Socioeconomic inequalities in avoidable mortality in Italy: results from a nationwide longitudinal cohort.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in avoidable mortality have never been evaluated in Italy at the national level. The present study aimed to assess the association between socioeconomic status and avoidable mortality. METHODS: The nationwide closed cohort of the 2011 Census of Population and Housing was followed up for 2012-2019 mortality. Outcomes of preventable and of treatable mortality were separately evaluated among people aged 30-74. Education level (elementary school or less, middle school, high school diploma, university degree or more) and residence macro area (North-West, North-East, Center, South-Islands) were the exposures, for which adjusted mortality rate ratios (MRRs) were calculated through multivariate quasi-Poisson regression models, adjusted for age at death. Relative index of inequalities was estimated for preventable, treatable, and non-avoidable mortality and for some specific causes. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 35,708,459 residents (48.8% men, 17.5% aged 65-74), 34% with a high school diploma, 33.5% living in the South-Islands; 1,127,760 deaths were observed, of which 65.2% for avoidable causes (40.4% preventable and 24.9% treatable). Inverse trends between education level and mortality were observed for all causes; comparing the least with the most educated groups, a strong association was observed for preventable (males MRR = 2.39; females MRR = 1.65) and for treatable causes of death (males MRR = 1.93; females MRR = 1.45). The greatest inequalities were observed for HIV/AIDS and alcohol-related diseases (both sexes), drug-related diseases and tuberculosis (males), and diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and renal failure (females). Excess risk of preventable and of treatable mortality were observed for the South-Islands. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality persist in Italy, with an extremely varied response to policies at the regional level, representing a possible missed gain in health and suggesting a reassessment of priorities and definition of health targets.

[The health of immigrants in Italy: the viewpoint of the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP)]. / La salute degli immigrati in Italia: il punto di vista dell'INMP.

The foreign population accounts for 8.6 percent (about 5 million) of the total number of residents, so it is necessary to monitor their health status. Foreigners have standardized mortality rates of about half that of Italians. In terms of hospitalization, rates and causes of hospitalization differ substantially due to the younger average age of foreigners. In particular, a much higher burden of hospitalizations in obstetrical care is observed among foreign women. Maternal and child health is a major concern for foreigners, especially for pregnancy care, which is also reflected in worse health outcomes for newborns.Difficulties in accessing and using basic and specialized territorial services are confirmed by the higher proportion of ordinary emergency hospitalizations among foreigners, the higher risk of being hospitalized for causes that could be treated in an outpatient setting, and the higher frequency of access to emergency rooms with a white/green triage code.The pandemic exacerbated health inequalities because it affected the most disadvantaged social strata of the population, including immigrants, more severely in terms of infection and outcomes.Immigrants could become the least healthy part of the population, similar to what is observed in countries with a longer tradition of migration, even in a country like Italy, where access to care is universally guaranteed.

[Reducing the impact of COVID-19 in immigrants: a systematic review of the efficacy of interventions]. / Contenimento della diffusione del COVID-19 nella popolazione immigrata: una revisione sistematica dell'efficacia degli interventi.

BACKGROUND: the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population has amplified the effects of health inequalities, particularly in the most vulnerable groups such as immigrants and refugees. An assessment of the intervention to contain the COVID-19 in these population groups was essential to define new strategies for more equitable, inclusive, and effective health policies to on health. OBJECTIVES: to provide a systematic synopsis of the impact of interventions to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in immigrants. METHODS: data sources included major bibliographic databases. Using a study protocol, already shared with the international scientific community, two independent researchers reviewed the citations, selected and evaluated the interventions studies. Due to the heterogeneity of the interventions, a narrative synthesis was carried out. RESULTS: three eligible studies were identified. The first study modelled the incidence of the disease in a refugee camp in Greece, based on an intervention of sectorialization of people that accessed to services, the use of masks, the early identification and isolation of cases and their family members, and the limitation of movements within the camp. The second evaluated the impact of preventive pharmacological interventions such as the use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, povidone-iodine, zinc, and vitamin C, in different dosages and combinations, to a group of immigrant workers in a city dormitory in Singapore. The third study evaluated an intervention to increase vaccination coverage within a Latino immigrant community in the United States, moving the location of vaccine supply throughout the most frequented contexts by the immigrant community to access the city services. The results of the first and second studies suggest impacts for some of the proposed interventions even if they have been partially overcome due to the use of mass vaccination. The third showed a reduction in vaccine hesitancy and an increase in vaccination uptake and a snowball effect. CONCLUSIONS: the systematic review identified few heterogeneous studies, preventing any generalization of the results. Probably, the low scientific production does not reflect the successful experiences implemented. In the case of a possible resumption of the epidemic or new emergencies, it will be necessary to rely on indirect evidence and the scientific community should consider more the responsibility to evaluate and make available the experiences gained in the field. A constant monitoring activity of the evidence that will be necessary to updating the results for suggest consolidated prevention measures to for controlling the incidence of COVID-19 in immigrants during a possible resumption of the epidemic and for application in other similarly emergency contexts.

[Development of a recommendations document in an emergency context]. / Lo sviluppo di un documento di raccomandazioni in un contesto di emergenza.

Italy is a destination country for a growing international migration, accounting for 8.4% of the total population. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the difficulties in accessing healthcare services among immigrants, and barriers due to linguistic and cultural differences had a significant impact during the pandemic. This paper presents the methodology used in the project 'Epidemiological surveillance and control of COVID-19 in metropolitan urban areas for the containment of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in the immigrant population in Italy', carried out with the technical and financial support of the Italian Ministry of Health. This methodology is aimed to identify and select statements available in the literature, transferable to the Italian context, on the topic of interventions deemed useful in reducing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the foreign population in urban/metropolitan settings.In February 2022, a systematic search was conducted in databases such as Medline, Embase, and Web of Science, as well as on national and international websites (WHO, Italian Institute of Health, and CDC), and on 'RecMap' (included in the 'COVID19 Recommendations' website) to identify guidelines containing recommendations on the management and prevention of COVID-19 among immigrants. The selected recommendations were divided into intervention areas (infection control, vaccination, screening, planning and monitoring, healthcare systems). In the first phase, a group of researchers independently assessed the inclusion of recommendations through three rounds of consensus. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool was used to assess the quality of the included guidelines. In the second phase, an external group of experts independently evaluated the relevance of the included recommendations using a Likert scale. The document is the result of a collaborative work based on evidence from the literature available until that time. The adaptation and adoption of recommendations already formulated by other international organizations on the topic of preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluated through a consensus process with experts, can be a valid method aimed at producing documents to inform and guide those involved in the care of immigrants in Italy, as well as promoting inclusive forms of prevention in emergency contexts.

Impact of COVID-19 on foreign population resident in urban areas of Italy: selection of indicators, data sources, and definition of geographical stratification levels / Impatto del COVID-19 negli stranieri residenti nelle aree urbane in Italia: la scelta degli indicatori, delle fonti informative e la definizione dei livelli di stratificazione del territorio.

OBJECTIVES: to describe indicators, data sources, and levels of geographical stratification used within the framework of the CCM project "Epidemiological Surveillance and Control of COVID-19 in Metropolitan Urban Areas and for the containment of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in the immigrant population in Italy". DESIGN: population-based observational study based on data from the Integrated Covid-19 Surveillance System and the archive of hospital discharge records. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: interregional collaborative project. Resident population in 5 Italian Regions (Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: crude and age-standardized rates of diagnostic test utilization and positivity, hospitalization (in any department and in intensive care unit), and mortality in COVID-19 cases. RESULTS: starting from the set of 11 indicators from the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) project "Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) and Use of Health Services in the Immigrant Population and Vulnerable Population Groups in Italy", the five most effective indicators for CCM purposes were identified. The INMP project highlighted higher rates of test access and positivity among Italians compared to foreigners, higher standardized hospitalization rates among foreigners, and higher standardized mortality rates among Italians, with geographical and temporal heterogeneity. The intersection between the DEGURBA (degree of urbanisation) classification and altimetric zones defined five levels of territorial stratification characterized by decreasing population density. Approximately 81% of the population involved in the CCM project resided in the first two levels; 43% of Italians lived in areas with intermediate population density in hilly or plain areas, while 48% of foreigners were concentrated in densely populated areas. CONCLUSIONS: sharing the collaborative approach and a research methodology already tested, integrated with the analysis of disaggregated indicators by morphological, functional, and administrative characteristics of the residential territory, allowed for assessing differences in the impact of the pandemic between Italians and foreigners residing in more or less densely populated areas.

[Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic on the immigrant population by urbanisation degree in five Italian Regions (Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily)]. / Impatto dell'epidemia da SARS-CoV-2 nella popolazione immigrata per grado di urbanizzazione in Piemonte, Emilia-Romagna, Toscana, Lazio e Sicilia.

BACKGROUND: according to the literature, socially disadvantaged strata of the population, including immigrants, have been more vulnerable to the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to greater exposure and less opportunity to protect themselves, and to COVID-19 complications due to metabolic and clinical risk factors as well as to healthcare access barriers. Two Italian projects - coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty and the Italian National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - set up an epidemiological surveillance to monitor the temporal trends of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in five Italian regions using validated indicators. OBJECTIVES: to identify differences between Italians and immigrants in terms of the epidemic evolution and its health consequences, and to investigate possible differences by urbanisation degree and region of residence. DESIGN: cross sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: resident population in five Italian regions: Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: frequencies of positive tests, routine hospitalisations, and deaths related to COVID-19 were collected, with respect to the period between 22.02.2020 and 31.01.2021. Data were aggregated by week, region, degree of urbanisation, gender, age (5-year classes), and citizenship (Italian/foreigner). Crude and standardised rates of the outcomes considered were calculated, stratified by gender, citizenship, region, and aggregated by pandemic macro-period. RESULTS: the study population counts approximately about 23 million residents as of 01.01.2020 (9.4% immigrants). During the period of interest, 1,542,458 cases of infection were recorded, whereas hospitalisations amounted to 175,979, and deaths to 44,867. Lower crude rates of hospitalisations and deaths were observed among immigrants compared to Italians. The age-standardised hospitalisation rates, on the other hand, showed an opposite trend and were significantly higher among immigrants, due to the excess observed in urban areas, especially in periods of epidemic peak, both for males (weekly mean standardised rate: 34.6 per 1,000 of foreign residents vs 24.3 of Italians over the period October 2020-January 2021) and females (23.2 vs 15.1 over the period February-April 2021). These differences seem to be more pronounced in the central regions and tend to disappear for residents in scarcely populated areas. Standardised mortality rates were higher among immigrants, both men and women, from October 2020 and more markedly in February-April 2021 among men. CONCLUSIONS: the impact of COVID-19 was stronger among immigrants in relation to hospitalisation, especially during epidemic peak periods and in some regions. The difference in the impact on mortality was smaller. There is some heterogeneity among regions and urban areas that is worth considering in the planning of interventions and integration policies.

Newly arrived migrants did not represent an additional COVID-19 burden for Italy: data from the italian information flow.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, migrants arriving in host countries irregularly have not infrequently been perceived as increasing the COVID-19 burden. Italy is a transit and destination country for migrants who cross the Central Mediterranean route and, during the pandemic, all migrants who landed on Italian shores were COVID-19 tested and quarantined. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection among migrants who landed on the Italian coasts by analyzing both incidence and health outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective observational study has been designed. The population of interest was represented by 70,512 migrants (91% male, 99% <60 years old) who landed in Italy between January 2021 and 2022. SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate per 1,000 (with 95%CI) in migrants and the resident population in Italy of the corresponding age group was computed. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was used to compare the incidence rates in migrants and the resident population. RESULTS: 2,861 migrants out of those landed in Italy during the observation period tested positive, with an incidence rate of 40.6 (39.1-42.1) cases per 1,000. During the same period, 177.6 (177.5-177.8) cases per 1,000 were reported in the resident population, with an IRR of 0.23 (0.22-0.24). 89.7% of cases were male and 54.6% belonged to the 20-29 age group. 99% of cases reported no symptoms, no relevant comorbidities were reported and no cases were hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a low rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in migrants reaching Italy by sea with an incidence rate that is roughly a quarter of that of the resident population. Thus, irregular migrants who arrived in Italy during the observation period did not increase the COVID-19 burden. Further studies are needed to investigate possible reasons for the low incidence observed in this population.

Education inequalities in cardiovascular and coronary heart disease in Italy and the role of behavioral and biological risk factors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Behavioral and biological risk factors (BBRF) explain part of the variability in socioeconomic differences in health. The present study aimed at evaluating education differences in incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in Italy and the role of BBRF. METHODS AND RESULTS: All subjects aged 30-74 years (n = 132,686) who participated to the National Health Interview Surveys 2000 and 2005 were included and followed-up for ten years. Exposure to smoking, physical activity, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension at baseline was considered. Education level was used as an indicator of socioeconomic status. The outcomes were incident cases of CVD and CHD. Hazard ratios by education level were estimated, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates and stratifying by sex and geographic area. The contribution of BBRF to education inequalities was estimated by counterfactual mediation analysis, in addition to the assessment of the risk attenuation by comparing the models including BBRF or not. 22,214 participants had a CVD event and 6173 a CHD event. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, the least educated men showed a 21% higher risk of CVD and a 17% higher risk of CHD compared to the most educated (41% and 61% among women). The mediating effect (natural indirect effect) of BBRF between extreme education levels was 52% for CVD and 84% for CHD among men (16% among women for CVD). CONCLUSIONS: More effective strategies aiming at reducing socioeconomic disparities in CVD and CHD are needed, through programs targeting less educated people in combination with community-wide initiatives.

[The impact of COVID-19 on the immigrant population in Italy. Context, methodology and synthesis of the main evidence from the project of the National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) and Italian Regions]. / L'impatto del COVID-19 nella popolazione immigrata in Italia. Contesto, metodologia e sintesi delle principali evidenze dal progetto INMP-Regioni.

COVID-19 acted on health inequalities in two ways: directly, in terms of infection risk and outcomes; indirectly, through effects on the economy, which exacerbated social inequalities. Immigrants have particularly suffered the effects of the pandemic.The Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) has promoted the project "Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and use of health services in immigrant and vulnerable population groups in Italy" in collaboration with the Regions of Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily, to assess the impact of the pandemic in the immigrant population.This is an observational population-based study design, based on weekly monitoring data from the COVID-19 National Surveillance System of the Italian National Health Institute (ISS). The observation period was split into five sub-periods: February-May 2020 (wave I), June-September 2020 (intermediate period I), October 2020-January 2021 (wave II), February-April 2021 (wave III), May-July 2021 (intermediate period II).Access to diagnostic testing was higher among Italians; the incidence curve showed a lower level of infection among immigrants during the three waves and higher in the two intermediate periods. Age-standardized hospitalization rates were higher among immigrants both in noncritical care areas and in the intensive care unit, particularly in the intermediate stages of the epidemic. Immigrant standardized mortality rates were higher than those of Italians since the third period among males and in the fourth period among females.Differences were also observed on a regional basis and by the immigrants' area of origin.

[The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Italian and foreign population in the various phases: the results of an interregional multicentre project]. / L'impatto della pandemia di COVID-19 nella popolazione italiana e straniera residente nelle diverse fasi: i risultati di un progetto multicentrico inter-regionale.

OBJECTIVES: to analyze the difference of the SARS-CoV-2 infection impact between Italian and foreigner subjects, evaluating the trend of infections and access to diagnostic tests (molecular or antigenic swabs for the detection of SARS- CoV-2) in the two different populations, inducing the detection of new positive cases in the population. DESIGN: retrospective population study for the period February 2020-June 2021. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Italian and foreign resident population on 1st January of the years 2020 and 2021 in the Regions participating to the project: Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Tuscany, Lazio (Central Italy), and Sicily (Southern Italy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: in the two populations, for every week and aggregated by macropandemic period were calculated: • the test rate (people tested on the population); • the swab positivity rate (positive subjects on those who are tested); • the new positives (positive subjects on study population); • the percentage of foreigners among the new positive cases. The ratio of the value of the indicators in the foreign and Italian populations (with 95% confidence interval) was calculated to evaluate the association between nationality (Italian vs not Italian) and outcome. The analyses were conducted at the regional level and at pool level. RESULTS: the trend of new positives by nationality (Italian vs not Italian) has a similar tendency in the different pandemic waves. However, the incidence of new positives during pandemic waves among foreigners is lower than in Italians, while it tends to increase during intermediate periods. Except for the summer periods, foreigners are less tested than Italians, but the percentage of new positives out of the total of new ones tested is higher among foreigners compared to Italians. The relative weight of new positives among foreigners tends to increase in periods with the greatest risk of inflow of SARS-CoV-2 for foreigners. CONCLUSIONS: the epidemic trends in the two populations are similar, although foreigners tend to show lower incidence values, probably in part because they are tested less frequently. Furthermore, in foreigners compared to Italians, there is a greater risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially in periods of relaxation of containment Coronavirus measures, reopening of national borders, production and commercial activities.

[Impact of COVID-19 on the immigrant population in the Veneto Region (Northern Italy), by geographical area of origin]. / Impatto del COVID-19 nella popolazione immigrata in Veneto, per area geografica di provenienza.

OBJECTIVES: to examine the differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates among migrant populations in Veneto Region (Northern Italy), according to the geographic area of origin. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all residents in Veneto Region aged <65 years were included in the analyses. All subjects infected by SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized for COVID-19 were identified by means of the regional biosurveillance system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: age- and gender-specific infection and hospitalization rates were stratified by geographic area of origin and were estimated using the number of incident cases over the resident population in Veneto on 01.01.2021. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for infection and hospitalization rates were estimated using a Poisson model, adjusted for age and gender, among migrants compared to Italians. RESULTS: compared to Italians, SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were significantly higher among migrants from Central and South America and Central and South Asia, lower among those from North Africa and High-Income Countries (HIC), and were approximately halved for those coming from Other Asian Countries (mainly represented by China). Hospitalization rates were significantly higher for all migrant populations when compared to Italians, with the exception of those coming from HIC. Neither age nor gender seemed to modify the association of the geographic area of origin with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates. IRR for SARS-CoV-2 infection of migrants compared to Italians showed how migrants from Other Asian Countries had the lowest infection rates (-53%), followed by people from HIC (-25%), North Africa (-21%), and Eastern Europe (-10%). Higher infection rates were present for Central and South America and Central and South Asia (+17% and +10, respectively). Hospitalization rates were especially high among migrants from Central and South Asia, Africa, and Central and South America, ranging from 1.84 to 3.14 times those observed for Italians. CONCLUSIONS: a significant heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates of migrant populations from different geographic areas of origin were observed. The significantly lower incidence rate ratio for infections, compared to that observed for hospitalizations, is suggestive of a possible under-diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection among migrant populations. Public health efforts should be targeted at increasing support among migrants to contrast the spread of the pandemic by potentiating vaccination campaigns, contact tracing, and COVID-19 diagnostic tests.

[SARS-CoV-2 epidemic among Italians e resident immigrant population: differential incidence from an interregional multicentre study]. / L'epidemia di SARS-CoV-2 nella popolazione italiana e straniera: differenze di incidenza che emergono da uno studio multicentrico interregionale.

OBJECTIVES: to describe differences in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections between Italians and foreigners residing in seven Italian Regions during the different phases of the pandemic and by gender. DESIGN: retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections from 02.02. 2020 to 16.07.2021 in the seven Regions under study were included. Italian resident population calculated by the National Institute of Statistics as of 01.01.2020 was used to calculate the rates. The considered period is divided into 5 sub-periods (phases). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: number of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in the five phases of the pandemic and crude rates by citizenship (Italian vs foreign). Distribution of infections by age group and by week. Crude and age-adjusted incidence rates ratios (IRR) were calculated, by Region, gender, and phase of the pandemic. RESULTS: an epidemic curve delay was observed in foreigners in the first phase of the epidemic, in particular in the northern Regions, the most affected in that phase. The first phase of the epidemic was characterized by a greater proportion of cases occurred in people aged over 60 years than the other phases, both in Italians and in foreigners. The incidence among foreigners is higher during the summer of 2020 (intermediate period: June-September 2020) and during the last period (May-July 2021) in all Regions. The overall figure shows a lower incidence among foreigners than Italians, except for males in Tuscany. CONCLUSIONS: the lower incidence rates among foreigners should be interpreted with caution as the available data suggest that it is at least partly attributable to less access to diagnostic tests. Regional differences found in the study deserve further research together with the effect of gender and country of origin.

[Hospital assistance for COVID-19: a comparison between non-Italian and Italian resident population in five Italian Regions since the beginning of the pandemic until June 2021]. / Un confronto tra italiani e stranieri residenti nell'assistenza ospedaliera per COVID-19 in cinque Regioni italiane da inizio pandemia a giugno 2021.

OBJECTIVES: to describe trends of overall and intensive care hospitalization for COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic in Italy until June 2021, and to compare the results between foreign and Italian population. DESIGN: retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: hospital discharges of 28 million people living in Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Toscana and Lazio (Central Italy) occurred between 22.02.2020 and 02.07.2021 in the hospitals located in each considered Region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: two weekly outcomes were examined: 1. the overall number of COVID-19 hospitalizations; 2. the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations in intensive care units. RESULTS: a higher COVID-19 overall and intensive care unit hospitalization was found among the foreign population compared to Italians. The association emerged only after the adjustment for age, and it was consistent among all Regions, though less marked in Lombardy. The association varied across epidemic phases. CONCLUSIONS: the issue of vulnerability of migrants to the risk of severe COVID-19 calls for a diversity-sensitive approach in prevention. The specific country of origin and the prevalence of preventable co-morbidities that are often underestimated in the migrant populations, and related to COVID-19 complications, should be taken into consideration in future analyses.

Self-perceived workplace discrimination and mental health among immigrant workers in Italy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The process of immigration is associated with poor mental and physical health. While the workplace represents an important context of social integration, previous studies evaluating the effect of discrimination experienced in the workplace found worse mental health status among immigrants. The aim of this study was to investigate whether self-perceived workplace discrimination has any role in the mental health status of immigrants living and working in Italy, evaluating the contribution of other personal experiences, such as loneliness and life satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 12,408 immigrants (aged 15-64) living and working in Italy. Data were derived from the first national survey on immigrants carried out by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat). Mental health status was measured through the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the SF-12 questionnaire. A linear multivariate linear regression was carried out to evaluate the association between mental health status, self-perceived workplace discrimination, and sociodemographic factors; path analysis was used to quantify the mediation effect of self-perceived loneliness, level of life satisfaction, and the Physical Component Summary (PCS). RESULTS: Mental health status was inversely associated (p < 0.001) with self-perceived workplace discrimination (ß:-1.737), self-perceived loneliness (ß:-2.653), and physical health status (ß:-0.089); it was directly associated with level of life satisfaction (ß:1.122). As confirmed by the path analysis, the effect of self-perceived workplace discrimination on MCS was mediated by the other factors considered: self-perceived loneliness (11.9%), level of life satisfaction (20.7%), and physical health status (3.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that self-perceived workplace discrimination is associated with worse mental health status in immigrant workers through personal experiences in the workplace and explains the effect of the exposure to workplace discrimination on immigrants' psychological well-being. Our findings suggest that an overall public health response is needed to facilitate the social integration of immigrants and their access to health services, particularly those services that address mental health issues.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in a Sample of Putative Inactive HBV Carriers in Rome, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive methods are useful for investigating patients with chronic HBV infection. The severity of liver disease in inactive HBsAg carriers can be noninvasively assessed by transient elastography (TE) alone or in association with biochemical markers of fibrosis. OBJECTIVES: The study evaluates the effectiveness of the TE compared to common fibrosis scores (FSs), APRI, Forns Index, and FIB4, for identifying significant fibrosis in Italian and foreigner HBsAg carriers. To investigate the risk of progression of the liver disease, liver stiffness (LS) and HBV-DNA were monitored over time. METHODS: Viral load, biochemical parameters, and LS have been retrospectively evaluated in 125 putative inactive HBV carriers, who visited two outpatient departments (Colleferro Hospital and INMP) from 01/03/2014 to 31/12/2019. Differences in clinical, biochemical, and demographic variables between Italians and foreigners were analyzed. 66 of 125 patients were followed up for 24 months by monitoring liver stiffness and HBV-DNA. RESULTS: Mean overall LS was 5.55 ± 1.92 kPa; 18 (14.4%) patients had a LS ≥7.5 kPa. Mean of APRI, Forns, and FIB4 was 0.29 ± 0.11, 4.15 ± 1.63, and 1.16 ± 0.59, respectively. FS did not differ between the patients with LS <7.5 kPa and those with LS ≥7.5 kPa. Italians displayed a significant lower ALT (0.53 ± 0.18 vs. 0.67 ± 0.33, p < 0.05) and AST (0.59 ± 0.16 vs. 0.70 ± 0.21, p < 0.01) value than foreigners. No differences in LS and HBV-DNA levels were observed. In 66 patients followed up for 24 months, HBV-DNA increased by ≥2000 UI/ml after 12 months in 15 individuals and remained ≥2000 UI/ml after 24 months in 10/15 individuals. 7/10 patients showed LS ≥ 7.5 kPa after 24 months, and 4 of them underwent antiviral therapy for HBV. Patients with HBV-DNA <2000 IU/ml had a significantly lower LS than those with HBV-DNA ≥2000 IU/ml (5.30 ± 1.43 vs. 7.69 ± 1.07, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis shows lower effectiveness of FS vs. TE in the assessment of putative inactive HBV carriers. Furthermore, using FibroScan® and HBV-DNA can identify "false" inactive carriers.

Avoidable hospitalisation for diabetes mellitus among immigrants and natives: Results from the Italian Network for Longitudinal Metropolitan Studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Italy has experienced a relevant increase in migration inflow over the last 20 years. Although the Italian Health Service is widely accessible, immigrants can face many barriers that limit their use of health services. Diabetes mellitus (DM) has a different prevalence across ethnic groups, but studies focusing on DM care among immigrants in Europe are scarce. This study aimed to compare the rates of avoidable hospitalisation (AH) between native and immigrant adults in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multi-centre open cohort study including all 18- to 64-year-old residents in Turin, Venice, Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Bologna and Rome between 01/01/2001 and 31/12/2013-14 was conducted. Italian citizens were compared with immigrants from high migratory pressure countries who were further divided by their area of origin. We calculated age-, sex- and calendar year-adjusted rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of AH for DM by citizenship using negative binomial regression models. The RRs were summarized using a random effects meta-analysis. The results showed higher AH rates among immigrant males (RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.16-2.23), whereas no significant difference was found for females (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.65-1.99). Immigrants from Asia and Africa showed a higher risk than Italians, whereas those from Central-Eastern Europe and Central-Southern America did not show any increased risk. CONCLUSION: Adult male immigrants were at higher risk of experiencing AH for DM than Italians, with differences by area of origin, suggesting that they may experience lower access to and lower quality of primary care for DM. These services should be improved to reduce disparities.

A systematic review of economic evaluations of neonatal and maternal healthcare in immigrant and ethnic minority women.

BACKGROUND: less access to appropriate care during pregnancy for immigrant/ethnic minority women can lead to worse health outcomes and higher costs for health services. OBJECTIVES: to conduct a systematic review of studies on the economic evaluation of maternal and child healthcare among immigrants and racial/ethnic minority groups in advanced economy countries. METHODS: the main biomedical/economic bibliographic databases and institutional sources were searched. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: encouraging breastfeeding and reducing inappropriate hospital use/length of hospital stay proved potentially able to reduce costs. Most studies showed a cost reduction if immigrant and ethnic minority women were included both in national and targeted programmes, such as nutritional programmes or case management. Screening campaigns targeting immigrants and ethnic minority groups were more cost-effective than broader, universal or non-screening strategies. Screenings were cost-effective when extended to newborns/relatives of pregnant women (Chagas disease) and were cost-effective for unvaccinated women in low-vaccination rates regions (rubella), immigrant women reporting no/uncertain vaccination history (varicella), and first-generation immigrants (HCV). DISCUSSION: promoting inclusion in pregnancy healthcare programmes or in targeted screening campaigns could be effective in cost saving for health services.

[Evaluating health care of the immigrant population in Italy through indicators of a national monitoring system]. / Valutazione dell'assistenza sanitaria della popolazione immigrata in Italia attraverso alcuni indicatori di un sistema nazionale di monitoraggio.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate maternal and child healthcare, avoidable hospitalisation, access to emergency services among immigrants in Italy. DESIGN: cross sectional study of some health and health care indicators among Italian and foreign population residing in Italy in 2016-2017. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: indicators based on the national monitoring system coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) of Rome, calculated on perinatal care (CedAP), hospital discharge (SDO), emergency services (EMUR) archives for the years 2016-2017, by of the following regions: Piedmont, Trento, Bolzano, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Lazio, Basilicata, Sicily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: number and timeliness of pregnancy visits, number of ultrasounds, invasive prenatal investigations; perinatal mortality rates, birth weight, Apgar score at 5 minutes, need for neonatal resuscitation; standardized rates of avoidable hospitalisation and access to emergency services by triage code. RESULTS: more often than Italians, immigrant women have during pregnancy: less than 5 gynaecological examination (16.3% vs 8.5%), first examination after the 12th week of gestational age (12.5% vs 3.8%), less than 2 ultrasounds (3.8% vs 1.0%). Higher perinatal mortality rates among immigrants compared to Italians (3.6 vs 2.3 x1,000). Higher standardized rates (x1,000) among immigrants compared to Italians of avoidable hospitalisation (men: 2.1 vs 1.4; women: 0.9 vs 0.7) and of white triage codes in emergency (men: 62.0 vs 32.7; women: 52.9 vs 31.4). CONCLUSIONS: study findings show differences in access and outcomes of healthcare between Italians and immigrants. National monitoring system of indicators, coordinated by INMP, represents a useful tool for healthcare intervention policies aimed to health equity.

The geography and economics of forgoing medical examinations or therapeutic treatments in Italy during the economic crisis.

BACKGROUND: In Italy, the number of individuals who have forgone medical examinations or treatments for economic reasons is one of the highest in Europe. During the global economic crisis of 2008, the restrictive policies concerning access to healthcare and the quality of these services, which differs widely throughout the country, may have accentuated the territorial differences in unmet needs, thereby penalizing the more disadvantaged segments of the population. The study aimed at evaluating the geographical and socioeconomic differences, in particular the risk of poverty, that influence forgoing healthcare services in Italy. METHODS: Cross-sectional Italian data from the 2004-2015 European Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) were used. Hierarchical logistic models were tested, using as the outcome unmet needs for medical examinations or treatment in the preceding 12 months, and as risk factor the condition of being at risk of poverty. Age, sex, citizenship, educational level, presence of chronic or severely limiting diseases and self-perceived health were used as adjustment factors. Analyses were stratified over three time periods: pre-crisis (2004-2007), initial phase of the crisis (2008-2012) and second phase of the crisis (2013-2015). RESULTS: In Central Italy and particularly in Southern Italy, a marked increase (9.9% in 2013-2015) was seen in the overall rate of unmet needs as well as in that of unmet needs due to economic reasons. The probability of unmet needs was higher, and increased over time, for those at risk of poverty (aOR = 1.54 in 2004-07, aOR = 1.70 in 2008-12, aOR = 2.21 in 2013-15). Individuals with a low educational level, who had a chronic or severely limiting disease, who perceived their health as not good and immigrants had a higher risk of forgoing healthcare. The regions in Southern Italy had a significantly higher probability of unmet needs. CONCLUSIONS: A strong association was found between the probability of forgoing medical examination or treatment and being at risk of poverty. Study results underline the need for healthcare policies aimed at facilitating access to healthcare services, particularly in the South, by developing a progressive mechanism of contribution to healthcare costs proportional to income and by guaranteeing free access to the poor.

[The inappropriateness in the use of female cancer screening tests in Italy: over- and under-utilization determinants]. / L'inappropriatezza nell'uso dei test di screening oncologici femminili in Italia: determinanti di sovra e sottoutilizzo.

OBJECTIVES: to identify the determinants of over and under-use of Pap test and mammography in the screening programme target population. DESIGN: cross-sectional study. SETTING E PARTICIPANTS: we used data from the National Health interview conducted by the Italian National Institute of Statistics in 2012-2013 obtaining nation-wide representative samples of the female resident population aged 25-64 years (No. 32,831; target age of Pap test) and 50-69 years (No. 16,459; target age of mammography). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: overall coverage: proportion of women in the target age with at least one test in lifetime; appropriate coverage: proportion of women reporting to have at least one or more tests following the first one with the recommended frequency (three and two years for Pap test and mammography, respectively); over-use: women reporting to repeat test at higher frequency; under-use: women reporting not having ever had a test or having test at longer intervals. For frequency outcomes, only women aged 28-64 years and 52-69 years were included for Pap test and mammography, respectively. RESULTS: 11.9% of women have Pap test at the recommended frequency, 48.5% at shorter intervals, and 19.6% at longer intervals than recommended, while 20.0% never had a Pap test at all (39.6% under-use). 41.1% of women have a mammography at the recommended interval, 18.4% at shorter intervals, and 20.2% at longer intervals, while 20.3% never had a mammography at all. For both tests, in the North-East higher appropriate coverage and less over-use are observed, while in the South more under-use is highlighted. Young, foreigners, single, less educated, and unoccupied women have, at the same time, more over- and under-use for Pap test. Foreigner women reporting economic difficulties and single women have more mammography over and under-use. CONCLUSIONS: Pap test and, in a minor measure, mammography over-use are relevant in Italy, while large part of the population is still not covered.