RESUMO
PURPOSE: To estimate causation of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports, causality methods were developed from a theoretical perspective. In daily practice, not all information is relevant or available, decreasing the applicability. We developed a new causality documentation tool (CausDoc) where an algorithm is combined with expert judgement. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of CausDoc for ADR reports on drugs and vaccines. METHODS: CausDoc provides 9 structured relevant questions. If information is available, an answer will be chosen. If not, the question is excluded. Causality outcome is based on the sum score of all answers divided by the included questions: ≤30%: unlikely, 31% to 70%: possible, 71% to 90%: probable, and >90%: certain. Other relevant information is taken into account by expert judgement in the final step by adjusting the outcome to a limited extent. After testing face validity on 12 ADR reports, sensitivity and specificity were tested on 40 ADR reports, compared with the Naranjo algorithm and WHO AEFI criteria, using the expert panel's judgements as a standard. Inter-rater reliability was tested using weighted Cohen kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Average sensitivity and specificity with CausDoc were 47% and 83% for drugs (29% and 78% with Naranjo) and 72% and 89% for vaccines (65% and 87% with WHO AEFI criteria). Reliability between the 2 couples of assessors: κ 0.48 and 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: CausDoc shows a better performance and allows for a better documentation of ADRs in clinical practice. This approach is useful in assessing the causality of adverse drug reactions.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Causalidade , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Farmacovigilância , Algoritmos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Vacinas/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current practice for diagnosis of Q fever, caused by the intracellular pathogen Coxiella burnetii, relies mainly on serology and, in prevaccination assessment, on skin tests (STs), which both have drawbacks. In this study, C. burnetii-specific interferon γ (IFN-γ) production was used as a new diagnostic tool for previous Q fever, circumventing most of these drawbacks. Our aim was to compare this test to serology and ST. METHODS: One thousand five hundred twenty-five individuals from an endemic area with a risk for chronic Q fever were enrolled. IFN-γ production was measured after in vitro stimulation of whole blood with C. burnetii antigens. Various formats using different C. burnetii antigens were tested. Serology and ST were performed in all individuals. RESULTS: In all assay formats, C. burnetii-specific IFN-γ production was higher (P < .0001) in seropositive or ST-positive subjects than in seronegative and ST-negative subjects. Whole blood incubated for 24 hours with C. burnetii Nine Mile showed optimal performance. After excluding subjects with equivocal serology and/or borderline ST results, IFN-γ production was 449 ± 82 pg/mL in the positive individuals (n = 219) but only 21 ± 3 pg/mL in negative subjects (n = 908). Using Bayesian analysis, sensitivity and specificity (87.0% and 90.2%, respectively) were similar to the combination of serology and ST (83.0% and 95.6%, respectively). Agreement with the combination of serology and ST was moderate (84% concordance; κ = 0.542). CONCLUSIONS: Specific IFN-γ detection is a novel diagnostic assay for previous C. burnetii infection and shows similar performance and practical advantages over serology and ST. Future studies to investigate the clinical value in practice are warranted.
Assuntos
Testes de Liberação de Interferon-gama/métodos , Interferon gama/análise , Febre Q/diagnóstico , Idoso , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Coxiella burnetii/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Interferon gama/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Febre Q/imunologia , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Testes Cutâneos/métodos , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Improved influenza vaccines are needed to reduce influenza-associated complications in older adults. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal formulation of adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine for use in elderly people. METHODS: This observer-blind, randomized study assessed the optimal formulation of adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine based on immunogenicity and safety in participants aged ≥65 years. Participants were randomized (~200 per group) to receive one dose of non-adjuvanted vaccine or one of eight formulations of vaccine formulated with a squalene and tocopherol oil-in-water emulsion-based Adjuvant System (AS03(C), AS03(B) or AS03(A), with 2.97, 5.93 and 11.86 mg tocopherol, respectively) together with the immunostimulant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL, doses of 0, 25 or 50 mg). Hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody responses and T-cell responses were assessed on Day 0 and 21 days post-vaccination. The ratio of HI-based geometric mean titers in adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted vaccine groups were calculated and the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval was transformed into a desirability index (a value between 0 and 1) in an experimental domain for each vaccine strain, and plotted in relation to the AS03 and MPL dose combination in the formulation. This model was used to assess the optimal formulation based on HI antibody titers. Reactogenicity and safety were also assessed. The immunogenicity and safety analyses were used to evaluate the optimal formulation of adjuvanted vaccine. RESULTS: In the HI antibody-based model, an AS03 dose-response was evident; responses against the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains were higher for all adjuvanted formulations versus non-adjuvanted vaccine, and for the AS03(A)-MPL25, AS03(B)-MPL25 and AS03(B)-MPL50 formulations against the B strain. Modelling using more stringent criteria (post hoc) showed a clear dose-range effect for the AS03 component against all strains, whereas MPL showed a limited effect. Higher T-cell responses for adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted vaccine were observed for all except two formulations (AS03(C) and AS03(B)-MPL25). Reactogenicity increased with increasing AS03 dosage, and with MPL. No safety concerns were raised. CONCLUSIONS: Five formulations containing AS03(A) or AS03(B) were identified as potential candidates to improve immune responses to influenza vaccination; AS03(B) without MPL showed the best balance between improved immunogenicity and acceptable reactogenicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00540592.
Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos ImunológicosRESUMO
In 1956 The Netherlands experienced a major outbreak of poliomyelitis with over 2200 patients. A vaccine was in reach, and it was used. Now, polio is nearly eradicated globally with vaccinations. In 2020 a similar situation occurred with COVID-19. Large-scale vaccinations form an essential tool to combat the epidemic. This article describes uncertainties to start both mass vaccination campaigns, and reflects on similarities and differences then and now.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Poliomielite , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Poliomielite/epidemiologia , Poliomielite/prevenção & controle , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Varicella is a common childhood disease. Only 5% of first varicella-zoster-virus infections occur asymptomatically. Most data on the burden of varicella stem from health service databases. This study aims to provide insight in the burden of varicella from a parent's perspective including cases outside the healthcare system. METHODS: An internet questionnaire was developed for parents in the Netherlands to report health care resource use and productivity losses during the varicella episode in their child younger than 6 years. 11,367 invitations were sent out to members with children of an internet panel of a market research agency. 4,168 (37%) parents started the questionnaire (response rate), of which 360 (9%) stopped before completion and 1,838 (44%) were out of the target group. In total 1,970 parents completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire provided a symptom list ranging from common symptoms, such as skin vesicles, itching to fits or convulsions. A posteriori, in the analyses, the symptoms 'skin infections', 'fits/convulsions', 'unconsciousness', and 'balance and movement disorders' were labelled as complications. There was no restriction to time since the varicella episode for inclusion in the analyses. RESULTS: The 1,970 respondents had in total 2,899 children aged younger than six years, of which 2,564 (88%) children had had varicella. In 62% of the episodes the parent did not seek medical help. In 18% of all episodes symptoms labelled as complications were reported; in 11% of all episodes parents visited a medical doctor (MD) for a complication. Reporting of complications did not differ (X2 ; p = 0.964) between children with a recent (≤ 12 months ago) or a more distant (> 12 months) history of varicella. Prescription drugs were used in 12% of the children with varicella; OTC drugs in 72%. Parents reported work loss in 17% of the varicella-episodes (23% when MD visit; 14% when no MD-visit) for on average 14 hours, which equals to 2.5 hours of work loss for any given varicella-episode. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the full spectrum of varicella-episodes and associated healthcare use, including the large proportion of cases not seeking medical care and the societal impact associated with those cases.
Assuntos
Varicela/epidemiologia , Adulto , Varicela/patologia , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Eficiência , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Internet , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Pais , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Varicella is a common viral disease affecting almost the entire birth cohort. Although usually self-limiting, some cases of varicella can be serious, with 2 to 6% of cases attending a general practice resulting in complications. The hospitalisation rate for varicella in Europe ranges from 1.3 to 4.5 per 100,000 population/year and up to 10.1% of hospitalised patients report permanent or possible permanent sequelae (for example, scarring or ataxia). However, in many countries the epidemiology of varicella remains largely unknown or incomplete. In countries where routine childhood vaccination against varicella has been implemented, it has had a positive effect on disease prevention and control. Furthermore, mathematical models indicate that this intervention strategy may provide economic benefits for the individual and society. Despite this evidence and recommendations for varicella vaccination by official bodies such as the World Health Organization, and scientific experts in the field, the majority of European countries (with the exception of Germany and Greece) have delayed decisions on implementation of routine childhood varicella vaccination, choosing instead to vaccinate high-risk groups or not to vaccinate at all. In this paper, members of the Working Against Varicella in Europe group consider the practicalities of introducing routine childhood varicella vaccination in Europe, discussing the benefits and challenges of different vaccination options (vaccination vs. no vaccination, routine vaccination of infants vs. vaccination of susceptible adolescents or adults, two doses vs. one dose of varicella vaccine, monovalent varicella vaccines vs. tetravalent measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines, as well as the optimal interval between two doses of measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines). Assessment of the epidemiology of varicella in Europe and evidence for the effectiveness of varicella vaccination provides support for routine childhood programmes in Europe. Although European countries are faced with challenges or uncertainties that may have delayed implementation of a childhood vaccination programme, many of these concerns remain hypothetical and with new opportunities offered by combined measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines, reassessment may be timely.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Varicela/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Varicela/imunologia , Varicela/epidemiologia , Varicela/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , HumanosRESUMO
Respiratory diphtheria is an acute respiratory tract infection. The high mortality rates (5-10%) are related to airway obstruction and local and systemic effects of the diphtheria toxin. Vaccination against diphtheria has been available through the Dutch national vaccination programme since the 1950s. The disease has now become rare as a result of herd immunity by these vaccinations. As a consequence, the disease has largely been forgotten, which can result in it not being recognised and treated in time. In addition, diphtheria antitoxin is not always available. In this article, we are drawing attention to the need for immunisation. We also look back at how diphtheria prevention started in the Netherlands.
Assuntos
Antitoxina Diftérica/imunologia , Toxoide Diftérico/imunologia , Difteria/imunologia , Humanos , Imunização , Programas de Imunização , Países Baixos , Infecções Respiratórias/imunologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae causes morbidity and mortality among all ages in The Netherlands. To reduce this burden, infants in The Netherlands receive the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV10), but older persons are not targeted. We assessed the impact and cost-effectiveness of vaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) or 13-valent PCV (PCV13) among all those aged 60, 65 or 70 and/or in combination with replacing PCV10 with PCV13 in the infant vaccination programme. METHODS: A static cost-effectiveness model was parameterized including projected trends for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and hospitalised community acquired pneumonia (CAP). The different strategies were evaluated using vaccine list prices and a 10-year time horizon. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated with the current strategy (infant vaccination program with PCV10) as reference. RESULTS: Compared to the reference, the largest impact on pneumococcal disease burden was projected with a combined use of PCV13 among infants and PPV23 at 60, 65 and 70 years, preventing 1,635 cases of IPD and 914 cases of CAP. The most cost-effective strategy was vaccinating with PPV23 at 70 years only with similar low ICERs at age 60 and 65. The impact of the use of PCV13 among infants depends strongly on the projected herd-immunity effect on serotype 19A. Vaccinating elderly with either PCV13 or PPV23 was dominated by PPV23 in all investigated scenarios, mainly due to the lower price of PPV23. CONCLUSION: Under the current assumptions, the best value for money is the use of PPV23 for elderly, with a single dose or at five year increment between age 60 to age 70.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Humanos , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, acellular pertussis vaccines replaced the more reactogenic whole-cell pertussis vaccines. This replacement in the primary immunization schedule of infants coincided with a significant increase in pronounced local adverse events (AEs) in 4 years old children shortly after the administration of a fifth diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated polio (DTaP-IPV) vaccine. The objective of this study was to investigate possible differences in vaccine antigen-specific immune responses between children with and without a pronounced local AE after the fifth DTaP-IPV vaccination. METHODS: Blood was sampled in 2 groups of 4-year-olds: a case group reporting pronounced local swelling and/or erythema up to extensive limb swelling at the injection site (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with individual vaccine antigens. Plasma antigen-specific IgG, IgG subclass and total IgE concentrations and T-cell cytokine [interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL)-13, IL-17 and IL-10] production by stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells were determined by multiplex bead-based fluorescent multiplex immunoassays. RESULTS: In children with AEs, significantly higher total IgE and vaccine antigen-specific IgG and IgG4 responses as well as levels of the T-helper 2 (Th2) cytokine IL-13 were found after pertussis, tetanus and diphtheria stimulation compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Children with pronounced local reactions show higher humoral and cellular immune responses. Acellular vaccines are known to skew toward more Th2 responses. The pronounced local AEs may be associated with more Th2 skewing after the fifth DTaP-IPV vaccination, but other biologic factors may also impact the occurrence of these pronounced local reactions.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/imunologia , Imunização Secundária/efeitos adversos , Imunização Secundária/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Células Cultivadas , Pré-Escolar , Citocinas/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Inflamação , Leucócitos Mononucleares/imunologia , Masculino , Países Baixos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae and Neisseria meningitidis group B are among the main causes of invasive bacterial meningitis infections in infants. Worldwide, these diseases lead to significant mortality, morbidity and costs. The societal impact is especially severe since the majority of cases occur in very young infants. A combination vaccine consisting of 9-valent conjugated pneumococcal and meningococcal B components is currently being developed. The aim of this study was to estimate the potential impact and cost effectiveness from the societal perspective of vaccinating infants in The Netherlands with this combination pneumococcal and meningococcal B vaccine versus no vaccination. METHODS: A Markov cycle model was developed using epidemiological and healthcare resource use data from 1996 to 2001. This model was used to project the annual costs, benefits and health gains associated with vaccinating all newborns. The base year for the costing was 2003 and all costs and health effects were discounted at 4%. The results of the analysis are expressed in costs per QALY and both probabilistic and univariate sensitivity analyses were used to identify the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Annually, an average of 755 cases of invasive pneumococcal and meningococcal B infection occurred in infants aged 0-10 years in The Netherlands. Introduction of the combination vaccine would prevent 201 cases of meningococcal B meningitis and 165 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease per year. Additionally, 3410 cases of pneumococcal pneumonia and 46,350 cases of otitis media would be prevented. Vaccination would save 35 lives per year and prevent 71 cases of severe sequelae. This translates into 860 life-years gained, or 1128 QALYs gained. Alongside these health gains, vaccination would prevent euro 17,681,370 of direct medical and indirect costs attributable to meningococcal and pneumococcal infections in The Netherlands. Depending on vaccine price, cost effectiveness varied from euro 3160 (vaccine price per dose euro 20) to euro 32,170 (vaccine price euro 60 per dose) per QALY. Base-case cost effectiveness (vaccine price euro 40) was euro 17,700 per QALY. The model was most sensitive to changes in incidence, vaccine price and duration of protective efficacy. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the introduction of a combination meningococcal B and pneumococcal vaccine into the Dutch infant vaccination programme is potentially cost effective compared with no vaccination.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Infecções Meningocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/economia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Vacinas Combinadas/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Farmacoeconomia , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Cadeias de Markov , Infecções Meningocócicas/complicações , Infecções Meningocócicas/economia , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/complicações , Infecções Pneumocócicas/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Choque Séptico/etiologiaRESUMO
Mass immunization of children has the potential to decrease infection rates and prevent the transmission of influenza. We evaluated the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of different formulations of cell-derived MF59-adjuvanted and nonadjuvanted A/H1N1 influenza vaccine in children and adolescents. This was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter study with a total of 666 healthy subjects aged 6 months-17 y in one of 3 vaccination groups, each receiving formulations containing different amounts of influenza A/H1N1 antigen with or without MF59. A booster trivalent seasonal MF59 vaccine was administered one year after primary vaccinations. Antibody titers were assessed by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization assays obtained on days 1, 22, 43, 366, and 387 (3 weeks post booster). Safety was monitored throughout the study. One vaccination with 3.75 µg of A/H1N1 antigen formulated with 50% MF59 (3.75_halfMF59) or 7.5 µg of A/H1N1 antigen formulated with 100% MF59 (7.5_fullMF59) induced an HI titer ≥1:40 in >70% of children in the 1-<3, 3-8, and 9-17 y cohorts; however, 2 vaccinations with nonadjuvanted 15 µg A/H1N1 antigen were needed to achieve this response in the 1-<3 and 3-8 y cohorts. Among children aged 6-11 months, 1 dose of 7.5_fullMF59 resulted in an HI titer ≥1:40 in >70% while 2 doses of 3.75_halfMF59 were required to achieve this result. All vaccines were well tolerated. Our findings support the immunogenicity and safety of the 3.75_halfMF59 (2 doses for children <12 months) and 7.5_fullMF59 vaccine formulations for use in children and adolescents aged 6 months to 17 y The use of the 3.75_halfMF59 could have the benefit of antigen and adjuvant sparing, increasing the available vaccine doses allowing vaccination of more people.
Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Polissorbatos/administração & dosagem , Esqualeno/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Voluntários Saudáveis , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Testes de Neutralização , Polissorbatos/efeitos adversos , Método Simples-Cego , Esqualeno/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to identify the optimal dose of an MF59-adjuvanted, monovalent, A/H1N1 influenza vaccine in healthy paediatric subjects. METHODS: Subjects aged 3-8 years (n=194) and 9-17 years (n=160) were randomized to receive two primary doses of A/H1N1 vaccine containing either 3.75 µg antigen with half a standard dose of MF59 adjuvant, 7.5 µg antigen with a full dose of MF59, or (children 3-8 years only), a non-adjuvanted 15 µg formulation. A booster dose of MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine including homologous A/H1N1 strain was given one year after priming. Immunogenicity was assessed by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and microneutralization assays. Vaccine safety was assessed throughout the study (up to 18 months). RESULTS: A single priming dose of either MF59-adjuvanted formulation was sufficient to meet the European licensure criteria for pandemic influenza vaccines (HI titres ≥1:40>70%; seroconversion>40%; and GMR>2.5). Two non-adjuvanted vaccine doses were required to meet the same licensure criteria. After first and second doses, percentage of subjects with HI titres ≥1:40 were between 97% and 100% in the adjuvanted vaccine groups compared with 68% and 91% in the non-adjuvanted group, respectively. Postvaccination seroconversion rates ranged from 91% to 98% in adjuvanted groups and were 68% (first dose) and 98% (second dose) in the non-adjuvanted group. HI titres ≥1:330 after primary doses were achieved in 69% to 90% in adjuvanted groups compared with 41% in the non-adjuvanted group. Long-term antibody persistence after priming and a robust antibody response to booster immunization were observed in all vaccination groups. All A/H1N1 vaccine formulations were generally well tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred, and no subjects were withdrawn from the study due to an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: An MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine containing 3.75 µg of A/H1N1 antigen was well tolerated and sufficiently immunogenic to meet all the European licensure criteria after a single dose in healthy children 3-17 years old.
Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Polissorbatos/efeitos adversos , Esqualeno/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Testes de Neutralização , Polissorbatos/administração & dosagem , Esqualeno/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The majority of cancer patients loses weight and becomes malnourished during the course of their disease. Metabolic alterations and reduced immune competence lead to wasting and an increased risk of infectious complications. In the present study, the effect of a nutritionally complete medical food, which is high in protein and leucine and enriched with fish oil and specific oligosaccharides, was investigated on immune function, nutritional status, and inflammation in patients with esophageal cancer and compared with routine care. METHODS: In this exploratory double-blind study, 64 newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients were randomized. All patients received dietary counselling and dietary advice. In the Active group, all patients received the specific medical food for 4 weeks before the start of anticancer therapy. In the routine care control arm, patients with <5% weight loss received a non-caloric placebo product, and patients with weight loss ≥5% received an iso-caloric control product to secure blinding of the study. The required study parameters of body weight and performance status were recorded at baseline and after 4 weeks of nutritional intervention, and patients were asked to complete quality of life questionnaires. In addition, blood samples were taken for the measurement of several immune, nutritional, and safety-parameters. RESULTS: No effect of the specific nutritional intervention could be detected on ex vivo stimulations of blood mononuclear cells. By contrast, body weight was significantly increased (P < 0.05) and ECOG performance status was improved after intervention with the specific medical food (P < 0.05). In addition, serum Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels were significantly decreased in the specific medical food group and increased in the control group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional intervention with the specific medical food significantly increased body weight and improved performance status compared with routine care in newly diagnosed esophageal cancer patients. This effect was accompanied by significantly reduced serum PGE2 levels.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae is one of the main causes of bacterial meningitis, bacteremia, pneumonia, and otitis media in the Netherlands. These diseases lead to substantial mortality, morbidity, and costs. The societal impact is especially severe because most cases occur in very young infants. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness of universal infant vaccination with a 7-valent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine in the Netherlands. METHODS: Decision analysis was performed using epidemiological data and data on health care resource use from 1996 to 2001. A model was used to project the impact of pneumococcal vaccination on the incidence of pneumococcal infections in infants and children from birth to age 10 years. Costs, benefits, and health gains were estimated, and cost-effectiveness was calculated. All analyses were performed from a societal perspective. RESULTS: On average, 339 cases per year of invasive pneumococcal infection occurred in infants and children from birth to age 10 years in the Netherlands from 1996 to 2001. The model predicted that introduction of the 7-valent conjugated pneumococcal vaccine would prevent 48 cases of bacterial meningitis and 88 cases of pneumococcal bacteremia per year, as well as 42,695 cases of pneumococcal otitis media and 3411 cases of invasive pneumococcal pneumonia. The model also predicted that vaccination would save 13 lives per year and prevent 31 cases of lifelong sequelae, rendering 382 discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained or 329 discounted life-years gained per year. Considering these health gains, vaccination would prevent Euro 9,453,600 of direct and indirect medical costs of meningococcal and pneumococcal infections in the Netherlands, including acute medical care, management of sequelae, and lost time at work. With a vaccine price of Euro 40 per dose, the base-case cost-effectiveness ratio would be Euro 71,250 per QALY. The model was sensitive to changes in incidence of infections, vaccine effectiveness, and vaccine price. CONCLUSIONS: Our analytic model predicted that universal pneumococcal vaccination of infants in the Netherlands could prevent a large number of pneumococcal infections and considerably reduce related mortality and morbidity. However, the baseline cost-effectiveness ratio of such a vaccination program would be relatively unfavorable compared with other interventions implemented in the Netherlands.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/economia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Econômicos , Países Baixos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/economia , Vacinas Conjugadas/economiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Review of case reports of possible adverse events following immunization (AEFI) after vaccination with an influenza vaccine in the past three years. DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective. METHOD: Lareb (Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre) investigated and reviewed reports of possible AEFI after vaccination with an influenza vaccine over seasons 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. RESULTS: Over the three seasons we received a total of 531 reports after administration of seasonal influenza vaccination. Each year the number of reports increased, especially the reports directly from vaccinees. In 32 cases (6%) the report was considered 'serious', in most cases it was associated with hospitalization. Two reports mentioned that the patient died but a causal relationship with the vaccination was considered unlikely. There were three reports of acute severe reactions, with anaphylaxis, angio-oedema and cardiac arrest. A total of 961 possible AEFI were reported. In 256 (over 25%) AEFI inflammatory symptoms occurred at the injection site. Besides the injection site reactions, headache (101), myalgia (90) and pyrexia (86) were the most reported AEFI. Notably, there were 26 reports of extensive limb swelling, in which injection site inflammation extends beyond shoulder or elbow or around the upper arm. The clinical picture resembles cellulitis or an allergic reaction and usually disappears with symptomatic treatment. Its aetiology is unknown. CONCLUSION: Apart from extensive swelling of the limb, we did not find signs of unknown side effects of influenza vaccination. Based on the reported AEFI, influenza vaccines seem to be safe.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Farmacovigilância , Adulto , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/etiologia , Angioedema/induzido quimicamente , Angioedema/etiologia , Celulite (Flegmão)/induzido quimicamente , Celulite (Flegmão)/etiologia , Criança , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Febre/etiologia , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia/etiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estações do Ano , Vacinação/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Following a large Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands, patients at risk for chronic Q fever received a whole-cell Q fever vaccine. Sensitized people were excluded based on pre-vaccination screening with skin test (ST) and serology. An investigational IFN-γ-production assay was added. No previous experience existed for Q fever vaccination in this patient risk-group with predefined cardiac valvular anomalies or aortic aneurysm/prosthesis and many co-morbidities. We studied the adverse events (AE) and their association with patient characteristics and immunological parameters. METHODS: AE registration covered the week after skin test and 90 days following vaccination, with the use of diaries, interviews and spontaneous reports. Serious (S)AE were assessed immediately to ensure safety. We coded AE according to reported severity. Univariate and multivariate analysis addressed associations. RESULTS: Pre-vaccination screening led to exclusion of 182 patients with positive serology and 207 patients with positive skin test-reading. The skin test did not lead to any causally related SAE. Subsequent vaccination of 1370 patients did not reveal unexpected AE; however, 80% of vaccinees reported local AE (in 26% of these pronounced or extensive). The two causally related SAE (0.1%) both concerned a persistent subcutaneous injection site mass. AE were more frequent in women, younger patients, and those without immunosuppressive co-morbidity/medication. The occurrence of local AE after skin test was associated with pre-vaccination positive serology and high IFN-γ production. This was also true for local AE following vaccination, with a strong association with local AE after skin test as well. The proportion of vaccinees with positive serology and positive IFN-γ values 6 months after vaccination was higher in those with local AE after skin test or after vaccination (non-significant, probably due to small numbers). CONCLUSION: Q fever vaccination was safe but reactogenic in this high-risk patient-group. Rates of local AE were higher in women, younger age groups and in those with positive immunological parameters. Vaccinees with local AE after skin test or after vaccination appear to have more pronounced post-vaccination immune responses.
Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Febre Q/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Virais/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Febre Q/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vaccines against pandemic A/H1N1 influenza should provide protective immunity in children, because they are at greater risk of disease than adults. This study was conducted to identify the optimal dose of an MF59®-adjuvanted, egg-derived, A/H1N1 influenza vaccine for young children. METHODS: Children 6-11 months (N = 144) and 12-35 months (N = 186) of age received vaccine formulations containing either 3.75 µg antigen with half the standard dose of MF59 or 7.5 µg antigen with a standard dose of MF59, or a nonadjuvanted formulation containing 15 µg antigen (children 12-35 months only). Participants were given 2 primary vaccine doses 3 weeks apart, followed by 1 booster dose of MF59-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine 1 year later. Immunogenicity was assessed by hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays. RESULTS: All vaccine formulations were highly immunogenic and met all 3 European licensure criteria after 2 doses. MF59-adjuvanted vaccines met all licensure criteria after 1 dose in both age cohorts, while nonadjuvanted vaccine did not meet all criteria after 1 dose in children 12-35 months. A single booster dose was highly immunogenic, and stable antibody persistence was observed in response to all vaccines. All vaccines were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a single dose of 3.75 µg antigen with half the standard dose of MF59 was shown to be optimal, providing adequate levels of immediate and long-term antibodies in pediatric subjects 6-35 months of age. These data demonstrated that MF59 adjuvant allowed for reduced antigen content and promoted significant long-term antibody persistence in children, with a satisfactory safety profile.
Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Polissorbatos/efeitos adversos , Esqualeno/efeitos adversos , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação , Humanos , Lactente , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Masculino , Testes de Neutralização , Polissorbatos/administração & dosagem , Esqualeno/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/métodosRESUMO
Disease protection provided by herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination tends to reduce as age increases. This study was designed to ascertain whether a second dose of the HZ vaccine, Zostavax(®), would increase varicella zoster virus (VZV)-specific immune response among individuals aged ≥ 70 y. Individuals aged ≥ 70 y were randomized to receive HZ vaccine in one of three schedules: a single dose (0.65 mL), two doses at 0 and 1 mo, or two doses at 0 and 3 mo. VZV antibody titers were measured at baseline, 4 weeks after each vaccine dose, and 12 mo after the last dose. In total, 759 participants (mean age 76.1 y) were randomized to receive vaccination. Antibody responses were similar after a single dose or two doses of HZ vaccine [post-dose 2/post-dose 1 geometric mean titer (GMT) ratios for the 1-mo or 3-mo schedules were 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.22 and 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.85], respectively). The 12-mo post-dose 2/12-mo post-dose 1 GMT ratio was similar for the 1-mo schedule and for the 3-mo schedule (1.06, 95% CI 0.96-1.17 and 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.19, respectively). Similar immune responses were observed in participants aged 70-79 y and those aged ≥ 80 y. HZ vaccine was generally well tolerated, with no evidence of increased adverse event incidence after the second dose with either schedule. Compared with a single-dose regimen, two-dose vaccination did not increase VZV antibody responses among individuals aged ≥ 70 y. Antibody persistence after 12 mo was similar with all three schedules.
Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Between 2007 and 2011 the Netherlands was faced with an unprecedented Q fever outbreak with more than 4000 people affected. Dairy goats were considered the main source of infection. In addition to taking veterinary measures, the Dutch government offered an unlicensed vaccine against the causative bacterium Coxiella burnetii to patient groups at high-risk of Q fever complications. This article describes the complexity of the vaccination program for Q fever in 2010-2011. METHODS: High-risk patients were selected and referred mainly by their general practitioner to a publicly funded centralized screening and vaccination program. In addition, cardiovascular specialists and the public were informed. Patients were screened for previous infection with C. burnetii by serology and skin-tests. Patients who tested positive were excluded from vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 2741 referred high-risk patients (1669 male, 1957 from the high-risk area), 955 were excluded because vaccination was considered unnecessary or the distance to the vaccination clinic too far. 388 (22% of those screened) were excluded because of a positive skin-test or serology. 1368 patients (77% of those screened) were vaccinated between January and June 2011. Two-thirds of the vaccinees reported an adverse event. 89 patients (6.6%) reported serious adverse events. In just one patient, with an injection site reaction, a possible causal relationship was considered. CONCLUSION: This Q fever vaccination program posed challenges to the Dutch Health Care system. Creating clarity on the roles and responsibilities of those involved precluded timely vaccination. Targeting the high-risk population through GPs was challenging but appeared to be efficient. The vaccination was considered to be safe and compliance of the screened patients was high.