Impact of sildenafil on marital and sexual adjustment in patients and their wives after radiotherapy and short-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer: analysis of RTOG 0215.

PURPOSE: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0215 investigated the efficacy of sildenafil in improving erectile dysfunction following radiotherapy and neoadjuvant/concurrent androgen deprivation therapy among prostate cancer patients and found a significant improvement on drug but only in 21% of study participants. This paper reports on a secondary aim to investigate the effect of sildenafil on overall sexual and marital adjustment among both patients and their wives. METHODS: RTOG 0215 was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial of sildenafil. Participation of wives was optional. Twenty-four married heterosexual couples (33% of heterosexual couples in study) completed the Sexual Adjustment Questionnaire and Locke's Marital Adjustment Test. Treatment differences in mean change scores were evaluated by paired t-tests, and the proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful change was evaluated using chi-square tests. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to determine the association of adjustment between patients and wives. RESULTS: There was no significant change in either sexual or marital adjustment for patients. For wives, there was a trend for improvement in sexual adjustment but no significant change in marital adjustment. Change in marital adjustment between patients and wives was weakly related (r(s) = 0.15, p = 0.48), and for sexual adjustment, there was a moderate, but nonsignificant relationship (r(s) = 0.40, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Larger studies are warranted to further examine possible differences in sexual experiences and treatment needs between prostate cancer patients and their wives, as well as to assess predictors of sildenafil response.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a preliminary analysis of the phase II intergroup trial 0122.

PURPOSE: To determine the preliminary acute toxicity and survival results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation therapy in patients with local/regional squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with clinical stage T1-4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma were entered onto the trial. Eight patients were declared ineligible after registration. Patients received three monthly cycles of fluorouracil (5-FU; 1,000 mg/m2/24hr for 5 days) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 on day 1) (neoadjuvant segment) followed by two additional monthly cycles of 5-FU (1,000 mg/m2/24hr for 5 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) plus concurrent 64.8 Gy (combined modality segment). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 15 months in surviving patients, the incidence of total grade 3+ toxicity during the neoadjuvant chemotherapy segment was 61%, and during the combined modality segment was 72%. Of the 33 patients who started radiation therapy, 91% were able to complete the full course. There were six deaths during treatment, five of which (11%), because of nadir sepsis and/or dehydration, were treatment-related. For the 37 eligible patients, the median disease-free survival duration was 9 months, and the overall median survival was 20 months. CONCLUSION: The preliminary analysis of this trial demonstrated that the incidence of grade 3+ toxicity was similar to that reported in the combined modality arm of the prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) intergroup esophageal trial RTOG 85-01. However, because of the increased incidence of treatment-related mortality, this treatment program will not be used as an experimental arm of intergroup trial INT 0123 (RTOG 94-05).

Prostate-specific antigen as a pretherapy prognostic factor in patients treated with radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a pretherapy prognostic factor for localized prostate cancer treated with primary irradiation (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 1987 and December 1990, 254 patients with pretherapy PSA determinations were treated for clinical stage A2 to C prostate adenocarcinoma. In conjunction with other prognostic factors, pretherapy PSA was evaluated to determine whether it had independent predictive value for disease outcome. RESULTS: Pretherapy PSA was highly and directly correlated with clinical stage, tumor grade, and acid phosphatase level. With a median follow-up duration of 24 months, 241 patients (95%) were fully assessable for disease outcome. In these patients, PSA and tumor grade were the sole independent predictive factors for tumor relapse (ie, clinically determined and/or increasing PSA level). The combination of pretherapy PSA and tumor grade information defined groups of patients with distinctly different outcome. For patients in low- (favorable PSA and tumor grade), intermediate- (favorable PSA or tumor grade), and high- (adverse PSA and tumor grade) risk categories, the actuarial rates of survival free of tumor relapse or increasing PSA level were 94%, 77%, and 42% at 3 years, respectively (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Pretherapy PSA is a strongly independent prognostic factor for disease outcome following primary RT. The combination of adverse pretherapy PSA and unfavorable tumor grade identified a cohort of patients with a high risk of early treatment failure in whom combined modality therapy may be appropriately investigated.

Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study examined the records of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with radiation in 1992 through 1994 to determine the national practice processes of care and outcomes and to compare the results with those of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national survey of 63 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell (62%) or adenocarcinoma (37%) of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary or adjuvant treatment. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Fifteen percent of patients had clinical stage (CS) I disease, 40% had CS II disease, and 30% had CS III disease. Twenty-six percent of patients underwent esophagectomy. Seventy-five percent of patients received chemotherapy; 84% of these received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). RESULTS: Significant variables for overall survival in multivariate analysis include the use of esophagectomy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.62), the use of chemotherapy (RR = 0.63), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than 80 (RR = 0.61), CS I or II disease (RR = 0.66), and facility type (RR = 0.72). Age, sex, and histology were not significant. Preoperative CRT resulted in a nonsignificantly higher 2-year survival rate compared with definitive CRT alone (63% v 39%; P =.11), whereas 2-year survival by planned treatment rather than treatment given was 47.7% for preoperative CRT and 35.4% for definitive CRT (P =.23). Definitive CRT compared with definitive RT alone resulted in significantly higher 2-year survival (39% v 20.6%; P =.027) and lower 2-year local regional failure (30% v 57.9%; P =. 0031). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of CRT in EC treatment. It indicates that the results obtained in practice settings nationwide are similar to those obtained in clinical trials and that KPS and the 1983 clinical staging system are useful prognostic indicators. The suggested value of esophagectomy and superiority of preoperative CRT over CRT alone in this study should be tested in a randomized trial.

Pilot evaluation of venlafaxine hydrochloride for the therapy of hot flashes in cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Hot flashes can be a prominent clinical problem for breast cancer survivors and men who undergo androgen-deprivation therapy. Anecdotal information suggested a low dose of a relatively new antidepressant, venlafaxine, could abrogate this clinical problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 28 consecutive assessable patients entered onto a phase II clinical trial. Hot flash data were collected by daily diary questionnaires during a 1-week baseline period and then for 4 weeks, during which time patients received venlafaxine 12.5 mg orally twice daily. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of patients who completed the study had a greater than 50% reduction in hot flash scores (frequency times severity) during the fourth treatment week as compared with the baseline week. Median weekly hot flash scores were reduced by 55% from baseline during the fourth week of venlafaxine therapy. Therapy was generally well tolerated and appeared to alleviate fatigue, sweating, and trouble sleeping. CONCLUSION: Venlafoxine appears to represent an efficacious new method to alleviate hot flashes. Further evaluation of this compound for alleviating hot flashes is indicated.

Radiation therapy for rectosigmoid and rectal cancer: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care process survey.

PURPOSE: To determine the US national practice standards for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated in radiation oncology facilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey of 57 institutions identified 507 eligible patients who received radiation therapy as a component of their treatment for rectal cancer. A stratified two-stage cluster sampling with simple random sampling at each stage for each stratum was used and on-site surveys were performed. RESULTS: Of the 507 patients, 378 (75%) received postoperative therapy, 110 (22%) received preoperative therapy, 17 (2%) received both preoperative and postoperative therapy, and less than 0.5% received intraoperative radiation alone. To more accurately assess the utilization of modern radiation techniques as well as recommendations of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored, randomized, postoperative, adjuvant combined modality therapy rectal cancer trials into current practice, the analysis was limited to the 243 (48%) patients with tumor, node, and metastasis staging system classification T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease who underwent conventional surgery with negative margins. Although only 7% were treated on a clinical trial, 90% received chemotherapy for a median of 21 weeks. Most were treated with modern radiation treatment techniques. In contrast, techniques to identify and help exclude the small bowel from the radiation field were not routinely used. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that only 7% of patients with T3 and/or N1-2M0 disease were treated on a clinical trial, such trials appear to have resulted in a positive influence on the standard of practice within the oncology community. Although there are still some deficiencies, the majority of these patients received combined modality therapy and were treated with modern radiation therapy techniques.

The cell cycle inhibitors p21WAF1 and p27KIP1 are associated with survival in patients treated by salvage prostatectomy after radiation therapy.

We evaluated p27KIP1 and p21WAF1 expression in 52 patients treated by salvage radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for biopsy-proven locally persistent or recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy. We defined low and high expression based on the median value observed in our sample. Five-year distant metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 71 and 82%, respectively, for patients with low expression of p21 (< or =5%), compared with 94 and 100%, respectively, for those with high expression of p21 (>5%; P = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Five-year distant metastasis-free survival and cancer-specific survival were 71 and 82%, respectively, for patients with low expression of p27 (<50%), compared with 88 and 96%, respectively, for those with high expression of p27 (> or =50%; P = 0.06 and 0.01, respectively). These findings indicate that p21 and p27 expression levels are significant predictors of survival for patients selected for salvage prostatectomy for recurrent prostate cancer.

Cell proliferation in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis: a marker for progression.

The biological aggressiveness of lymph node-positive prostate cancer is closely linked to cancer volume in nodal metastases. We evaluated MIB-1 (Ki-67) labeling index and bcl-2 expression in primary cancer and matched nodal metastases from 138 node-positive patients treated with radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy between 1987 and 1992 at the Mayo Clinic. One hundred twenty-eight patients (93%) received androgen deprivation therapy within 90 days after radical prostatectomy. Mean patient age was 66 years (range, 51-78). The median follow-up was 6.7 years (range, 0.03-11). MIB-1 (Ki-67) labeling index was determined by digital image analysis, and nodal cancer volume was determined by the grid method. Systemic progression, defined as the presence of distant metastasis documented by biopsy or radiographic examination, was used as an outcome end point in the Cox proportional hazard models. MIB-1 labeling index in nodal metastases was predictive of systemic progression-free survival (P = 0.001). The 8-year systemic progression-free survival was 100% for those with MIB-1 labeling index <3.5% compared with 78% for those with MIB-1 labeling index > or =7.8%. MIB-1 labeling index correlated with Gleason score, DNA ploidy, and nodal cancer volume (P<0.001, 0.04, and <0.001, respectively). After controlling for nodal cancer volume, MIB-1 labeling index remained significant in predicting systemic progression-free survival (P = 0.047). bcl-2 expression in the primary cancer and lymph node metastasis was associated with systemic progression-free survival in univariate analysis (P = 0.027 and 0.048, respectively) but was not significant after adjusting for nodal cancer volume (P = 0.52 and 0.17, respectively). Our data indicate that assessment of cell proliferation in nodal metastasis is predictive of clinical outcome in prostate cancer patients with regional lymph node metastasis.

Doses to radiation sensitive organs and structures located outside the radiotherapeutic target volume for four treatment situations.

This study documents dosage to radiation sensitive organs/structures located outside the radiotherapeutic target volume for four treatment situations: (a) head and neck, (b) brain (pituitary and temporal lobe), (c) breast and (d) pelvis. Clinically relevant treatment fields were simulated on a tissue-equivalent anthropomorphic phantom and subsequently irradiated with Cobalt-60 gamma rays, 6- and 18-MV x-ray beams. Thermoluminescent dosimeters and diodes were used to measure absorbed dose. The head and neck treatment resulted in significant doses of radiation to the lens and thyroid gland. The total treatment lens dose (300-400 cGy) could be cataractogenic while measured thyroid doses (1000-8000 cGy) have the potential of causing chemical hypothyroidism, thyroid neoplasms, Graves' disease and hyperparathyroidism. Total treatment retinal (400-700cGy) and pituitary (460-1000 cGy) doses are below that considered capable of producing chronic disease. The pituitary treatment studied consisted of various size parallel opposed lateral and vertex fields (4 x 4 through 8 x 8 cm). The lens dose (40-200 cGy) with all field sizes is below those of clinical concern. Parotid doses (130-1200 cGy) and thyroid doses (350-600 cGy) are in a range where temporary xerostomia (parotid) and thyroid neoplasia development are a reasonable possibility. The retinal dose (4000 cGy) from the largest field size (8 x 8 cm2) is in the range where retinopathy has been reported. The left temporal lobe treatment also used parallel opposed lateral and vertex fields (7 x 7 and 10 x 10 cm). Doses to the pituitary gland (5200-6200 cGy), both parotids (200-6900 cGy), left lens (200-300 cGy) and left retina (1700-4500 cGy) are capable of causing significant future clinical problems. Right-sided structures received insignificant doses. Secondary malignancies could result from measured total treatment thyroid doses (670-980 cGy). Analysis of three breast/chest wall and regional nodal irradiation techniques demonstrated a 25-50% decrease in secondary lung dose with use of independent collimation compared to use of custom alloy blocking material. However, it is unlikely that a reduction in secondary dose of this magnitude would reduce the risk of treatment sequellae. In four-field "box" pelvic irradiation, secondary testes dose may result in temporary (clamshell shield) or permanent azoospermia, but is unlikely to impair androgen production.

Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with histologic findings from pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify pretherapy factors associated with pelvic lymph node involvement (LNI) in patients with localized prostatic carcinoma (CaP), and to develop a model that would allow for estimation of this risk at the time of initial diagnosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1988 and December 1992, 2439 patients with clinical Stage T1a-3cN0-XM0 CaP underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection as sole initial therapy at a single medical institution. Preoperative factors were evaluated for their association with pelvic LNI in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A model was developed that incorporated independent predictive variables, and probability plots were generated to estimate the likelihood of pelvic LNI in the patient with a new diagnosis of localized CaP. RESULTS: Within clinical tumor stage, three groups (Tla-2a, T2b-c, and T3) were identified in which the observed rate of pelvic LNI was distinctly different. Gleason primary grades were also combined (1-2, 3, and 4-5) because of a similar observation. Univariate analysis identified clinical tumor stage (p < 0.0001), Gleason primary grade (p < 0.0001), and serum prostate-specific antigen (p < 0.0001) as factors associated with pelvic LNI. Each of these variables retained independent significance (p < or = 0.0002) in the multivariate model. Patient age (p = 0.12) and history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (p = 0.36) were not found to correlate with this endpoint. Probability plots provided an estimate of the likelihood for pelvic LNI according to the combination of pretherapy clinical tumor stage, Gleason primary grade, and serum prostate-specific antigen level. CONCLUSION: Clinical tumor stage as determined by digital rectal examination, Gleason primary grade of the diagnostic biopsy specimen, and pretherapy serum prostate-specific antigen value can be combined to estimate the probability of pelvic LNI for the patient with a new diagnosis of localized CaP. This information may be of value in directing the pretherapy diagnostic evaluation, as an aid in radiation therapy treatment planning, and in the conduct of clinical research efforts.

Correlation of pretherapy prostate cancer characteristics with seminal vesicle invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to identify pretherapy factors associated with seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate (CaP), and to develop a model that would allow estimation of the likelihood for SVI at the time of initial diagnosis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 1988 and December 1993, 2959 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy, with or without pelvic lymph node dissection, as initial therapy for clinical Stage T1a-3bN0-XM0 CaP. Preoperative patient and tumor-related characteristics were evaluated for an association with SVI in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A model was developed and probability plots were constructed to display the estimated likelihood for SVI in the patients with a new diagnosis of localized CaP. RESULTS: Within clinical tumor stage, three groups (T1a-2a, T2b-c, and T3a-b) were observed to have a distinctly different rate of SVI. Gleason primary grades were combined (1-2, 3 and 4-5) because of a similar observation. Univariate analysis identified clinical tumor stage (p < 0.0001), Gleason primary grade (p < 0.0001), and serum prostate-specific antigen level (p < 0.0001) as factors associated with the likelihood for SVI. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent significance (p = 0.0001) of each of these factors. Patient age (p = 0.16) and history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (p = 0.82) were not associated with this end point. Probability plots were constructed to display the likelihood of SVI as a function of pretherapy clinical tumor stage, Gleason primary grade, and serum prostate-specific antigen value. CONCLUSION: In the patient with a new diagnosis of localized CaP, clinical tumor stage as determined by digital rectal examination, diagnostic biopsy tumor (Gleason primary) grade, and pretherapy serum prostate-specific antigen value were significant factors for development of a model that estimated the likelihood of SVI. Estimates from this type of model may be of value in the pretherapy diagnostic evaluation of such patients, and may aid in the administration of radiation therapy.

Final report of Intergroup Trial 0122 (ECOG PE-289, RTOG 90-12): Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy and high-dose radiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation therapy in patients with local/regional squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-five patients with clinical Stage T1-4N0-1M0 squamous cell carcinoma were entered on a prospective single-arm study, of which 38 were eligible. Patients received 3 monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (100 mg/m2 day 1; neoadjuvant segment) followed by 2 additional monthly cycles of 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/24 h x 5 days) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 day 1) plus concurrent 6480 cGy (combined modality segment). The median follow-up in surviving patients was 59 months. RESULTS: For the 38 eligible patients, the primary tumor response rate was 47% complete, 8% partial, and 3% stable disease. The first site of clinical failure was 39% local/regional and 24% distant. For the total patient group, there were 6 deaths during treatment, of which 9% (4/45) were treatment related. The median survival was 20 months. Actuarial survival at 3 years was 30%, and at 5 years, 20%. CONCLUSION: This intensive neoadjuvant approach does not appear to offer a benefit compared with conventional doses and techniques of combined modality therapy. However, high dose radiation (6480 cGy) appears to be tolerable, and is being tested further in Intergroup Trial INT 0123.

Treatment systems guidelines for primary rectal cancer from the 1996 Patterns of Care Study.

PURPOSE: The Patterns of Care Rectal Cancer Committee was formed to develop consensus recommendations for patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Committee was composed of a multidisciplinary group of oncologists, and clinical scenarios were chosen to address most of the major treatment controversies in the combined modality treatment of rectal cancer. A literature search was then conducted and the major articles were identified. A modified Delphi technique was used to arrive at consensus. Serial surveys were conducted by distributing questionnaires to the Committee members to consolidate expert opinion. Voting was conducted using a scoring system and opinions were unified to the highest degree possible. RESULTS: Consensus voting was performed for 4 clinical scenarios. Acceptability ratings for treatment were grouped into 3 broad categories: not acceptable, acceptable, and most acceptable. Based on the treatment options, a decision tree was developed that reflects the consensus of the committee. CONCLUSION: These options may help guide treatment decisions in rectal cancer.

Prevalence and distribution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in salvage radical prostatectomy specimens after radiation therapy.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostate cancer. The effect of radiation therapy (RT) on the prevalence of PIN is uncertain. We studied 86 patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy after irradiation failure at the Mayo Clinic. The prevalence, volume, multicentricity, spatial proximity to cancer, and architectural patterns of PIN were evaluated. High-grade PIN was identified in 53 (62%) of 86 prostatectomy specimens. Multiple architectural patterns were usually observed, including tufting in 87%, micropapillary in 66%, cribriform in 38%, and flat in 17%. The mean volume of PIN was 0.12 cm3 (range, 0.05-1.20 cm3). PIN was usually multicentric (70%), with a mean number of PIN foci of 2.5 (range, 1-10). Ninety-four percent of PIN foci were located within 2 mm of invasive cancer. There was no correlation between PIN and pathologic stage, surgical margin, tumor size, DNA ploidy, post-RT Gleason score, time interval from RT to biopsy-proven recurrence, postoperative prostate-specific antigen level, distant metastasis-free survival, or cancer-specific survival. Our examination of salvage radical prostatectomy specimens indicated that the prevalence and extent of PIN appeared to be reduced after RT compared to published studies of prostatectomies without prior RT.

Postsurgical changes of the breast that mimic inflammatory breast carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize a clinical syndrome that occurs in some women who have undergone breast or axillary lymph node biopsy or partial mastectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six case reports are presented, the clinical and histopathologic findings are described, and the implications for recognition of this entity are discussed. RESULTS: Patients who had undergone partial mastectomy, breast biopsy, or axillary lymph node excision shortly thereafter had clinical signs (most notably, erythema and edema) suggestive of infectious mastitis or inflammatory breast cancer. Representative histologic sections of involved skin revealed dilated dermal vessels without specific evidence of infection or cancer. Although antibiotic therapy was generally ineffective, the clinical findings resolved with time (from 2 months to 1 year). This condition should be considered in the differential diagnosis when this circumscribed patient population has such intervention-related symptoms. CONCLUSION: This clinical syndrome may mimic an infectious or neoplastic process, but we hypothesize that it is due to interruption of lymphatic vessels. Appropriate recognition may alter the use of antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention.

Lymph node-positive prostate cancer: evaluation of the results of the combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with pathologic stage IV prostate cancer treated with androgen ablation plus external-beam radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients treated between August 1986 and February 1995 with androgen ablation plus radiation therapy for stage IV (T1-4 N1 M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate were selected for outcome analysis in this retrospective study. Bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 56 patients (93%). The 4 remaining patients had pelvic adenopathy on computed tomography, which was confirmed histologically in all patients. The median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 28.8 ng/mL (mean, 55 ng/ mL; range, 0.1-428 ng/mL). All patients received radiation therapy to the prostate, and 29 (48%) had pelvic node radiation. Biochemical failure was defined according to the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology criteria of 3 successive increases in the PSA level. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration for surviving patients was 101.1 months (range, 20-134 months). Biochemical failure with (in 2 patients) or without (in 10 patients) clinically evident disease relapse was noted in 12 patients (20%). Four additional patients (7%) had clinical relapse without biochemical failure. Local recurrences were observed in 6 patients (10%), and this clinical impression was confirmed by biopsy in 4 patients. Thirteen patients (22%) died of causes related to prostate cancer. The biochemical relapse-free, clinical disease-free, overall, and cause-specific survival rates at 5 years were 82%, 84%, 76%, and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This observational case series of patients treated with the combination of external-beam radiation therapy and permanent androgen ablation for pathologic stage IV prostate cancer suggests that the addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy may improve disease outcome. In the absence of randomized trial results, these observations may be beneficial in clinical decision making.

Breast conservation therapy for invasive breast cancer: a review of prior trials and the Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of breast conservation therapy in the management of early-stage invasive breast cancer. DESIGN: We reviewed the results of previously published trials and summarized 165 cases of breast conservation surgical procedures and irradiation at the Mayo Clinic between January 1979 and September 1989. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the prior clinical trials, the criteria for selection of patients, the surgical and radiation techniques used, the complications of treatment, the cosmetic results, and the follow-up assessment and survival were analyzed. The 165 Mayo patients were also characterized, and their results were described. RESULTS: Breast conservation therapy consists of excision of the primary tumor followed by irradiation. A coordinated multidisciplinary approach should be used for selection of patients. Several large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that breast conservation therapy is an appropriate option for most women with early-stage breast cancer and provides tumor control and survival rates equivalent to mastectomy. With a collaborative treatment program and judicious application of contemporary standards of practice, a good-to-excellent cosmetic outcome can be achieved in most patients, and the risk of treatment-related sequelae is minimal. The Mayo Clinic experience with breast conservation therapy is consistent with these observations and compares favorably with other institutional and clinical trial results. CONCLUSION: Patients should be fully educated about the options for primary management of early-stage breast cancer because the selection of therapy may profoundly influence psychologic adjustment and acceptance of the treatment program.

Irradiation for locally recurrent carcinoma of the prostate following radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcome of patients treated with irradiation (RT) for isolated, clinically apparent local tumor recurrence following prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate (CaP). METHODS: Between May 1979 and July 1992, 35 patients received external-beam RT as sole salvage therapy for post-prostatectomy locally recurrent CaP. Patient outcome was evaluated through retrospective medical record review with respect to clinical and prostate-specific antigen-based (that is, biochemical) control rates, as well as disease-free (clinical and biochemical) and overall survival estimates. Chronic RT-induced morbidity was also examined, and pre-RT disease characteristics were evaluated for their association with disease outcome. RESULTS: With median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 1.7 to 12.1) in survivors (30 patients), 19 patients (54%) had clinical (local, 1 patient [3%]; metastatic, 7 patients [20%]) or biochemical only (11 patients [31%]) relapse. The 8-year clinical relapse-free and any relapse-free (clinical or biochemical) rates were 80% and 56%, respectively, whereas the overall survival estimate was 97%. A chronic complication(s) of treatment was noted in 15 patients (43%) but spontaneously resolved in all but 6 (17%); persistent complications were mild and associated with rectal (grade 1 to 2, 14%) and lymphatic (3%) systems. The interval between prostatectomy and local tumor recurrence, the pre-RT prostate-specific antigen serum level, the pathologic stage, and tumor differentiation may be associated with disease outcome. CONCLUSIONS: External-beam RT resulted in excellent local tumor control without serious long-term morbidity in most patients. Although this study could not define an optimal management strategy (for example, symptomatic measures only, RT, or hormonal therapy), these results provided outcome measures, in relationship to pre-RT tumor-related factors, that may be valuable for clinical decision-making.

The role of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

The results of radiotherapy (RT) as used at the Mayo Clinic are reviewed and compared with the available literature. An attempt is made to summarize the risks and benefits of RT in these settings. Additionally, avenues of future potential investigation are explored.

Inflammatory breast cancer: integration of irradiation, surgery, and chemotherapy.

Between January 1983 and April 1987, 36 consecutive patients with nonmetastatic clinical (30 patients) or occult (6 patients) inflammatory breast cancer were treated with irradiation, mastectomy, and chemotherapy. In 29 patients, treatment consisted of preoperative once daily (16 patients) or twice daily (13 patients) irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy. In 27 (93%) of these 29 patients, this treatment was followed by mastectomy and additional chemotherapy. In 25 (86%) of these patients, major clinical response was attained, but an examination of the pathology of the operative specimen revealed complete tumor absence in only two patients (7%). The remaining seven patients underwent immediate mastectomy followed by once daily irradiation and chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 30.4 months in all patients (59.2 months in surviving patients), the 5-year probability of relapse-free survival was 24% and of overall survival, 34%. Overall, the probability at 5 years of initial isolated local-regional tumor recurrence was 19%; in patients treated with once daily irradiation, the 5-year probability was 28%, whereas the probability was 8% with twice daily (accelerated) fractionated irradiation. Chemotherapy dose intensity did not appear to be adversely affected by the use of irradiation. The treatment approach described herein provides results comparable with those in other contemporary American series.