SYSTEMATIC CORRELATION OF CENTRAL SUBFIELD THICKNESS WITH RETINAL FLUID VOLUMES QUANTIFIED BY DEEP LEARNING IN THE MAJOR EXUDATIVE MACULAR DISEASES.

PURPOSE: To investigate the correlation of volumetric measurements of intraretinal (IRF) and subretinal fluid obtained by deep learning and central retinal subfield thickness (CSFT) based on optical coherence tomography in retinal vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema, and neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: A previously validated deep learning-based approach was used for automated segmentation of IRF and subretinal fluid in spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. Optical coherence tomography volumes of 2.433 patients obtained from multicenter studies were analyzed. Fluid volumes were measured at baseline and under antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy in the central 1, 3, and 6 mm. RESULTS: Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration generally demonstrated the weakest association between CSFT and fluid volume measurements in the central 1 mm (0.107-0.569). In patients with diabetic macular edema, IRF correlated moderately with CSFT (0.668-0.797). In patients with retinal vein occlusion, IRF volumes showed a moderate correlation with CSFT (0.603-0.704). CONCLUSION: The correlation of CSFT and fluid volumes depends on the underlying pathology. Although the amount of central IRF seems to partly drive CSFT in diabetic macular edema and retinal vein occlusion, it has only a limited impact on patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Our findings do not support the use of CSFT as a primary or secondary outcome measure for the quantification of exudative activity or treatment guidance.

Combining stimulus types for improved coverage in population receptive field mapping.

Retinotopy experiments using population receptive field (pRF) mapping are ideal for assigning regions in the visual field to cortical brain areas. While various designs for visual stimulation were suggested in the literature, all have specific shortcomings regarding visual field coverage. Here we acquired high-resolution 7 Tesla fMRI data to compare pRF-based coverage maps obtained with the two most commonly used stimulus variants: moving bars; rotating wedges and expanding rings. We find that stimulus selection biases the spatial distribution of pRF centres. In addition, eccentricity values and pRF sizes obtained from wedge/ring or bar stimulation runs show systematic differences. Wedge/ring stimulation results show lower eccentricity values and strongly reduced pRF sizes compared to bar stimulation runs. Statistical comparison shows significantly higher pRF centre numbers in the foveal 2° region of the visual field for wedge/ring compared to bar stimuli. We suggest and evaluate approaches for combining pRF data from different visual stimulus patterns to obtain improved mapping results.

Severity Stratification of Coronary Artery Disease Using Novel Inner Ellipse-Based Foveal Avascular Zone Biomarkers.

Purpose: Given the similarities between the retinal and coronary microvasculature, the retina holds promising potential to serve as a non-invasive screening tool for coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to develop novel inner ellipse-based metrics and discern whether foveal avascular zone (FAZ) alterations can serve as indicators for CAD presence and severity. Methods: Patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology who underwent coronary angiography were included. This resulted in an inclusion of 212 patients, of which 73 had no CAD. During the same visit, 6 × 6-mm (nominal size) fovea-centered optical coherence tomography angiography images of both eyes were acquired. The Gensini score (GS) was utilized to quantify CAD severity. Six known FAZ shape metrics were assessed and three novel biomarkers based on the inner ellipse were defined: absolute inner ellipse difference, Hausdorff distance, and Chamfer distance. Results: Eight out of nine metrics showed significant associations with the GS in the left eye. However, significant differences across three CAD severity groups were only demonstrated by the novel metrics. Utilizing the Chamfer distance, age, and sex, patients with and without CAD could be distinguished with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.95). Moreover, three CAD severity groups could be discerned with a macro average AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84). Conclusions: A comprehensive assessment of FAZ shape descriptors was performed, and a strong association with CAD was found. The inner ellipse-based biomarkers especially demonstrated high predictive abilities for CAD presence and severity.

Retinotopic cortical mapping in objective functional monitoring of macular therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine the suitability of functional MRI (fMRI) as an objective measure of macular function following therapeutic intervention; conventional psychophysical measures rely heavily on patient compliance. METHODS: Twenty patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) were studied with high-resolution fMRI, visual acuity, reading accuracy and speed, contrast sensitivity (CS) and microperimetry (MP) before and after 3 monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab. Population-receptive field retinotopic maps calculated from fMRI data were compared with psychophysical measures and optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) responders (≥5 letters) showed an increase of 29.5% in activated brain area, while non-responders showed a decrease of 0.8%. Radial histograms over eccentricity allowed quantification of the absolute number of significant voxels and thus differences before and after treatment. Responders showed increases in foveal (α<0.5°) activation, while non-responders did not. Absence of intraretinal fluid and preservation of outer retinal layers was associated with higher numbers of active V1 voxels and better BCVA. Higher voxel numbers were associated with improved reading performance and, less marked, with BCVA, CS and MP. CONCLUSION: The data show that retinotopic mapping using fMRI can successfully be applied objectively to evaluate the therapeutic response in nAMD patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. This demonstrates the ability of retinotopic mapping to provide an objective assessment of functional recovery at a cortical level; the technique can therefore be applied, in other degenerative macular diseases, to the assessment of potential therapeutic interventions such as gene therapy or cell replacement therapy.

Performance of retinal fluid monitoring in OCT imaging by automated deep learning versus human expert grading in neovascular AMD.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of automated fluid detection in identifying retinal fluid activity in OCT scans of patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration by correlating human expert and automated measurements with central retinal subfield thickness (CSFT) and fluid volume values. METHODS: We utilized an automated deep learning approach to quantify macular fluid in SD-OCT volumes (Cirrus, Spectralis, Topcon) from patients of HAWK and HARRIER Studies. Three-dimensional volumes for IRF and SRF were measured at baseline and under therapy in the central millimeter and compared to fluid gradings, CSFT and foveal centerpoint thickness (CPT) values measured by the Vienna Reading Center. RESULTS: 41.906 SD-OCT volume scans were included into the analysis. Concordance between human expert grading and automated algorithm performance reached AUC values of 0.93/0.85 for IRF and 0.87 for SRF in HARRIER/HAWK in the central millimeter. IRF volumes showed a moderate correlation with CSFT at baseline (HAWK: r = 0.54; HARRIER: r = 0.62) and weaker correlation under therapy (HAWK: r = 0.44; HARRIER: r = 0.34). SRF and CSFT correlations were low at baseline (HAWK: r = 0.29; HARRIER: r = 0.22) and under therapy (HAWK: r = 0.38; HARRIER: r = 0.45). The residual standard error (IRF: 75.90 µm; SRF: 95.26 µm) and marginal residual standard deviations (IRF: 46.35 µm; SRF: 44.19 µm) of fluid volume were high compared to the range of CSFT values. CONCLUSION: Deep learning-based segmentation of retinal fluid performs reliably on OCT images. CSFT values are weak indicators for fluid activity in nAMD. Automated quantification of fluid types, highlight the potential of deep learning-based approaches to objectively monitor anti-VEGF therapy.

Macular Microvascular Perfusion Status in Hypertensive Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

To compare retinal microvascular perfusion between the eyes of hypertensive patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD), the vessel density (VD) and fractal dimension (FD) of the superficial (SVP) and deep retinal vascular plexus (DVP) were analyzed on 6 × 6 mm fovea-centered optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of patients with hypertension. The retina was divided into an inner ring (IR) and outer ring (OR) according to the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grid. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was determined and CKD was diagnosed (GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Ninety-six eyes from 52 patients with hypertension were included in this analysis. Twenty patients (n = 37 eyes) were diagnosed with CKD. The mean age was 69 ± 11.7 years and 60.4 ± 9.2 years in the CKD group and in the control group, respectively. The univariate model revealed a significant difference in VD between patients without and with CKD in the superficial IR (0.36 ± 0.03 vs. 0.34 ± 0.04, p = 0.03), the superficial OR (0.35 ± 0.02 vs. 0.33 ± 0.04, p = 0.02), the deep OR (0.24 ± 0.01 vs. 0.23 ± 0.02, p = 0.003), and the FD in the SVP (1.87 ± 0.01 vs. 1.86 ± 0.02, p = 0.02) and DVP (1.83 ± 0.01 vs. 1.82 ± 0.01, p = 0.006). After adjusting for age and sex, these differences did not remain statistically significant. Similar results were observed for the FD in the SVP and DVP. In our cohort, patients with hypertension and CKD did not differ from patients without CKD in regard to microvascular perfusion status in the macular area as assessed using OCTA.

Comparison of Stimulus Types for Retinotopic Cortical Mapping of Macular Disease.

Purpose: Retinotopic maps acquired using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide a valuable adjunct in the assessment of macular function at the level of the visual cortex. The present study quantitatively assessed the performance of different visual stimulation approaches for mapping visual field coverage. Methods: Twelve patients with geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were examined using high-resolution ultra-high field fMRI (Siemens Magnetom 7T) and microperimetry (MP; Nidek MP-3). The population receptive field (pRF)-based coverage maps obtained with two different stimulus techniques (moving bars, and rotating wedges and expanding rings) were compared with the results of MP. Correspondence between MP and pRF mapping was quantified by calculating the simple matching coefficient (SMC). Results: Stimulus choice is shown to bias the spatial distribution of pRF centers and eccentricity values with pRF sizes obtained from wedge/ring or bar stimulation showing systematic differences. Wedge/ring stimulation results show a higher number of pRF centers in foveal areas and strongly reduced pRF sizes compared to bar stimulation runs. A statistical comparison shows significantly higher pRF center numbers in the foveal 2.5 degrees region of the visual field for wedge/ring compared to bar stimuli. However, these differences do not significantly influence SMC values when compared to MP (bar <2.5 degrees: 0.88 ± 0.13; bar >2.5 degrees: 0.88 ± 0.11; wedge/ring <2.5 degrees: 0.89 ± 0.12 wedge/ring; >2.5 degrees: 0.86 ± 0.10) for the peripheral visual field. Conclusions: Both visual stimulation designs examined can be applied successfully in patients with GA. Although the two designs show systematic differences in the distribution of pRF center locations, this variability has minimal impact on the SMC when compared to the MP outcome.

Intrasession and Intersession Reproducibility of Artificial Scotoma pRF Mapping Results at Ultra-High Fields.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) combined with population receptive field (pRF) mapping allows for associating positions on the visual cortex to areas on the visual field. Apart from applications in healthy subjects, this method can also be used to examine dysfunctions in patients suffering from partial visual field losses. While such objective measurement of visual deficits (scotoma) is of great importance for, e.g., longitudinal studies addressing treatment effects, it requires a thorough assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of the results obtained. In this study, we quantified the reproducibility of pRF mapping results within and across sessions in case of central visual field loss in a group of 15 human subjects. We simulated scotoma by masking a central area of 2° radius from stimulation to establish ground-truth conditions. This study was performed on a 7T ultra-high field MRI scanner for increased sensitivity. We found excellent intrasession and intersession reproducibility for the pRF center position (Spearman correlation coefficients for x, y: >0.95; eccentricity: >0.87; polar angle: >0.98), but only modest reproducibility for pRF size (Spearman correlation coefficients around 0.4). We further examined the scotoma detection performance using an automated method based on a reference dataset acquired with full-field stimulation. For the 2° artificial scotoma, the group-averaged scotoma sizes were estimated at between 1.92° and 2.19° for different sessions. We conclude that pRF mapping of visual field losses yields robust, reproducible measures of retinal function and suggest the use of pRF mapping as an objective method for monitoring visual deficits during therapeutic interventions or disease progression.