Associations of thoracic cage size and configuration with outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To analyse the association of thoracic cage size and configuration with outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). METHODS: A single-centred retrospective study was conducted. Adult patients experiencing IHCA during 2006-2015 were screened. By analysing computed tomography images, we measured thoracic anterior-posterior and transverse diameters, circumference, and both anterior and posterior subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) depths at the level of the internipple line (INL). We also recorded the anatomical structure located immediately posterior to the sternum at the INL. RESULTS: A total of 649 patients were included. The median thoracic circumference was 88.6 cm. The median anterior and posterior thoracic SAT depths were 0.9 and 1.5 cm, respectively. The ascending aorta was found to be the most common retrosternal structure (57.6%) at the INL. Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that anterior thoracic SAT depth of 0.8-1.6 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.40-6.35; p-value = 0.005) and thoracic circumference of 83.9-95.0 cm (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.16-5.29; p-value = 0.02) were positively associated with a favourable neurological outcome while left ventricular outflow track or aortic root beneath sternum at the level of INL was inversely associated with a favourable neurological outcome (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.91; p-value = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Thoracic circumference and anatomic configuration might be associated with IHCA outcomes. This proof-of-concept study suggested that a one-size-fits-all resuscitation technique might not be suitable. Further investigation is needed to investigate the method of providing personalized resuscitation tailored to patient needs.

Barriers to bystanders defibrillation: A national survey on public awareness and willingness of bystanders defibrillation☆.

BACKGROUND: After years of setting up public automated external defibrillators (AEDs), the rate of bystander AED use remains low all over the world. This study aimed to assess the public awareness and willingness of bystanders to use AEDs and to investigate the awareness on the Good Samaritan Law (GSL) and the factors associated with the low rate of bystander AED use. METHODS: Using stratified random sampling, national telephone interviews were conducted using an author-designed structured questionnaire. The results were weighted to match the census data in Taiwan. The factors associated with public awareness and willingness of bystanders to use AEDs were analysed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1073 respondents, only 15.2% had the confidence to recognise public AEDs, and 5.3% of them had the confidence to use the AED. Concerns on immature technique and legal issues remain the most common barriers to AED use by bystanders. Moreover, only 30.8% thought that the public should use AEDs at the scene. Few respondents (9.6%) ever heard of the GSL in Taiwan, and less than 3% understood the meaning of GSL. Positive awareness on AEDs was associated with high willingness of bystanders to use AEDs. Respondents who were less likely to use AEDs as bystanders were healthcare personnel and women. CONCLUSION: The importance of active awareness and the barriers to the use of AEDs among bystanders seemed to have been underestimated in the past years. The relatively low willingness to use AEDs among bystander healthcare providers and women needs further investigation.

Public knowledge, attitudes and willingness regarding bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A nationwide survey in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: A low bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) rate is one of the factors associated with low cardiac arrest survival. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and willingness towards performing CPR and the barriers for implementation of bystander-initiated CPR. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted using an author-designed and validated structured questionnaire in Taiwan. After obtaining a stratified random sample from the census, the results were weighted to match population data. The factors affecting bystander-initiated CPR were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 1073 respondents, half of them stated that they knew how to perform CPR correctly, although 86.7% indicated a willingness to perform CPR on strangers. The barriers to CPR performance reported by the respondents included fear of legal consequences (44%) and concern about harming patients (36.5%). Most participants expressed a willingness to attend only an hour-long CPR course. Respondents who were less likely to indicate a willingness to perform CPR were female, healthcare providers, those who had no cohabiting family members older than 65 years, those who had a history of a stroke, and those who expressed a negative attitude toward CPR. CONCLUSION: The expressed willingness to perform bystander CPR was high if the respondents possessed the required skills. Attempts should be made to recruit potential bystanders for CPR courses or education, targeting those respondent subgroups less likely to express willingness to perform CPR. The reason for lower bystander CPR willingness among healthcare providers deserves further investigation.

A simplified scoring model for predicting bacteremia in the unscheduled emergency department revisits: The SADFUL score.

BACKGROUND: Bacteremia is a severe complication of infectious disease. Patients with a high bacteremia risk in the emergency department (ED) but misidentified would lead to the unscheduled revisits. This study aimed to develop a simplified scoring model to predict bacteremia in patients with unscheduled ED revisits. METHODS: Adult patients with unscheduled ED revisits within 72 h with a final diagnosis of infectious disease were retrospectively included. The development cohort included patients visiting the ED from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. Internal validation was performed in patients visiting the ED from January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2022. Variables including demographics, pre-comorbidities, triage levels, vital signs, chief complaints, and laboratory data in the index visit were analyzed. Bacteremia was the primary outcome determined by blood culture in either index visits or revisits. RESULTS: The SADFUL score for predicting bacteremia comprised the following predictors: "S"egmented neutrophil percentage (+3 points), "A"ge > 55 years (+1 point), "D"iabetes mellitus (+1 point), "F"ever (+2 points), "U"pper respiratory tract symptoms (-2 points), and "L"eukopenia (2 points). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence interval in the development (1802 patients, 190 [11%] with bacteremia) and the validation cohort (134 patients, 17 [13%] with bacteremia) were 0.78 (0.74-0.81) and 0.79 (0.71-0.88), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SADFUL score is a simplified useful tool for predicting bacteremia in patients with unscheduled ED revisits. The scoring model could help ED physicians decrease misidentification of patients at a high risk for bacteremia and potential complications.