First-in-human study of alpibectir (BVL-GSK098), a novel potent anti-TB drug.

BACKGROUND: The clinical candidate alpibectir augments the activity of, and overcomes resistance to, the anti-TB drug ethionamide in vitro and in vivo. OBJECTIVES: A Phase 1, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and food effect of alpibectir administered as single and multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers (NCT04654143). METHODS: Eighty participants were randomized. In single ascending dose (SAD), a total of six dose levels of alpibectir (0.5 to 40 mg) were tested under fasted and fed (10 mg) conditions as single daily doses in sequential cohorts. In multiple ascending dose (MAD), repeat doses (5 to 30 mg) were administered once daily for 7 days in three sequential cohorts. RESULTS: No serious adverse event was reported. Thirteen participants across groups experienced a total of 13 mild or moderate treatment-emergent adverse events. Alpibectir showed rapid absorption after single dose (mean Tmax range of 0.88 to 1.53 h). Food affected the PK of alpibectir, characterized by a slower absorption (mean Tmax 3.87 h), a lower Cmax (-17.7%) and increased AUC0-t (+19.6%) compared with the fasted condition. Following repeat dosing, dose proportionality was shown for both Cmax and AUC0-tau. Accumulation of alpibectir was observed across all doses, with a more profound effect on AUC during a dosing interval (AUC0-tau) compared with Cmax (1.8- and 1.3-fold on average), respectively. Steady state was considered to have been achieved by Day 7 of dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Alpibectir was generally well tolerated, and no clinically relevant safety findings were identified in the participants treated during SAD or MAD. The PK is dose-proportional and affected by food.

Translation of Inhaled Drug Optimization Strategies into Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Using GSK2292767A, a Novel Inhaled Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase δ Inhibitor.

This study describes the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmaco-dynamic (PD) profile of N-(5-(4-(5-(((2R,6S)-2,6-dimethylmorpholino)methyl)oxazol-2-yl)-1H-indazol-6-yl)-2-methoxypyridin-3-yl)methanesulfonamide (GSK2292767A), a novel low-solubility inhaled phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta (PI3Kδ) inhibitor developed as an alternative to 2-(6-(1H-indol-4-yl)-1H-indazol-4-yl)-5-((4-isopropylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)oxazole (nemiralisib), which is a highly soluble inhaled inhibitor of PI3Kδ with a lung profile consistent with once-daily dosing. GSK2292767A has a similar in vitro cellular profile to nemiralisib and reduces eosinophilia in a murine PD model by 63% (n = 5, P < 0.05). To explore whether a low-soluble compound results in effective PI3Kδ inhibition in humans, a first time in human study was conducted with GSK2292767A in healthy volunteers who smoke. GSK2292767A was generally well tolerated, with headache being the most common reported adverse event. PD changes in induced sputum were measured in combination with drug concentrations in plasma from single (0.05-2 mg, n = 37), and 14-day repeat (2 mg, n = 12) doses of GSK2292767A. Trough bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) for PK was taken after 14 days of repeat dosing. GSK2292767A displayed a linear increase in plasma exposure with dose, with marginal accumulation after 14 days. Induced sputum showed a 27% (90% confidence interval 15%, 37%) reduction in phosphatidylinositol-trisphosphate (the product of phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation) 3 hours after a single dose. Reduction was not maintained 24 hours after single or repeat dosing. BAL analysis confirmed the presence of GSK2292767A in lung at 24 hours, consistent with the preclinical lung retention profile. Despite good lung retention, target engagement was only present at 3 hours. This exposure-response disconnect is an important observation for future inhaled drug design strategies considering low solubility to drive lung retention.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single ascending subcutaneous dose of GSK3772847 in healthy participants.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of GSK3772847, compared with placebo administered subcutaneously (SC) in healthy participants, including cohorts of Japanese and Chinese participants. This was a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single ascending dose study. Following a screening period of up to 28 days, eligible participants were assigned to one of four cohorts receiving a single dose of GSK3772847 70 mg (cohort 1) or 140 mg (cohorts 2, 3, and 4) or placebo SC. In cohorts 1 and 2, participants were randomly assigned to one of three injection sites (upper arm, abdomen, or thigh), while cohorts 3 and 4 included Japanese and Chinese participants, respectively, assigned to receive GSK3772847 or placebo SC (upper arm). Participants attended follow-up visits on Days 9, 15, 29, 43, 57, 71, and 85 before final analysis. GSK3772847 was generally well tolerated. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild, resolved without treatment and were considered not related to study treatment by the investigator. There were no serious AEs or deaths during the study. The PK and PD were dose dependent, with negligible differences across injection sites or ethnicities. Target engagement was demonstrated by reduced free soluble interleukin 33 (sIL-33) concentrations and substantially increased total sIL-33 concentrations compared with baseline. Subcutaneously administered GSK3772847 was well tolerated in healthy participants, including cohorts of Japanese and Chinese participants, and shows consistent PK and PD across injection sites and ethnicities.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol via a Single Inhaler in Patients with COPD.

A population pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted from a subset of samples obtained from the Lung Function and Quality of Life Assessment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with Closed Triple Therapy trial to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol in patients with symptomatic COPD following treatment with fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol combined in a single inhaler. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study comparing 24 weeks of once-daily triple therapy (fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol, 100 µg/62.5 µg/25 µg; Ellipta inhaler) with twice-daily dual therapy (budesonide/formoterol 400 µg/12 µg; Turbuhaler). The analyses were conducted in a subset of 74 patients who received fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol and provided serial or sparse samples. Monte Carlo simulations and a model-based estimation approach both indicated that systemic drug concentrations of fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol after administration of fluticason furoate-umeclidinium-vilanterol triple combination therapy from a single inhaler were within the ranges observed following administration of these drugs as monotherapy (fluticasone furoate, umeclidinium, and vilanterol) or as dual-combination therapy (fluticasone furoate/vilanterol or umeclidinium/vilanterol).