RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 2016, France allowed men who have sex with men (MSM) to donate blood if they had not had sex with men in the previous 12 months. In April 2020, this restriction was relaxed to 4 months due to the lack of negative impact observed on blood safety. This study assesses the impact of reducing this deferral period on epidemiological surveillance indicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares infection surveillance indicators between two 30-month periods before (P1) and after (P2) this second deferral change. RESULTS: Overall, 79 donations tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (49 in P1 and 30 in P2), 322 for hepatitis C virus (HCV) (185 and 137), 622 for hepatitis B virus (HBV) (355 and 267) and 1684 for syphilis (799 and 885). Positive donation rates decreased between P1 and P2, except for syphilis: HIV (0.07/10,000 donations vs. 0.04; p > 0.5), HCV (0.25 vs. 0.20; p < 0.05), HBV (0.49 vs. 0.39; p < 0.01) and syphilis (1.10 vs. 1.29; p < 0.001). For all three viruses, residual risks of transmission by transfusion did not increase: HIV (1/7,800,000 donations vs. 1/10,500,000), HCV (1/25,200,000 vs. 1/47,300,000) and HBV (1/6,400,000 vs. 1/6,000,000). CONCLUSION: Reducing the deferral period for MSM in April 2020 did not negatively impact residual risks, which remained very low, or the rate of positive donations, except for syphilis, which requires careful monitoring. To ensure equal access to blood donation, MSM have been allowed to donate blood under the same conditions as other donors since March 2022 (i.e., no more than one sexual partner in the last 4 months).
RESUMO
The latest updates (February 2004 and February 2005) of the analysis of the risk of transmission of the agent of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) by blood and blood products in France firstly reported in 2000, were triggered by the two cases of probable transmission of variant CJD (vCJD) by transfusion reported in the UK, and the notification of two French cases of vCJD who had been blood donors on several occasions before clinical onset. Even though some figures of the quantitative assumption used in the risk analysis have been modified since 2000, the conclusion as regards the risk for blood cellular component is considered unchanged: it can be assumed that one unit of labile blood products will contain more than one infectious unit if the donor is incubating the disease. Therefore, the residual risk of receiving by transfusion one infectious blood unit is depending on the prevalence of subjects incubating the disease in the blood donor population. For this particular aspect, the expected number of clinical vCJD cases to occur in France has been lowered since 2000. However, the worst-case scenario of 300 cases in the next 60 years has been maintained in the risk analysis, leading to the hypothesis that one blood donor per 120,000 could be infectious. In conclusion, the risk of getting one infectious blood unit is considered probable to a level of 1/120,000, but the benefit outweighs the risk if the use of transfusion is restricted to well justified indications and if patients are informed a priori and a posteriori.