatment plan consisted of three courses of carboplatin AUC4 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8, every 21 days, followed by chemoradiotherapy. Carboplatin 100 mg/m2 was delivered weekly for the duration of the radiation therapy (70 Gy, 2 Gy/daily). RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with an average age of 68 years (range 42-85, 16 patients > or =70 years) were treated. Twenty-seven patients (77.1%) responded to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (2 complete and 25 partial responses). Haematological toxicity was grade 3-4 in 13 patients (37.2%), while gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 3-4 in 20 patients (57.1%). All the patients completed the chemoradiotherapy plan, with grade 4 mucositis plus febrile neutropenia in 3 patients (8.5%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 10.2 months, with 31.5% of patients being alive at two years. CONCLUSION: The regimen of neo-adjuvant carboplatin and vinorelbine followed by chemoradiotherapy is feasible and active in older (> or =70 years) or low PS (Karnofsky 70-80) patients, although toxicity is not negligible and long-term outcome remains poor.

Adjuvant treatment for elderly patients with colon cancer. An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant 5-fluoruracil-based chemotherapy significantly reduces mortality in patients with stage II-III colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. In this study we were interested in the pattern of adjuvant treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to December 2004, 63 questionnaires on the management of stage II-III resected colon cancer patients aged over 70 years, collected from 10 Italian Centres, were retrospectively examined. Determinants of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to survival were considered. RESULTS: The proportion of elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was 79.4%, distinct of age, gender, educational level and comorbidities. Grade 3-4 toxicities were the following: haematological in 4 (8.5.%) patients, mucositis in 4 (8.5%), diarrhoea in 2 (4.2%) and nausea in 1 (2.1%). The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at two years were 79.9% and 95.6%, respectively. Due to the paucity of events, the impact of prognostic factors (patient's age and comorbidity, tumour stage and grade) on DFS and OS could not be assessed. CONCLUSION: An increasing proportion of elderly patients with colon cancer may be treated with a tolerability and OS similar to those observed in the younger population. Development of age-based guidelines and increased awareness of both physicians and patients through education is important to prevent undertreatment of those elderly patients who are eligible for chemotherapy.

Palliative treatment for elderly patients with colon cancer in ten Italian medical oncology units.

BACKGROUND: Palliative chemotherapy significantly reduces mortality in patients with stage IV colon cancer, but is less prescribed with rising age. In this paper, we highlight the pattern of palliative treatment and possible effects on survival among elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January to December 2004, 78 files on the management of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients over 70 years, collected from 10 Italian Centres, were retrospectively examined. Determinants of receipt of palliative chemotherapy and their relation to toxicity and survival were considered. RESULTS: The proportion of elderly patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy was 98.7% and it was evaluated according to age, gender, educational level and comorbidities; patients receiving second-line therapy comprised 47.4%, those receiving third-line therapy 14.1% and those treated with a fourth-line therapy totalled 2.6%. Forty-one percent of patients received best supportive care (BSC) alone. CONCLUSION: In Italy, a proportion of elderly patients with metastatic chemonaive CRC are usually treated with a tolerability and overall survival similar to those for the younger population. Among progressive patients after second-line therapy, 45.8% usually undergo third line therapy; the remaining 54.2% undergo BSC.

Glutathione S-transferase P1 Ile105Val polymorphism is associated with haematological toxicity in elderly rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that common gene polymorphisms may influence the toxicity of various cytotoxic agents used in the treatment of cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of acute toxicity of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677T polymorphism, glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) substitution of isoleucine with valine at codon 105 (Ile105Val) polymorphism and the tandem repeat polymorphism in the thymidylate synthase gene promoter in elderly patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHOD: From 1994 to 2002, 166 Caucasian patients underwent surgery following CRT for mid-low rectal cancer at a single institution, 42 (male-to-female ratio, 25 : 17) of whom were aged > or =65 years (median age 70 years, range 65-79). The pre-treatment clinical stage was tumour (T) stage 3-4 in 38 patients and node (N)-positive in 29 patients. Patients received external-beam radiotherapy with conventional fractionation and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Blood samples were used to extract and amplify DNA. Gene polymorphisms were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion. Acute toxicity to preoperative therapy was reported according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance and linear regression, respectively. RESULTS: Haematological toxicity (grade 1-2) was observed in 15 of 40 patients for whom toxicity data were available and gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 1-4) in 24 of these same 40 patients. At univariate analysis, female sex (p = 0.036) and GSTP1 Ile105Val (p = 0.0376) were associated with haematological toxicity. At multivariate analysis, GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism (p = 0.041) was the only factor found to be associated with haematological toxicity. Patients carrying the Val/Val genotype in the GSTP1 gene had a lower risk of haematological toxicity (odds ratio = 0.322, 95% CI 0.101, 0.957) than patients with the Ile/Ile genotype. CONCLUSION: GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism is a promising marker of potential haematological toxicity in elderly patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative CRT.

Colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients: when should be more useful?

Current guidelines endorse colon cancer screening every 5-10 years in persons over 50 years of age. However, there is no consensus regarding what age is appropriate to stop screening. Prior history of neoplasia seems to be a strong risk factor for colorectal neoplasia development in elderly people and should be considered when deciding the need for continuing screening/surveillance, however, clinical judgment of comorbidities is still required to individualize screening practice. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly persons (aged 80 years), i.e. should be performed only after careful consideration of potential benefits, risks and patient preferences. The aims of this paper are to: (1) determine the best type of colorectal cancer screening (faecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy) and its association with age and health status among elderly veterans and (2) describe the outcomes of colorectal cancer screening among older veterans who have widely differing life expectancies (based on age and health status).

Preoperative assessment of elderly cancer patients.

The incidence of most types of cancers is age-dependent and progressive ageing is rapidly increasing the number of elderly people who need treatment for cancer. It is an ethical dilemma how aggressive one should be when it comes to treating cancer in the older population. Presumed fear of increased postoperative morbidity and mortality often results in delivery of sub-optimal cancer surgery. A careful evaluation of the general and organ-related conditions of the patients is absolutely necessary for planning the right treatment. Nevertheless, preoperative removal of risk factors and postoperative rehabilitation are as important as the use of the best techniques of anaesthesia and surgery to achieve good postoperative outcomes in these patients. In this review article we take into consideration physiology of the aged and tools available to assess surgical risks in elderly patients, in the aim of increasing awareness on optimising surgical management of elderly patients with cancer. MEDLINE and EMBASE.com (search terms: "elderly", "preoperative", "surgery"), bibliographies of articles retrieved and the authors' reference files have been used as data sources. Independent extraction has been performed by the authors using predefined criteria, including study quality indicators.

Gemcitabine in advanced biliary tract cancers.

The annual incidence of hepatobiliary cancer has been steadily increasing in the USA from 15,000 in 1993 to 22,200 in 2000. Despite this increase, it still continues to be a rare neoplasm. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice, but a high percentage of patients are unsuitable for resection. These patients have a very poor prognosis because of the lack of efficacious therapy options. Thus, overall survival in these patients ranges from 3 to 12 months, depending on the extent of disease and its site of origin. For some time, mitomycin C, doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil have been considered among the most active chemotherapeutic agents, with a response rate ranging from 10 to 20%. More recently, gemcitabine has become the reference agent for these neoplasias because of the histologically common origin of biliary cancer and exocrine pancreatic cancer. However, its role has yet to be well-defined. Here we examine clinical trials designed for locally advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancer and review the existing data supporting palliative therapy with gemcitabine alone or in association with other drugs.

Quality of life in elderly cancer patients.

The incidence of most types of cancer is age-dependent and progressive ageing is rapidly increasing the number of elderly people who need treatment for cancer. Elderly patients (older than 70 years) present particular characteristics that make the choice of the correct treatment more difficult; for this reason, these patients are often undertreated and largely underrepresented in cancer trials making the experimental evidence on this topic even weaker. Only relatively recently has Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) begun to be considered as one of the hard end-points for clinical cancer research in the elderly. Treatment of elderly cancer patients represents a typical situation where its assessment is particularly useful because of the expected toxicity of treatment and several unresolved methodological problems (higher frequency of illiteracy, worse compliance with the questionnaires, concomitant diseases, use of instruments not validated in the aged population). The aim of this review is to underline the importance detected by the too small number of studies on elderly QoL evaluation and the need in future trials either to improve QoL assessment in this subcategory of patients undergoing treatment for cancer or not, or find specific assessment tools to do it.

Primary rectal carcinoma in patients with stage IV resectable disease at diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer is commonly diagnosed at a precocious stage, but for patients presenting at diagnosis with stage IV disease the best treatment is still undefined. The purpose of this study was to review the feasibility and outcome of multimodality treatment of rectal cancer patients metastatic at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2005, 40 patients with histologically proven stage IV rectal adenocarcinoma (< 12 cm from the anal verge) were examined. Variables considered were age (under or over 65 years), tumour grade, presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis, type of surgery (palliative versus resection). RESULTS: The median age was 61 years (range, 32-83) and 27 were male and 13 female. Seventeen patients with unresectable or potentially resectable metastatic disease received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CHT-RT) with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (plus oxaliplatin in 11 cases), radical surgery was performed in almost half of the cases; only in two patients were metastases also resected. If the patient is a candidate for radical surgical resection, the primary tumour should initially be treated as in a patient without metastatic disease and subsequently the primary tumour and metastases should be treated surgically. If the metastases are unresectable, the treatment of the primary lesion, according to the patient's symptoms, should be by palliative CHT. It is still not determined whether RT should be reserved for the symptomatic cases as an alternative to local surgery. In five patients treated with neoadjuvant CHT alone, radical local surgery was performed in two cases. Eighteen symptomatic patients were resected primarily; all of them received a postoperative CHT but only five of them also received postoperative RT. Nevertheless, after a multimodality treatment (neoadjuvant CHT +/- RT) 22.5% achieved a response rate (RR) (one complete remission (CR) and eight partial remission (PR)). Considering that all except two of the patients were locally radically resected and two of them also underwent metastases surgery, the overall RR was 17.5% (four CR and three PR). All of the CR were disease-free and alive after a median follow-up of 19.3 months. Age > or = 65 years had no impact on overall survival (OS), but the presence of peritoneal carcinosis in five patients showed a trend towards diminished survival, although it was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: The best treatment on diagnosis of metastatic rectal cancer is a multimodality CHT-RT approach. New prospective studies should evaluate non cross-resistant regimens as additional therapy for those patients with a systemic residual disease after common CHT-RT.

Colorectal cancer treatment in elderly patients: results of a retrospective analysis addressed to the chiefs of medical oncology units in Italy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the differences of 1-year treatment and chemotherapy related-toxicity in elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in different Italian medical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An open questionnaire on the management of CRC patients over 70 years of age, from January to December 2004, was sent to Italian centres. One hundred and seventy-five files from 10 centres were analysed. Variables considered were age, gender, educational level, comorbidities and modality of therapy administration. RESULTS: In only a minority of units were there some staff specifically dedicated to the older patients in close cooperation with geriatricians and the Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment (MGA) was not routinely used (11.2%-16.8% of cases). Only 5.7% patients were routinely enrolled in a protocol. In total, 95 out of 175 (54.3%) of CRC underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and 80 out of 175 (45.7%) received palliative chemotherapy. Of the patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, 75.6% immediately accepted postoperative treatment while 12.2% were initially dubious but subsequently agreed. Only 5.5 and 9.7% of these patients reported very bad or bad tolerability, respectively. At disease progression, 62.5% patients accepted chemotherapy instantly while 33.3% accepted subsequently. Only 1.3% cases reported very bad and 1.3% bad tolerability. CONCLUSION: In those units in which the problem of the elderly is actually recognised, CRC treatment is adequate, not influenced by age discrimination but inhomogeneous. In the future, standardizing treatment in different oncology units could prove to be beneficial to this population.

Determining therapeutic approaches in the elderly with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the toxicity and feasibility of pelvic radiotherapy (RT) and/or surgery in elderly patients with locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1999 to November 2005, 51 patients aged >or=70 years who underwent RT for locally advanced low-lying rectal cancer were retrospectively examined. Variables considered were age, co-morbidities (evaluated according to the Charlson score and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric [CIRS-G] score) and surgery versus no surgery. RESULTS: The median age was 80 years (range 70-94 years) and the male : female ratio was 33 : 18. A total of 5.9% of patients were considered 'fit', 72.5% had one or more CIRS-G grade 1 or 2 co-morbidities and 21.6% had one or more CIRS-G grade 3 co-morbidities. 54.9% of patients underwent surgery and 45.1% underwent RT. Only 9 of 21 (42.8%) patients who underwent radical resection received the full course of adjuvant RT and only seven (50%) of all patients treated with RT alone received the full dose of therapy. Patients with one or more CIRS-G grade 3 co-morbidities reported similar numbers of grade 1-2 toxicities as patients with one or more CIRS-G grade 2 co-morbidities. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the small number of patients analysed, the findings of this study indicate that elderly patients with rectal cancer and mild co-morbidities could probably receive the same treatment as fit elderly patients, given that tolerability appeared to be similar in both categories of patients. Neither age nor co-morbidities should be considered reasons to deny the patient the possible benefits of receiving complete treatment. Moreover, Multidimensional Geriatric Assessment should always be undertaken to help clinicians make better decisions about treatment. Further prospective trials are needed to confirm these results.

Oxaliplatin-related neurotoxicity: how and why?

In early clinical trials, oxaliplatin has demonstrated significant activity against colorectal cancer in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA), both in metastatic as in radically resected disease. The drug differs from the other two most important platinum compounds (cisplatin and carboplatin) for the absence of nephrotoxicity or for the reduced drug-induced ototoxicity. During its administration, two different types of neurological symptoms can be experienced: the first one occurs during or immediately after the end of the infusion and it appears as a transient peripheral sensory neuropathy manifesting as paresthesias and dysesthesia in the extremities sometimes accompanied by muscular contractions of the extremities or the jaw (triggered or enhanced by exposure to cold). The second one occurs after long-term administration of oxaliplatin presenting with deep sensory loss, sensory ataxia and functional impairment (similar to those observed with cisplatin). This type of neurotoxicity is usually late-onset and correlated with the cumulative-dose of oxaliplatin. The aim of this review is to analyse the mechanism underlying induction of neurotoxicity and the possible treatments to prevent and to treat it.

The development of platinum compounds and their possible combination.

Cisplatin plays a central role in cancer chemotherapy in spite of its toxicity. To circumvent this toxicity and to enhance its therapeutic index a lot of preclinical and clinical studies have been conducted and several thousand analogues have been synthesized. Much more analysis remains to be done, but nowadays, the absence of any definitive, biologically interpretable molecular predictor of activity is consistent with the idea that platinum compounds have multiple intracellular targets and that cells can have multiple mechanisms of resistance. This review analyses a part of these platinum compounds analyzed to date, their mechanism of action, resistance and the future trends in this sector.