Hospital Admissions Associated With Head and Neck Injuries From Olympic-style Sports and Activities Between 2010 and 2022.

The objective of this study was to evaluate which Olympic-style sports and activities are most likely to result in hospitalizations relating to head and neck injuries. This was a cross-sectional study using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) database. Subjects with head and neck injuries from selected Olympic-style sports and activities between 2010 and 2022 were included. Independent variables were demographics and injury characteristics (injury location and sport). The primary outcome variable was hospitalization (yes/no). Survey-weighted descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between demographic/injury variables and hospitalization. There were 175,995 subjects (national estimate, 5,922,584) meeting inclusion criteria. After adjusting for demographic and injury characteristics, head injuries (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.83-2.56; P<0.001) demonstrated higher odds of hospitalization compared with facial injuries. Injuries from cycling (OR = 2.52; 95% CI, 2.16-2.95; P<0.001), mountain biking (OR = 2.56; 95% CI, 1.80-3.65; P<0.001), and horseback riding (OR = 4.01; 95% CI, 2.76-5.83; P<0.001) demonstrated higher odds of hospitalization relative to baseball injuries. In conclusion, head and neck injuries associated with high velocity Olympic-style sports and activities such as cycling, mountain biking, and horseback riding had the highest odds of hospitalization.

Does Fee-for-Service Medicare Reimbursement Incentivize Volume Over Value Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons?

PURPOSE: National health care payment models have begun transitioning from fee-for-service to value-based reimbursement because of criticism of the former incentivizing quantity over quality. However, there has yet to be an evaluation of the influence of fee-for-service incentives among oral and maxillofacial surgery services. This study characterized service intensity among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) serving Medicare beneficiaries in 2017 to determine if higher Medicare income among OMSs arises from higher service intensity or a higher volume of patients treated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was composed of Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2017. Providers were included if their specialty type was listed as "maxillofacial surgery." The predictor variables included service intensity, defined as the number of health care services administered per Medicare beneficiary, and Medicare beneficiary volume. The primary outcome variable was Medicare income. Descriptive statistics and pair-wise comparisons were computed at an α level of .05. RESULTS: The analysis cohort was composed of 696 distinct OMSs. A total of 69,959 services were recorded for 53,245 Medicare beneficiaries, with a mean service intensity of 1.12 services per beneficiary. A statistically significant difference in service intensity was found between Medicare payment deciles (P = .002). The magnitude of this difference was less relative to the difference in all medical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: There is a statistically significant difference in service intensity between low and high earners in oral-maxillofacial surgery; however, the magnitude of the difference is unlikely to be clinically or economically meaningful. Variation in service intensity is lower in oral-maxillofacial surgery relative to all medical specialties in aggregate. Given the changing reimbursement landscape in medicine and surgery, it is important to evaluate existing billing practices within the specialty to advocate for the profession in discussions of payment reform and ensure that patients are receiving only necessary services.

Rural Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Case Mix Leads to Lower Medicare Reimbursement.

PURPOSE: A relative paucity of literature exists analyzing rural-urban differences in Medicare insurance claims by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs). The purpose of this study is to compare Medicare utilization, billing practices, and reimbursement rates between rural OMSs and their urban counterparts. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examines Medicare claims data from the 2017 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File. The primary predictor variable was the provider Rural-Urban Commuting Area Code (rural vs urban). The primary outcome variable was the total Medicare standardized payment amount per OMS. Additional variables include total number of services provided, total unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes submitted, total submitted charge amount for all services, mean beneficiary hierarchical condition category, and the total Medicare allowed/payment amount for all services. Descriptive statistics were calculated and continuous variables were compared using nonparametric Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: The analysis cohort had 921 OMSs who recorded 114,169 Part B services in 2017. Urban OMSs billed more services compared to rural OMSs, saw patients with a higher average hierarchical condition category score, and submitted more claims per beneficiary. The mean reimbursement-to-charge ratio was higher among rural OMSs, although the mean payment per service was higher among urban surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Rural OMSs bill fewer unique codes and treat less medically complex patients compared with their urban counterparts. Rural surgeons were reimbursed proportionally higher for their total submitted charges than urban surgeons; however, they were reimbursed less for each individual service provided. These differences may be attributable to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Multiple Procedure Payment Reduction policy and provider case mix.

Clinical Productivity and Medicare Payments Among Female and Male Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

PURPOSE: To characterize and compare clinical productivity and payments between female and male oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) serving Medicare beneficiaries in 2017. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study was composed of Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2017. Providers were included if they were labeled as maxillofacial surgeons. The primary outcome variable was Medicare payment. Secondary outcome variables included clinical productivity (number of charges), unique billing codes, mean payment per charge, and beneficiary hierarchical condition category. Descriptive statistics and pair-wise comparisons were computed at an α level of .05. RESULTS: The analysis cohort was composed of 737 distinct OMSs, of whom 58 were women. Although female surgeons recorded higher mean clinical productivity, total Medicare payments, and number of unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System billing codes relative to male surgeons in both the facility and office settings, the differences were not statistically different. Payment per charge did not differ significantly between genders in the office setting. In the facility setting, women were reimbursed $63.74 per charge whereas men were reimbursed $109.69 per charge (P < .02). Female OMSs treated more medically complex patients relative to male OMSs (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical productivity and total Medicare payments were similar between genders in both the facility and office settings, disputing prior surveys that illustrated bias about the productivity and ability of female OMSs. Female OMSs earned, on average, less per submitted charge in facility settings, which may be due to differences in documentation. The reason for this difference warrants further study.

Five-Year Comparative Analysis of Medicare Opioid Prescription Volume Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

PURPOSE: To examine the volume and variation in opioid prescribing practices among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) serving Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2017 and identify the practice-level features that correlate with the opioid prescription volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present cross-sectional study included Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data from 2013 to 2017. Providers were included if they were labelled as OMSs. The primary outcome variable was the opioid claim volume. The predictor variables included provider and beneficiary gender, beneficiary age, and beneficiary hierarchical condition category (HCC). The secondary outcome variables included mean opioid prescriptions per beneficiary and opioid days' supply per claim. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were computed at an α level of 0.05. RESULTS: The 5-year analysis cohort included 2071 distinct providers; 605,593 total opioid prescription claims were recorded for 516,217 Medicare beneficiaries, with an average supply of 3.54 days of opioids per patient. From 2013 to 2017, a significant increase had occurred in the number of mean opioid claims per provider (P < .001) and a significant decrease in both the mean opioid claims per beneficiary (P < .001) and the days' supply per opioid claim per beneficiary (P < .001). Male provider gender (P < .001), lower beneficiary age (P < .001), percentage of female beneficiaries seen by a provider (P < .001), and lower HCC risk score (P < .001) all correlated with an increased opioid claim volume. Finally, a significant difference was found in the opioid claim volume among OMSs between the states (P < .001) and between oral and maxillofacial surgery and other surgical subspecialties (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the total number of opioids prescribed by OMSs has increased over time, the prescribing practices have, on the aggregate, become more responsible. The extreme cases of opioid prescribing and variations in state-level opioid claim volumes warrant additional investigation.

WITHDRAWN: Health Policy Research May Ensure the Future of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.056. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Studies Of Prescription Digital Therapeutics Often Lack Rigor And Inclusivity.

Little is known about the evidence to support prescription digital therapeutics, which are digital tools that rely primarily on software for diagnosis or treatment that have indications for use regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and require a clinician's prescription. We conducted the first retrospective cross-sectional analysis of clinical studies of twenty prescription digital therapeutics authorized by the FDA and available on the market as of November 2022. Our analysis found that just two prescription digital therapeutics had been evaluated in at least one study that was randomized and blinded and that used other rigorous standards of evidence. Two-thirds of clinical studies of prescription digital therapeutics were conducted on a postmarket basis, with less rigorous standards of evidence than the standards used in premarket studies. More than half of studies did not report data on participants' race, and more than 80 percent did not report their ethnicity. More than one-third required English proficiency, and nearly half of nonpediatric studies had an upper age limit. These results suggest the need for a more rigorous and inclusive approach to clinical research supporting FDA-authorized prescription digital therapeutics. A stronger evidence base would increase confidence in these technologies' effectiveness and would enable more informed decision making about their clinical use and coverage.

Do rural oral and maxillofacial surgeons prescribe more postoperative opioids?

PURPOSE: This study assesses rural-urban differences in opioid prescription practices among oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) who treated Medicare beneficiaries in 2017. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examines the 2017 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Dataset. The primary predictor variable was provider Rural-Urban Commuting Area code (rural versus urban). The primary outcome variable was mean opioid claims per Medicare beneficiary. Additional outcomes include total opioid claims volume, average Medicare beneficiaries and opioid cost per provider, mean days' supply of opioids per opioid claim, and average percentage of Medicare Part D claims represented by opioid claims. Mann-Whitney U tests compared continuous variables. A least-squares regression identified correlates of opioid claims volume. RESULTS: Rural OMSs demonstrated a higher mean opioid claims per OMS and opioid cost per provider compared to urban surgeons. Urban OMSs prescribed a greater mean days' supply of opioids per opioid claim. A larger percentage of Medicare Part D claims were represented by opioid claims for rural OMSs compared to urban OMSs. There were no differences in mean opioid claims per Medicare beneficiary. Male provider gender, female Medicare beneficiary gender, total number of beneficiaries, and a higher hierarchical condition category score were correlated with increased opioid claims per Medicare beneficiary for urban providers only. CONCLUSION: Urban and rural OMSs prescribe a similar volume of opioids per Medicare beneficiary, with rural providers prescribing higher total volumes of opioids due to larger patient panels. This work indicates that rural and urban OMSs have similar opioid prescribing practices.

Assessment of Risk Factors for Suicide Among US Health Care Professionals.

Importance: Burnout among health care professionals has been increasingly associated with suicide risk. An examination of possible risk factors may help in the prevention of suicide among health care professionals. Objective: To assess suicide risk factors for 3 categories of health care professionals (surgeons, nonsurgeon physicians, and dentists) compared with non-health care professionals. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from the National Violent Death Reporting System were reviewed to identify all individuals who died by suicide in the United States between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016. Individuals were divided into health care professionals and non-health care professionals (general population), with the health care professionals further categorized into surgeons, nonsurgeon physicians, and dentists. The covariates of suicide decedents included demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, and marital status), medical history (mental illness, substance use, and physical health), and documented factors associated with the suicide death (job, intimate partner, financial, legal, and other problems). Data were analyzed from October 2 to December 17, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: In this analysis, the outcome variable was occupation, with health care professionals overall and by category compared with the general population. Multiple logistic regression analyses with backward stepwise selection were performed. Results: A total of 170 030 individuals who died by suicide between 2003 and 2016 were identified. Of those, 767 individuals (0.5%) were health care professionals (mean [SD] age, 59.6 [15.6] years; 675 men [88.0%]; 688 white [89.7%]), with the remainder of the sample (95.5%) comprising the general population (mean [SD] age, 46.8 [31.5] years; 77.7% men; 87.8% white). A total of 485 health care professionals (63.2%) were nonsurgeon physicians, 179 professionals (23.3%) were dentists, and 103 professionals (13.4%) were surgeons. Compared with the general population, risk factors for suicide among health care professionals included having Asian or Pacific Islander ancestry (odds ratio [OR], 2.80; 95% CI, 1.96-3.99; P < .001), job problems (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.49-2.17; P < .001), civil legal problems (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.15-2.26; P = .006), and physical health problems (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19-1.64; P < .001) and currently receiving treatment for mental illness (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.24-1.69; P < .001). Compared with the general population, health care professionals had a lower risk of suicide if they had black ancestry (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.84; P < .001) or were female (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35-0.55; P < .001) or unmarried (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.31-0.42; P < .001). Health care professionals who died by suicide were also less likely to have problems with intimate partners (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.86; P < .001) or alcohol use (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.73; P < .001) compared with the general population. Surgeons had a higher risk of suicide compared with the general population if they were older, male, married, had Asian or Pacific Islander ancestry, were currently receiving treatment for mental illness, or had problems with their job or alcohol use. Compared with their nonsurgeon physician colleagues, surgeons had a higher risk of suicide if they were male, older, married, or currently receiving treatment for mental illness. Conclusions and Relevance: This study highlights risk factors for suicide among health care professionals, with additional analyses of surgeon-specific risk factors. The results may be useful in improving the detection of burnout and the development of suicide prevention interventions among health care professionals.