Impact of type of health care provider on long term asthma control.

OBJECTIVE: Asthma prevalence is high and adherence to asthma guidelines is still less than adequate. The main objective of this study was to determine if there were significant differences in outcome measures if asthma care was provided per guidelines either by physicians (pediatric pulmonologists) or specialty trained advance practice nurses (APNs). METHODS: This was a three-year, prospective cohort study of children referred by their primary care providers to a tertiary care center for better asthma control. Patients were provided asthma care per NAEPP guidelines including asthma education. Results were compared over time and between patients followed by physicians or APNs. Alpha level of significance was ≤0.05. RESULTS: The sample included 471 children, ages 2-17 years (mean = 6.4 ± 2.4 years). Physicians and APN's provided asthma care. Of the 471 children enrolled in the study, 176 (37%) were followed for the full three-year study period. At the initial visit, physician group reported more short courses of oral steroids and more unscheduled visits to PCP for acute asthma care in the past 6 months compared to those followed by APNs (<0.05 for all). Among the total cohort and both subgroups, there were significant improvements in mean Asthma Control Test (ACT), acute care need and mean days/month with asthma symptoms over a three-year period (p < 0.05). There was significantly more improvement in use of oral steroids and urgent care visits in physician group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When asthma guidelines are followed, improvements in asthma control are achieved in children in both the MD and APN groups.

Impact of asthma severity on long-term asthma control.

Background: Asthma is a common childhood disease with significant morbidity. Severe asthma accounts for just 4-6% of patients, but this group is more difficult to treat and is responsible for up to 40% of asthma expenses.Objective: The relationship between asthma severity and control is not well characterized. The main objective of this study was to determine impact of asthma severity on asthma control over time.Methods: This was a three year, prospective observational cohort study at a tertiary care children's hospital. Results were compared over time and between patients with severe and non-severe persistent asthma. Intervention included therapy based on severity and control, accompanied by a NAEPP (EPR-3) guidelines based structured asthma education program.Results: The sample included 471 children referred from primary care offices with the diagnosis of persistent asthma, mean age 6.4 ± 2.4 years. Forty-one children (8.7%) had severe persistent asthma and 430 (91.3%) children had non-severe persistent asthma (mild-moderate persistent). Our sample size decreased over the three-year period and the number of patients completing the third year were 176 (38%) and among them 20 (11.4%) had severe asthma. At the initial visit, children with severe persistent asthma had significantly more acute care needs, more daily symptoms, and lower mean Asthma Control Test™ scores compared to children with non-severe persistent asthma. Differences between groups decreased within six months with significant improvements in most indicators persisting throughout three-year follow up in both groups (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Asthma control improves independent of severity if asthma guidelines are followed.

Improved quality-of-life of caregivers of children with asthma through guideline-based management.

OBJECTIVE: The quality of life (QOL) of caregivers of children with asthma may be related to children's responses to asthma management. AIM: To evaluate change in QOL over time of caregivers of children with asthma through guideline-based management. DESIGN: This was a 3-year prospective cohort study of children with asthma referred to our pediatric asthma center. Families completed Pediatric Asthma Caregiver's Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ), the Asthma Control Test™ (ACT), and reported the number of days/month of albuterol use and wheezing at each clinic visit. RESULTS: We enrolled 143 children, ages 7-17 years (mean = 10.6 ± 2.9), 56.6% male, 70.6% Caucasian. Patients were managed by the same MD (n = 65,45.5%) or APN (n = 78,54.5%) over time. The mean total PACQLQ significantly increased over the 3-year period (F = 67.418, p < .001). Total scores at the first visit were 4.8 ± 1.6, which improved to 6.1 ± 1 at the 3-month follow-up visit. This improvement was sustained at the 1, 2, and 3-year clinic visits. PACQLQ emotional function (F = 60.798, p < .001) and activity limitation (F = 41.517, p < .001) domains significantly improved as well. PACQLQ scores were significantly associated with improved ACT scores (r = .37 to .47, p < .05), fewer days/month of albuterol use (r = -.25 to -.36., p < .05), and wheezing (r = -.28 to -.33, p < .05). There were no significant differences in PACQLQ, or asthma clinical outcome measures between MD and APN providers. CONCLUSION: Use of National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines significantly improved QOL of caregivers of children with asthma and in asthma-related symptoms. Improvements over time were independent of type of providers.

Environmental exposures and family history of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma pathogenesis is a complex interaction of genetic, ethnic, environmental and social/life style risk factors. AIM: The goal of this study was to identify associations, if any, in children with asthma, between environmental risk factors (exposure to second-hand tobacco smoke (STS), pet ownership, race and a family history of asthma. METHODS: After IRB approval, from June 2011 to December 2014, 823 children with asthma were enrolled in this prospective cross sectional study. At the initial visit, families completed a questionnaire with information on family history of asthma, having a pet at home and exposure to STS by parents at home. Chi square analyses were calculated, with alpha level of significance ≤0.05. RESULTS: History of asthma in parents, siblings or grandparents was reported by 575 (69.8%) patients including father (n = 154, 17.8%) and mother (n = 235, 26.5%). Children with family history of asthma (n = 575) were significantly more likely to have a pet at home and exposure to STS (n = 347, 60.3% and n = 198, 34.4%, respectively) compared to families without a history of asthma (n = 124, 50%, p = 0.006 and n = 44, 17.7%, p < 0.001, respectively). Similarly, asthmatic children with exposure to STS (n = 241) were significantly more likely to have a pet at home and a family history of asthma (n = 153, 63.5% and n = 197, 81.7%, respectively) compared to children with no STS exposure (n = 315, 55.5%, p = 0.034 and n = 371, 65.3%, p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more asthmatic children with immediate relatives with a history of asthma have a pet at home and experience STS exposure compared to children without relatives with a history of asthma, suggesting association between life style choices/environmental exposures and family history of asthma.

Screening high-risk children for asthma through a community intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Many children, particularly those from inner city neighborhoods, have undiagnosed asthma. This study was done to evaluate the effectiveness of an asthma screening, referral and follow-up intervention in an inner city community setting in early identification of children at risk for undiagnosed asthma. METHODS: A descriptive longitudinal cohort design was used to assess children at baseline and at a 2-year follow-up. Parents of children in a private day school and a church Sunday school (N = 103) completed a validated Asthma Screening Tool at both time periods. Children with asthma and at risk for asthma were referred to a primary care provider (PCP). RESULTS: At baseline, screening of 103 children, ages 3-17 years (mean=7.7 ± 2.9), were categorized as known asthma diagnosis (n = 22), at-risk for undiagnosed asthma (n = 52) and not at-risk for asthma (n = 29). Sixty-two (60.2%) parents responded to the 2-year follow-up. Referral to PCP was kept by 61.5% from the known asthma group and by 24% of children at-risk for asthma. At 2-year follow-up, among not at-risk group, no one converted to at risk status, but majority of children among known asthma group continued to have uncontrolled asthma symptoms, and very few received daily preventive asthma medications. CONCLUSIONS: The asthma screening, referral and follow-up intervention for inner city children in a community setting was successful in early identification of patients at-risk for asthma. More education for PCPs on guidelines for diagnosis and management of asthma is needed to decrease childhood asthma morbidity.

Impact of guideline adherence and race on asthma control in children.

BACKGROUND: Asthma control in African Americans (AA) is considered more difficult to achieve than in Caucasian Americans (CA). The aim of this study was to compare asthma control over time among AA and CA children whose asthma is managed per NAEPP (EPR-3) guidelines. METHODS: This was a one-year prospective study of children referred by their primary care physicians for better asthma care in a specialty asthma clinic. All children received asthma care per NAEPP guidelines. Results were compared between CA and AA children at baseline and then at three-month intervals for one year. RESULTS: Of the 345 children, ages 2-17 years (mean = 6.2 ± 4), 220 (63.8%) were CA and 125 (36.2%) were AA. There were no significant differences in demographics other than greater pet ownership in CA families. At baseline, AA children had significantly more visits to the Emergency Department for acute asthma symptoms (mean = 2.3 [Formula: see text] compared to CA (1.4 ± 2.3, P = 0.003). There were no other significant differences in acute care utilization, asthma symptoms (mean days/month), or mean asthma control test (ACT) scores at baseline. Within 3-6 months, in both groups, mean ACT scores, asthma symptoms and acute care utilization significantly improved (P < 0.05 for all) and change over time in both groups was comparable except for a significantly greater decrease in ED visits in AA children compared to CA children (P = 002). CONCLUSION: Overall, improvement in asthma control during longitudinal assessment was similar between AA and CA children because of  consistent use of NAEPP asthma care guidelines.

Erratum to: Racial differences in pet ownership in families of children with asthma.

In the article by Sheikh SI, et al, "Racial differences in pet ownership in families of children with asthma" in World Journal of Pediatrics 2016;12(3):343-346 (doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0027-9), the last author's name was incorrectly listed as "Don Hayes". His name should have read "Don Hayes Jr".

Racial differences in pet ownership in families of children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to household domestic animals such as cats and dogs in early life may have some role in pathogenesis of asthma. Racial differences exist in the prevalence of asthma. We hypothesized that there may also be racial differences in pet ownership in families with asthma. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted from June 2011 to December 2014 on 823 of 850 (97%) families of children with asthma for pet ownership. Comparisons among racial groups were done using chi square analysis and one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 6.9±4.4 years. A total of 540 (65.62%) patients were Caucasian, 195 (23.7%) African American, 42 (5.1%) hispanics, and 26 (3.2%) biracial with one Caucasian parent. Pets in the home were reported by 470 (58.5%) households. Significantly fewer African American and hispanic families had pets in the home (26.9% and 44.7%) than biracial and Caucasian families (72% and 69.9%, P<0.001). Likewise, significantly more biracial and Caucasian families were noted to have dogs (52% and 54.4%) or cats (25.4% and 40%) or both cats and dogs (28% and 18%) than African Americans families (20.3%, P<0.001; 7.1%, P<0.001) and (4.6%, P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among families with asthmatic children, pet ownership is significantly more likely in Caucasian families compared with African-American and Hispanic families, thus there is a racial diversity in pet ownership among families of children with asthma.