Sorafenib and continued erlotinib or sorafenib alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer progressing on erlotinib: A randomized phase II study of the Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib, continued after tumor progression, plus sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously benefitted from single-agent erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive refractory NSCLC who had previously benefitted from erlotinib (objective response or stable disease >8weeks) were randomized to receive treatment with either erlotinib and sorafenib (400mg orally twice daily) or sorafenib alone. Patients were evaluated for response every 8 weeks, and continued treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were randomized (erlotinib/sorafenib, 25; sorafenib, 28) and 52 patients received study treatment. Patients in both groups received a median of 8weeks of treatment. The median PFS was 3.1months for erlotinib/sorafenib versus 1.7months for sorafenib alone; response rates were 8% and 4%, respectively. Both regimens were tolerable, but toxicity was more frequent with erlotinib/sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not suggest any benefit in continuing erlotinib after tumor progression in patients with refractory metastatic NSCLC. Both regimens tested had limited efficacy, consistent with results from other studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT00609804.

Rituximab with or without bevacizumab for the treatment of patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis by the interruption of VEGF pathway signaling is of therapeutic value in several solid tumors. Preclinical evidence supports similar importance of the pathway in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this randomized phase II trial, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of rituximab with bevacizumab versus single-agent rituximab, in patients with previously-treated follicular lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 60) were randomized (1:1) to receive rituximab (375 mg/m(2) intravenously [I.V.] weekly for 4 weeks) either as a single agent or with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg I.V. on days 3 and 15). Patients with an objective response or stable disease at week 12 received 4 additional doses of rituximab (at months 3, 5, 7, and 9); patients who received rituximab/bevacizumab also received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg I.V. every 2 weeks for 16 doses. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 34 months, PFS was improved in patients who received rituximab/bevacizumab compared with patients who received rituximab alone (median 20.7 vs. 10.4 months respectively; HR, 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.80); P = .007). Overall survival was also improved numerically (73% vs. 53% at 4 years), but did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.40 (95% CI, 0.15-1.05); P = .055). The addition of bevacizumab increased the toxicity of therapy, but both regimens were well tolerated (no grade 4 toxicity). CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to rituximab significantly improved PFS. The role of angiogenesis inhibition in the treatment of follicular lymphoma requires further definition in larger clinical trials.

Molecular gene expression profiling to predict the tissue of origin and direct site-specific therapy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a prospective trial of the Sarah Cannon research institute.

PURPOSE: Molecular tumor profiling is a promising diagnostic technique to determine the tissue of origin in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP). However, the clinical value of these molecular predictions is unknown. We used tumor profiling results to direct site-specific therapy for patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor biopsy specimens from previously untreated patients with CUP were tested with a 92-gene reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction cancer classification assay. When a tissue of origin was predicted, patients who were treatment candidates received standard site-specific first-line therapy. RESULTS: Of 289 patients enrolled, 252 had successful assays performed, and 247 (98%) had a tissue of origin predicted. Sites most commonly predicted were biliary tract (18%), urothelium (11%), colorectal (10%), and non-small-cell lung (7%). Two hundred twenty-three patients were treatment candidates, and 194 patients received assay-directed site-specific treatment. In these 194 patients, the median survival time was 12.5 months (95% CI, 9.1 to 15.4 months). When the assay predicted tumor types that were clinically more responsive, the median survival was significantly improved when compared with predictions of more resistant tumors (13.4 v 7.6 months, respectively; P = .04). CONCLUSION: In this large prospective trial, molecular tumor profiling predicted a tissue of origin in most patients with CUP. The median survival time of 12.5 months for patients who received assay-directed site-specific therapy compares favorably with previous results using empiric CUP regimens. Patients with CUP predicted to have more responsive tumor types had longer survival compared with patients with less responsive tumor types. Molecular tumor profiling contributes to the management of patients with CUP and should be a part of their standard evaluation.

Phase II study of maintenance sunitinib following irinotecan and carboplatin as first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of angiogenesis may be effective in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Sunitinib, an oral agent that inhibits the VEGF signaling pathway, may delay progression in sequence with chemotherapy. This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the role of sunitinib monotherapy following 6 cycles of irinotecan and carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage (ES) SCLC. METHOD: Patients aged ≥18 years with previously untreated ES-SCLC were eligible. Additional criteria included: ECOG PS 0-1, no active brain metastases, and adequate organ function. Patients received 28-day cycles of irinotecan (60 mg/m(2), days 1, 8, 15) and carboplatin (AUC=4, day 1), and were assessed for response every 8 weeks. After 6 cycles of chemotherapy, patients with stable disease or responding disease proceeded to sunitinib monotherapy (25 mg orally daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was 1-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Between 2/09 and 10/09, 34 patients (median age 65 years [range, 41-80]) were enrolled. 53% of patients were male, 47% had ECOG PS 0.21 patients (62%) completed 6 cycles of chemotherapy, and 17 (50%) initiated sunitinib monotherapy (median duration: 9 weeks; range, 2-28+weeks). After a median follow-up of 50 weeks (range: 37-68 weeks), 22 (62%) of the patients remain alive. The objective response rate with chemotherapy was 59%, and an additional 20% had stable disease. 1-year OS was 54% and median time to progression was 7.6 months. Grade 3/4 toxicity was rare during sunitinib monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II trial provides support for further study of sunitinib maintenance therapy following platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. The 1 year OS of 54% is encouraging, and a randomized trial would be appropriate to assess sunitinib's impact following chemotherapy.