Optimal Treatment Strategies for cT2 Staged Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and the Gastroesophageal Junction: A Multinational, High-volume Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: A multi-national high-volume center study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes after primary surgery (PS) or neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery (NAT/S) in cT2 staged adenocarcinomas of the esophagus (EAC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment approach with either NAT/S or PS for clinically staged cT2cNany or cT2N0 EAC and GEJ remains unknown due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases from ten centers was performed. Between 01/2012-08/2023 645 patients who fulfilled inclusion criteria of GEJ Siewert type I, II or EAC with cT2 status at diagnosis underwent PS or NAT/S with curative intent. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In the cT2cNany cohort 192 patients (29.8%) underwent PS and 453 (70.2%) underwent NAT/S. In all cT2cN0 patients (n=333), NAT/s remained the more frequent treatment (56.2%). Patients undergoing PS were in both cT2 cohorts older (P<0.001) and had a higher ASA classification (P<0.05). R0 resection showed no differences between NAT/S and PS in both cT2 cohorts (P>0.4).Median OS was 51.0 months in the PS group (95% CI 31.6-70.4) versus 114.0 months (95% CI 53.9-174.1) in the NAT/S group (P=0.003) of cT2cNany patients. For cT2cN0 patients NAT/S was associated with longer OS (P=0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.001). After propensity score matching of cT2N0 patients, survival benefit for NAT/S remained (P=0.004). Histopathology showed that 38.1% of cT2cNany and 34.2% of cT2cN0 patients were understaged. CONCLUSIONS: Due to unreliable identification of cT2N0 disease, all patients should be offered a multimodal therapeutic approach.

Is long-term follow-up solely by imaging tests safe in non-operated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

INTRODUCTION: the diagnosis of asymptomatic sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) has increased significantly due to the widespread use of high-resolution imaging tests, which is why the most appropriate management at the time of diagnosis is the subject of debate, as is how to follow-up patients. AIMS: the objective of this study was to analyze the frequency of imaging and endoscopic studies performed during long-term follow-up. METHODS: a retrospective review was performed of a database collected between January 2008 and December 2020 of patients with an incidental diagnosis of small NF-PNETs; follow-up was closed in March 2023. The imaging tests performed at the time of diagnosis and long-term follow-up were recorded. Growing less than 1 mm per year has not been considered as a worrisome feature. Follow-up was performed through imaging tests, considering endoscopic cytology for lesions with a faster grow rate. RESULTS: fifty-eight patients were included; the median age was 69 years. The initial mean size of the lesions studied was 12.79 mm (5-27). Follow-up was carried out only with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The initial size did not influence the behavior of the lesion in a statistically significant manner. Twenty-eight tumors (45 %) increased in size, with a growth equal to or less than 4 mm in 24 cases. The mean follow-up time was 82.41 months (12-164). No patient developed metastasis or died from PNET progression. CONCLUSIONS: the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors of small size can be performed safely with only imaging tests.

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic cysts. Usefulness of intracystic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19.9.).

INTRODUCTION: To decide treatment of hepatic cysts diagnosis between simple hepatic cyst (SHC) and cystic mucinous neoplasm (CMN). Radiological features are not patognomonic. Some studies have suggested the utility of intracystic tumor markers. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of our prospective database including patients treated due to symptomatic SHC from 2003 to 2021. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of treatment of symptomatic SHC and the usefulness of the determination of intracystic "carcinoembryonic antigen" (CEA) and "carbohydrate antigen" CA 19.9. RESULTS: 50 patients diagnosed and treated for symptomatic SHC were included. In 15 patients the first treatment was percutaneous drainage. In 35 patients the first treatment was laparoscopic fenestration. Four patients were diagnosed of premalignant or malignant liver cystic lesions (MCN, IPMN, lymphoma B); three of them required surgery after initial fenestration and pathological diagnosis. Median CEA and CA 19-9 were 196 µg/L and 227.321 U/mL respectively. Patients with malignant or premalignant pathology did not have higher levels of intracystic tumor markers. Positive predictive value was 0% for both markers, and negative predictive value was 89% and 91% respectively. CONCLUSION: Values of intracystic tumor markers CEA and CA 19-9 do not allow distinguishing simple cysts from cystic liver neoplasms. The most effective treatment for symptomatic simple liver cysts is surgical fenestration. The pathological analysis of the wall of the cysts enables the correct diagnosis, allowing to indicate a surgical reintervention in cases of hepatic cyst neoplasia.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los quistes hepáticos. Utilidad de los marcadores tumorales intraquísticos (CEA y CA 19.9.) / Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic cysts: Usefulness of intracystic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19.9)

Introducción: El tratamiento de los quistes hepáticos requiere del diagnóstico diferencial de quiste simple hepático (QSH) de la neoplasia mucinosa quística (NMQ) hepática. Las características radiológicas no son patognomónicas. Algunos estudios han sugerido la utilidad de los marcadores tumorales (MKT) intraquísticos. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de base de datos prospectiva incluyendo pacientes diagnosticados de QSH sintomático desde el 2003 hasta el 2021. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar los resultados del tratamiento de los QSH sintomáticos y analizar la utilidad de la determinación de «carcinoembryonic antigen» (CEA) y «carbohydrate antigen» CA 19.9 intraquísticos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 50 pacientes tratados por quiste sintomático. En 15 pacientes el primer tratamiento fue el drenaje percutáneo. En 35 pacientes se realizó fenestración laparoscópica. Cuatro pacientes se diagnosticaron de lesiones premalignas/malignas (NMQ, NPIB, linfoma B); tres de ellos requirieron una segunda cirugía tras la fenestración y el diagnóstico anatomopatológico. La mediana de los valores de CEA y CA- 19.9 fue de 196μg/L y 227.321U/mL respectivamente. Los pacientes con lesiones premalignas no tuvieron valores elevados de MKT. El valor predictivo positivo fue del 0% en ambos MKT, y el valor predictivo negativo fue de 89% y 91% respectivamente. Conclusiones: Los valores de CEA y CA 19.9 intraquísticos no permiten distinguir los QSH de las NMH. El tratamiento más resolutivo de los QSH sintomáticos es la fenestración quirúrgica. El análisis anatomopatológico de la pared del quiste posibilita su correcto diagnóstico, permitiendo indicar una reintervención quirúrgica en los casos de NMQ.(AU)

Introduction: To decide treatment of hepatic cysts diagnosis between simple hepatic cyst (SHC) and cystic mucinous neoplasm (CMN). Radiological features are not pathognomonic. Some studies have suggested the utility of intracystic tumor markers. Methods: Retrospective analysis of our prospective database including patients treated due to symptomatic SHC from 2003 to 2021. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of treatment of symptomatic SHC and the usefulness of the determination of intracystic “carcinoembryonic antigen” (CEA) and “carbohydrate antigen” CA 19.9. Results: Fifty patients diagnosed and treated for symptomatic SHC were included. In 15 patients the first treatment was percutaneous drainage. In 35 patients the first treatment was laparoscopic fenestration. Four patients were diagnosed of premalignant or malignant liver cystic lesions (MCN, IPMN, and lymphoma B); three of them required surgery after initial fenestration and pathological diagnosis. Median CEA and CA 19.9 were 196μg/L and 227.321U/mL, respectively. Patients with malignant or premalignant pathology did not have higher levels of intracystic tumor markers. Positive predictive value was 0% for both markers, and negative predictive value was 89% and 91%, respectively. Conclusion: Values of intracystic tumor markers CEA and CA 19.9 do not allow distinguishing simple cysts from cystic liver neoplasms. The most effective treatment for symptomatic simple liver cysts is surgical fenestration. The pathological analysis of the wall of the cysts enables the correct diagnosis, allowing to indicate a surgical reintervention in cases of hepatic cyst neoplasia.(AU)

Is long-term follow-up solely by imaging tests safe in non-operated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors?

Introduction: the diagnosis of asymptomatic sporadic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs) has increased significantly due to the widespread use of high-resolution imaging tests, which is why the most appropriate management at the time of diagnosis is the subject of debate, as is how to follow-up patients. Aims: the objective of this study was to analyze the frequency of imaging and endoscopic studies performed during long-term follow-up. Methods: a retrospective review was performed of a database collected between January 2008 and December 2020 of patients with an incidental diagnosis of small NF-PNETs; follow-up was closed in March 2023. The imaging tests performed at the time of diagnosis and long-term follow-up were recorded. Growing less than 1 mm per year has not been considered as a worrisome feature. Follow-up was performed through imaging tests, considering endoscopic cytology for lesions with a faster grow rate. Results: fifty-eight patients were included; the median age was 69 years. The initial mean size of the lesions studied was 12.79 mm (5-27). Follow-up was carried out only with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The initial size did not influence the behavior of the lesion in a statistically significant manner. Twenty-eight tumors (45 %) increased in size, with a growth equal to or less than 4 mm in 24 cases. The mean follow-up time was 82.41 months (12-164). No patient developed metastasis or died from PNET progression. Conclusions: the follow-up of neuroendocrine tumors of small size can be performed safely with only imaging tests. (AU)