Molecular and cellular architecture of the larval sensory organ in the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis.

Cnidarians are the only non-bilaterian group to evolve ciliated larvae with an apical sensory organ, which is possibly homologous to the apical organs of bilaterian primary larvae. Here, we generated transcriptomes of the apical tissue in the sea anemone Nematostella vectensis and showed that it has a unique neuronal signature. By integrating previously published larval single-cell data with our apical transcriptomes, we discovered that the apical domain comprises a minimum of six distinct cell types. We show that the apical organ is compartmentalised into apical tuft cells (spot) and larval-specific neurons (ring). Finally, we identify ISX-like (NVE14554), a PRD class homeobox gene specifically expressed in apical tuft cells, as an FGF signalling-dependent transcription factor responsible for the formation of the apical tuft domain via repression of the neural ring fate in apical cells. With this study, we contribute a comparison of the molecular anatomy of apical organs, which must be carried out across phyla to determine whether this crucial larval structure evolved once or multiple times.

Effectiveness of eDNA for monitoring riverine macroinvertebrates.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is a technique increasingly used for monitoring organisms in the natural environment including riverine macroinvertebrates. However, the effectiveness of eDNA for monitoring riverine macroinvertebrates compared with the more traditional method of sampling the organisms directly and identifying them via morphological analysis, has not been well established. Furthermore, the ability of the various gene markers and PCR primer sets to detect the full range of riverine invertebrate taxa has not been quantified. Here we conducted a meta-analysis of the available literature, to assess the effectiveness of eDNA sampling for detecting riverine macroinvertebrates compared with sampling for the organisms directly and applying morphological analysis. We found, on average, eDNA sampling, irrespective of the gene marker used, detected fewer riverine invertebrates than morphological sampling. The most effective PCR primer set for identifying taxa was mlCOIintF/jgHCO2198, (mlCOIintF- forward primer, jgHCO2198, - reverse primer). Regardless of the gene marker or primer sets used, however, many taxa were not detected by eDNA metabarcoding that were detected by sampling directly for these invertebrates, including over 100 members of Arthropoda. eDNA sampling failed to detect any species belonging to Nematoda, Platyhelminthes, Cnidaria or Nematomorpha and these markers applied for eDNA sampling in terrestrial systems also do not detect members of Nematoda. In addition to these issues, uncertainties relating to false positives from upstream DNA sources, the stability of DNA from different species, differences in the propensity for DNA release into the environment for different organisms, and lack of available sequence information for numerous taxa illustrates the use of eDNA is not yet applicable as a robust stand-alone method for the monitoring of riverine invertebrates. As a primary consideration, further methodological developments are needed to ensure eDNA captures some of the key freshwater taxa, notably taxa belonging to the phyla Arthropoda, Nematoda, Platyhelminthes, Cnidaria and Nematomorpha.