Accuracy of different approaches for detecting proximal root caries lesions in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic evaluation (XR), visual-tactile assessment (VT), laser-fluorescence (LF) (DIAGNOdent Pen/KaVo), and near-infrared-light transillumination (NILT) (DIAGNOcam/KaVo) on proximal root caries lesions in vitro. METHODS: Two-hundred extracted permanent premolars and molars with and without proximal root caries lesions were allocated to 50 diagnostic models simulating the proximal contacts between teeth and mounted in a phantom dummy head. Two independent examiners used the diagnostic approaches to detect any or advanced root caries lesions, with histologic evaluation of the lesions serving as reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed, and sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) are calculated. Significant differences in mean AUCs between approaches were assumed if p < 0.05 (two-sample t-test). RESULTS: NILT was not applicable for proximal root caries detection. The sensitivity/specificity to detect any lesions was 0.81/0.63 for XR, 0.76/0.88 for VT and 0.81/0.95 for LF, and the sensitivity/specificity to detect advanced lesions was 0.43/0.94 for XR, 0.66/0.99 for VT, and 0.83/0.78 for LF, respectively. For both, any and advanced root caries lesions, mean AUCs for LF and VT were significantly higher compared to XR (p < 0.05). For any root caries lesions, LF was significantly more accurate than VT (p = 0.01), but not for advanced root caries lesions (p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Under the in vitro conditions chosen, LF and VT were more accurate than XR to detect proximal root caries lesions, with LF being particularly useful for initial lesion stages. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: LF might be a useful diagnostic aid for proximal root caries diagnosis. Clinical studies are necessary to corroborate the findings.

Outcome of revascularization therapy in traumatized immature incisors.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of revascularization therapy in traumatized permanent incisors to determine whether this approach could be implemented into clinical routine. METHODS: A total of 16 traumatized incisors (either avulsion or severe luxation/intrusion) with open apices (> 1 mm) that underwent revascularization following a standardized protocol were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 22 months. Radiographs and clinical parameters (such as root length, pulp space, dentin wall width, apical foramen, alveolar bone loss, ankylosis/mobility, supra-/infraposition, discoloration, probing depth) were compared pre- and postoperatively and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Over the follow-up period, 81.3% of the teeth survived revascularization and regained sensitivity, while 18.7% failed, as they had to be extracted due to serious root resorption. Regarding radiographic outcomes a significant difference could only be found in the decrease of apical foramina (p = 0.04). The other parameters showed no significant difference between pre- and postoperative measurements. More than half of the teeth (56.3%) developed root resorptions and 31.3% displayed signs of ankylosis and 92.9% developed discolorations during follow-up. However, 85.7% of the teeth maintained the bone level and outcomes of mobility showed a significant solidification. CONCLUSIONS: Revascularization is a promising approach for the treatment of immature incisors to regain sensitivity and to enhance apical closure and at least to maintain alveolar bone in terms of a socket preservation. Further studies have to be performed to determine ideal conditions (type of trauma, age, width of apical foramen) for a revascularization.