The efficacy of suprapatellar, parapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing in the treatment of tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tibial fractures are common and challenging orthopedic injuries that are commonly treated with intramedullary nailing techniques via suprapatellar (SP), parapatellar (PP), and infrapatellar (IP) approaches. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of the efficacy of different treatment approaches based on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a detailed search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for clinical studies comparing suprapatellar, parapatellar, and infrapatellar approaches in intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies involving patients aged 18 and older, comparing outcomes of these surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria included studies with insufficient data, non-English publications, and those focusing on non-tibial fractures. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies involving 1396 patients were included in meta-analysis. Pooled results indicated that, compared to IP nailing, the SP approach significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (MD = - 35.63, 95% CI - 39.37 to - 31.89, p < 0.001), operative time (MD = - 10.72, 95% CI - 17.30 to - 4.15, p = 0.001), pain scores (SMD = - 1.49, 95% CI - 2.36 to - 0.62, p < 0.001), and improved Lysholm scores (MD = 5.74, 95% CI 3.29 to 8.19, p < 0.001) and malalignment rate (RR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.68, p = 0.008). Quality of life assessments also indicated higher physical component scores for the SP group (MD = 6.68, 95% CI 5.19 to 8.17, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SP approach provides significant intraoperative and postoperative benefits, reducing surgery time and improving patient outcomes in pain management and knee joint function. These findings support the SP approach as a preferred option for surgical treatment of tibial fractures.

Removing a suprapatellar intramedullary nail via a suprapatellar approach: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Over the last 20 years, suprapatellar (SP) intramedullary nailing has gained considerable attention for treating tibia fractures and is believed to improve fracture alignments, decrease anterior knee pain, and facilitate intraoperative fluoroscopy. However, it is associated with various concerns, including the need to make another infrapatellar (IP) incision to remove the nail. AIMS: This study was aimed at developing a new technique for the removal of SP tibial nails through an SP approach using a cannulated extraction system. The efficiency of the novel SP approach was compared to that of the traditional IP approach for the removal of SP tibial nails. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected clinical registry. The data for 69 consecutive patients who received surgery to remove a previous SP intramedullary nail using an SP approach (n = 30, SP cohort) or an IP approach (n = 39, IP cohort) were analyzed. Intra-operative evaluations included intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and changes in the surgical procedures. At six months follow-up, post-operative Lysholm knee score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and the active range of motion (ROM) of the affected knee and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Patients in the SP cohort exhibited an increased post-operative Lysholm knee score (ß, 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6 to 4.6; P = 0.012), decreased post-operative VAS score (ß, - 0.7; 95% CI, - 1.1 to - 0.2; P = 0.004), and increased operation time (ß, 9.8 minutes; 95% CI, 5.7 to 14.0 minutes; P < 0.001) compared with those treated with the IP approach after adjustment for baseline characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in blood loss, post-operative ROM, or complications between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the IP technique, the SP approach for the removal of an SP tibial nail was independently associated with an increased post-operative Lysholm knee score and decreased VAS score, although the surgery was longer in duration. The novel technique offers a reliable and minimally invasive option for the removal of an SP tibial nail.

The semi-extended infrapatellar intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Malalignment is a common event during the intramedullary nailing (IMN) of distal tibia fractures (DTFs). Although it is reported that the semi-extended IMN techniques such as suprapatellar (SP) and parapatellar (PP) approaches may be superior in preventing malalignment, the application of these techniques is concerning owing to the intra-articular involvement. We thus developed an extra-articular semi-extended infrapatellar (SEIP) approach which utilizes the infrapatellar (IP) space while maintaining the knee in a semi-extended position. However, there are no studies on the safety and efficacy of SEIP in treating DTFs. Therefore, in this study, the SEIP technique was examined, particularly in terms of the potential alignment improvement of DTFs, and this technique was compared with the traditional hyperflexed infrapatellar (HFIP) procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) compared IMN malalignment while correcting extraarticular and nondisplaced intra-articular DTFs between April 2018 and June 2021 using the HFIP and SEIP techniques at a level I trauma center in China. The study participants were clinically and radiographically examined for at least 12 months of follow-ups. Intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operation time, blood loss, hospitalization duration, functional ankle score, and complications were assessed as well. RESULTS: Among the 88 recruited participants, 45 (51%) underwent traditional HFIP IMN and 43 (49%) underwent SEIP IMN. Malalignment occurred in 9 patients (20.0%) from the HFIP cohort and in 2 patients (4.7%) from the SEIP cohort (P value = 0.030). In addition, the SEIP IMN technique significantly reduced the intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operation time, and improved the postoperative ankle function compared to the HFIP IMN technique. However, the intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization duration, infection, delay union, and nonunion remained the same between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we demonstrated that the SEIP IMN provides markedly enhanced alignment of extraarticular and nondisplaced intra-articular DTFs compared to the traditional HFIP IMN procedure. The described technique represents an effective option for IMN of DTFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100043673. Registered 26 February 2021, retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=122263.

Comparison between infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches for intramedullary nailing for the fractures of the tibial shaft.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the outcomes at the clinical and functional levels of suprapatellar (SP) and infrapatellar (IP) approaches for intramedullary nailing in treating tibial shaft fracture. METHODS: Patients who underwent tibial shaft fracture intramedullary nailing by the SP approach or IP approach in a trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. The demographics, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operation time, blood loss, irrigation volume, postoperative X-ray alignment, and complications of patients were compared between the two groups under different approaches. Lysholm knee score, visual analog score (VAS), and incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) were assessed 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The study finally included well-documented 81 patients (38 SP versus 43 IP). The SP group exhibited significantly shorter intraoperative fluoroscopy time than that of the IP group (81.7 ± 14.5 s vs. 122.0 ± 24.3 s, P < 0.001). Both aspects recorded a precise reduction of the fracture: angulation (2.1 ± 1.2° vs 3.1 ± 1.5°, P < 0.05) and translation (0.6 ± 0.8 mm vs 1.4 ± 1.5 mm, P < 0.05) in the coronal plane in the SP group. However, the sagittal plane recorded no such change (P > 0.05). The Lysholm knee score was higher in the SP group than that of the IP group (87 ± 8 vs. 80 ± 15, P < 0.05). The SP group displayed an evidently lower average VAS score than that of the IP approach group (0.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.3 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Six cases (16%) in the SP group and 16 cases (37%) in the IP group experienced AKP 1-year post-operation (P < 0.05). As far as complications are concerned, neither group showed any significant difference (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the IP approach, the application of intramedullary nailing through the SP approach in treating tibial shaft fractures can effectively shorten the intraoperative fluoroscopy time, correct coronal plane angulation and translation deformity, reduce the incidence of AKP and improve postoperative function.

A comparison of the use of a suprapatellar Chinese Aircraft-shaped Sleeve System versus suprapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: Outcomes over a one-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the Chinese Aircraft-shaped Sleeve (CASS) system on the clinical outcomes of tibial intermedullary nailing using a suprapatellar approach for the treatment of tibial fractures in a cohort of adult Chinese patients over a minimum one-year follow-up. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, skeletally mature patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type 42 tibial shaft fractures were randomized into either a SP approach using CASS group or a conventional SP approach group after informed consent was obtained. The operations were performed by a single senior orthopaedic surgeon according to group assignments. A group of 33 patients were treated using the CASS system and the other group of 34 patients were treated using a conventional SP approach. Both groups fully complied with research requirements and completed 12 months of follow-up. Magnetic resonance images (MRI) were obtained for the evaluation of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) and residual debris preoperatively, as well as one week and 12 months postoperatively. Radiographs were used to assess alignment and union, visual analog scores (VAS) were used to assess anterior knee pain, and range of motion (ROM) and the Lysholm knee scoring scales were used for evaluating the operated knee at the 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Differences in cartilage lesion changes observed by MRI between the two groups were statistically significant (P = 0.030 at 1 week postoperatively; P = 0.025 at 12 months postoperatively). No significant differences were evident with respect to debris residue, malalignments, nonunion, VAS, ROM and Lysholm knee scoring scale with the exception of stair climbing (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Based on the data of this one-year clinical follow-up study, the SP approach using the CASS system offers the potential to benefit patients suffering from tibial shaft fractures, who will be treated with intramedullary nailing especially for smaller patients.