Consensus-Based Management Protocol (CREVICE Protocol) for the Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Imaging and Clinical Examination for Use When Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Is Not Employed.

Globally, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring use in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is inconsistent and susceptible to resource limitations and clinical philosophies. For situations without monitoring, there is no published comprehensive management algorithm specific to identifying and treating suspected intracranial hypertension (SICH) outside of the one ad hoc Imaging and Clinical Examination (ICE) protocol in the Benchmark Evidence from South American Trials: Treatment of Intracranial Pressure (BEST:TRIP) trial. As part of an ongoing National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported project, a consensus conference involving 43 experienced Latin American Intensivists and Neurosurgeons who routinely care for sTBI patients without ICP monitoring, refined, revised, and augmented the original BEST:TRIP algorithm. Based on BEST:TRIP trial data and pre-meeting polling, 11 issues were targeted for development. We used Delphi-based methodology to codify individual statements and the final algorithm, using a group agreement threshold of 80%. The resulting CREVICE (Consensus REVised ICE) algorithm defines SICH and addresses both general management and specific treatment. SICH treatment modalities are organized into tiers to guide treatment escalation and tapering. Treatment schedules were developed to facilitate targeted management of disease severity. A decision-support model, based on the group's combined practices, is provided to guide this process. This algorithm provides the first comprehensive management algorithm for treating sTBI patients when ICP monitoring is not available. It is intended to provide a framework to guide clinical care and direct future research toward sTBI management. Because of the dearth of relevant literature, it is explicitly consensus based, and is provided solely as a resource (a "consensus-based curbside consult") to assist in treating sTBI in general intensive care units in resource-limited environments.

Hyperglycemia and short-term outcome in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia has a detrimental effect in several acute neurological critical illnesses. No consensus exists on the optimal management of hyperglycemia in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Our aim was to determine whether blood glucose (BG) would predict 30-day mortality in sICH. METHODS: All patients with a well-defined diagnosis of sICH admitted into 24 h in three primary referred centers were included in this prospective observational follow-up study. Patients had extensive monitoring of BG values and those with BG values >8.29 mmol/l (150 mg/dl) received a variable intravenous insulin dose to maintain BG concentrations during the first 72 h after sICH between 3.32 and 8.29 mmol/l (60-150 mg/dl) using pre-specified insulin dosing schedule protocol. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003, 295 consecutive patients (mean +/- SD age 66 +/- 12 years) were prospectively included. A 1.0 mmol/l (18 mg/dl) increase in the BG concentration at admission was associated with a 33% mortality increase (OR: 1.33; 95%CI: 1.22-1.46; P < 0.0001). Adjusting for demographics, risk factors, stroke severity, and surgery there was no change in the increased risk. During the first 12 h after sICH, the insulin treatment protocol was enabling to reduce mortality (OR: 1.36, 95%CI: 1.14-1.61; P = 0.0005, per 1 IU increase) while thereafter this association was greatly attenuated and not more significant. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycemia is a common condition after sICH and may worsen prognosis. Very early insulin therapy apparently does not improve prognosis. These results raise concern about routine clinical practice implementation of this intervention without any evidence from randomized trials.