Immediate and long-term management practices of acute symptomatic seizures and epileptiform abnormalities: A cross-sectional international survey.

OBJECTIVES: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) and epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) on electroencephalography (EEG) are commonly encountered following acute brain injury. Their immediate and long-term management remains poorly investigated. We conducted an international survey to understand their current management. METHODS: The cross-sectional web-based survey of 21 fixed-response questions was based on a common clinical encounter: convulsive or suspected ASyS following an acute brain injury. Respondents selected the option that best matched their real-world practice. Respondents completing the survey were compared with those who accessed but did not complete it. RESULTS: A total of 783 individuals (44 countries) accessed the survey; 502 completed it. Almost everyone used anti-seizure medications (ASMs) for secondary prophylaxis after convulsive or electrographic ASyS (95.4% and 97.2%, respectively). ASM dose escalation after convulsive ASyS depends on continuous EEG (cEEG) findings: most often increased after electrographic seizures (78% of respondents), followed by lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs; 41%) and sporadic epileptiform discharges (sEDs; 17.5%). If cEEG is unrevealing, one in five respondents discontinue ASMs after a week. In the absence of convulsive and electrographic ASyS, a large proportion of respondents start ASMs due to LPD (66.7%) and sED (44%) on cEEG. At hospital discharge, most respondents (85%) continue ASM without dose change. The recommended duration of outpatient ASM use is as follows: 1-3 months (36%), 3-6 months (30%), 6-12 months (13%), >12 months (11%). Nearly one-third of respondents utilized ancillary testing before outpatient ASM taper, most commonly (79%) a <2 h EEG. Approximately half of respondents had driving restrictions recommended for 6 months after discharge. SIGNIFICANCE: ASM use for secondary prophylaxis after convulsive and electrographic ASyS is a universal practice and is continued upon discharge. Outpatient care, particularly the ASM duration, varies significantly. Wide practice heterogeneity in managing acute EAs reflects uncertainty about their significance and management. These results highlight the need for a structured outpatient follow-up and optimized care pathway for patients with ASyS.

Trends in management of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) from 2016 to 2023: An interim analysis.

In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Comparative analysis of patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus preceded by fever (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome) versus without prior fever: An interim analysis.

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non-FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non-FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non-infection-related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.

Impact of acute symptomatic seizures and their management on patient-reported outcomes after stroke.

OBJECTIVE: Acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) after stroke are not uncommon. However, the impact of ASyS and its management with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) remains poorly investigated. The objective of our study is to evaluate the association between PROMs and ASyS and ASMs following stroke. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all stroke patients who underwent inpatient continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring performed due to suspected ASyS, including the ones with observed convulsive ASyS, from 04/01/2012 to 03/31/2018, who completed PROMs within 6 months of hospital discharge. Patient-reported outcome measures, including one Neuro-QoL and six PROMIS v1.0 domain scales, were completed by patients as the standard of care in ambulatory stroke clinics. Since ASMs are sometimes used without clearly diagnosed ASyS, we performed group comparisons based on ASM status at discharge, irrespective of their ASyS status. T-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared continuous variables across groups and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 508 patients were included in the study [mean age 62.0 ± 14.1 years, 51.6% female; 244 (48.0%) ischemic stroke, 165 (32.5%) intracerebral hemorrhage, and 99 (19.5%) subarachnoid hemorrhage]. A total of 190 (37.4%) patients were discharged on ASMs. At the time of the first PROM, conducted a median of 47 (IQR = 33-78) days after the suspected ASyS, and 162 (31.9%) were on ASMs. ASM use was significantly higher in patients diagnosed with ASyS. Physical Function and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities were the most affected health domains. Patient-reported outcome measures were not significantly different between groups based on ASyS (electrographic and/or convulsive), ASM use at hospital discharge, or ASM status on the day of PROM completion. SIGNIFICANCE: There were no differences in multiple domain-specific PROMs in patients with recent stroke according to ASyS status or ASM use suggesting the possible lack of the former's sensitivity to detect their impact. Additional research is necessary to determine if there is a need for developing ASyS-specific PROMs.

Atrophy and cognitive profiles in older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy are similar to mild cognitive impairment.

Epilepsy incidence and prevalence peaks in older adults yet systematic studies of brain ageing and cognition in older adults with epilepsy remain limited. Here, we characterize patterns of cortical atrophy and cognitive impairment in 73 older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy (>55 years) and compare these patterns to those observed in 70 healthy controls and 79 patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, the prodromal stage of Alzheimer's disease. Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy were recruited from four tertiary epilepsy surgical centres; amnestic mild cognitive impairment and control subjects were obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Whole brain and region of interest analyses were conducted between patient groups and controls, as well as between temporal lobe epilepsy patients with early-onset (age of onset <50 years) and late-onset (>50 years) seizures. Older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy demonstrated a similar pattern and magnitude of medial temporal lobe atrophy to amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Region of interest analyses revealed pronounced medial temporal lobe thinning in both patient groups in bilateral entorhinal, temporal pole, and fusiform regions (all P < 0.05). Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy demonstrated thinner left entorhinal cortex compared to amnestic mild cognitive impairment (P = 0.02). Patients with late-onset temporal lobe epilepsy had a more consistent pattern of cortical thinning than patients with early-onset epilepsy, demonstrating decreased cortical thickness extending into the bilateral fusiform (both P < 0.01). Both temporal lobe epilepsy and amnestic mild cognitive impairment groups showed significant memory and language impairment relative to healthy control subjects. However, despite similar performances in language and memory encoding, patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment demonstrated poorer delayed memory performances relative to both early and late-onset temporal lobe epilepsy. Medial temporal lobe atrophy and cognitive impairment overlap between older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy and amnestic mild cognitive impairment highlights the risks of growing old with epilepsy. Concerns regarding accelerated ageing and Alzheimer's disease co-morbidity in older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy suggests an urgent need for translational research aimed at identifying common mechanisms and/or targeting symptoms shared across a broad neurological disease spectrum.

Personalized model to predict seizures based on dynamic and static continuous EEG monitoring data.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Early recognition of patients who may be at risk of developing acute symptomatic seizures would be useful. We aimed to determine whether continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) data using machine learning techniques such as neural networks and decision trees could predict seizure occurrence in hospitalized patients. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective cohort analysis of cEEG data in patients aged 18-90 years who were admitted and underwent cEEG monitoring between 2010 and 2019 limited to 72 h excluding those who were seizing at the onset of recording. A total of 41,491 patients were reviewed; of these, 3874 were used to develop the static model and 1687 to develop the dynamic model (half with seizure and half without seizure in each cohort). Of these, 80% were randomly selected as derivation cohorts for each model and 20% were randomly selected as validation cohorts. Dynamic and static machine learning models (long short term memory (LSTM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm (XGBoost)) based on day-to-day dynamic EEG changes and binary static EEG features over the prior 72 h or until seizure, which ever was earlier, were used. RESULTS: The static model was able to predict seizure occurrence based on cEEG data with sensitivity and specificity of 0.81 and 0.59, respectively, with an AUC of 0.70. The dynamic model was able to predict seizure occurrence with sensitivity and specificity of 0.72 and 0.80, respectively, and AUC of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models could be applied to cEEG data to predict seizure occurrence based on available cEEG data. Dynamic day-to-day EEG data are more useful in predicting seizures than binary static EEG data. These models could potentially be used to determine the need for ongoing cEEG monitoring and to prioritize resources.

Telepsychology May Improve Treatment Adherence in Patients with Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures.

Introduction: Access to mental health care is a significant challenge in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Telepsychology can curb the access barriers and improve adherence but the role of telepsychology in improving adherence has not been well investigated. The current study examines the utility of telepsychology during the COVID-19 pandemic and treatment adherence in PNES patients. Materials and Methods: Patients with PNES admitted to a 12-week counseling program were offered two visit types: telepsychology and in-office. Visit type, visit status, and demographic information were obtained from department database. Follow-up visits in 6 months were used to examine the effect of visit type on visit status. Adherence to treatment was measured by higher attendance of scheduled visits and less cancellation and no-show rates. Results: Two hundred fifty-seven (n) patients who scheduled virtual or telepsychology visits were included in the study. After adjusting for demographic variables, and accounting for repeated measures, telepsychology visits were significantly more likely to be attended (odds ratio [OR] = 2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.69-3.41, p < 0.001) and were significantly less likely to be canceled (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.29-0.64, p < 0.001). The regression model showed patients in the telepsychology visit group attended more than three times as many visits as in-office patients (incidence rate ratios = 3.16, 95% CI = 2.13-4.73, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with PNES have logistical and psychological barriers that can impede their ability to attend counseling treatment. Receiving care remotely may have been associated with higher engagement with mental health treatment compared to having to travel to counseling clinics. Considering the symptom-related restrictions patients with PNES have and the barriers presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, telepsychology played a key role for continuation of mental health treatment.

Diagnosing cognitive disorders in older adults with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the nature and prevalence of cognitive disorders in older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and compare their cognitive profiles to patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (ie, aMCI). METHODS: Seventy-one older patients with TLE, 77 aMCI, and 69 normal aging controls (NACs), all 55-80 years of age, completed neuropsychological measures of memory, language, executive function, and processing speed. An actuarial neuropsychological method designed to diagnose MCI was applied to individual patients to identify older adults with TLE who met diagnostic criteria for MCI (TLE-MCI). A linear classifier was performed to evaluate how well the diagnostic criteria differentiated patients with TLE-MCI from aMCI. In TLE, the contribution of epilepsy-related and vascular risk factors to cognitive impairment was evaluated using multiple regression. RESULTS: Forty-three TLE patients (60%) met criteria for TLE-MCI, demonstrating marked deficits in both memory and language. When patients were analyzed according to age at seizure onset, 63% of those with an early onset (<50 years) versus 56% of those with late onset (≥ 50 years) met criteria for TLE-MCI. A classification model between TLE-MCI and aMCI correctly classified 81.1% (90.6% specificity, 61.3% sensitivity) of the cohort based on neuropsychological scores. Whereas TLE-MCI showed greater deficits in language relative to aMCI, patients with aMCI showed greater rapid forgetting on memory measures. Both epilepsy-related risk factors and the presence of leukoaraiosis on MRI contributed to impairment profiles in TLE-MCI. SIGNIFICANCE: Cognitive impairment is a common comorbidity in epilepsy and it presents in a substantial number of older adults with TLE. Although the underlying etiologies are unknown in many patients, the TLE-MCI phenotype may be secondary to an accumulation of epilepsy and vascular risk factors, signal the onset of a neurodegenerative disease, or represent a combination of factors.

Acute Symptomatic Seizures in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: Is There an Association?

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) emerged as a global pandemic. Historically, the group of human coronaviruses can also affect the central nervous system leading to neurological symptoms; however, the causative mechanisms of the neurological manifestations of COVID-19 disease are not well known. Seizures have not been directly reported as a part of COVID-19 outside of patients with previously known brain injury or epilepsy. We report two cases of acute symptomatic seizures, in non-epileptic patients, associated with severe COVID-19 disease. CASE PRESENTATIONS: Two advanced-age, non-epileptic, male patients presented to our northeast Ohio-based health system with concern for infection in Mid-March 2020. Both had a history of lung disease and during their hospitalization tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. They developed acute encephalopathy days into their hospitalization with clinical and electrographic seizures. Resolution of seizures was achieved with levetiracetam. DISCUSSION: Patients with COVID-19 disease are at an elevated risk for seizures, and the mechanism of these seizures is likely multifactorial. Clinical (motor) seizures may not be readily detected in this population due to the expansive utilization of sedatives and paralytics for respiratory optimization strategies. Many of these patients are also not electrographically monitored for seizures due to limited resources, multifactorial risk for acute encephalopathy, and the risk of cross-contamination. Previously, several neurological symptoms were seen in patients with more advanced COVID-19 disease, and these were thought to be secondary to multi-system organ failure and/or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy-related brain injury. However, these patients may also have an advanced breakdown of the blood-brain barrier precipitated by pro-inflammatory cytokine reactions. The neurotropic effect and neuroinvasiveness of SARS-Coronavirus-2 have not been directly established. CONCLUSIONS: Acute symptomatic seizures are possible in patients with COVID-19 disease. These seizures are likely multifactorial in origin, including cortical irritation due to blood-brain barrier breakdown, precipitated by the cytokine reaction as a part of the viral infection. Patients with clinical signs of seizures or otherwise unexplained encephalopathy may benefit from electroencephalography monitoring and/or empiric anti-epileptic therapy. Further studies are needed to elucidate the risk of seizures and benefit of monitoring in this population.

Bridging the gap in epilepsy care: A single-center experience of 3700 outpatient tele-epilepsy visits.

We describe the largest-to-date single-center implementation of tele-epilepsy. Beginning in 2017, all patients at a single tertiary care academic epilepsy center were offered the option to complete outpatient follow-up visits via video-conferencing using personal devices. A retrospective review of all patients who self-selected virtual visits over nearly 3 years showed 2140 patients completed 3698 tele-epilepsy visits, with 41% completing more than one visit during the study period. Based on the distance from the center to the home address, 26.7% of patients were local (≤50 miles), 30.5% were near regional (51-150 miles), 20.1% were far regional (151-270 miles), and 22.7% were remote (>270 miles), from 43 different states. An estimated 928 696 miles of travel was prevented, with a median travel distance saved of 124.5 miles (interquartile range = 45.0-253.0). The mean visit time was 15.7 (±10.4) minutes. More than 90% of patients gave the visit and provider experience the maximum rating, with a nearly 60% response rate on the post-visit survey. Virtual outpatient follow-up care provides a convenient way to connect with epilepsy specialists and reduce the burden of care by cutting travel time. Our experience demonstrates that outpatient tele-epilepsy is feasible, sustainable, and scalable.

Topological alterations in older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy are distinct from amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Epilepsy incidence and prevalence peaks in older adults, yet systematic studies of brain aging and epilepsy remain limited. We investigated topological network disruption in older adults with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; age > 55 years). Additionally, we examined the potential network disruption overlap between TLE and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI), the prodromal stage of Alzheimer disease. Measures of network integration ("global path efficiency") and segregation ("transitivity" and "modularity") were calculated from cortical thickness covariance from 73 TLE subjects, 79 aMCI subjects, and 70 healthy controls. Compared to controls, TLE patients demonstrated abnormal measures of segregation (increased transitivity and decreased modularity) and integration (decreased global path efficiency). aMCI patients also displayed increased transitivity and decreased global path efficiency, but these differences were less pronounced than in TLE. At the local level, TLE patients demonstrated decreased local path efficiency focused in the bilateral temporal lobes, whereas aMCI patients had a more frontal-parietal distribution. These results suggest that network disruption at the global and local level is present in both disorders, but global disruption may be a particularly salient feature in older adults with TLE. These findings motivate further research into whether these network changes have distinct cognitive correlates or are progressive in older adults with epilepsy.

Long-term outcomes of reoperations in epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze longitudinal seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery, including reoperations, in patients with intractable focal epilepsy. METHODS: Clinicoradiological characteristics of patients who underwent epilepsy surgery from 1995 to 2016 with follow-up of ≥1 year were reviewed. In patients undergoing reoperations, the latest resection was considered the index surgery. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom (Engel I) at last follow-up. Potentially significant outcome variables were first identified using univariate analyses and then fit in multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Of 898 patients fulfilling study criteria, 110 had reoperations; 92 had one resection prior to the index surgery and 18 patients had two or more prior resective surgeries. Two years after the index surgery, 69% of patients with no prior surgeries had an Engel score of I, as opposed to only 42% of those with one prior surgery, and 33% of those with two or more prior resections (P < .001). Among surgical outcome predictors, the number of prior epilepsy surgeries, female sex, lesional initial magnetic resonance imaging, no prior history of generalization, and pathology correlated with better seizure outcomes on univariate analysis. However, only sex (P = .011), history of generalization (P = .016), and number of prior surgeries (P = .002) remained statistically significant in the multivariate model. SIGNIFICANCE: Although long-term seizure control is possible in patients with failed prior epilepsy surgery, the chances of success diminish with every subsequent resection. Outcome is additionally determined by inherent biological markers (sex and secondary generalization tendency), rather than traditional outcome predictors, supporting a hypothesis of "surgical refractoriness."

Quality of life before and after epilepsy surgery: Age is just a number.

BACKGROUND: In a rapidly aging population, it is critical to analyze if the quality of life (QOL) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and the change in it after epilepsy surgery is dependent on the age at operation. METHODS: A prospective registry-based retrospective cohort study including adults with a completed pre- and post-surgery Quality of Life in Epilepsy 10 (QOLIE-10) survey. Multivariable linear regression models analyzed the baseline, postoperative, or change in QOLIE-10 score. RESULTS: We analyzed 416 patients (51% females) with the mean age of 39.6 (SD = 12.6) years at the time of surgery, including 100 (24%) individuals 50 years or older. The younger and older adults (dichotomized as <50 vs. ≥50 and <60 vs. ≥60) had comparable pre- and post-surgery QOLIE 10 total scores. The change in total and individual QOLIE-10 items score were comparable between the groups as well. Within group improvements in total QOLIE-10 score post-surgery was in younger as well as older groups. The linear regression models showed that age, regardless of parameterization (linear or dichotomized), was not related to pre-surgery, post-surgery, and change in QOLIE-10 score, both before and after adjustment for covariates. The change in QOLIE-10 score did not show correlation with age, whether seizure freedom or relative seizure reduction was used in the model. CONCLUSION: With QOL, before or after surgery, being independent of a patient's age, our findings suggest that well-selected older adults and the elderly should be offered epilepsy surgery without concern for an inferior improvement in QOL compared to their younger counterparts.

Evidence of a Rapid Shift in Outpatient Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Telemedicine.

Introduction: During the current pandemic, measures for preventing SARS-CoV-2 virus exposure has severely impacted the delivery of outpatient clinical care to patients with a chronic neurological condition. Telemedicine has emerged as an obvious choice to counter these impediments. However, its potential for maintaining outpatient care at pre-pandemic levels during these rapidly changing times is untested. Therefore, we analyzed our experience in a tertiary care epilepsy center. Methods: We divided the study period from March 1, 2020 to April 15, 2020 into a baseline, transition (to telemedicine), and current phase. We divided outpatient encounters into clinic, virtual (using Cleveland Clinic Express Care Online platform), and telephone (including commercial video conferencing platforms). Results: Completed outpatient visits during baseline and current period were 595 and 590, respectively. Nearly 1 out of 4 patients missed outpatient visits during the transition period. The virtual visits accounted for 19.7% of completed visits during baseline and increased to 66.8% during the current period. There were no telephone visits during the baseline phase but accounted for 26.1% of completed visits during the current phase. Less than 1 percent of completed visits in the current phase were in the clinic. Conclusion: We provide evidence that telemedicine's robust and rapid scalability can help maintain a seamless transition of outpatient care during the pandemic.

New onset epilepsy among patients with periodic discharges on continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of new onset epilepsy and associated risk factors in patients with periodic patterns on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) during critical illness. METHODS: The local cEEG database and then medical records were reviewed from January 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013 to find adult patients with no history of epilepsy who had periodic discharges-either lateralized (LPDs) or generalized (GPDs)-or nonperiodic/nonepileptogenic (NP/NE) findings on cEEG and ≥3 months of clinical follow-up. Clinical seizure after discharge was the primary outcome. Chi-square test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (median age = 67.8 years) were included. There were 53 (27%), 73 (37%), and 69 (35%) patients with LPDs, GPDs, and NP/NE findings on cEEG, respectively. These three groups did not differ by demographic or clinical variables. A total of 29 (15%) patients (LPDs = 20 [38%], GPDs = 4 [6%], and NP/NE = 5 [7%]) developed epilepsy during a median follow-up of 32.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 13.2-42.8) months. The hazard ratio for epilepsy development among LPD patients was 7.7 (95% CI = 2.9-20.7) times compared to the NP/NE group, and the risk further increased to 11.4 (95% CI = 4-31.4) times if they also had electrographic seizures. This association remained significant despite adjusting for each covariate at a time. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with LPDs on cEEG during critical illness are at least seven times more likely to develop epilepsy compared to patients with NP/NE findings. This risk is further increased if patients with LPDs have electrographic seizures. In comparison, the presence of GPDs does not seem to impact the risk for developing epilepsy. cEEG findings at the time of acute insult have potential to serve as prognostic biomarkers for epilepsy development.

Breaking the age barrier: Epilepsy surgery in septuagenarians.

Resective epilepsy surgery (RES) has traditionally been offered to young patients (<50years). The reservation about offering RES to the elderly is multifactorial with their advanced age and comorbidities being the primary reason. The elderly age group (≥65years of age) is one of the fastest growing populations. The arbitrary age limits for RES need reconsideration in the face of an ever increasing elderly population. Considering such changes in demographics, we report the first case series in the literature of seven septuagenarians who underwent RES in the form of anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). The 10-year median survival probability based on their comorbidities and age was more than 50%. Six patients had good surgical outcome (Engle I/II) with four of them being completely free of disabling seizures after a median follow-up of almost 2years. No significant medical or surgical morbidity was observed. However, three out of the four patients undergoing pre- and post-RES neuropsychological testing showed decline in memory function. Seizure-related injuries were noted in four out of seven patients and may have been a motivation to proceed with RES in our cohort. Our experience suggests that RES can be a safe and effective therapy in well-selected, septuagenarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Neuropsychological outcomes after RES in this population need further evaluation.

Epileptic auras and their role in driving safety in people with epilepsy.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of auras in preventing motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) among patients with medically refractory epilepsy. The Multicenter Study of Epilepsy Surgery database was used to perform a case-control study by identifying patients who had seizures while driving that led to MVAs (cases) and those who had seizures while driving without MVAs (controls). We compared presence of reliable auras and other aura-related features between the two groups. Two hundred fifteen of 553 patients reported having seizure(s) while driving; 74 were identified as "controls" and 141 as "cases." The two groups had similar demographic and clinical features. The presence of reliable auras was not different between the two groups (67% in cases vs. 65% in controls; odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.61, p = 0.76). In addition, the groups did not differ in the proportion of patients who reported longer (>1 min) auras (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.28-1.76, p = 0.47), or who thought that their auras were of sufficient duration to be protective (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.62-2.00, p = 0.77). Our study questions the long-held belief of a protective role of reliable auras against MVAs in people with epilepsy.

Incidence of recurrent seizures following hospital discharge in patients with LPDs (PLEDs) and nonconvulsive seizures recorded on continuous EEG in the critical care setting.

PURPOSE: Continuous EEG (cEEG) has helped to identify nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) along with lateralized periodic patterns (LPDs or PLEDs) in ICU patients with much higher frequency than previously appreciated, but understanding their implications may be more complex. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of recurrent seizures after hospital discharge and their associated factors in patients with PLEDs and NCS in the critical care setting. METHODS: After IRB approval, we used our EEG reporting database to find 200 consecutive patients who had PLEDs and/or NCSs on cEEG. Patients with less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Remaining patients were divided into three groups: PLEDs+Seizure (NCS/NCSE), PLEDs only, and Seizures (NCS/NCSE) only. Medical records were reviewed to gather demographical and clinical details. Univariate data analysis was done using JMP 9.0 (Marlow, Buckinghamshire, UK). RESULTS: There were 51 patients in 'PLEDs+Seizure' group, 45 in 'PLEDs only' group, and 22 in 'Seizure only' group. Ischemic stroke, hemorrhage, and tumors were the top three etiologies. Nearly 47% of our study population had postdischarge seizures during a mean follow-up period of 11.9 (+/-6) months. We found that 24.4% of patients in the PLEDs only group had seizures after discharge, which increased to 60.7% if they had seizures as well during their ICU stay. Slightly more than 52% of patients had a postdischarge EEG, of which, 59% was in the form of inpatient cEEG during a rehospitalization, accounting for 30.5% of the total study population. It was an indicator of high readmission rates in this population. CONCLUSION: Almost every other patient with PLEDs and/or NCS on cEEG had seizures after ICU discharge. A quarter of patients on cEEG in the ICU with PLEDs alone had seizures after discharge, and after excluding prior epilepsy, 17% of patients with PLEDs had seizures on follow-up. This was dramatically increased with the recording of PLEDs with NCS, with 60% of patients having seizures after discharge from the ICU and 48% of patients after excluding prior epilepsy. Patients with NCS on cEEG alone had 63% chance of seizure recurrence that dropped to 38% with exclusion of prior epilepsy. Future studies are needed to define the postdischarge outcomes including seizure recurrence in this patient population. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".