Hospitalization for peptic ulcer and bleeding in users of selective COX-2 inhibitors and nonselective NSAIDs with special reference to celecoxib.

PURPOSE: To assess the relative incidence of peptic ulcer bleeding and perforation (PUBP) in users of selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study based on insurance claims, with chart review to confirm cases. The base population consisted of 2.2 million adult users of celecoxib, diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, rofecoxib, or valdecoxib who were covered by commercial health insurance in the United States from 1999-2003. For 790 persons hospitalized for PUBP and 7887 controls, most recent NSAID/COX-2 use and a variety of medical and pharmacy risk factors were ascertained from the insurance files and analyzed by conditional logistic regression. The main outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) associated with use of each drug by comparison to naproxen, and in successive intervals after last dispensing. RESULTS: Hospitalization for PUBP was highest from the date of NSAID/COX-2 dispensing through the end of an exposure period that corresponded to the days supply; the rate dropped steadily thereafter. The covariate-adjusted ORs by comparison to naproxen were: ibuprofen 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68, 1.09), rofecoxib 0.79 (0.62, 1.02), diclofenac 0.66 (0.47, 0.94), valdecoxib 0.50 (0.26, 0.97), and celecoxib 0.45 (0.35, 0.58). The nonselective NSAIDs had an OR for PUBP of 1.51 (1.26, 1.98) compared to the selective COX-2 inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Nonselective NSAIDs convey half again as much risk of hospitalization for PUBP as do COX-2 inhibitors. Celecoxib users had about half the hospitalization rate of users of naproxen.

Asthma drug use and the development of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS).

PURPOSE: Case reports suggest that leukotriene modifier use may be associated with the onset of Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS). Using pooled data from two nested case-control studies, we examined the association between asthma drug use and the development of CSS. METHODS: The study was performed in three US managed care organizations and a US national health plan with chart access and complete electronic pharmacy data, with a covered population of 13.9 million. There were 47 cases of possible or definite CSS and 4700 asthma drug user controls identified between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2002. We examined exposure to asthma drugs in cases and controls, including leukotriene modifiers (6 cases and 202 controls), in the two to 6 months prior to the onset of adjudicated CSS. RESULTS: While the crude association between use of leukotriene modifiers and CSS was strong (odds ratio (OR) 4.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-10.60), in a multivariable analysis controlling for use of oral corticosteroids, inhaled corticosteroids, and number of categories of asthma drugs dispensed, there was no significant association (OR 1.32, 95% CI: 0.44-3.96). Use of inhaled and oral corticosteroids, evaluated as markers of asthma severity, were associated with CSS (OR 3.07, 95% CI: 1.34-7.03 and OR 5.36, 95% CI: 2.51-11.45, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: No association was found between CSS and leukotriene modifiers after controlling for asthma drug use However, it is not possible to rule out modest associations with asthma treatments given CSS is so rare and so highly correlated with asthma severity, suggesting further investigation is warranted.