Vernakalant hydrochloride for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation: a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The present study assessed the efficacy and safety of vernakalant hydrochloride (RSD1235), a novel compound, for the conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive vernakalant or placebo and were stratified by AF duration of 3 hours to 7 days (short duration) and 8 to 45 days (long duration). A first infusion of placebo or vernakalant (3 mg/kg) was given for 10 minutes, followed by a second infusion of placebo or vernakalant (2 mg/kg) 15 minutes later if AF was not terminated. The primary end point was conversion of AF to sinus rhythm for at least 1 minute within 90 minutes of the start of drug infusion in the short-duration AF group. A total of 336 patients were randomized and received treatment (short duration, n=220; long duration, n=116). Of the 145 vernakalant patients, 75 (51.7%) in the short-duration AF group converted to sinus rhythm (median time, 11 minutes) compared with 3 of the 75 placebo patients (4.0%; P<0.001). Overall, in the short- and long-duration AF groups, 83 of the 221 vernakalant patients (37.6%) experienced termination of AF compared with 3 of the 115 placebo patients (2.6%; P<0.001). Transient dysgeusia and sneezing were the most common side effects in vernakalant-treated patients. Four vernakalant-related serious adverse events (hypotension [2 events], complete atrioventricular block, and cardiogenic shock) occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vernakalant demonstrated rapid conversion of short-duration AF and was well tolerated.

Monitoring the ACTIVE-W trial: some issues in monitoring a noninferiority trial.

Noninferiority comparisons of new to current therapies and the use of composite outcomes represent significant advances in the design of clinical trials. They increasingly characterize trials of new cardiovascular agents, posing new challenges to Data Safety Monitoring Boards (DSMB) and principal investigators. The ACTIVE-W study was a noninferiority comparison of the combination of clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid versus oral anticoagulant among patients with atrial fibrillation. When unexpectedly high rates of stroke and then of the composite outcome of stroke, non-central nervous system systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, and vascular death emerged, the DSMB modified its monitoring plan and conducted its first formal interim analysis much earlier than had been planned in the DSMB charter. The study was terminated when only 27% of the anticipated outcomes had occurred. This paper discusses issues of appropriate stopping guidelines for noninferiority trials and the early emergence of significant harm in relation to one component (stroke) of a composite outcome. Conditional power was not determined concurrently with the HRs during the monitoring of ACTIVE-W; however, the members of the DSMB now believe that such calculations should be considered as useful adjuncts to the calculation of HRs and could lead to earlier termination of noninferiority trials whose interim results suggest futility, without the need for convincing proof of harm.

Azimilide for the treatment of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: results of a randomized trial and insights on the concordance of symptoms and recurrent arrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: Azimilide hydrochloride is an investigational antiarrhythmic medication that had shown evidence of efficacy in prolonging the time to recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). This study was designed to confirm efficacy of 125 mg daily azimilide. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary endpoint was ECG-documented recurrence of AF, AFL, or PSVT, followed for a maximum of 180 days. Four hundred eighty-two patients were enrolled in the United States and Canada (422 with AF or AFL and 60 with PSVT). The primary efficacy analysis included 402 patients with AF-AFL and 56 patients with PSVT. There was no significant difference in the time to first recurrence of symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia in the AF-AFL stratum (median of 38 days for azimilide versus 27 days for placebo; hazard ratio [HR] of 1.14, P = 0.29). Similarly, there was no difference in time to recurrence in the PSVT stratum (>180 days for azimilide versus 135 days for placebo; HR = 1.28, P = 0.55). There were three deaths in the azimilide group and one in the placebo group. Four patients had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (one torsades de pointes), all in the azimilide group. Asymptomatic recurrence was frequent in the AF-AFL group (8% with azimilide and 11% with placebo), but was absent in the PSVT group. False recurrence was common in both groups. CONCLUSION: Azimilide 125 mg daily was not associated with significant prolongation of the time to recurrent symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias. There was substantial discordance between symptoms and recurrence.

Antiarrhythmic efficacy of azimilide in patients with atrial fibrillation. Maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion to sinus rhythm.

BACKGROUND: Azimilide dihydrochloride (azimilide) is an investigational antiarrhythmic drug that has been tested in patients with a variety of arrhythmias. In patients with atrial fibrillation, it has shown excellent efficacy in some previous trials and minimal efficacy in others. METHODS: Patients who had symptomatic atrial fibrillation for > 48 hours but < 6 months were eligible for this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients were admitted to a hospital and randomly assigned to receive either azimilide 125 mg or a matched placebo twice daily for 3 days and then once daily. Patients who were in sinus rhythm spontaneously or had sinus rhythm restored by electric cardioversion on day 4 were discharged from the hospital. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation was documented by electrocardiogram. In the primary efficacy analysis, time to recurrence in the 2 treatment groups was compared with the log-rank test in the subgroup of patients with structural heart disease. Safety was assessed as deaths, adverse events, and serious adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients were randomized in the study; 314 were in the subgroup with structural heart disease. The median time to arrhythmia recurrence in both treatment groups with structural heart disease was 13 days, and the difference between treatments was not significant (P = .4596, n = 314). The relative risk for recurrence (placebo:azimilide) was 1.104 (95% CI 0.849-1.436). There was 1 death in the placebo group and 3 in the azimilide group. CONCLUSIONS: Azimilide did not demonstrate clinically important or statistically significant efficacy in reducing the risk for arrhythmia recurrence in patients with structural heart disease who were in atrial fibrillation and converted to sinus rhythm.

Efficacy of azimilide for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the presence and absence of structural heart disease.

Azimilide hydrochloride (azimilide), an investigational antiarrhythmic drug, has shown variable efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to assess its efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF and heart disease. Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were screened for 1 month by transtelephonic monitoring. After recording 1 episode of AF in the screening period, they were randomized to receive azimilide 125 mg or placebo once daily. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of congestive heart failure or coronary heart disease (CHF/CHD). A maximum of 220 patients without CHF/CHD were randomized, with the remainder having CHF/CHD. Patients with CHF/CHD were monitored for 3 days during loading. The primary efficacy analysis was the time to the first symptomatic recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group. Secondary analyses were the time to the first recurrence in the entire population and the time to the first recurrence in those with significant structural heart disease. The median time to recurrence of AF in the CHF/CHD group was 10 days in the 2 treatment arms. Nonsignificant trends were seen toward efficacy of azimilide in the CHF/CHD group (hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.97 to 1.70, p=0.087), structural heart disease group (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.56, p=0.11), and overall group (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.49, p=0.053). No patient died. In conclusion, azimilide showed a nonsignificant trend toward efficacy in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single oral dose of vanoxerine for the conversion of subjects with recent onset atrial fibrillation or flutter to normal sinus rhythm: RESTORE SR.

BACKGROUND: Vanoxerine is an oral, 1,4-dialkylpiperazine derivative antiarrhythmic drug being evaluated for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of vanoxerine for the restoration of sinus rhythm in subjects with recent onset AF or atrial flutter (AFL). METHODS: RESTORE SR (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a single oral dose of vanoxerine for the conversion of subjects with recent onset atrial fibrillation or flutter to normal sinus rhythm) was a prospective, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomized subjects to a single oral dose of vanoxerine 400 mg or placebo (2:1 allocation). RESULTS: A total of 41 subjects were randomized in the study (placebo [n = 15] and vanoxerine [n = 26]). The study was terminated prematurely because of safety concerns. Overall, 61% (23 of 38) of the treated cohort had a history of AF/AFL and 66% (27 of 41) had structural heart disease (SHD). The primary efficacy end point-conversion to sinus rhythm through 24 hours-occurred in 20% (3 of 15) in the placebo arm vs 69% (18 of 26) in the vanoxerine arm (P = .0024). The mean length of stay was 4.2 ± 2.9 days in the placebo arm vs 4.7 ± 3.2 days in the vanoxerine arm (P = .6561). The primary safety end point (all-cause death, ventricular fibrillation/tachycardia requiring intervention, or torsades de pointes) occurred in no patient in the placebo arm vs 11.5% (3 of 26) in the vanoxerine arm. All 3 patients had torsades de pointes and underlying SHD. CONCLUSION: Vanoxerine is an oral, mixed ion channel blocker with IKr, INa, and L-type calcium channel activity. While oral therapy with 400 mg of vanoxerine appears effective for the termination of recent onset AF/AFL, its use was associated with a significant risk of ventricular proarrhythmia in patients with SHD.

Asymptomatic or "silent" atrial fibrillation: frequency in untreated patients and patients receiving azimilide.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic, or "silent" atrial fibrillation could increase the risk of stroke. Little is known about the frequency of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients who also have symptomatic atrial fibrillation; similarly, little is known about the effect of antiarrhythmic drug therapy on asymptomatic atrial fibrillation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in sinus rhythm with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter received placebo or azimilide (35 to 125 mg) once daily for 6 or 9 months in 4 similar double-blind trials. The end point was the first recurrence of a symptomatic ECG-documented supraventricular arrhythmia. Routine transtelephonic electrocardiograms, in the absence of symptoms, were recorded for 30 seconds every 2 weeks until patients completed follow-up or documented a symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia. Of the 1380 patients, 489 received placebo. Among these patients receiving placebo, 303 transmitted at least one routine ECG while asymptomatic. Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation was recorded in 50 (17%) within 6 months and before recurrence of symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia. In the 3 trials evaluating azimilide in therapeutic doses (100 and 125 mg), asymptomatic atrial fibrillation occurred in 49 of 382 (13%) receiving azimilide and 43 of 233 (18%) receiving placebo. Although drug effect on time to first asymptomatic event was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.70; P=0.09), there was a 40% reduction in asymptomatic atrial fibrillation on azimilide compared with placebo (P=0.03) when repeated observations were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation is common in untreated patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (and is likely underestimated by this analysis). Azimilide may reduce the occurrence of this silent arrhythmia.

Symptoms at the time of arrhythmia recurrence in patients receiving azimilide for control of atrial fibrillation or flutter: results from randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Azimilide is a new antiarrhythmic agent being developed for the management for atrial fibrillation and flutter (AF). Four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials have been performed that investigated the effect of azimilide on time to first recurrence of symptomatic AF. This paper examines the data collected during those studies regarding the symptoms reported by patients at the time of AF recurrence METHODS: At the time that patients reported their first documented symptomatic recurrence of arrhythmia, they were systematically asked whether or not they were experiencing any of the following 6 symptoms: palpitation, fatigue, chest pain, shortness of breath, dizziness, or sweating. Patients were required to answer yes or no. A symptom score was created varying from 0 to 6, in increasing order of number of symptoms reported. This was compared for patients receiving either of 2 doses of azimilide or placebo. The relationship between the number of symptoms, heart rate at time of arrhythmia recurrence and treatment was analyzed. RESULTS: In 2 separate studies, azimilide at a dose of 125 mg/day significantly reduced the number of symptoms at the time of arrhythmia recurrence compared to placebo. On the other hand, in 2 studies, the dose of 100 mg/day did not significantly reduce symptom burden. The individual symptoms significantly reduced by azimilide125 mg/day were fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain and dizziness. Palpitations and sweating were not significantly reduced. Modeling of heart rate at the time of arrhythmia recurrence, symptoms and treatment indicated that a small reduction in heart rate with azimilide accounted for only a small part of the symptom reduction. There was another effect of azimilide: an average reduction of 0.38 symptoms (P <.01) that was independent of heart rate. CONCLUSION: Azimilide (125 mg/day) reduces the number of symptoms reported at the time of AF recurrence.

Antiarrhythmic effects of azimilide in paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia: efficacy and dose-response.

BACKGROUND: Azimilide is a novel classification III antiarrhythmic agent that blocks both I(Kr)and I(Ks)and shows evidence of efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Its effect on paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) has not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients with symptomatic PSVT were enrolled in 4 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials with almost identical trial design (supraventricular arrhythmia-1 [SVA-1], SVA-2, SVA-3, and SVA-4), performed as a separate stratum of studies that also included a stratum of patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter. Patients received oral azimilide (100 mg in SVA-1 and SVA-3, 35 or 75 mg in SVA-2, and 125 mg in SVA-4) or matching placebo twice daily for 3 days (loading period), followed by once-daily dosing (maintenance period). The primary outcome variable was the first recording of a symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia (either PSVT, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter) recorded on a transtelephonic electrocardiographic event recorder. The duration of study was 270 days in SVA-1 and SVA-2 and 180 days in SVA-3 and SVA-4. Combined analysis results of the PSVT stratum from the 4 studies showed a dose-response relationship in prolongation of time to recurrence (P =.02). In the combined 100-mg daily dose, the hazard ratio (placebo:azimilide) was 2.35 (P =.023). The hazard ratio for the 125-mg daily dose measured 1.28 (P = not significant). However, the time to recurrence was prolonged when the patients receiving 100 and 125 mg daily were combined and compared with placebo (P =.02). There were no deaths and 1 case of torsades de pointes. CONCLUSION: These trial results suggest a significant dose-related suppression of PSVT with azimilide, with a low risk of serious adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of sustained-release propafenone (propafenone SR) for patients with atrial fibrillation.

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was to test the efficacy and safety of a new sustained-release preparation of the antiarrhythmic drug propafenone (propafenone SR) in reducing the frequency of symptomatic arrhythmia recurrences in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with a history of symptomatic AF who were in sinus rhythm were randomly assigned to receive placebo or propafenone SR 425, 325, or 225 mg, all twice daily. Recurrent symptomatic arrhythmias were documented using transtelephone electrocardiographic monitoring. Electrocardiograms were reviewed by an event committee that was blinded to treatment assignment. In the primary efficacy analysis, propafenone SR significantly lengthened the time to first symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrence at all 3 doses compared with placebo as assessed by log-rank test: propafenone SR 425 mg twice daily versus placebo twice daily, p <0.001; 325 mg twice daily versus placebo twice daily, p <0.001; and 225 mg twice daily versus placebo twice daily, p = 0.014. The median time to recurrence was 41 days in the placebo twice daily group, >300 days in the propafenone SR 425-mg group, 291 days in the 325-mg group, and 112 days in the 225-mg group. Adverse effects leading to withdrawal were higher in the propafenone SR 425-mg twice daily group than in any other group. Thus, propafenone SR has important and statistically significant antiarrhythmic effects in patients with AF.

Symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence as an outcome in clinical trials of antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia requiring medical treatment, and developing new antiarrhythmic therapies remains a challenging problem. Documenting symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence using patient-activated ECG recording has been a useful tool to test new pharmacologic therapies. This technique has been used successfully to test immediate-release verapamil in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; flecainide acetate in patients with atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; immediate-release propafenone in patients with atrial fibrillation and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia; d,l-sotalol in patients with atrial fibrillation; digoxin in patients with atrial fibrillation; azimilide dihydrochloride in patients with atrial fibrillation; and sustained-release propafenone in patients with atrial fibrillation. These studies have contributed to understanding efficacy and have led to regulatory approvals in the United States to label drugs as effective for supraventricular arrhythmias.

Effects of azimilide on heart rate and ECG conduction intervals during sinus rhythm in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation.

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of azimilide, a Class III antiarrhythmic drug, on ECG conduction intervals recorded during sinus rhythm in patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. In Phase I clinical pharmacology studies, azimilide was associated with prolongation of the QT and QTc intervals on electrocardiograms recorded during sinus rhythm in normal subjects, but the effect of azimilide on the target population of patients with atrial fibrillation has not been reported in detail previously. Patients with a history of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or both were randomly assigned to receive placebo or azimilide twice daily for 3 days and then qd thereafter. Azimilide doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 125 mg were tested. The RR, PR, QRS, QT, QTc(Bazett), and QTc(Fridericia) intervals were measured from electrocardiograms recorded at baseline and on Day 4 of test therapy. Increasing azimilide doses were associated with significant increases in the RR, QT, QTc(Bazett), and QTc(Fridericia) compared with changes in the placebo group based on the F-test for differences among treatment groups and the test for a dose response. In the azimilide 125 mg dose group, the mean change in RR was significantlygreater than the mean change in the placebo group (+61.4 ms in the azimilide 125 mg group vs. -14.1 ms in the placebo group). The mean change in QT was significantly greater in the azimilide 125 mg group than the mean change in the placebo group (+44.2 ms in the azimilide 125 mg group vs. -1.0 ms in the placebo group). The mean change in QTc using both correction methods was significantly greater in the azimilide 125 mggroup than the mean change in the respective placebo group: QTc(Bazett) +31.6 ms in the azimilide 125 mg group versus +2.1 ms in the placebo group and QTc(Fridericia) +35.8 in the azimilide 125 mg group versus +1.0 ms in the placebo group. It was concluded that in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation or flutter, azimilide was associated with statistically significant increases in RR, QT, QTc(Bazett), and QTc(Fridericia) when patients were in sinus rhythm.

Azimilide for atrial fibrillation: clinical trial results and implications.

Azimilide dihydrochloride (or azimilide) is a class III antiarrhythmic drug currently under investigation that has been tested in atrial fibrillation in four randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials to assess efficacy and dose range. These investigational trials showed that doses of azimilide 100 and 125 mg once daily prolonged the time to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence in patients with a history of symptomatic atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or both. Doses of 75 mg or less were not useful in this indication. Safety of azimilide has been examined in several different types of studies. In a large randomized clinical trial of post-infarct patients, azimilide neither increased nor decreased mortality risk. In patients with supraventricular arrhythmias, the most common adverse effects reported by patients on azimilide were approximately equal in frequency with those on placebo: headache, asthenia, infection, diarrhea and dizziness. Infrequent cases of torsade de pointes and severe neutropenia were reported in patients taking azimilide. Azimilide is an investigational antiarrhythmic drug that has shown efficacy in patients with atrial fibrillation.