Lack of beneficial effects of low-dose radiation therapy on hand osteoarthritis symptoms and inflammation: a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) is widely used as treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) in some countries, while relatively unknown in others. Systematic literature review displayed a lack of high-level evidence for beneficial effects in clinical practice. The aim was to assess the efficacy of LDRT on symptoms and inflammation in hand OA patients in a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial, using validated outcome measures. DESIGN: Hand OA patients, ≥50 years, with pain ≥5 (scale 0-10) and non-responding to conservative therapy were included and randomised 1:1 to receive LDRT (6 × 1 Gy in 2 weeks) or sham (6 × 0 Gy in 2 weeks). Primary outcome was the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders, 3 months post-intervention. Secondary outcomes were pain and functioning (Australian/Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index; AUSCAN), quality of life (Short Form Health Survey; SF36) and inflammatory outcomes: erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein serum levels, effusion, synovial thickening and power Doppler signal on ultrasound (range 0-3). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included. After 3 months, no significant difference in responders was observed between groups (LDRT: 8 (29%); sham: 10 (36%); difference -7% (95%CI -31-17%)). Also, differences in clinical and inflammatory outcomes between groups were small and not significant. CONCLUSIONS: We were unable to demonstrate a substantial beneficial effect of LDRT on symptoms and inflammation in patients with hand OA, compared to sham treatment. Although a small effect can not be excluded, a treatment effect exceeding 20% is very unlikely, given the confidence interval. Therefore, in the absence of other high-level evidence, we advise against the use LDRT as treatment for patients with hand OA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR4574 (Dutch Trial Register).

Nationwide population-based study of trends and regional variation in breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Landmark trials have shown breast-conserving surgery (BCS) combined with radiotherapy to be as safe as mastectomy in breast cancer treatment. This population-based study aimed to evaluate trends in BCS from 1989 to 2015 in nine geographical regions in the Netherlands. METHODS: All women diagnosed between 1989 and 2015 with primary T1-2 N0-1 breast cancer, treated with BCS or mastectomy, were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Crude and case mix-adjusted rates of BCS were evaluated and compared between nine Dutch regions for two time intervals: 1989-2002 and 2003-2015. The annual percentage change in BCS per region over time was assessed by means of Joinpoint regression analyses. Explanatory variables associated with the choice of initial surgery were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 202 934 patients were included, 82 200 treated in 1989-2002 and 120 734 in 2003-2015. During 1989-2002, the mean rate of BCS was 50·6 per cent, varying significantly from 39·0 to 71·7 per cent between the nine regions. For most regions, a marked rise in BCS was observed between 2002 and 2003. During 2003-2015, the mean rate of BCS increased to 67·4 per cent, but still varied significantly between regions from 58·5 to 75·5 per cent. A significant variation remained after case-mix correction. CONCLUSION: This large nationwide study showed that the use of BCS increased from 1989 to 2015 in the Netherlands. After adjustment for explanatory variables, a large variation still existed between the nine regions. This regional variation underlines the need for implementation of a uniform treatment and decision-making strategy.

Incidence of second tumors after treatment with or without radiation for rectal cancer.

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between radiation therapy (RT) for rectal cancer and the development of second tumors. Patients and methods: Data on all surgically treated non-metastatic primary rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 1989 and 2007 were retrieved from the Netherlands population-based cancer registry. Fine and Gray's competing risk model was used for estimation of the cumulative incidence of second tumors. Multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox regression. Results: The cohort consisted of 29 027 patients of which 15 467 patients had undergone RT. Median follow-up was 7.7 years (range 0-27). Among all 4398 patients who were diagnosed with a second primary tumor, 1030 had one or more pelvic tumors. The standardized incidence risk for any second tumor was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.19), resulting in 27.7/10 000 excess cancer cases per year in patients treated for rectal cancer compared with the general population. RT reduced the cumulative incidence of second pelvic tumors compared with patients who did not receive RT (subhazard ratio [SHR] 0.77, CI 0.68-0.88). Second prostate tumors were less common in patients who received RT (SHR 0.54, CI 0.46-0.64), gynecological tumors were more frequently observed in patients who received RT (SHR 1.49, CI 1.11-2.00). Conclusions: Patients with previous rectal cancer had a marginally increased risk of a second tumor compared with the general population. Gynecological tumors occurred more often in females who received RT, but this did not result in an overall increased risk for a second cancer. RT even seemed to have a protective effect on the development of other second pelvic tumors, pre-dominantly for prostate cancer. These findings are highly important and can contribute to improved patient counseling.

Patterns and predictors of first and subsequent recurrence in women with early breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Little is known about the occurrence, timing and prognostic factors for first and also subsequent local (LR), regional (RR) or distant (DM) breast cancer recurrence. As current follow-up is still consensus-based, more information on the patterns and predictors of subsequent recurrences can inform more personalized follow-up decisions. METHODS: Women diagnosed with stage I-III invasive breast cancer who were treated with curative intent were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 9342). Extended Cox regression was used to model the hazard of recurrence over ten years of follow-up for not only site-specific first, but also subsequent recurrences after LR or RR. RESULTS: In total, 362 patients had LR, 148 RR and 1343 DM as first recurrence. The risk of first recurrence was highest during the second year post-diagnosis (3.9%; 95% CI 3.5-4.3) with similar patterns for LR, RR and DM. Young age (<40), tumour size >2 cm, tumour grade II/III, positive lymph nodes, multifocality and no chemotherapy were prognostic factors for first recurrence. The risk of developing a second recurrence after LR or RR (N = 176) was significantly higher after RR than after LR (50 vs 29%; p < 0.001). After a second LR or RR, more than half of the women were diagnosed with a third recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of subsequent recurrence is high, absolute incidence remains low. Also, almost half the second recurrences are detected in the first year after previous recurrence and more than 80% are DM. This suggests that more intensive follow-up for early detection subsequent recurrence is not likely to be (cost-)effective.

Clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node procedure versus follow-up: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-08).

BACKGROUND: Studies showed that axillary lymph node dissection can be safely omitted in presence of positive sentinel lymph node(s) in breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy. Since the outcome of the sentinel lymph node biopsy has no clinical consequence, the value of the procedure itself is being questioned. The aim of the BOOG 2013-08 trial is to investigate whether the sentinel lymph node biopsy can be safely omitted in clinically node negative breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy. METHODS: The BOOG 2013-08 is a Dutch prospective non-inferiority randomized multicentre trial. Women with pathologically confirmed clinically node negative T1-2 invasive breast cancer undergoing breast conserving therapy will be randomized for sentinel lymph node biopsy versus no sentinel lymph node biopsy. Endpoints include regional recurrence after 5 (primary endpoint) and 10 years of follow-up, distant-disease free and overall survival, quality of life, morbidity and cost-effectiveness. Previous data indicate a 5-year regional recurrence free survival rate of 99% for the control arm and 96% for the study arm. In combination with a non-inferiority limit of 5% and probability of 0.8, this result in a sample size of 1.644 patients including a lost to follow-up rate of 10%. Primary and secondary endpoints will be reported after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. DISCUSSION: If the sentinel lymph node biopsy can be safely omitted in clinically node negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy, this study will cost-effectively lead to a decreased axillary morbidity rate and thereby improved quality of life with non-inferior regional control, distant-disease free survival and overall survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The BOOG 2013-08 study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov since October 20, 2014, Identifier: NCT02271828. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02271828.

The value of completion axillary treatment in sentinel node positive breast cancer patients undergoing a mastectomy: a Dutch randomized controlled multicentre trial (BOOG 2013-07).

BACKGROUND: Trials failed to demonstrate additional value of completion axillary lymph node dissection in case of limited sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. It has been suggested that the low regional recurrence rates in these trials might partially be ascribed to accidental irradiation of part of the axilla by whole breast radiation therapy, which precludes extrapolation of results to mastectomy patients. The aim of the randomized controlled BOOG 2013-07 trial is therefore to investigate whether completion axillary treatment can be safely omitted in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy. DESIGN: This study is designed as a non-inferiority randomized controlled multicentre trial. Women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with unilateral invasive clinically T1-2 N0 breast cancer who are treated with mastectomy, and who have a maximum of three axillary sentinel lymph nodes containing micro- and/or macrometastases, will be randomized for completion axillary treatment versus no completion axillary treatment. Completion axillary treatment can consist of completion axillary lymph node dissection or axillary radiation therapy. Primary endpoint is regional recurrence rate at 5 years. Based on a 5-year regional recurrence free survival rate of 98 % among controls and 96 % for study subjects, the sample size amounts 439 per arm (including 10 % lost to follow-up), to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the rate for study and control subjects is inferior by at least 5 % with a probability of 0.8. Results will be reported after 5 and 10 years of follow-up. DISCUSSION: We hypothesize that completion axillary treatment can be safely omitted in sentinel node positive breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. If confirmed, this study will significantly decrease the number of breast cancer patients receiving extensive treatment of the axilla, thereby diminishing the risk of morbidity and improving quality of life, while maintaining excellent regional control and without affecting survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The BOOG 2013-07 study is registered in the register of ClinicalTrials.gov since April 10, 2014, Identifier: NCT02112682 .

Small but significant excess mortality compared with the general population for long-term survivors of breast cancer in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Coinciding with the relatively good and improving prognosis for patients with stage I-III breast cancer, late recurrences, new primary tumours and late side-effects of treatment may occur. We gained insight into prognosis for long-term breast cancer survivors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on all 205 827 females aged 15-89 diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer during 1989-2008 were derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Conditional 5-year relative survival was calculated for every subsequent year from diagnosis up to 15 years. RESULTS: For stage I, conditional 5-year relative survival remained ~95% up to 15 years after diagnosis (a stable 5-year excess mortality rate of 5%). For stage II, excess mortality remained 10% for those aged 15-44 or 45-59 and 15% for those aged 60-74. For stage III, excess mortality decreased from 35% at diagnosis to 10% at 15 years for those aged 15-44 or 45-59, and from ~40% to 30% for those aged ≥60. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage I or II breast cancer had a (very) good long-term prognosis, albeit exhibiting a small but significant excess mortality at least up to 15 years after diagnosis. Improvements albeit from a lower level were mainly seen for patients who had been diagnosed with stage III disease. Caregivers can use this information to better inform (especially disease-free) cancer survivors about their actual prognosis.

Satisfaction with information provision is associated with baseline but not with follow-up quality of life among lymphoma patients: Results from the PROFILES registry.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate information provision is an important determinant of patient satisfaction and might also affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of cancer patients. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between perceived information provision at baseline and HRQoL, anxiety and depression among lymphoma patients two years later. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study is part of a longitudinal, population-based survey among all lymphoma patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2009 as registered in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (southern part of The Netherlands). Patients between six months and 10 years after diagnoses received the first questionnaire including the EORTC QLQ-INFO25, EORTC QLQ-C30 and HADS at baseline (T1) and the second two years later (T2). All analyses are stratified for time since diagnosis (< 2 and ≥ 2 years since diagnosis). RESULTS: At baseline 69% of the patients (n = 1186) responded, at T2 355 (30%) patients responded. For patients < 2 years since diagnosis, receiving more medical test information was associated with higher levels of cognitive functioning (ß = 0.46; p = 0.04) and lower levels of anxiety (ß = -0.41; p = 0.04) at baseline, no prospective relationships were found. For patients ≥ 2 years since diagnosis, receiving more medical test information (ß = 0.20; p = 0.03) was associated with better emotional functioning, while receiving more treatment information was associated with worse emotional functioning (ß = -0.21; p = 0.04). Among this group, satisfaction with the received information was associated with better functioning (ß ranging from -0.15 to -0.33; all p < 0.05) at baseline, and these relationships remained significant prospectively for physical (ß = -0.13; p = 0.02) and emotional functioning (ß = -0.13; p = 0.04) only. Stability of satisfaction with received information over time was associated with better emotional (ß = -0.13) and better cognitive functioning (ß = -0.09; p < 0.05) at T2. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that satisfaction with received information among lymphoma patients was associated with better HRQoL at baseline (only for patients ≥ 2 years since diagnosis), but not at follow-up when corrected for baseline HRQoL.

Quality assurance of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery among patients in the BOOG 2013-08 trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the BOOG 2013-08 trial (NCT02271828), cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients were randomized between breast conserving surgery with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) followed by whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT). While awaiting primary endpoint results (axillary recurrence rate), this study aims to perform a quality assurance analysis on protocol adherence and (incidental) axillary radiation therapy (RT) dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled between 2015 and 2022. Data on prescribed RT and (in 25% of included patients) planning target volumes (PTV) parameters were recorded for axillary levels I-IV and compared between treatment arms. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic variables for incidental axillary RT dose. RESULTS: 1,439/1,461 included patients (98.5%) were treated according to protocol and 87 patients (5.9%) received regional RT (SLNB 10.9%, no-SLNB 1.5 %). In 326 patients included in the subgroup analysis, the mean incidental PTV dose at axilla level I was 59.5% of the prescribed breast RT dose. In 5 patients (1.5%) the mean PTV dose at level I was ≥95% of the prescribed breast dose. No statistically or clinically significant differences regarding incidental axillary RT dose were found between treatment arms. Tumour bed boost (yes/no) was associated with a higher incidental mean dose in level I (R2 = 0.035, F(6, 263) = 1.532, p 0.168). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that RT-protocol adherence was high, and that incidental axillary RT dose was low in the BOOG 2013-08 trial. Potential differences between treatmentarms regarding the primary endpoint can thus not be attributed to different axillary radiation doses.

The role of radioactive iodine-125 seed localization in breast-conserving therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used in the framework of breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Localization of the initial tumor is essential to guide surgical resection after NAC. This study describes the results obtained with I-125 seed localization in BCT including NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2010, 85 patients treated with NAC and BCT after I-125 seed localization were included. Radiological and pathological response and resection margins were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: BCT was carried out in 85 patients without secondary local excisions. Nineteen patients with unifocal tumors and seven patients with multifocal tumors showed a complete pathological response (P = 0.18). Tumor-free resection margins were obtained in 78 patients (50 patients with unifocal and 28 patients with multifocal tumors, P = 0.27). Focally involved margins were found in four patients (two patients with a unifocal and two patients with a multifocal tumor, P = 0.27). A subsequent mastectomy was carried out in three patients (two patients with multifocal tumors, P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: BCT after NAC can be carried out successfully after initial localization with I-125 seeds in both unifocal and multifocal breast tumors with complete resection rates of >90%.

Results of a phase II pilot study of moderate dose radiotherapy for inoperable desmoid-type fibromatosis--an EORTC STBSG and ROG study (EORTC 62991-22998).

BACKGROUND: To determine the activity of radiotherapy in patients with inoperable desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) a multicenter prospective phase II trial was carried out. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable progressive disease of primary, recurrent or incompletely resected lesions received a dose of 56 Gy in 28 fractions. Follow-up MRI studies were carried out every 3 months for 2 years and thereafter every 6 months. The primary end point was local control rate at 3 years, estimated by a nonparametric method for interval-censored survival data. Secondary end points were objective tumor response, acute and late toxic effect. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (27 F/17 M) were enrolled from 2001 to 2008. Median age was 39.5 years. Main tumor sites included trunk 15 (34.1%) and extremities 27 (61.3%). Median follow-up was 4.8 years. The 3-year local control rate was 81.5% (90% one-sided confidence interval 74% to 100%). Best overall response during the first 3 years was complete response (CR) 6 (13.6%), partial response (PR) 16 (36.4%), stable disease 18 (40.9%), progressive disease 3 (6.8%) and nonassessable 1 (2.3%). Five patients developed new lesions. After 3 years, the response further improved in three patients: (CR 2, PR 1). Acute grade 3 side-effects were limited to skin, mucosal membranes and pain. Late toxic effect consisted of mild edema in 10 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate dose radiotherapy is an effective treatment of patients with DF. Response after radiation therapy is slow with continuing regression seen even after 3 years.

Diminishing differences in treatment between patients with colorectal cancer with and without diabetes: a population-based study.

AIMS: An increasing number of oncologists will be confronted with individuals having diabetes and cancer. We assessed changes in patient-, tumour- and treatment-related variables in patients with colorectal cancer with and without diabetes. METHODS: All 17 170 cases of primary colorectal cancer between 1995 and 2010 in the South-Eastern Netherlands were included. The Cochrane-Armitage test and logistic regression analysis were used to analyse trends. RESULTS: In total, 11 893 patients were diagnosed with colon cancer and 5277 with rectal cancer, of whom 1711 (14%) and 609 (12%), respectively, had diabetes at the time of cancer diagnosis. Patients with colorectal cancer with diabetes compared with those without were approximately 5 years older and more often diagnosed with proximal colon tumours (60 vs. 54%; P < 0.0001). Chemotherapy administration significantly increased in patients with stage III colon cancer with and without diabetes (from 17% in 1995-1998 to 50% in 2007-2010, 38% to 63%, respectively; P < 0.0001). However, in the most recent period, and after adjusting for the co-variables age, gender, year of diagnosis and specific co-morbidities, patients with stage III colon cancer with diabetes received adjuvant chemotherapy less frequently than those without [odds ratio 0.7 (95% CI 0.5-0.9); P = 0.002]. The proportion of patients with stage II/III rectal cancer with and without diabetes who underwent radiotherapy has been similar in recent years (91 vs. 87%). CONCLUSIONS: Although the administration of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased between 1995 and 2010 in patients with colorectal cancer with and without diabetes, patients with colorectal cancer with diabetes continue to receive chemotherapy less frequently than those without diabetes.

Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' trial.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer treated with breast-conserving radiotherapy, the influence of the boost dose on cosmetic outcome after long-term follow-up is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 348 patients participating in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' mega trial with a minimum follow-up of 6 years. Digitalised pictures were analysed using specific software, enabling quantification of seven relative asymmetry features associated with different aspects of fibrosis. RESULTS: After 3 years, we noted a statistically significantly poorer outcome for the boost patients for six features compared with those of the no boost patients. Up to 9 years of follow-up, results continued to worsen in the same magnitude for the both patient groups. We noted the following determinants for poorer outcome: (i) boost treatment, (ii) larger excision volumes, (iii) younger age, (iv) tumours located in the central lower quadrants of the breast and (v) a boost dose administered with photons. CONCLUSIONS: A boost dose worsens the change in breast appearance in the first 3 years. Moreover, the development of fibrosis associated with whole-breast irradiation, as estimated with the relative asymmetry features, is an ongoing process until (at least) 9 years after irradiation.

Target Volume Coverage and Organ at Risk Doses for Left-sided Whole-breast Irradiation With or Without Internal Mammary Chain Irradiation: A Comparison Between Three Techniques Representing the Past and the Present.

AIMS: The 15-year results of the EORTC 229922-10925 phase III trial showed a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality and breast cancer recurrences after internal mammary chain (IMC) and medio-supraclavicular irradiation. Unexpectedly, cardiac death was not increased, and the incidence of cardiac events did not differ between left- and right-sided cases, although target volume coverages and organ at risk doses were unknown. Therefore, a planning study was carried out comparing the past and the present, to eventually enable, thereafter, an increased therapeutic ratio of IMC irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A planning study was carried out on target volume coverage and organ at risk doses for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) ± IMC comparing the results between two-dimensional radiotherapy (free-breathing), hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; breath-hold) and robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT; free-breathing) for 10 left-sided breast cancer cases. Two-dimensional radiotherapy consisted of two tangential wedged photon breast fields and mixed electron/photon beams for the IMC. Hybrid IMRT included two tangential photon breast fields (70%) complemented with IMRT (30%). IMPT plans were created using multi-field robust optimisation (5 mm set-up and 3% range uncertainties) with two (WBI) or three (WBI + IMC) beams. RESULTS: Target volume dose objectives were met for hybrid IMRT and IMPT. For two-dimensional radiotherapy, target coverage was 97% and 83% for breast and IMC, respectively. The mean heart dose for WBI only was <2 Gy for all techniques. For WBI + IMC, heart doses (mean heart dose, mean left anterior descending region, volume of the heart receiving 5 Gy (V5) were significantly higher for two-dimensional radiotherapy when compared with contemporary techniques. The V5 left anterior descending region reduced from 100% (two-dimensional radiotherapy) to 70% and 20% for hybrid IMRT and IMPT, respectively. CONCLUSION: Contemporary radiotherapy techniques result in improved target volume coverage and significantly decreased heart doses for WBI + IMC radiotherapy. Hence, nowadays an increased therapeutic ratio of elective IMC irradiation may be anticipated.

Variation in the Use of Boost Irradiation in Breast-Conserving Therapy in the Netherlands: The Effect of a National Guideline and Cofounding Factors.

AIMS: To determine the variation in radiation therapy boost use in a nationwide study following adjustment of a national guideline in 2011, as well as to address the relationship to patient, tumour and radiation therapy institutional factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All invasive breast cancers and non-invasive breast cancers (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS) that received external whole-breast radiation between 2011 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Box plots were used to evaluate variation over time and logistic regression was carried out to address other factors influencing the variation. Funnel plots were constructed, with unadjusted and adjusted data for patient and tumour factors significantly affecting the use of a boost. RESULTS: For breast cancer patients (n = 45,207), the proportion receiving a boost and its range decreased over the years from 37.3-92.7% in 2011 to 28.3-65.4% in 2016. This trend was not observed in DCIS patients (n = 6,844). Young age, large tumours, high grade and the absence of tumour-free resection margins were associated with boost use for both breast cancer and DCIS. For breast cancer, triple-negative tumour subtype and metastatic lymph node involvement were also associated with boost use. Institutional factors did not influence the use of a boost and institutional variation remained substantial after case-mix adjustments. CONCLUSION: Following adjustment of a nationwide implemented guideline, variation in radiation therapy boost use decreased in patients with breast cancer but not in patients with DCIS. Several tumour and patient characteristics were associated with boost use. Substantial institutional variation could not be explained by differences in patient, tumour or predefined institutional characteristics.

The addition of a boost dose on the primary tumour bed after lumpectomy in breast conserving treatment for breast cancer. A summary of the results of EORTC 22881-10882 "boost versus no boost" trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the boost dose to the primary tumour bed in the framework of breast conserving therapy on local control, cosmetic results, fibrosis and overall survival for patients with early stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five thousand five hundred and sixty-nine patients after lumpectomy followed by whole breast irradiation of 50 Gy were randomised. After a microscopically complete lumpectomy (5318 patients), the boost doses were either 0 or 16 Gy, while after a microscopically incomplete (251 patients) lumpectomy randomisation was between 10 and 26 Gy. The results at a median follow-up of 10 years are presented. RESULTS: At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 10.2% versus 6.2% for the 0 Gy and the 16 Gy boost groups (p < 0.0001) and 17.5% versus 10.8% for the 10 and 26 Gy boost groups, respectively (p > 0.1). There was no statistically significant interaction per age group but recurrences tended to occur earlier in younger patients. As younger patients had a higher cumulative risk of local relapse by year 10, the magnitude of the absolute 10-year risk reduction achieved with the boost decreased with increasing age. Development of fibrosis was significantly dependent on the boost dose with a 10-year rate for severe fibrosis of 1.6% after 0 Gy, 3.3% after 10 Gy, 4.4% after 16 Gy and 14.4% after 26 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: An increase of the dose with 16 Gy improved local control for patients after a complete lumpectomy only. The development of fibrosis was clearly dose dependent. With 10 years median follow-up, no impact of survival was observed.

Tumor response after long interval comparing 5x5Gy radiation therapy with chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In the era of organ preserving strategies in rectal cancer, insight into the efficacy of preoperative therapies is crucial. The goal of the current study was to evaluate and compare tumor response in rectal cancer patients according to their type of preoperative therapy. METHODS: All rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014, receiving radiation therapy (RT, 5 × 5Gy; N = 764) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT; N = 5070) followed by total mesorectal excision after an interval of 5-15 weeks were retrieved from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer registry. Logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Median age of patients treated with RT was 76 years (range 28-92) compared to 64 years (range 21-92) for patients treated with CRT (P < 0.001). Patients treated with RT had a significantly lower clinical stage (P < 0.001). A complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) was found in 9.3% of patients treated with RT, significantly less than in patients treated with CRT (17.5%; odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.57). A good response (ypT0-1N0) was observed in 17.5% of patients treated with RT and in 22.6% of patients treated with CRT (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.95). Histological subtype, clinical stage and distance to anus were identified as independent predictors for tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a more advanced clinical stage, complete pathologic response was more common in patients treated with CRT than in patients treated with RT. Prospective trials are needed to establish the differences in other outcome parameters, including the impact on organ preserving strategies.

Does pelvic radiation increase rectal cancer incidence? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: One of the late complications associated with radiation therapy (RT) is a possible increased risk of second cancer. In this systematic review, we analysed the incidence of rectal cancer following primary pelvic cancer irradiation. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the PubMed and EMBASE libraries. Original articles that reported on secondary rectal cancer after previous RT for a primary pelvic cancer were included. Sensitivity analyses were performed by correcting for low number of events, high risk of bias, and outlying results. RESULTS: A total of 5171 citations were identified during the literature search, 23 studies were included in the meta-analyses after screening. A pooled analysis, irrespective of primary tumour location, showed an increased risk for rectal cancer following RT (N = 403.243) compared with non-irradiated patients (N = 615.530) with a relative risk (RR) of 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.72). Organ specific meta-analysis showed an increased risk for rectal cancer after RT for prostate (RR 1.36, 95%CI 1.10-1.67) and cervical cancer (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.10-2.35). No relation was seen in ovarian cancer patients. The modality of RT did not influence the incidence of rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates an increased risk for second primary rectal cancer in patients who received RT to the pelvic region. This increased risk was modest and could not be confirmed for all primary pelvic cancer sites. The present study does not provide data to change guidelines for surveillance for rectal cancer in previously irradiated patients.

A population based study of radiotherapy in a cohort of patients with breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2000.

We studied the use of radiotherapy (RT) (especially secondary RT) in a cohort of 6561 patients in southern Netherlands with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1996 and 2000 (median follow-up: 66 months, range 0-107 months). Radiation within 6 months of diagnosis was considered primary RT (PRT). RT given 6 months or later after diagnosis or after PRT was considered secondary RT (SRT). Of all patients, 67% received RT, 3554 only PRT, 323 only SRT and 503 both. The cumulative use of SRT at 100 months was 17%. The 826 patients receiving SRT underwent 1846 courses 0-105 months (median 36) after diagnosis; the retreat rate was 35%. Elderly patients received SRT significantly less often (OR(age50-69)=0.7, 95%CI=0.6-0.8, OR(age> or 70)=0.4, 95%CI=0.3-0.5). The following factors increased the chance for SRT: patients from the eastern region (OR=1.3, 95%CI=1.1-1.6); patients who received PRT (OR=1.3, 95%CI=1.0-1.5) and patients who underwent mastectomy including axillary node dissection as well as unresected patients (OR=1.9, 95%CI=1.5-2.4, OR=2.6, 95%CI=1.7-3.9, respectively). Thirteen percent of all patients with breast cancer received SRT, with a large variation in age and between the 2 RT departments in the region.