Health Disparities in Nontraumatic Lower Extremity Amputations. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases and their associated health outcomes have been known to disproportionately affect people of low socioeconomic status (SES) around the world. The authors aim to examine the association between SES and nontraumatic lower extremity amputation. METHODS: A search of current literature was performed in March 2022 across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Medline for relevant literature. Keywords included "socioeconomics", "income", "amputation", and "lower extremities". RESULTS: A total of 1,164,630 patients across 5 studies were incorporated into the meta-analysis of nontraumatic lower extremity amputation and SES. An additional 3 citations were used in the secondary analyses between gender and ethnicity and their relationship with amputation. An association was observed between low SES and nontraumatic lower extremity amputations, odds ratio (OR) = 1.168, (confidence interval [CI]: 1.153, 1.183) P ≤ 0.05. Gender and race subanalyses were also conducted, with associations found with men and non-Caucasians with amputation: OR = 1.044; [CI: 1.036, 1.053] P ≤ 0.05; race OR = 2.893; [CI: 2.866, 2.920] P ≤ 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: SES along with gender and race are associated with nontraumatic lower extremity amputation. These findings add additional perspectives for which populations are disproportionately affected by disease and subsequent health outcomes. The authors anticipate the results presented may further assist in future public health screening methods and interventions. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 2.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Total Ankle Arthroplasty or Ankle Arthrodesis for Treatment of Osteoarthritis in Patients With Diabetes.

Background: End-stage ankle osteoarthritis often requires one of 2 major surgical procedures: total ankle arthroplasty or ankle arthrodesis. Although the gold standard has been arthrodesis, patients with diabetes represent a unique cohort that requires additional considerations because of their decreased mobility and risk factors for cardiovascular complications. The purpose of this study is to review odds of major and minor adverse events for patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes in both total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. Methods: A total of 14 articles published between 2010 and 2020 were included in this review. Databases included PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE/Embase, and Cochrane Library. Key words included ankle arthroplasty, total ankle arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis, and diabetes. Results: The total number of procedures was 26 287, comprising 13 830 arthroplasty and 12 457 arthrodesis procedures. There was a significant association between patients with diabetes treated with arthrodesis and major adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 1.880, 95% CI 1.279, 2.762), whereas no significant association was observed between patients with diabetes treated with arthroplasty and major adverse events (OR 1.106, 95% CI 0.871, 1.404). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests patients with diabetes to be at significantly higher risk for major and minor adverse events after undergoing ankle arthrodesis. However, it suggests no significant differences in major adverse events between patients with diabetes and patients without diabetes having undergone total ankle arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Routine Preoperative Venous Doppler Screening Is Not Effective in Preventing Thromboembolic Events After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Despite advances in thromboprophylaxis, the relationship between preexisting deep venous thromboses (DVTs) and postoperative thromboembolic complications is not fully established. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of selective and nonselective preoperative lower extremity venous Doppler screening protocols as tools in reducing the incidence of thromboembolic events (DVT/pulmonary embolism [PE]) after total joint arthroplasty. In the 2-year period from August 2013 to August 2015, a total of 455 consecutive elective primary total joint arthroplasties were identified from the authors' database. During the first year, a selective preoperative Doppler ultrasound screening protocol (only patients with a history of DVT/PE) was used for 182 patients, 31 of whom had preoperative ultrasound scans. The following year, a nonselective screening protocol was used for 273 consecutive patients, all of whom had preoperative Doppler ultrasound scans. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months postoperatively for postoperative Doppler ultrasound scans, emergency department visits, and readmissions related to DVT/PE. Preoperatively, there was no difference between the selective and nonselective cohorts regarding preoperative DVTs (3 and 1, respectively; P=.307); all patients were known to have prior DVT. Postoperative thromboembolic events were found in 4 (2.6%) of the patients in the selective cohort and 2 (0.7%) of the patients in the nonselective cohort (P=.196). Use of a nonselective preoperative Doppler ultrasound screening protocol did not improve the identification of preoperative DVTs or reduce postoperative thromboembolic complications. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):e202-e206.].

The Risk of Curve Progression and Surgery in African Americans With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine if certain risk factors (age, curve magnitude, skeletal maturity, gender, and curve pattern) traditionally associated with curve progression and surgical intervention in the general population apply equally to African Americans. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Currently, information is limited on the role that a patient's race plays in the risk of curve progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and existing studies have conflicting results. METHODS: Retrospective search of records identified patients who were African American, had been diagnosed with AIS, had a major curve Cobb angle of 10 degrees or more, and had at least two clinical visits with spinal radiographs at least 90 days apart to determine the risk factors for surgical treatment, and 2 years apart to determine the risk factors for curve progression. Patients with a medical condition likely to cause scoliosis were excluded. RESULTS: Of 738 African American patients with AIS, 223 were assessed for surgical risk factors, and 72 were assessed for curve progression risk factors. Fifty-six (29.17%) had progression of the major coronal curve, and 38 (17.04%) underwent surgery. Age at presentation and curve magnitude at presentation were significant risk factors for surgical intervention. Curve magnitude at presentation was a significant risk factor for curve progression. No significant relationships were found for gender or curve type as they relate to surgical intervention or curve progression. CONCLUSION: Age and curve magnitude at presentation were significantly associated with surgery, as is true in other scoliosis populations. Curve magnitude at presentation was associated with curve progression. In contrast to studies in other populations, however, no significant association was observed between curve progression and age at presentation, curve type, or gender, or between surgery and curve type or gender. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic cohort study.