RESUMO
Coliphages are virus that infect coliform bacteria and are used in aquatic systems for risk assessment for human enteric viruses. This mini-review appraises the types and sources of coliphage and their fate and behavior in source waters and engineered drinking water treatment systems. Somatic (cell wall infection) and F+ (male specific) coliphages are abundant in drinking water sources and are used as indicators of fecal contamination. Coliphage abundances do not consistently correlate to human enteric virus abundance, but they suitably reflect the risks of exposure to human enteric viruses. Coliphages have highly variable surface characteristics with respect to morphology, size, charge, isoelectric point, and hydrophobicity which together interact to govern partitioning and removal characteristics during water treatment. The groups somatic and F+ coliphages are valuable for investigating the virus elimination during water treatment steps and as indicators for viral water quality assessment. Strain level analyses (e.g., Qß or GA-like) provide more information about specific sources of viral pollution but are impractical for routine monitoring. Consistent links between rapid online monitoring tools (e.g., turbidity, particle counters, and flow cytometry) and phages in drinking water have yet to be established but are recommended as a future area of research activity. This could enable the real-time monitoring of virus and improve the process understanding during transient operational events. Exciting future prospects for the use of coliphages in aquatic microbiology are also discussed based on current scientific evidence and practical needs.
RESUMO
The effect of drinking water treatment (ferric coagulation, floc blanket clarification, rapid sand filtration) on the spatial heterogeneity of five species of micro-organism was studied at pilot scale. It was found that the spatial heterogeneity of vegetative bacteria (namely total coliform and heterotrophic (22 degrees C; 3 d) bacteria) was little affected by treatment. Indeed, counts of total coliform bacteria within 500 l volumes of treated water were Poisson distributed (i.e. showed minimum variation). In contrast, treatment appeared to increase the spatial heterogeneity (or clustering) of both aerobic spores indigenous to the raw water and Bacillus subtilis var niger spores added to the raw water. Furthermore, B. subtilis var niger spores added to the raw water were detected in the treated water 25 h after termination of spiking to the raw water. The effect on C. parvum oocysts added to the raw water could not be determined because few oocysts broke through treatment into the treated water. Indeed oocyst removals of 5-6 logs were apparent. "Species-specific" differences in the removal ratios were also demonstrated. It is concluded that audits for treatment processes based on single 100 ml "spot" samples for spores will tend to over-estimate the net spore removal and hence underestimate the public health risk. Spatial heterogeneity of counts in treated water contributes to explaining why no "ideal" surrogate has been identified for treatment plant performance.