RESUMO
Patients affected by multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and subsequent coronavirus (20)19 disease (COVID-19)-related death. The changing epidemiological and therapeutic scenarios suggest that there has been an improvement in severity and survival of COVID-19 during the different waves of the pandemic in the general population, but this has not been investigated yet in MM patients. Here we analyzed a large cohort of 1221 patients with MM and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection observed between February 2020, and August 2022, in the EPICOVIDEHA registry from 132 centers around the world. Median follow-up was 52 days for the entire cohort and 83 days for survivors. Three-hundred and three patients died (24%) and COVID-19 was the primary reason for death of around 89% of them. Overall survival (OS) was significantly higher in vaccinated patients with both stable and active MM versus unvaccinated, while only a trend favoring vaccinated patients was observed in subjects with responsive MM. Vaccinated patients with at least 2 doses showed a better OS than those with one or no vaccine dose. Overall, according to pandemic waves, mortality rate decreased over time from 34% to 10%. In multivariable analysis, age, renal failure, active disease, hospital, and intensive care unit admission, were independently associated with a higher number of deaths, while a neutrophil count above 0.5 × 109 /L was found to be protective. This data suggests that MM patients remain at risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection even in the vaccination era, but their clinical outcome, in terms of OS, has progressively improved throughout the different viral phases of the pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Mieloma Múltiplo , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemias , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Early chimerism analysis is important to assess engraftment in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the impact of T-cell chimerism at day 30 in bone marrow on acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), relapse, and overall survival in 142 adult allo-transplanted patients. RESULTS: The majority of patients (89%) received myeloablative conditioning and 90% have undergone T-cell replete donor graft. At day 30, 103 patients showed T-complete chimerism with prevalence in haploidentical transplants, whereas 39 cases had CD3+ mixed chimerism, including 30 patients transplanted with HLA identical donors, and 21 with T-cell donors<90%. T-cell chimerism at day 30 was weakly inversely related to aGVHD grades II-IV (p = .078) with no cases of grades III-IV aGVHD in patients with CD3+ <95%. Mixed T-cell chimerism did not impact on relapse (p = .448) and five of the seven patients who relapsed had T-cell chimerism ≤90%. Older age and active disease at transplant had a statistically significant negative effect on overall survival (p = .01 and p = .0001, respectively), whereas mixed CD3+ chimerism did not. CONCLUSIONS: T lymphocyte chimerism analysis at day +30 in bone marrow could identify allo-transplanted patients at major risk of aGVHD grades III-IV (CD3+ donors >95%) mainly post-myeloablative conditioning regimen.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Medula Óssea , Quimerismo , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/diagnóstico , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/epidemiologia , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfócitos T , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R AML) who received salvage chemotherapy, limited and not updated studies explored the incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and the role of antifungal prophylaxis (AP). The aims of this multicentre retrospective 'SEIFEM 2016-B' study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the current rate and the outcome of proven/probable IA and (2) to assess the efficacy of AP, in a large 'real life' series of patient with R/R AML submitted to salvage chemotherapy. RESULTS: Of 2250 R/R AML patients, a total of 74 cases of IA (5.1%) were recorded as follows: 10 (0.7%) proven and 64 (4.3%) probable. Information about AP were available in 73/74 (99%) patients. Fifty-eight (79%) breakthrough infections occurred, mainly during AP with posaconazole [25 (43%)]. The patients who received AP during salvage chemotherapy showed a benefit from antifungal therapy (AT) than patients who did not received AP [43 (86%) vs 7 (14%); p < .033]. In a multivariate analysis, AP and absence of severe mucositis had a significant favourable effect on overall response rate. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated that the incidence of IA during the salvage chemotherapy is similar to the past. Nevertheless, the attributable mortality rate (AMR) appears to be lower than that previously reported in R/R AML. Further prospective studies should be performed to confirm our preliminary observation and understand and the why a decreased AMR is reported in this setting of high-risk patients.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos , Aspergilose , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Aspergilose/epidemiologia , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/epidemiologia , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/complicações , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/microbiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
We describe the opportunistic infections occurring in 362 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders treated with ibrutinib and idelalisib in clinical practice. Overall, 108 of 362 patients (29·8%) developed infections, for a total of 152 events. Clinically defined infections (CDI) were 49·3% (75/152) and microbiologically defined infections (MDI) were 50·7% (77/152). Among 250 patients treated with ibrutinib, 28·8% (72/250) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 104 episodes. MDI were 49% (51/104). Bacterial infections were 66·7% (34/51), viral 19·6% (10/51) and invasive fungal diseases (IFD) 13·7% (7/51). Among the 112 patients treated with idelalisib, 32·1% (36/112) experienced one or more infections, for a total of 48 episodes. MDI were 54·2% (26/48). Bacterial infections were 34·6% (9/26), viral 61·5% (16/26) and IFD 3·8% (1/26). With ibrutinib, the rate of bacterial infections was significantly higher compared to idelalisib (66·7% vs. 34·6%; P = 0·007), while viral infections were most frequent in idelalisib (61·5% vs. 19·6%; P < 0·001). Although a higher rate of IFD was observed in patients treated with ibrutinib, the difference was not statistically significant (13·7% vs. 3·8% respectively; P = 0·18). Bacteria are the most frequent infections with ibrutinib, while viruses are most frequently involved with idelalisib.
Assuntos
Adenina/análogos & derivados , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Infecções Oportunistas/induzido quimicamente , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Purinas/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinonas/efeitos adversos , Adenina/administração & dosagem , Adenina/efeitos adversos , Adenina/uso terapêutico , Tirosina Quinase da Agamaglobulinemia/antagonistas & inibidores , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/induzido quimicamente , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Inibidores Enzimáticos/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Enzimáticos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/induzido quimicamente , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/epidemiologia , Itália/epidemiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/complicações , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/microbiologia , Transtornos Linfoproliferativos/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Purinas/administração & dosagem , Purinas/uso terapêutico , Quinazolinonas/administração & dosagem , Quinazolinonas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Viroses/induzido quimicamente , Viroses/epidemiologiaAssuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Dexametasona , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/complicações , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Cardiovascular complications are included among the systemic effects of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapeutic strategies. To test the hypothesis that inhibition of Kit tyrosine kinase that promotes cardiac progenitor cell (CPC) survival and function may be one of the triggering mechanisms of imatinib mesylate (IM)-related cardiovascular effects, the anatomical, structural and ultrastructural changes in the heart of IM-treated rats were evaluated. Cardiac anatomy in IM-exposed rats showed a dose-dependent, restrictive type of remodeling and depressed hemodynamic performance in the absence of remarkable myocardial fibrosis. The effects of IM on rat and human CPCs were also assessed. IM induced rat CPC depletion, reduced growth and increased cell death. Similar effects were observed in CPCs isolated from human hearts. These results extend the notion that cardiovascular side effects are driven by multiple actions of IM. The identification of cellular mechanisms responsible for cardiovascular complications due to TKIs will enable future strategies aimed at preserving concomitantly cardiac integrity and anti-tumor activity of advanced cancer treatment.
Assuntos
Cardiomiopatias/induzido quimicamente , Mesilato de Imatinib/toxicidade , Miocárdio/patologia , Células-Tronco/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Morte Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Miocárdio/ultraestrutura , RatosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Micafungin inhibits 1,3-ß-D-glucan synthase and interferes with fungal cell wall synthesis. Clinically, micafungin has been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. However, little is known about the immunomodulatory activity of micafungin in these infections. METHODS: We evaluated the immunomodulatory activity of escalating doses of micafungin in murine and human polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) in vitro and in vivo in different preclinical models of invasive aspergillosis, including mice deficient for selected innate immune receptors. RESULTS: Micafungin was able to regulate PMN cytokine response to Aspergillus fumigatus conidia by decreasing the expression of tumour necrosis factor-α and increasing that of interleukin-10 (IL-10). In vivo, the therapeutic efficacy of micafungin was strictly dose-dependent, with the maximum activity observed at the highest dose, concomitant with reduced inflammatory pathology. The anti-inflammatory activity of micafungin required IL-10 and occurred through signalling via the TLR2/dectin-1 and TLR3/TRIF pathways. CONCLUSION: Together, these findings suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of micafungin in aspergillosis is orchestrated by the activation of innate immune receptors affecting the inflammatory/anti-inflammatory balance during infection.
Assuntos
Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Aspergillus fumigatus/efeitos dos fármacos , Equinocandinas/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Lipopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Aspergilose/microbiologia , Carga Bacteriana , Células Cultivadas , Equinocandinas/farmacologia , Feminino , Histocitoquímica , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacologia , Lipopeptídeos/farmacologia , Pulmão/microbiologia , Pulmão/patologia , Micafungina , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neutrófilos/microbiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an overall improvement in patient mortality. However, haematological malignancy patients continue to experience significant impacts from COVID-19, including high rates of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and mortality. In comparison to other haematological malignancy patients, individuals with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) generally have better prognosis. This study, conducted using a large haematological malignancy patient database (EPICOVIDEHA), demonstrated that the majority of CML patients experienced mild infections. The decline in severe and critical infections over the years can largely be attributed to the widespread administration of vaccinations and the positive response they elicited. Notably, the mortality rate among CML patients was low and exhibited a downward trend in subsequent years. Importantly, our analysis provided confirmation of the effectiveness of vaccinations in CML patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva , Humanos , Pandemias , Leucemia Mielogênica Crônica BCR-ABL Positiva/epidemiologia , HospitalizaçãoRESUMO
The increasing population of cancer survivors faces considerable morbidity and mortality due to late effects of the antineoplastic therapy. Cardiotoxicity is a major limiting factor of therapy with doxorubicin (DOXO), the most effective anthracycline, and is characterized by a dilated cardiomyopathy that can develop even years after treatment. Studies in animals have proposed the cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) as the cellular target responsible for DOXO-induced cardiomyopathy but the relevance of these observations to clinical settings is unknown. In this study, the analysis of the DOXO-induced cardiomyopathic human hearts showed that the majority of human CPCs (hCPCs) was senescent. In isolated hCPCs, DOXO triggered DNA damage response leading to apoptosis early after exposure, and telomere shortening and senescence at later time interval. Functional properties of hCPCs, such as migration and differentiation, were also negatively affected. Importantly, the differentiated progeny of DOXO-treated hCPCs prematurely expressed the senescence marker p16(INK4a). In conclusion, DOXO exposure severely affects the population of hCPCs and permanently impairs their function. Premature senescence of hCPCs and their progeny can be responsible for the decline in the regenerative capacity of the heart and may represent the cellular basis of DOXO-induced cardiomyopathy in humans.
Assuntos
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/induzido quimicamente , Senescência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Mioblastos Cardíacos/efeitos dos fármacos , Células-Tronco/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Western Blotting , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/metabolismo , Cardiomiopatia Dilatada/patologia , Morte Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Movimento Celular , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Cultivadas , Dano ao DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Técnica Indireta de Fluorescência para Anticorpo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-kit/metabolismo , Homeostase do Telômero , beta-Galactosidase/metabolismoRESUMO
â¢Data on caplacizumab use for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) in Italy are missing.â¢Twenty-six Italian patients were treated with caplacizumab for an acute immune TTP episode.â¢Caplacizumab was effective in treating acute TTP in the Italian real-world clinical setting.â¢Two major bleeds leading to drug discontinuation were observed.
RESUMO
In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the absolute risk of infection in the real-life setting of AML patients treated with CPX-351. The study included all patients with AML from 30 Italian hematology centers of the SEIFEM group who received CPX-351 from July 2018 to June 2021. There were 200 patients included. Overall, 336 CPX-351 courses were counted: all 200 patients received the first induction cycle, 18 patients (5%) received a second CPX-351 induction, while 86 patients (26%) proceeded with the first CPX-351 consolidation cycle, and 32 patients (10%) received a second CPX-351 consolidation. A total of 249 febrile events were recorded: 193 during the first or second induction, and 56 after the first or second consolidation. After the diagnostic work-up, 92 events (37%) were classified as febrile neutropenia of unknown origin (FUO), 118 (47%) were classifiable as microbiologically documented infections, and 39 (17%) were classifiable as clinically documented infections. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 14% (28/200). The attributable mortality-infection rate was 6% (15/249). A lack of response to the CPX-351 treatment was the only factor significantly associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis [p-value: 0.004, OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.39]. Our study confirms the good safety profile of CPX-351 in a real-life setting, with an incidence of infectious complications comparable to that of the pivotal studies; despite prolonged neutropenia, the incidence of fungal infections was low, as was infection-related mortality.
RESUMO
Background: The outcome of COVID-19 in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients is almost uniformely considered poor. The aim of present study was to retrospectively analyse the outcome and risk factors for mortality in a large series of patients who developed COVID-19 infection after an allogeneic HSCT. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study promoted by the European Hematology Association - Infections in Hematology Study Working Group, included 326 adult HSCT patients who had COVID-19 between January 2020 and March 2022. Results: The median time from HSCT to the diagnosis of COVID-19 was 268 days (IQR 86-713; range 0-185 days). COVID-19 severity was mild in 21% of the patients, severe in 39% and critical in 16% of the patients. In multivariable analysis factors associated with a higher risk of mortality were, age above 50 years, presence of 3 or more comorbidities, active hematologic disease at time of COVID-19 infection, development of COVID-19 within 12 months of HSCT, and severe/critical infections. Overall mortality rate was 21% (n=68): COVID-19 was the main or secondary cause of death in 16% of the patients (n=53). Conclusions: Mortality in HSCT recipients who develop COVID-19 is high and largely dependent on age, comorbidities, active hematologic disease, timing from transplant and severity of the infection.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Hematológicas , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/etiologia , Doenças Hematológicas/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Células-TroncoRESUMO
Background: Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) typically incur high rates of infections and both drugs and comorbidities may modulate infection risk. Objectives: The present study aims to assess the effect of immunosuppressive agents on clinical outcomes of MPN patients affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Design: This is an observational study. Methods: We specifically searched and analyzed MPN patients collected by EPICOVIDEHA online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020. Results: Overall, 398 patients with MPN were observed for a median of 76 days [interquartile range (IQR): 19-197] after detection of SARS-CoV2 infection. Median age was 69 years (IQR: 58-77) and 183 individuals (46%) had myelofibrosis (MF). Overall, 121 patients (30%) of the whole cohort received immunosuppressive therapies including steroids, immunomodulatory drugs, or JAK inhibitors. Hospitalization and consecutive admission to intensive care unit was required in 216 (54%) and 53 patients (13%), respectively. Risk factors for hospital admission were identified by multivariable logistic regression and include exposure to immunosuppressive therapies [odds ratio (OR): 2.186; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.357-3.519], age ⩾70 years, and comorbidities. The fatality rate was 22% overall and the risk of death was independently increased by age ⩾70 years [hazard ratio (HR): 2.191; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521], previous comorbidities, and exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection (HR: 2.143; 95% CI: 1.363-3.521). Conclusion: COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals. Plain language summary: EPICOVIDEHA registry reports inferior outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Patients with Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) incur high rates of infections during the course of their disease.The present study was aimed at assessing which patient characteristics predicted a worse outcome of SARS-COV-2 infection in individuals with MPN.To pursue this objective, the researchers analyzed the data collected by EPICOVIDEHA, an international online registry, which includes individuals with hematological malignancies diagnosed with COVID-19 since February 2020.The database provided clinical data of 398 patients with MPN incurring COVID-19:Patients were mostly elderly (median age was 69 years);Forty-six percent of them were affected by myelofibrosis, which is the most severe MPN;Moreover, 32% were receiving immunosuppressive therapies (JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, steroids, or immunomodulatory IMID drugs, such as thalidomide) before COVID-19.Hospitalization was required in 54% of the patients, and the risk of being hospitalized for severe COVID-19 was independently predicted byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies.Overall, 22% of MPN patients deceased soon after COVID-19 and the risk of death was independently increased over twofold byOlder age;Comorbidities;Exposure to immunosuppressive therapies before the infection.In conclusion, COVID-19 infection led to a particularly dismal outcome in MPN patients receiving immunosuppressive agents, including JAK inhibitors, or reporting multiple comorbidities. Therefore, specific preventive strategies need to be tailored for such individuals.
RESUMO
Only few studies have analyzed the efficacy of tixagevimab/cilgavimab to prevent severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and related complications in hematologic malignancies (HM) patients. Here, we report cases of breakthrough COVID-19 after prophylactic tixagevimab/cilgavimab from the EPICOVIDEHA registry). We identified 47 patients that had received prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in the EPICOVIDEHA registry. Lymphoproliferative disorders (44/47, 93.6%) were the main underlying HM. SARS-CoV-2 strains were genotyped in 7 (14.9%) cases only, and all belonged to the omicron variant. Forty (85.1%) patients had received vaccinations prior to tixagevimab/cilgavimab, the majority of them with at least two doses. Eleven (23.4%) patients had a mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (44.7%) a moderate infection, while 8 (17.0%) had severe infection and 2 (4.3%) critical. Thirty-six (76.6%) patients were treated, either with monoclonal antibodies, antivirals, corticosteroids, or with combination schemes. Overall, 10 (21.3%) were admitted to a hospital. Among these, two (4.3%) were transferred to intensive care unit and one (2.1%) of them died. Our data seem to show that the use of tixagevimab/cilgavimab may lead to a COVID-19 severity reduction in HM patients; however, further studies should incorporate further HM patients to confirm the best drug administration strategies in immunocompromised patients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Imunização Passiva , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Elderly patients with hematologic malignancies face the highest risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. The infection's impact on different age groups remains unstudied in detail. METHODS: We analyzed elderly patients (age groups: 65-70, 71-75, 76-80, and >80 years old) with hematologic malignancies included in the EPICOVIDEHA registry between January 2020 and July 2022. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were conducted to identify factors influencing death in COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancy. RESULTS: The study included data from 3,603 elderly patients (aged 65 or older) with hematological malignancy, with a majority being male (58.1%) and a significant proportion having comorbidities. The patients were divided into four age groups, and the analysis assessed COVID-19 outcomes, vaccination status, and other variables in relation to age and pandemic waves. The 90-day survival rate for patients with COVID-19 was 71.2%, with significant differences between groups. The pandemic waves had varying impacts, with the first wave affecting patients over 80 years old, the second being more severe in 65-70, and the third being the least severe in all age groups. Factors contributing to 90-day mortality included age, comorbidities, lymphopenia, active malignancy, acute leukemia, less than three vaccine doses, severe COVID-19, and using only corticosteroids as treatment. CONCLUSION: These data underscore the heterogeneity of elderly hematological patients, highlight the different impacts of COVID-19 waves and the pivotal importance of vaccination, and may help in planning future healthcare efforts.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Linfopenia , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Vacinação , Imunização , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaçõesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir are antivirals used to prevent progression to severe SARS-CoV-2 infections and decrease hospitalisation and mortality rates. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was authorised in Europe in December 2021, whereas molnupiravir is not yet licensed in Europe as of February 2022. Molnupiravir may be an alternative to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir because it is associated with fewer drug-drug interactions and contraindications. A caveat for molnupiravir is the mode of action induces viral mutations. Mortality rate reduction with molnupiravir was less pronounced than that with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in patients without haematological malignancy. Little is known about the comparative efficacy of the two drugs in patients with haematological malignancy at high-risk of severe COVID-19. Thus, molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were compared in a cohort of patients with haematological malignancies. METHODS: Clinical data from patients treated with molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir/ritonavir monotherapy for COVID-19 were retrieved from the EPICOVIDEHA registry. Patients treated with molnupiravir were matched by sex, age (±10 years), and severity of baseline haematological malignancy to controls treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients receiving molnupiravir for the clinical management of COVID-19 were matched to an equal number of controls receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. In each of the groups, 68 (59%) patients were male; with a median age of 64 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53-74) for molnupiravir recipients and 64 years (IQR 54-73) for nirmatrelvir/ritonavir recipients; 56.9% (n=66) of the patients had controlled baseline haematological malignancy, 12.9% (n=15) had stable disease, and 30.2% (n=35) had active disease at COVID-19 onset in each group. During COVID-19 infection, one third of patients from each group were admitted to hospital. Although a similar proportion of patients in the two groups were vaccinated (molnupiravir n=77, 66% vs. nirmatrelvir/ritonavir n=87, 75%), more of those treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir had received four vaccine doses (n=27, 23%) compared with those treated with molnupiravir (n=5, 4%) (P<0.001). No differences were detected in COVID-19 severity (P=0.39) or hospitalisation (P=1.0). No statistically significant differences were identified in overall mortality rate (P=0.78) or survival probability (d30 P=0.19, d60 P=0.67, d90 P=0.68, last day of follow up P=0.68). Deaths were either attributed to COVID-19, or the infection was judged by the treating physician to have contributed to death. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalisation and mortality rates with molnupiravir were comparable to those with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir in high-risk patients with haematological malignancies and COVID-19. Molnupiravir is a plausible alternative to nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for COVID-19 treatment in patients with haematological malignancy.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Feminino , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Antivirais/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background: Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment decreases the hospitalisation rate in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19, but data on efficacy in patients with haematological malignancy are scarce. Here, we describe the outcome of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in a large cohort of the latter patients. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from the multicentre EPICOVIDEHA registry (NCT04733729) on patients with haematological malignancy, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and September 2022. Patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were compared to those who did not. A logistic regression was run to determine factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration in our sample. Mortality between treatment groups was assessed with Kaplan-Meier survival plots after matching all the patients with a propensity score. Additionally, a Cox regression was modelled to detect factors associated with mortality in patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Findings: A total of 1859 patients were analysed, 117 (6%) were treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 1742 (94%) were treated otherwise. Of 117 patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 80% had received ≥1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose before COVID-19 onset, 13% of which received a 2nd vaccine booster. 5% were admitted to ICU. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was associated with the presence of extrapulmonary symptoms at COVID-19 onset, for example anosmia, fever, rhinitis, or sinusitis (aOR 2.509, 95%CI 1.448-4.347) and 2nd vaccine booster (aOR 3.624, 95%CI 1.619-8.109). Chronic pulmonary disease (aOR 0.261, 95%CI 0.093-0.732) and obesity (aOR 0.105, 95%CI 0.014-0.776) were not associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use. After propensity score matching, day-30 mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was 2%, significantly lower than in patients with SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (11%, p = 0.036). No factor was observed explaining the mortality difference in patients after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration. Interpretation: Haematological malignancy patients were more likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir when reporting extrapulmonary symptoms or 2nd vaccine booster at COVID-19 onset, as opposed to chronic pulmonary disease and obesity. The mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was lower than in patients with targeted drugs other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Funding: EPICOVIDEHA has received funds from Optics COMMIT (COVID-19 Unmet Medical Needs and Associated Research Extension) COVID-19 RFP program by GILEAD Science, United States (Project 2020-8223).
RESUMO
The potential drug-drug interactions of midostaurin may impact the choice of antifungal (AF) prophylaxis in FLT3-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. To evaluate the incidence of invasive fungal diseases (IFD) during the treatment of FLT3-mutated AML patients and to correlate it to the different AF prophylaxis strategies, we planned a multicenter observational study involving 15 SEIFEM centers. One hundred fourteen patients treated with chemotherapy + midostaurin as induction/reinduction, consolidation or both were enrolled. During induction, the incidence of probable/proven and possible IFD was 10.5% and 9.7%, respectively; no statistically significant difference was observed according to the different AF strategy adopted. The median duration of neutropenia was similar in patients with or without IFD. Proven/probable and possible IFD incidence was 2.4% and 1.8%, respectively, during consolidation. Age was the only risk factor for IFD (OR, 95% CI, 1.10 [1.03-1.19]) and complete remission achievement after first induction the only one for survival (OR, 95% CI, 5.12 [1.93-13.60]). The rate of midostaurin discontinuation was similar across different AF strategies. The IFD attributable mortality during induction was 8.3%. In conclusion, the 20.2% overall incidence of IFD occurring in FLT3-mutated AML during induction with chemotherapy + midostaurin, regardless of AF strategy type, was noteworthy, and merits further study, particularly in elderly patients.