Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 117(4): 472-479, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36049105

RESUMO

Total duodenopancreatectomy (TDP), performed exclusively by laparoscopic approach is considered one of the most complex abdominal surgical procedures. TDP with preservation of spleen vessels (operation Kimura) is a more technically-demanding procedure, but is beneficial in selected cases. While some high-volume centers have gained experience in minimally-invasive pancreatectomies, laparoscopic approach remains a recommendation for well selected patients with benign or low-grade malignant tumors and should be performed with caution, by experienced HPB surgeons. In this paper, we present a spleen preserving, splenic vessels spearing, pure laparoscopic TDP on a 40-year-old patient diagnosed with diffuse IPMN performed in our center, illustrating the operative steps.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adulto , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Intraductais Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Baço/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 116(6 Suppl): S16-S27, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35274608

RESUMO

Abdominal sepsis remains the second most common source of sepsis, a life-threatening condition that became a global health priority in the medical field research. Open abdomen is part of the damage control surgery, a life-saving strategy in a well-selected group of surgical patients with severe abdominal sepsis and intra-abdominal hypertension. Definitions and recommendations in the management of abdominal sepsis and open abdomen have gradually evolved, as a reflection of the progress of both the comprehension of physiopathological mechanisms involved in sepsis and the technology of different temporary abdominal closure systems. The aim of this paper is to make an up-to-date literature narrative review of the definitions and current practice guidelines in abdominal sepsis, with illustration of clinical experience in the management of open abdomen wounds. In the past decades, progress has been made in the management of abdominal sepsis, with greatly ameliorated survival rates. Rapid diagnosis, extensive comprehension of the physiopathological mechanisms of sepsis, adapted fluid resuscitation, antimicrobial therapy and damage-control surgery, orchestrated by a multy-disciplinary team, play an equally important role in the prognosis of a patient.


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias , Hipertensão Intra-Abdominal , Sepse , Abdome/cirurgia , Humanos , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Life (Basel) ; 12(11)2022 Nov 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36362961

RESUMO

Background and Aims: Recent single-center retrospective studies have focused on laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) in elderly patients, and compared the outcomes between the laparoscopic and open approaches. Our study aimed to determine the outcomes of LPD in the elderly patients, by performing a systematic review and a meta-analysis of relevant studies. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing the Embase, Medline, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases to identify all studies that compared laparoscopic vs. open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Results: Five retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. Overall, 90-day mortality rates were significantly decreased after LPD in elderly patients compared with open approaches (RR = 0.56; 95%CI: 0.32−0.96; p = 0.037, I2 = 0%). The laparoscopic approach had similar mortality rate at 30-day, readmission rate in hospital, Clavien−Dindo complications, pancreatic fistula grade B/C, complete resection rate, reoperation for complications and blood loss as the open approach. Additionally, comparing with younger patients (<70 years old), no significant differences were seen in elderly cohort patients regarding mortality rate at 90 days, readmission rate to hospital, and complication rate. Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis, we identify that LPD in elderly is a safe procedure, with significantly lower 90-day mortality rates when compared with the open approach. Our results should be considered with caution, considering the retrospective analyses of the included studies; larger prospective studies are required.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA