RESUMO
Background: This single center prospective randomized study was performed to compare the effect of endovenous laser flush ablation (EVLAf) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) close to the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ) with a standard ablation (EVLAs) up to two cm distally of the SFJ on reflux in the GSV stump. Patients and methods: Between April 2013 and January 2016, 146 legs in 146 consecutive patients, meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria, were treated by EVLA. All patients were randomized into 2 groups. In group 1 EVLAf started from the SFJ level, and in group 2 EVLAs started two cm below the SFJ. The primary endpoint was reflux in the GSV stump after 900 days. Secondary endpoints were reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV), proximal clinically recurrent varicose veins related to reflux in the stump and/or the AASV. Results: At day 900, 27 patients were lost to follow-up. Reflux in the stump was detected in 3.6% in group 1 and in 22.2% in group 2 (p<0.05). Reflux in the AASV was present in 7.1% in group 1 and in 17.46% in group 2 (p=0.09). Proximal clinically recurrent varicose veins were observed in 8.9% in group 1 and in 19.1% in group 2 (p=0.12). The greatest diameter of the stump was significantly larger in group 2 (group 1: 0.41 cm, group 2: 0.6 cm, p<0.001). Conclusions: EVLAf is associated with a significantly lower incidence of reflux in the GSV stump, with a trend to a lower incidence of reflux in the AASV and with a lower incidence of proximal recurrent varicose veins after 900 days follow-up compared to EVLAs. EVLAf may improve the clinical recurrence rate after EVLA of the GSV.
Assuntos
Terapia a Laser , Varizes , Insuficiência Venosa , Humanos , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Lasers , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Veia Safena/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Safena/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Varizes/diagnóstico por imagem , Varizes/epidemiologia , Varizes/cirurgia , Insuficiência Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Insuficiência Venosa/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Venosa/cirurgiaRESUMO
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effects of compression following the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSVs) using a 1470 nm diode laser (Ceralas E 1470 nm, biolitec) and a 2ring radial fiber (ELVeS Radial 2ring™, biolitec). In this single-center prospective study, 150 legs of 150 consecutive patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (A, B, and C). Group A patients did not undergo postoperative compression. Group B patients wore a thigh-length graduated compression stocking (23-32 mmHg) for 7 days, whereas group C patients wore the same stocking for 28 days. No additional phlebectomies or sclerotherapies were performed. Investigations were performed prior to intervention, at the day of intervention (D0), at day 7 (D7), and at day 28 post intervention (D28). The primary endpoint was post-interventional pain measured on a 10-point scale. A significant but small pain decrease was observed in the first week of compression, by comparing group B's mean pain scores to those of group A (p = 0.009). Wearing a compression stocking after EVLA reduced pain within the first week on a significant, but low level. Taking the very low differences in pain levels into account, the difference may not be clinically relevant and post-treatment compression may not be necessary if no additional phlebectomies or sclerotherapies are performed.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has a strong inherited predisposition that is partly explained by the strong genetic risk factors such as mutations in factor V, prothrombin, antithrombin III, protein C and S genes. Only recently the first GWAS have been performed on DVT resulting in discovery of novel genetic variants, however, the information on the common polymorphisms predisposing to the risk of DVT is still scarce. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we selected six SNPs (rs5361 in SELE, rs2066865 in FGG, rs2227589 in SERPINC1, rs1613662 in GP6, rs13146272 in CYP4V2, rs2289252 in F11) reported to be associated with venous thrombosis conditions and studied the association of these common variants in selected case (n=177) and control (n=235) groups from population of Latvia. Genotyping was performed using TaqMan hybridization probe SNP genotyping assay. RESULTS: Patients with DVT had a significantly higher frequency of F11 rs2289252 polymorphism (p=0.001; OR [95%CI]=1.61 [1.20-2.14]). When stratified by recurrence of DVT the tendency was observed that the same SNP had higher OR value in group of DVT patients with repeated episodes of DVT compared to patients with single DVT episode (p=0.009; OR [95%CI]=2.27[1.22-4.21] and p=0.009; OR [95%CI]=1.52[1.11-2.08] respectively), but due to limited group of cases this finding should be replicated. CONCLUSION: We conclude that F11 gene variant rs2289252 contribute to inherited forms of DVT incidence and correlation of other analysed SNPs should be explored in populations with greater sample size and associated with various thrombosis related traits.