Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the IDEAL Schedule for assessing care needs in dementia: Cross-sectional, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: The IDEAL Schedule was developed for staging "care needs" in patients with dementia. We here aim to validate the Spanish version, further test its psychometric properties and explore a latent construct for "care needs". METHODS: A multicenter study was done in 8 dementia care facilities across Spain. Patients referred with a reliable ICD-10 diagnosis of dementia (n = 151) were assessed with the IDEAL Schedule by pairs of raters. Inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation [ICC] coefficients), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), and factor analysis were calculated. Convergent validity for individual items was tested against validated Spanish versions of international instruments. RESULTS: Pilot testing with numerical scales supported the feasibility, face, and content validity of the schedule. The psychometric coefficients were good/clinically acceptable: inter-rater reliability (mean ICC = 0.861; 85% of the ICCs > 0.8), internal consistency (global alpha coefficient = 0.74 in 5 nuclear items), and concurrent validity (global score against the Clinical Dementia Rating schedule, r = 0.63; coefficients for individual items ranging from 0.40 to 0.84, all statistically significant, p < 0.05). Internal consistency was low for the "nonprofessional care" and "social support" dimensions. Factor analysis supported a unidimensional solution, suggesting a latent "care needs" construct. CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the IDEAL Schedule confirms the main psychometric properties of the original version and documents for the first time the convergent validity of individual items. Factor analysis identified a latent construct consistent with the concept "care needs" although 2 dimensions need further psychometric research.

Depression and incident Alzheimer disease: the impact of disease severity.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that clinically significant depression (particularly severe depression) increases the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A longitudinal, three-wave epidemiologic study was implemented in a sample of individuals aged 55 years and older (n = 4,803) followed up at 2.5 years and 4.5 years. This was a population-based cohort drawn from the Zaragoza Dementia and Depression (ZARADEMP) Project, in Zaragoza, Spain. Participants included individuals cognitively intact at baseline (n = 3,864). The main outcome measures were depression as assessed by using the diagnostic interview Geriatric Mental State- Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer Assisted Taxonomy package; and AD diagnosed by a panel of research psychiatrists according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, criteria. The Fine and Gray multivariate regression model was used in the analysis, accounting for mortality. RESULTS: At baseline, clinically significant depression was diagnosed in 452 participants (11.7%); of these, 16.4% had severe depression. Seventy incident cases of AD were found at follow-up. Compared with nondepressed individuals, the incidence rate of AD was significantly higher in the severely depressed subjects (incidence rate ratio: 3.59 [95% confidence interval: 1.30-9.94]). A consistent, significant association was observed between severe depression at baseline and incident AD in the multivariate model (hazard ratio: 4.30 [95% CI: 1.39-13.33]). Untreated depression was associated with incident AD in the unadjusted model; however, in the final model, this association was attenuated and nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Severe depression increases the risk of AD, even after controlling for the competing risk of death.

Cognition and daily activities in a general population sample aged +55.

Objective: We tested the association of individual cognitive domains measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and disability. Method: Cross-sectional study in a population-based cohort aged ≥55 years (n = 4,803). Sample was divided into two groups: individuals with cognition within the normal range (CNR) (n = 4,057) and those with cognitive impairment (CI) (n = 746). Main outcome measures: The MMSE, the Katz Index (Basic Activities of Daily Living, bADL), the Lawton and Brody Scale (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, iADL), and the Geriatric Mental State (GMS-AGECAT). Results: MMSE-orientation was associated with disability in bADL, iADL and a decrease in social participation, regardless of cognitive status. MMSE-attention was associated with disability in iADL, but only in CNR. MMSE-language was associated with disability in bADL, iADL and with reduced social participation, but only in CI. Conclusions: The associations observed between disability and orientation may have clinical and public health implications.

Non-cognitive psychopathological symptoms associated with incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia, Alzheimer's type.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that specific psychopathological non-cognitive symptoms are associated with incident mild cognitive impairment (MCI), while different symptoms are associated with incident dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT). METHODS: A representative community sample of 4,803 individuals aged 55+ years was interviewed in a two-phase screening, in Wave I or ZARADEMP I. This is the baseline, cross-sectional study of the ZARADEMP Project, a longitudinal study to document incidence and risk factors of dementia. The main instrument for assessment of participants was the ZARADEMP Interview, which includes standardized Spanish versions of instruments such as the Mini-Mental Status Examination and the Geriatric Mental State GMS-AGECAT. Two years later, in Wave II or ZARADEMP II, the cognitively non-deteriorated elderly were reassessed in a similar, two-phase procedure. "Incident cases" of both dementia and DAT (DSM-IV-TR criteria), as well as MCI (operationally defined Petersen's criteria) were diagnosed by a panel of psychiatrists. Statistical, logistic regression models, adjusted by age, sex and education were used to test the hypothesized association. RESULTS: "Irritability", "neurovegetative symptoms", "sleep problems", "concentration difficulties", "loneliness" and "subjective slowing" documented at baseline were associated with incident MCI (odds ratio, OR range 1.71-2.67). A different profile of non-cognitive symptoms was associated with incident DAT, specifically "tension" (OR= 2.45), "sleep problems" (OR= 2.81), and "observed slowing" (OR= 4.35). On the contrary, "subjective restriction of activities" seemed to be negatively associated with DAT (OR= 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report about some specific psychopathological, non-cognitive symptoms associated with incident MCI and/ or incident DAT, when controlling by each other. The psychopathological profile associated with MCI is different from the profile preceding DAT.

Somatic and psychiatric comorbidity in the general elderly population: results from the ZARADEMP Project.

OBJECTIVE: In a representative sample of the elderly population in a southern European city, we tested the hypothesis that there is an association between general somatic and general psychiatric morbidity. METHODS: A stratified random sample of 4803 individuals aged > or =55 years was selected for the baseline study in the ZARADEMP Project. The elderly were assessed with standardized Spanish versions of instruments, including the Geriatric Mental State (GMS)-AGECAT. Psychiatric cases were diagnosed according to GMS-AGECAT criteria, and somatic morbidity was documented with the EURODEM Risk Factors Questionnaire. RESULTS: General comorbidity clustered in 19.9% of the elderly when hypertension was removed from the somatic conditions category, with 33.5% of the sample remaining free from both somatic and psychiatric illnesses. General comorbidity was associated with age, female gender, and limited education, but did not increase systematically with age. The frequency of psychiatric illness was higher among the somatic cases than among noncases, and the frequency of somatic morbidity among the psychiatric cases was higher than among noncases. This association between somatic and psychiatric morbidity remained statistically significant after controlling for age, gender, and education [odds ratio (OR)=1.61; confidence interval (CI)=1.38-1.88]. Most somatic categories were associated with psychiatric illness, but after adjusting for demographic variables and individual somatic illnesses, the association remained statistically significant only for cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) (OR=1.47; CI=1.09-1.98) and thyroid disease (OR=1.67; CI=1.10-2.54). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to document that there is a positive and statistically significant association between general somatic morbidity and general psychiatric morbidity in the (predominantly) elderly population. CVAs and thyroid disease may have more weight in this association.

Usefulness of 2 questions about age and year of birth in the case-finding of dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the efficacy of 2 simple questions commonly used in clinical practice, asking the age and year of birth of individuals, will be satisfactory to rule out cases of dementia. DESIGN: Population-based, longitudinal, prospective study focused on the incidence of dementia. In the baseline, a 2-phase procedure for identifying cases and noncases of dementia was implemented. SETTING: Zaragoza, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals 65 years or older without previous diagnoses of dementia (n = 3613) drawn from the population-based random sample of the ZARADEMP project. MEASUREMENTS: Standardized instruments were used, including the Geriatric Mental State (GMS) and the History and Aetiological Schedule (HAS); cases were diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria ("reference standard"). The simple cognitive test used in this study consists of the following 2 compulsory questions: "How old are you?" and "What year were you born?" RESULTS: The test was well accepted by the participants and took less than 30 seconds to complete. Compared with the "reference standard," validity coefficients for incorrect answers in both questions were as follows: sensitivity 61.2%, specificity 97.8%, positive predictive value 44.4%, negative predictive value 98.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This ultra-short test has very good specificity and negative predictive power. Its use to rule out cases of dementia might be generalized, as it has the best efficiency reported to date.

Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured byoptical coherence tomography in patients with schizophrenia: A short report

Background and Objectives: Our study aims to assess retinal nerve fiberlayer (RNFL) thickness in patients affected by schizophrenia. Methods: Ten schizophrenic (..) (AU)