Lung ultrasound and BNP to detect hidden pulmonary congestion in euvolemic hemodialysis patients: a single centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Dry weight assessment in hemodialysis (HD) remains a challenge. The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of subclinical pulmonary congestion using lung ultrasound (LUS) in maintenance HD patients with no clinical or bioimpedance signs of hyperhydration. The correlation between B-lines Score (BLS) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-four HD patients underwent LUS and BNP dosage at the end of the mid-week HD session, monthly for 6 months . LUS was considered as positive when BLS was >15. Hospitalizations and cardiovascular events were also evaluated in relation to the BLS. RESULTS: LUS+ patients at baseline were 16 (67%), whereas 11 (46%) showed LUS + in at least 50% of the measurements (rLUS+ patients). Only the rLUS+ patients had a higher number of cardiovascular events [p=0.019, OR: 7.4 (CI 95%. 1.32-39.8)] and hospitalizations [p=0.034, OR 5.5 (CI 95% 1.22- 24.89)]. A BNP level of 165 pg/ml was identified as cut-off value for predicting pulmonary congestion, defined by BLS >15. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of pulmonary congestion as assessed by LUS and persistent or recurrent BLS >15 were quite prevalent findings in euvolemic HD patients. In the patients defined as rLUS+, a higher rate of cardiovascular events and hospital admissions was registered. BNP serum levels > 165 pg/ml resulted predictive of pulmonary congestion at LUS. In the dialysis care, regular LUS examination should be reasonably included among the methods useful to detect subclinical lung congestion and to adjust patients' dry weight.

[Different methods to manage dry weight in hemodialysis patients].

Estimating the euvolemia and dry weight of hemodialysis patients still represents a challenge for the nephrologist, since both dehydration and hyperhydration are associated with intradialytic events and cardiovascular complications in the short and long term. Despite the need for a precise and objective definition of the dry weight for the individual patient on dialysis, this is usually determined on a clinical basis. To obtain greater sensitivity the dosage of natriuretic peptides, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) and, more recently, Lung Ultra-Sound (LUS) can all be used. The BIA allows to estimate the subject's body composition and, in particular, the distribution of body fluids. The presence of hyperhydration, as determined through the BIA, is predictive of an increased mortality in numerous observational studies. In recent years, pulmonary ultrasound has taken on an increasingly important role not only within the cardiology and intensive care units, but also in a nephrology setting, especially in dialysis. The purpose of this article is to analyze the advantages and limitations of the methods that can be used to assess the dry weight of patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment.

Home blood pressure measurement as a systematic tool for clinical practice in CKD patients: a real-world picture.

BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is very common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients and its prevalence increases with lowering estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Blood pressure (BP) control is a cornerstone in the treatment of CKD patients but still most treatment decisions are based on office BP measurement (OBPM). The aim of this cross-sectional, retrospective study is to investigate the prevalence of hypertension phenotypes in CKD patients and whether different home (HBPM) or OBPM are associated with a different CKD stage and cardiovascular comorbidities. METHODS: We analyzed 560 consecutive patients (359 men, age 70±13 years), affected by stage 3-5 CKD, who performed HBPM recording; OBPM during a single visit was also assessed. Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as OBPM values ≥140/90 mmHg and HBPM values ≥135/85 mmHg, respectively. RESULTS: Systolic and diastolic HBPM values were lower than OBPM values. A white coat effect (systolic BP +18±12 mmHg) was detected in 62.5%, while a masked effect (systolic BP -14±10 mmHg) was detected in 22.7%. No relationship was found between BP differences and body weight, CKD stage, eGFR or presence of diabetes. Based on OBPM, 18.6% of patients showed controlled systolic and diastolic BP, whereas 37.8% had sustained hypertension. White-coat hypertension was detected in 23.4% and Masked hypertension in 12.1%. The multiple logistic regression model showed that masked uncontrolled hypertensive patients showed a higher probability of having ischemic heart disease (OR=2.54 [1.02-6.36]), while sustained hypertension was associated with an increased prevalence of stroke in comparison to normotensive or true control BP group (OR=4.72 [1.30-17.07]). Age, gender, diabetes or CKD stage, were not different among the four hypertension phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: We observed a quite high rate of masked uncontrolled hypertension and of white coat hypertension in stage 3-5ND CKD patients. Office BP measurement, as a single tool, is an inadequate diagnostic procedure in the clinical management of CKD patients. HBPM should be routinely implemented for identifying hypertensive phenotypes and then for avoiding misdiagnosis and mistreatment of pre-dialysis CKD patients in a tertiary care setting.