RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch has a proven ability to estimate stroke-to-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delay. We evaluated the possibility of enhancing this estimation by quantifying MRI (DWI and FLAIR) signals, and compared this approach to the visual evaluation of DWI-FLAIR mismatch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 194 patients presenting an ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory that had been explored with 3T MRI within 12h. According to the study design, written informed consent was waived and patient information was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis. DWI-FLAIR mismatch was visually estimated by two radiologists and a quantification of MRI signals based on a manual segmentation of stroke lesion volume was performed. Using their receiver operating curve and area under the curve (AUC), we identified the variables of MRI quantification that were predictive of stroke-to-MRI delay, then compared their performance against visual classification. RESULTS: The quantitative variables identified as predictive of stroke-to-MRI delay were: 1st quartile, 3rd quartile and median values of B0; 1st quartile, 3rd quartile, median and relative values of B1000; 1st quartile and relative values of the apparent diffusion coefficient. FLAIR was not found to be predictive. The AUC values of these variables ranged between 0618±0.053 and 0.683±0.048. The relative value of B1000 appeared to be the best predictive quantitative variable, with predictive values comparable to visual classification. CONCLUSIONS: The quantification of MRI signal may be a helpful tool for stroke dating but cannot outperform the visual estimation of stroke lesion age.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/diagnóstico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/patologia , Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Artéria Cerebral Média/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The goal of the present study was to determine whether the presence or absence of parenchymal FLAIR hyperintensity alone, before thrombolysis, might be a predictive factor of ischemic stroke outcomes after the acute phase of stroke and at 3 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 84 patients with an ischemic stroke between November 2007 and March 2012, who underwent 3T MRI, were treated by thrombolysis, and had medical follow-up at 3 months. Two readers analyzed parenchymal FLAIR visibility. Logistic regressions were performed for NIHSS difference (NIHSS at admission - NIHSS at the end of hospitalization) and for 3 months modified Ranking Score (mRS). Predictive values of positive parenchymal FLAIR for identifying poor outcome at discharge and at 3 months were estimated. RESULTS: Parenchymal FLAIR positivity was not predictive of NIHSS difference but it predicted poor outcome at 3 months (sensitivity: 0.49 [0.37-0.60], specificity: 0.69 [0.46-0.91], positive predictive value: 0.87 [0.76-0.98] and negative predictive value: 0.24 [0.12-0.36]). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 Tesla, the presence of a parenchymal hyperintense FLAIR signal before thrombolysis is predictive of a poor clinical outcome at 3 months.
Assuntos
Encéfalo/patologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/patologia , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidade , Idoso , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: At 1.5 T, diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (DWI-FLAIR) mismatch helps identify strokes within 4.5 hours of onset. However, at 3T, studies have found divergent results. The goal of this study was to determine whether DWI-FLAIR mismatch at 3T would also be helpful for identifying patients within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. METHODS: All patients presenting with an ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory and explored with 3T MRI within 12 hours between November 2007 and April 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Two readers analyzed the DWI and FLAIR images. Logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of FLAIR visibility. Also, the predictive values of a mismatch for identifying patients with stroke onset ≤4.5 hours were estimated. RESULTS: The study included 194 patients. The only predictive factor of FLAIR visibility was delayed MRI acquisition. The DWI-FLAIR mismatch was able to identify patients within 4.5 hours of stroke onset with relatively low sensitivity (0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.63), low specificity (0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.77), high positive predictive value (0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.94), and very low negative predictive value (0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.28). In addition, 44.5% of patients had a positive FLAIR sequence within 4.5 hours. CONCLUSIONS: This study improves our understanding of DWI-FLAIR mismatch as an imaging biomarker for wake-up management of patients with stroke. At 3T, the presence of a DWI-FLAIR mismatch was able to identify stroke onset of <4.5 hours. However, 44.5% of such stroke cases demonstrated FLAIR signal changes.